Liberals' Salon hawks pedophiles as the next "civil rights" push
-
I don't think that drum will get beat too hard. Even the most liberal people with kids would be repulsed by the idea of someone banging their toddler.
Repulsed. That's the bottom line.
WSS
Repulsed. That's the bottom line.
WSS
Our legal system tends to be more than just repulsed by someone fucking kids against their will.
-
And tje org that would benefit tje most from this in any case, is the roman catholic church
-
A crime is a crime. Junkies and drunks don't get a pass either.
Aren't those diseases?
WSS
Aren't those diseases?
WSS
I would use that wording if I was a drunk or a junkie trying to avoid jail time. Otherwise, you choose to be either of those things.
-
And tje org that would benefit tje most from this in any case, is the roman catholic church
And tje org that would benefit tje most from this in any case, is the roman catholic church
"We don't have to relocate them anymore!"
-
Haha
-
Repulsed. That's the bottom line.
WSS
Our legal system tends to be more than just repulsed by someone fucking kids against their will.
We aren't talking against anybody's will.Our legal system tends to be more than just repulsed by someone fucking kids against their will.
Or harming anyone. Or causing pain to anyone.
We're just talking repulsed.
WSS
-
Stuart
It all boils down to how ones brain is wired. You can't help being attracted to men no more than Jerry Sandusky cant help being attracted to little boys.
So shouldn't that be considered when prosecuting pedo's?
A crime is a crime. Junkies and drunks don't get a pass either.
A crime is a crime. Junkies and drunks don't get a pass either.
Stuart
True, but mental conditions have always been used as a defense. I am not saying Sandusky gets a pass, what I'm implying is shouldn't the way he's wired be taken into consideration? Its not his fault he has an attraction to kids.
This is the same consideration we give to homos and trannys...and yes, I understand that homos and trannys don't have victims and are not on trial, but at its core pedophilia, homo, and trans are all are rooted in the way a person is wired.
Make no mistake, I am playing devils advocate here. I am not a proponent of "pedo civil rights". That's a liberal thing.
Pedo rights is in its infancy...20 yrs from now it will be talking about the LBGTP community.
-
"Claiming something isn't normal and therefore bad"
Uh so who exactly did that, and if you didn't think it was me why put it in the response to my post?
WSS
"Claiming something isn't normal and therefore bad"
Uh so who exactly did that, and if you didn't think it was me why put it in the response to my post?
WSS
Because you mockingly referenced something I had said in the past regarding left handed people and tall people. I said THAT in reference to others on here saying something wasn't normal and therefore it's bad.
All caught up now?
-
A crime is a crime. Junkies and drunks don't get a pass either.
Stuart
True, but mental conditions have always been used as a defense. I am not saying Sandusky gets a pass, what I'm implying is shouldn't the way he's wired be taken into consideration? Its not his fault he has an attraction to kids.
This is the same consideration we give to homos and trannys...and yes, I understand that homos and trannys don't have victims and are not on trial, but at its core pedophilia, homo, and trans are all are rooted in the way a person is wired.
Make no mistake, I am playing devils advocate here. I am not a proponent of "pedo civil rights". That's a liberal thing.
Pedo rights is in its infancy...20 yrs from now it will be talking about the LBGTP community.
Pedo rights is in its infancy...20 yrs from now it will be talking about the LBGTP community.
If we head that far down the rabbit hole, I will owe you guys a beer....and likely a plane ticket to somewhere that isn't o.k. with kids getting molested.
-
A handful of people on here seem to be rallying against an argument no one else is making.
Regardless of what that fantastic piece of journalism in the OP will tell you, no major group of people is fighting for pedofiles to be able to molest kids.
Shockingly enough though, there is a pretty heavy distinction between this and gays. Weird, I know. Hard to believe it isn't just straight sex and other, with all of other being bad
-
A handful of people on here seem to be rallying against an argument no one else is making.
Regardless of what that fantastic piece of journalism in the OP will tell you, no major group of people is fighting for pedofiles to be able to molest kids.
Shockingly enough though, there is a pretty heavy distinction between this and gays. Weird, I know. Hard to believe it isn't just straight sex and other, with all of other being bad
A handful of people on here seem to be rallying against an argument no one else is making.
Regardless of what that fantastic piece of journalism in the OP will tell you, no major group of people is fighting for pedofiles to be able to molest kids.
Shockingly enough though, there is a pretty heavy distinction between this and gays. Weird, I know. Hard to believe it isn't just straight sex and other, with all of other being bad
Did you not read Cal's google search results? You're about to get another dosage I suspect.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login