Camp Trade Down
-
NFLTradeRumors.co @nfltrade_rumors 18m18 minutes ago
Report: Potential Trade Between #Browns & #Eagles Expected To Include 1st & 3rd-Rd Picks In 2016 & 2017 If Completed
So Eagles 1st and 3rd this year and next.....thoughts ?
That Twitter account is garbage.
But no, I wouldn't take that. I'd want a first and second this year at the very least, along with a first next year.
If Wentz is gone and we can move back, still pick before 10 and pick up an extra second, we'd be able to likely come away with a very good LB, a very good WR and/or a very good DL without first three picks.
I wouldn't hate moving back to #7, getting SF's second, then getting, say, Jack, Nkemdiche and Smith.
Or, if injury worries you, getting Buckner, Spence, and Boyd.
And, of course, that opens the door to getting Lynch at #32. Not my first choice for QB, but I'd rather Lynch at #32 than Goff at #2.
That Twitter account is garbage.
But no, I wouldn't take that. I'd want a first and second this year at the very least, along with a first next year.
If Wentz is gone and we can move back, still pick before 10 and pick up an extra second, we'd be able to likely come away with a very good LB, a very good WR and/or a very good DL without first three picks.
I wouldn't hate moving back to #7, getting SF's second, then getting, say, Jack, Nkemdiche and Smith.
Or, if injury worries you, getting Buckner, Spence, and Boyd.
And, of course, that opens the door to getting Lynch at #32. Not my first choice for QB, but I'd rather Lynch at #32 than Goff at #2.
Mark my words....Lynch will go in Top 15-20.
-
That Twitter account is garbage.
But no, I wouldn't take that. I'd want a first and second this year at the very least, along with a first next year.
If Wentz is gone and we can move back, still pick before 10 and pick up an extra second, we'd be able to likely come away with a very good LB, a very good WR and/or a very good DL without first three picks.
I wouldn't hate moving back to #7, getting SF's second, then getting, say, Jack, Nkemdiche and Smith.
Or, if injury worries you, getting Buckner, Spence, and Boyd.
And, of course, that opens the door to getting Lynch at #32. Not my first choice for QB, but I'd rather Lynch at #32 than Goff at #2.
Mark my words....Lynch will go in Top 15-20.
Mark my words....Lynch will go in Top 15-20.
Agreed ,,,,he wont get past Jets at 20 unless they have Fitz signed before the draft then they will go pass rush .....
-
Tim- the problem is that the Eagles do not have a 2nd rounder anymore to give us. Already traded away.
Tim- the problem is that the Eagles do not have a 2nd rounder anymore to give us. Already traded away.
So take the two thirds and turn them into a 2nd... Should reach the 50th overall or so...
The real trick Sashi faces is convincing trades partners to use the traditional chart when we are moving down:
And our Director of Football Research's chart when we are trading up...
Here's his Harvard paper... it's been posted here before.
https://harvardsportsanalysis.wordpress.com/2011/11/30/how-to-value-nfl-draft-picks/
-
If We can trade down one more time and get another 2017 1st rd pick on top of it I'd be hard pressed not to be overjoyed if we found a way to get Treadwell
"A winner never whines." Paul Brown -
If We can trade down one more time and get another 2017 1st rd pick on top of it I'd be hard pressed not to be overjoyed if we found a way to get Treadwell
If We can trade down one more time and get another 2017 1st rd pick on top of it I'd be hard pressed not to be overjoyed if we found a way to get Treadwell
I suspect we have a target (or targets) picked out @ #8 and if he/they is/are there we pull the trigger. If target(s) gone we have a another target further down and try to trade to that level on draft day. And I'd rather have Fuller or Doctson rather than Treadwell if we are shooting WR as our first (which I doubt anyway).
-
If We can trade down one more time and get another 2017 1st rd pick on top of it I'd be hard pressed not to be overjoyed if we found a way to get Treadwell
-
If We can trade down one more time and get another 2017 1st rd pick on top of it I'd be hard pressed not to be overjoyed if we found a way to get Treadwell
If We can trade down one more time and get another 2017 1st rd pick on top of it I'd be hard pressed not to be overjoyed if we found a way to get Treadwell
Well, there is that rumor about the Tits wanting to come up. But would Treadwell still be there at #15? I kinda doubt it.
-
Well, there is that rumor about the Tits wanting to come up. But would Treadwell still be there at #15? I kinda doubt it.
He had a slow 40 time so it might cause a slight fall to 15. I wouldn't hate it at all.
-
Rappaport reporting Browns in discussions to trade out of 8 for Elliott ( if Dallas dont take him ) or an OT ....11, 13 , 15 the proposed landing spots for Cleveland
-
Rappaport reporting Browns in discussions to trade out of 8 for Elliott ( if Dallas dont take him ) or an OT ....11, 13 , 15 the proposed landing spots for Cleveland
Rappaport reporting Browns in discussions to trade out of 8 for Elliott ( if Dallas dont take him ) or an OT ....11, 13 , 15 the proposed landing spots for Cleveland
I've been saying for some time an OL will be one of our first picks.
-
No ...I meant a team will move up to 8 for Elliott ( Miami or Chicago ) or an OT ( Tennessee )
-
No ...I meant a team will move up to 8 for Elliott ( Miami or Chicago ) or an OT ( Tennessee )
-
Well, there is that rumor about the Tits wanting to come up. But would Treadwell still be there at #15? I kinda doubt it.
He had a slow 40 time so it might cause a slight fall to 15. I wouldn't hate it at all.
He had a slow 40 time so it might cause a slight fall to 15. I wouldn't hate it at all.
Jerry Rice had a slow 40 time. About the same as Treadwell.
-
-
Expecting at least 3 more trades in the 1st round tonite. No better place to watch draft unfold than our live shows online @CBSSports
3 more ...Browns to 13 then to 20 then to ?
-
So Sashi is saying the right things - there are eight players they are happy taking, so moving back to eighth is perfect, and it would take a monster offer to make them trade back.
Do you believe it? And if so, what is the offer?
-
So Sashi is saying the right things - there are eight players they are happy taking, so moving back to eighth is perfect, and it would take a monster offer to make them trade back.
Do you believe it? And if so, what is the offer?
So Sashi is saying the right things - there are eight players they are happy taking, so moving back to eighth is perfect, and it would take a monster offer to make them trade back.
Do you believe it? And if so, what is the offer?
Depends how far we are moving back.....would expect at least a 2 and a 4 to move back to 15 as well as the 15th pick ....back to 20 and I would want the 20 a 2 and a 3
-
So Sashi is saying the right things - there are eight players they are happy taking, so moving back to eighth is perfect, and it would take a monster offer to make them trade back.
Do you believe it? And if so, what is the offer?
So Sashi is saying the right things - there are eight players they are happy taking, so moving back to eighth is perfect, and it would take a monster offer to make them trade back.
Do you believe it? And if so, what is the offer?
Who are the 8? Does that include the 2 QBs at the top of the draft.....or does that mean 8 other players?
-
That would include the two QBs, presumably, but maybe not wentz.
-
maybe the Browns are trying to get to the #22 spot to draft their QB of the future
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login