Skip to content

Liberals' Salon hawks pedophiles as the next "civil rights" push

Political Discussion
64 8 1.5k
  • @mld-woody said:

    Except there is a very clear line here between homosexuals and pedofiles.

    Stuart

    It all boils down to how ones brain is wired. You can't help being attracted to men no more than Jerry Sandusky cant help being attracted to little boys.

    So shouldn't that be considered when prosecuting pedo's?

    @stinkhole said:

    Stuart

    It all boils down to how ones brain is wired. You can't help being attracted to men no more than Jerry Sandusky cant help being attracted to little boys.

    So shouldn't that be considered when prosecuting pedo's?

    A crime is a crime. Junkies and drunks don't get a pass either.

  • @westside-steve said:

    I have never said that something is bad because it isn't normal.

    I'm sure there are things that are bad and also abnormal but that's not the point is it? Point is is it some things piss us off as human beings. Therefore we make up reasons that it's wrong.

    We don't want stronger people to Bowe s, we don't like it when somebody smarter or better looking makes more money than we do, we don't like it if our girlfriend or wife wants to fuck the guy next door or a hundred other things. Therefore we make up reasons why it's considered evil. Those reasons range anywhere from Woody's own little made up system of rules to a book for over a thousand years ago.

    WSS

    I never said you said that. If you're attempting to reference things I've said in the past, at least try to get some of the details right.

    How about this, do you think there is any push being made for pedofiles to be "the next civil right"? It looks like your starting down your normal path of going way off topic, so I'll try to steer us back.

    @mld-woody said:

    How about this, do you think there is any push being made for pedofiles to be "the next civil right"? It looks like your starting down your normal path of going way off topic, so I'll try to steer us back.

    Stuart

    There is a "push", but the movement is in its infancy.

    An op-ed from the NY Times since you consider this a reliable news source.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/06/opinion/pedophilia-a-disorder-not-a-crime.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&module=c-column-top-span-region&region=c-column-top-span-region&WT.nav=c-column-top-span-region&_r=4&assetType=opinion

  • I don't think that drum will get beat too hard. Even the most liberal people with kids would be repulsed by the idea of someone banging their toddler.

  • I don't think that drum will get beat too hard. Even the most liberal people with kids would be repulsed by the idea of someone banging their toddler.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    I don't think that drum will get beat too hard. Even the most liberal people with kids would be repulsed by the idea of someone banging their toddler.

    Repulsed. That's the bottom line.

    WSS

  • coonecting pedophilia with gays and lesbians is the modern holy grail for conservatives. The fgts literallly go questing for it.

  • @stinkhole said:

    Stuart

    It all boils down to how ones brain is wired. You can't help being attracted to men no more than Jerry Sandusky cant help being attracted to little boys.

    So shouldn't that be considered when prosecuting pedo's?

    A crime is a crime. Junkies and drunks don't get a pass either.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    A crime is a crime. Junkies and drunks don't get a pass either.

    Aren't those diseases?

    WSS

  • @logicisforsquares said:

    I don't think that drum will get beat too hard. Even the most liberal people with kids would be repulsed by the idea of someone banging their toddler.

    Repulsed. That's the bottom line.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Repulsed. That's the bottom line.

    WSS

    Our legal system tends to be more than just repulsed by someone fucking kids against their will.

  • And tje org that would benefit tje most from this in any case, is the roman catholic church

  • @logicisforsquares said:

    A crime is a crime. Junkies and drunks don't get a pass either.

    Aren't those diseases?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Aren't those diseases?

    WSS

    I would use that wording if I was a drunk or a junkie trying to avoid jail time. Otherwise, you choose to be either of those things.

  • And tje org that would benefit tje most from this in any case, is the roman catholic church

    @clevfan4life said:

    And tje org that would benefit tje most from this in any case, is the roman catholic church

    "We don't have to relocate them anymore!"

  • Haha

  • @westside-steve said:

    Repulsed. That's the bottom line.

