***Official Browns @ Eagles Game Day Thread***
-
circle k? haven't seen one of those since i left po-dunk az.
Welcome to podunk oh mik. There are 2 of em within 3 miles of me. At one time they were Lawson stores.....back in the days of real Cleveland Browns football and redcap beer. Its so bad now that even the stool fans say good luck and mean it when I wear Browns gear. That is the bottom of the barrel for me
Welcome to podunk oh mik. There are 2 of em within 3 miles of me. At one time they were Lawson stores.....back in the days of real Cleveland Browns football and redcap beer. Its so bad now that even the stool fans say good luck and mean it when I wear Browns gear. That is the bottom of the barrel for me
They have a circle K at the Marathon about 3 miles from here. They have Lawsons and Circle K in Japan also, along with 7/11.
"You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970. -
Those are bad examples.. Whitner and Kruger would not earn time on a team that had any talent behind them.
The only reason Kruger has a job right now is because the Saints have found ways to be worse than the Browns at defense. Not coincidentally, they were led by RobRyan for the last 3 years.
-
Welcome to podunk oh mik. There are 2 of em within 3 miles of me. At one time they were Lawson stores.....back in the days of real Cleveland Browns football and redcap beer. Its so bad now that even the stool fans say good luck and mean it when I wear Browns gear. That is the bottom of the barrel for me
They have a circle K at the Marathon about 3 miles from here. They have Lawsons and Circle K in Japan also, along with 7/11.
They have a circle K at the Marathon about 3 miles from here. They have Lawsons and Circle K in Japan also, along with 7/11.
Kinda funny but there hasn't been a 7/11 around here in years. Circle Ks are about it now for stand alone stores...with or without gas pumps. All the other convenience type shops are gas stations too.
-
They have a circle K at the Marathon about 3 miles from here. They have Lawsons and Circle K in Japan also, along with 7/11.
Kinda funny but there hasn't been a 7/11 around here in years. Circle Ks are about it now for stand alone stores...with or without gas pumps. All the other convenience type shops are gas stations too.
Kinda funny but there hasn't been a 7/11 around here in years. Circle Ks are about it now for stand alone stores...with or without gas pumps. All the other convenience type shops are gas stations too.
Go down south, there is one about every mile or so. Also CA has a shit load. There are a few around here.
"You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970. -
They have a circle K at the Marathon about 3 miles from here. They have Lawsons and Circle K in Japan also, along with 7/11.
Kinda funny but there hasn't been a 7/11 around here in years. Circle Ks are about it now for stand alone stores...with or without gas pumps. All the other convenience type shops are gas stations too.
Kinda funny but there hasn't been a 7/11 around here in years. Circle Ks are about it now for stand alone stores...with or without gas pumps. All the other convenience type shops are gas stations too.
Theres one on 185th st. in Cleveland ,just north of Muldoons..
-
Kinda funny but there hasn't been a 7/11 around here in years. Circle Ks are about it now for stand alone stores...with or without gas pumps. All the other convenience type shops are gas stations too.
Go down south, there is one about every mile or so. Also CA has a shit load. There are a few around here.
We have Circle K over here. They bought out the local Wareco. They're open 24/7 and while I'm feeling chatty let me tell you something it's been bugging me.Go down south, there is one about every mile or so. Also CA has a shit load. There are a few around here.
I'm in manager training right now for six weeks I'm in week four starting this afternoon. I was opening for three weeks now I close for three weeks. I have to work 10 and a half hrs a day. Minimum of 50 hrs a week I get Sundays and Tuesdays off...anyway..
Driving from my small town into the city is a 45 minute trip. When I open the store I have to be there at 4:30 am so I get up at 3 am. Ok I stop at the Circle K and they guy working is smoking outside the gas station. I do my meds before I leave for work and need carbs to maintain my blood sugar level. So...I go into the store I'm waiting at the counter, he finally comes in talking on his cell phone and gives me the "hold on a sec finger"
I pay for my things and prepay my gas and told him I'll never be back and he's a lazy MFer.
-
I'm getting very impatient, getting very sick of building for the future instead of building for now.
