Skip to content

Ben Carson - a chance ObaMao will impose martial law

Political Discussion
109 12 1.9k
  • Therefore, the goofy joking is hereby rendered nonsense.

    There is NO HISTORICAL PRECEDENT, nor is there a LEGAL AVENUE

    for an alien invasion, or being hit by a meteor.

    okay, for the dumb guy wanting a date with a pretty gal who would NEVER go out with him....

    that at least fits.

    But the ramifications of happening are seriously dire with the martial law jobbie, not very much

    with the date.

  • To be fair there's historical precedent for being hit by a meteor.

  • I stand corrected. dammit. šŸ™‚

  • Still waiting cal. And still waiting for a takeup on that bet.

  • It's a stupidass bet. You don't get to slant the bet in your favor and get takers.

    that isn't real life. Quit the video game and start living in reality.

  • It's a stupidass bet. You don't get to slant the bet in your favor and get takers.

    that isn't real life. Quit the video game and start living in reality.

    @calfoxwc said:

    It's a stupidass bet. You don't get to slant the bet in your favor and get takers.

    that isn't real life. Quit the video game and start living in reality.

    how am I slanting the bet? There's no video game here what are you talking about? You're posting this long rambling assertion that there's a good chance Obama will impose martial law before the 2016 gen elections. So I threw the red flag now pick it up. So I say if you lose you can't start a thread for 6 months, if I lose the same......no hell i'll do one better, I won't post "at all" for 3 months. Deal?

  • I like where this is going...

  • I'm betting FOR a relatively small chance? you aren't sane.

    besides, you wouldn't "pay up" - you just are that way.

    But, it IS a chance. Not betworthy, unless you are stoned, which,

    would explain a lot of your posts....

  • I'm betting FOR a relatively small chance? you aren't sane.

    besides, you wouldn't "pay up" - you just are that way.

    But, it IS a chance. Not betworthy, unless you are stoned, which,

    would explain a lot of your posts....

    @calfoxwc said:

    I'm betting FOR a relatively small chance? you aren't sane.

    besides, you wouldn't "pay up" - you just are that way.

    But, it IS a chance. Not betworthy, unless you are stoned, which,

    would explain a lot of your posts....

    So you admit the chance is so small as to be almost laughable then yes? Like there would have to be some kind of global natural disaster where every country calls for martial law. So you went through all that to say OBama would do what pretty much any sitting president would do if we were invaded by aliens.

    ANd yes I absolutely would pay up...subject to a banning by the mods if I didn't .I would only post at the Browns forum...zero posts here at the political board for however long, i'm open to negotiations. ANd you would not be able to start any threads for that duration either.

  • I'm betting FOR a relatively small chance? you aren't sane.

    besides, you wouldn't "pay up" - you just are that way.

    But, it IS a chance. Not betworthy, unless you are stoned, which,

    would explain a lot of your posts....

    @calfoxwc said:

    ...Not betworthy, unless you are stoned, which,

    would explain a lot of your posts....

    Then it's also not newsworthy, which is pretty much ALL of your posts.

    Thanks, Obama

  • a serious small chance is not laughable, you are in constant knee-jerkie mode.

  • Then it's also not newsworthy, which is pretty much ALL of your posts. jblew

    ***********************************************

    Liberals always demand to be the sole arbiter of what is newsworthy.

    If they don't like the news.... it had better not be news...

    weird, how emotional knee-jerkie is so prevalent throughout the liberal cult community.

  • a serious small chance is not laughable, you are in constant knee-jerkie mode.

    @calfoxwc said:

    a serious small chance is not laughable, you are in constant knee-jerkie mode.

    People take wagers on small chances all the time, that's gambling in a nutshell. If you believe it's possible (clearly you do) then take the bet.

    FYI, we heard this same shit about Dubya just before he left office. Not going to happen, not then and not now.

  • @calfoxwc said:

    a serious small chance is not laughable, you are in constant knee-jerkie mode.

    People take wagers on small chances all the time, that's gambling in a nutshell. If you believe it's possible (clearly you do) then take the bet.

    FYI, we heard this same shit about Dubya just before he left office. Not going to happen, not then and not now.

    @tiamat63 said:

    People take wagers on small chances all the time, that's gambling in a nutshell. If you believe it's possible (clearly you do) then take the bet.

    FYI, we heard this same shit about Dubya just before he left office. Not going to happen, not then and not now.

    Bush was also building FEMA death camps for when he declared martial law.

  • Well, Tiam, you think there's a small chance that the 7th horse to be expected to

    win the Kentucky Derby might win?

    You go first - you bet big money on it. Bet yer house, dude, because 'there's a chance"

  • @tiamat63 said:

    People take wagers on small chances all the time, that's gambling in a nutshell. If you believe it's possible (clearly you do) then take the bet.

    FYI, we heard this same shit about Dubya just before he left office. Not going to happen, not then and not now.

    Bush was also building FEMA death camps for when he declared martial law.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    Bush was also building FEMA death camps for when he declared martial law.

    And who were in those camps? Poor minorities; the ones who'd most likely vote Democrat.

    It was a Republican conspiracy, I tell you!

  • except there wasn't any socialist history with Bush about martial law.

    There wasn't any Reps calling for him to go with martial law.

    So, it was nonsense. Not so much now.

  • Well, Tiam, you think there's a small chance that the 7th horse to be expected to

    win the Kentucky Derby might win?

    You go first - you bet big money on it. Bet yer house, dude, because 'there's a chance"

    @calfoxwc said:

    Well, Tiam, you think there's a small chance that the 7th horse to be expected to

    win the Kentucky Derby might win?

    You go first - you bet big money on it. Bet yer house, dude, because 'there's a chance"

    It's happened twice within the past decade, and several times since the beginning of the 20th century:

    http://www.horsenation.com/2014/04/04/7-horses-that-werent-supposed-to-win-the-kentucky-derby-but-did/

    And all of them, oddly enough, have happened since the last time a US President ACTUALLY used martial law (Lincoln, 1863).

    So yeah, I'd say it's much safer to bet on the underdog to win the Kentucky Derby than on Obama declaring martial law.

  • Idk how there's so many posts about Obama and martial law.

    It's not going to happen, but what is going to happen is Trump is going to win and make america great again.

  • Cal what the hell is a serious small chance? If its so small than its not serious. But if its not "that" small....what is the size of tje chance. Give me a figure i can work with here. We gotta book this man.....frankly i smell boardwide action here. Possibly even spilling over to the main board.

    So who wants some of this action?