    WSS

    Our legal system tends to be more than just repulsed by someone fucking kids against their will.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    Our legal system tends to be more than just repulsed by someone fucking kids against their will.

    We aren't talking against anybody's will.

    Or harming anyone. Or causing pain to anyone.

    We're just talking repulsed.

    WSS

  • @stinkhole said:

    Stuart

    It all boils down to how ones brain is wired. You can't help being attracted to men no more than Jerry Sandusky cant help being attracted to little boys.

    So shouldn't that be considered when prosecuting pedo's?

    A crime is a crime. Junkies and drunks don't get a pass either.

    @logicisforsquares said:

    A crime is a crime. Junkies and drunks don't get a pass either.

    Stuart

    True, but mental conditions have always been used as a defense. I am not saying Sandusky gets a pass, what I'm implying is shouldn't the way he's wired be taken into consideration? Its not his fault he has an attraction to kids.

    This is the same consideration we give to homos and trannys...and yes, I understand that homos and trannys don't have victims and are not on trial, but at its core pedophilia, homo, and trans are all are rooted in the way a person is wired.

    Make no mistake, I am playing devils advocate here. I am not a proponent of "pedo civil rights". That's a liberal thing.

    Pedo rights is in its infancy...20 yrs from now it will be talking about the LBGTP community.

  • "Claiming something isn't normal and therefore bad"

    Uh so who exactly did that, and if you didn't think it was me why put it in the response to my post?

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    "Claiming something isn't normal and therefore bad"

    Uh so who exactly did that, and if you didn't think it was me why put it in the response to my post?

    WSS

    Because you mockingly referenced something I had said in the past regarding left handed people and tall people. I said THAT in reference to others on here saying something wasn't normal and therefore it's bad.

    All caught up now?

  • @logicisforsquares said:

    A crime is a crime. Junkies and drunks don't get a pass either.

    Stuart

    True, but mental conditions have always been used as a defense. I am not saying Sandusky gets a pass, what I'm implying is shouldn't the way he's wired be taken into consideration? Its not his fault he has an attraction to kids.

    This is the same consideration we give to homos and trannys...and yes, I understand that homos and trannys don't have victims and are not on trial, but at its core pedophilia, homo, and trans are all are rooted in the way a person is wired.

    Make no mistake, I am playing devils advocate here. I am not a proponent of "pedo civil rights". That's a liberal thing.

    Pedo rights is in its infancy...20 yrs from now it will be talking about the LBGTP community.

    @stinkhole said:

    Pedo rights is in its infancy...20 yrs from now it will be talking about the LBGTP community.

    If we head that far down the rabbit hole, I will owe you guys a beer....and likely a plane ticket to somewhere that isn't o.k. with kids getting molested.

  • A handful of people on here seem to be rallying against an argument no one else is making.

    Regardless of what that fantastic piece of journalism in the OP will tell you, no major group of people is fighting for pedofiles to be able to molest kids.

    Shockingly enough though, there is a pretty heavy distinction between this and gays. Weird, I know. Hard to believe it isn't just straight sex and other, with all of other being bad

  • A handful of people on here seem to be rallying against an argument no one else is making.

    Regardless of what that fantastic piece of journalism in the OP will tell you, no major group of people is fighting for pedofiles to be able to molest kids.

    Shockingly enough though, there is a pretty heavy distinction between this and gays. Weird, I know. Hard to believe it isn't just straight sex and other, with all of other being bad

    @mld-woody said:

    A handful of people on here seem to be rallying against an argument no one else is making.

    Regardless of what that fantastic piece of journalism in the OP will tell you, no major group of people is fighting for pedofiles to be able to molest kids.

    Shockingly enough though, there is a pretty heavy distinction between this and gays. Weird, I know. Hard to believe it isn't just straight sex and other, with all of other being bad

    Did you not read Cal's google search results? You're about to get another dosage I suspect.