OK, fine, I get that...
The Browns are more than just 1 QB away. The Browns need good offensive and defensive linemen, a good secondary (Tramon Williams can't keep up with anyone anymore and Haden is not getting any younger), and some linebackers that can actually pressure a QB.
...which means it's going to take a couple of years to turn it around. There's no real difference between 'building for the future' and 'building for now' apart from maybe one or two older players who are currently slightly better taking reps away from younger players who will probably be better at the end of the season. See Campbell/Whitner, Schobert/Kruger etc.
I'm getting very impatient, getting very sick of building for the future instead of building for now.
OK, fine, I get that...
The Browns are more than just 1 QB away. The Browns need good offensive and defensive linemen, a good secondary (Tramon Williams can't keep up with anyone anymore and Haden is not getting any younger), and some linebackers that can actually pressure a QB.
...which means it's going to take a couple of years to turn it around. There's no real difference between 'building for the future' and 'building for now' apart from maybe one or two older players who are currently slightly better taking reps away from younger players who will probably be better at the end of the season. See Campbell/Whitner, Schobert/Kruger etc.
Right, what I"m saying to all of the people who are lamenting the fact we didn't get Wentz, is that drafting Wentz would not have made a difference on this team. I get why the FO traded down for more picks in this year's draft. I think the guys they drafted will turn out OK, didn't see any glaring busts yet but it's only 1 game. I want to see some progress this year once all of these rookies get more accustomed to the NFL, meaning I want to see wins now. Not next year, not 2-3 years down the road when we fire this coach and start from scratch again, but now. It would be nice to win more than 4 games a season.
-
Guys, I just hate this crap. I HATE IT.
In a previous post I made last week, I stated that we would lose this game because "It just makes too much sense." The Browns losing to the QB that "wasn't good enough" and wouldn't be "in the top 20" that we could've drafted made too much sense. It would become a fantastic story line, and one that would make the sporting world laugh at us hysterically. Boy, was I right. Not only did we lose, but we lost in glorious fashion. Our QB looked terrible. Even the two long balls were awful. Pryor pushed off, and Coleman's ball was thrown into triple coverage. Everyone in the universe knew that we'd kick a FG after Coleman's catch, and we should've kicked a FG after Pryor's but got saved by pass interference.
Carson Wentz will have his fair share of struggles this year, as virtually all rookies do. But here's the thing, if Wentz turns into viable starting QB, or god forbid a SUPERSTAR, then our front office is doomed. I'm telling you now, if we blew the chance at getting a franchise QB, our management team is gone. Now, this is ONE GAME, and nobody is anointing Wentz the next Big Ben. But here's what I can tell you: I've never, and I mean NEVER heard of a rookie QB missing the last 3 preseason games, not being the starter in OTA's or minicamp, practicing ONE WEEK before the start of the season, and winning the first game.
RG III was awful and I hate it. Yes, it's week 1, but let's remember this: NOBODY ELSE WANTED HIM as a starter. Hue Jackson wants everyone to trust him, but why should they? He drafted Cody Kessler. Cody freaking Kessler. And while nobody is calling him a bust, I think it's safe to say that nobody is predicting him to EVER be "the man" for us.
We had no first downs in the first quarter. I'm all excited about football, and those assholes come out looking like pieces of shit. If we're going to absolutely suck, why not play Kessler? What do we have to lose? Let's see if he has what it takes! What do we gain by playing RG III? Are we hoping that he magically turns into a drop back QB? That he magically develops an internal clock?
RG III missed Hawkins in the end zone for a TOUCHDOWN. You can't miss those throws. Jesus man. What's worse? It's pretty much the same throw that Wentz made for TD's. He made it TWICE.
Yeah, I knew we'd be bad this year. I really did. But fuck this team. Screw them for a fake punt that everyone is laughing at. Screw them for dropping four passes. Screw them for SNAPPING THE BALL TO NIGERIA.
-
I'm getting very impatient, getting very sick of building for the future instead of building for now.
OK, fine, I get that...
The Browns are more than just 1 QB away. The Browns need good offensive and defensive linemen, a good secondary (Tramon Williams can't keep up with anyone anymore and Haden is not getting any younger), and some linebackers that can actually pressure a QB.
...which means it's going to take a couple of years to turn it around. There's no real difference between 'building for the future' and 'building for now' apart from maybe one or two older players who are currently slightly better taking reps away from younger players who will probably be better at the end of the season. See Campbell/Whitner, Schobert/Kruger etc.
Right, what I"m saying to all of the people who are lamenting the fact we didn't get Wentz, is that drafting Wentz would not have made a difference on this team. I get why the FO traded down for more picks in this year's draft. I think the guys they drafted will turn out OK, didn't see any glaring busts yet but it's only 1 game. I want to see some progress this year once all of these rookies get more accustomed to the NFL, meaning I want to see wins now. Not next year, not 2-3 years down the road when we fire this coach and start from scratch again, but now. It would be nice to win more than 4 games a season.
Right, what I"m saying to all of the people who are lamenting the fact we didn't get Wentz, is that drafting Wentz would not have made a difference on this team. I get why the FO traded down for more picks in this year's draft. I think the guys they drafted will turn out OK, didn't see any glaring busts yet but it's only 1 game. I want to see some progress this year once all of these rookies get more accustomed to the NFL, meaning I want to see wins now. Not next year, not 2-3 years down the road when we fire this coach and start from scratch again, but now. It would be nice to win more than 4 games a season.
Yep it would be nice to see wins sooner rather than later, but I don't think a lot of wins are coming our way this season. I agree, between coleman, ogbah and nassib we have three good looking top draft picks that are already starters and should be for years to come. Kindred also looks good, and Schobert is already starting. So that's 5 players with important roles as rookies and not looking too shabby. We get another similar amount of solid starters from next year's draft and we are suddenly looking very competitive.
There's a long way to go but I feel good about this front office. Then again, I did about ray farmer and mike pettine, so who knows.
-
Optimism:
Scooby will start over Davis next year
Pryor will be a solid #3 all year long
Rookies made the team because talent on the Browns roster simply doesn't exist yet
We'll still be #1 or #2 in next year's draft no matter what happens
Schobert and Ogbah will both be solid, as will Orchard who is set to be a starter-level injury backup for us -- until OLB is improved in the draft, hopefully next year as well
-
-
my point is these rebuilds shouldn't take this long. i mean 1999? there has to be some meat on the bone from other regimes where the new regime just doesn't throw it all out and then start from scratch. amazing how the good teams might be thin one year at a position, draft or acquire and then they are back on top. yet the browns franchise just can't figure it out?
my point is these rebuilds shouldn't take this long. i mean 1999? there has to be some meat on the bone from other regimes where the new regime just doesn't throw it all out and then start from scratch. amazing how the good teams might be thin one year at a position, draft or acquire and then they are back on top. yet the browns franchise just can't figure it out?
-
donnie whalberg? really?
band of brothers.
maurice starr promoted and managed those guys and new edition when i was at ft. devens. my best friends sister used to go out with him. she also used to blow me in my celica gts.
small world.
-
Here's what I think. Getting a qb the last draft with the top pick, would not have
helped this team like the trade down did.
Personally, I still would have drafted Wentz.... but the guys they got from trading down help the
team immensely.
Here's why - the Browns all these years, started off on the wrong foot, with no youth foundation.
The Browns have kept adding veterans, and made pizzpoor choices of draft picks.
The foundation of the team has been weak for years. You keep adding some veterans, and poor draft picks...
and you still have a crap foundation.
Like a house. You can add all the fancy building up top, but if the foundation is bad, it sinks one way, breaks another,
and the whole house sucks.
Once, JUST THIS ONCE, it was time to fix the foundation. And not even Wentz would be fixing it.
They had to rebuild the foundation. Then, hopefully, they can start building a winning house that will
last over the years, just adding a piece here, a piece there.
But pieces here and there can't win by themselves. "A house built on weak and shifting sands cannot stand".
That's why all that money spent on defense still didn't work. Mack wanted out, I assume they wanted out because
it was just hopeless. The foundation (the overal talent level) never gets fixed. It's been a disaster for so long, either
you wait for five drafts, or you trade down and get a lot of problems fixed in one draft. WR...LB...DL...
I see a different team now, for the first time. Just because it hasn't taken off yet... ONE GAME?
The two areas that concern me are the secondary, and qb. RGIII may turn out to be a star. Or, he just doesn't have
it as far as seeing the field and making reads fast enough. He played like CRAP the first game. We'll see if that
continues. If it does, Hue may as well admit later that McCown needs to take over the reins, and draft a qb
next draft.
But the Browns fought like hell in that game. They mean business. I used to see "just going through the motions who cares"...
Josh Cribbs talked a few years ago, about the Browns having undisciplined,
selfish, lazy players that were bringing down the guys who left it all on the field and desperately wanted to win because
they love the game. And THAT was before manziel and gilbert.
The criteria for drafting in the past ignored work ethic, character, intelligence/football IQ/instincts and*love for the game*. If you added this criteria,
you would NEVER have drafted jm, gilbert, gordon, richardson.... the list is long.
-
Here's what I think. Getting a qb the last draft with the top pick, would not have
helped this team like the trade down did.
Personally, I still would have drafted Wentz.... but the guys they got from trading down help the
team immensely.
Here's why - the Browns all these years, started off on the wrong foot, with no youth foundation.
The Browns have kept adding veterans, and made pizzpoor choices of draft picks.
The foundation of the team has been weak for years. You keep adding some veterans, and poor draft picks...
and you still have a crap foundation.
Like a house. You can add all the fancy building up top, but if the foundation is bad, it sinks one way, breaks another,
and the whole house sucks.
Once, JUST THIS ONCE, it was time to fix the foundation. And not even Wentz would be fixing it.
They had to rebuild the foundation. Then, hopefully, they can start building a winning house that will
last over the years, just adding a piece here, a piece there.
But pieces here and there can't win by themselves. "A house built on weak and shifting sands cannot stand".
That's why all that money spent on defense still didn't work. Mack wanted out, I assume they wanted out because
it was just hopeless. The foundation (the overal talent level) never gets fixed. It's been a disaster for so long, either
you wait for five drafts, or you trade down and get a lot of problems fixed in one draft. WR...LB...DL...
I see a different team now, for the first time. Just because it hasn't taken off yet... ONE GAME?
The two areas that concern me are the secondary, and qb. RGIII may turn out to be a star. Or, he just doesn't have
it as far as seeing the field and making reads fast enough. He played like CRAP the first game. We'll see if that
continues. If it does, Hue may as well admit later that McCown needs to take over the reins, and draft a qb
next draft.
But the Browns fought like hell in that game. They mean business. I used to see "just going through the motions who cares"...
Josh Cribbs talked a few years ago, about the Browns having undisciplined,
selfish, lazy players that were bringing down the guys who left it all on the field and desperately wanted to win because
they love the game. And THAT was before manziel and gilbert.
The criteria for drafting in the past ignored work ethic, character, intelligence/football IQ/instincts and*love for the game*. If you added this criteria,
you would NEVER have drafted jm, gilbert, gordon, richardson.... the list is long.
Here's what I think. Getting a qb the last draft with the top pick, would not have
helped this team like the trade down did.
Personally, I still would have drafted Wentz.... but the guys they got from trading down help the
team immensely.
Here's why - the Browns all these years, started off on the wrong foot, with no youth foundation.
The Browns have kept adding veterans, and made pizzpoor choices of draft picks.
The foundation of the team has been weak for years. You keep adding some veterans, and poor draft picks...
and you still have a crap foundation.
Like a house. You can add all the fancy building up top, but if the foundation is bad, it sinks one way, breaks another,
and the whole house sucks.
Once, JUST THIS ONCE, it was time to fix the foundation. And not even Wentz would be fixing it.
They had to rebuild the foundation. Then, hopefully, they can start building a winning house that will
last over the years, just adding a piece here, a piece there.
But pieces here and there can't win by themselves. "A house built on weak and shifting sands cannot stand".
That's why all that money spent on defense still didn't work. Mack wanted out, I assume they wanted out because
it was just hopeless. The foundation (the overal talent level) never gets fixed. It's been a disaster for so long, either
you wait for five drafts, or you trade down and get a lot of problems fixed in one draft. WR...LB...DL...
I see a different team now, for the first time. Just because it hasn't taken off yet... ONE GAME?
The two areas that concern me are the secondary, and qb. RGIII may turn out to be a star. Or, he just doesn't have
it as far as seeing the field and making reads fast enough. He played like CRAP the first game. We'll see if that
continues. If it does, Hue may as well admit later that McCown needs to take over the reins, and draft a qb
next draft.
But the Browns fought like hell in that game. They mean business. I used to see "just going through the motions who cares"...
Josh Cribbs talked a few years ago, about the Browns having undisciplined,
selfish, lazy players that were bringing down the guys who left it all on the field and desperately wanted to win because
they love the game. And THAT was before manziel and gilbert.
The criteria for drafting in the past ignored work ethic, character, intelligence/football IQ/instincts and*love for the game*. If you added this criteria,
you would NEVER have drafted jm, gilbert, gordon, richardson.... the list is long.
Cal.. just stop man.. you and 20 people say the same damn thing.. year in.. year out.. This team is garbage.. Im tired of rebuilding.. get a fucking QB for christ sakes and move on..
-
The overreactions here are priceless to read. ?
I saw a youngteam that had good moments and bad. Rg made alot of good throws that were dropped and his int was off a tip. No major injuries and some bright spots.
Off with his head!!!!!!
Rg made alot of good throws that were dropped and his int was off a tip.
You really need to find a cutdown of all RG's throws and watch it. He was late on virtually every one... especially those over the middle which included the tipped INT which was thrown almost a yard behind his WR.
He's in serious need of a processor upgrade.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Rg made alot of good throws that were dropped and his int was off a tip.
You really need to find a cutdown of all RG's throws and watch it. He was late on virtually every one... especially those over the middle which included the tipped INT which was thrown almost a yard behind his WR.
He's in serious need of a processor upgrade.
You really need to find a cutdown of all RG's throws and watch it. He was late on virtually every one... especially those over the middle which included the tipped INT which was thrown almost a yard behind his WR.
He's in serious need of a processor upgrade.
I was really hoping to see something from him, leading a receiver down the field, a little touch here and there, but sadly nope. The two big plays were because 1) Pryor is a big dude (and got away with a little OPI that'll be called in 5 years) and 2) none of the eagles DBs covering coleman actually made a play on the ball. He overthrew Hawkins on a TD, on a 4th down, and the interception is squarely on him - it was so far behind coleman, that the DB coleman had a yard on reached back his hand to tip it.
Still, it's just one game and it's not like we have Tom Brady waiting in the wings. Hopefully more time to develop some rhythm with his receivers will do the world of good.
-
I honestly just don't understand what you guys expected this year. Like it or not, the regime has a plan. That plan included sucking nuts this year, churning the roster with young draft players and seeing who will stick. It's going to be the same thing next year as well to some degree. I'm not going to sound like that broken record guy, but I saw the Panthers do this exact same thing before getting Cam Newton.
The team last year was awful. We purged the awful from the squad and replaced it with young guys. In case you didn't realize it, young guys aren't going to be world beaters week one. For you guys complaining about Coleman, am I the only guy who saw him flag down a poorly thrown ball and make a play in triple coverage? Also, the defense was on the field for almost 40 minutes today. ANY defense who gets thrown out there for that long is going to give up yards.
The biggest thing to take away from this game is we have a lot of young guys who have the potential to get better. RG3 as I noted earlier in this thread looks scared, skittish, w/e you wanna say out there which bodes badly for his future. Today is another example of the fact he just can't get out of his own way too. One game is too soon to shake it all up of course, but idk I think the dude has just hit that wall. I don't even know how to describe it-it just seems like he's playing not to get hurt which you can't do at that position.
Relax people-we knew the Browns were gonna be bottom feeders even if you didn't want to admit it publicly.
- I honestly just don't understand what you guys expected this year. Like it or not, the regime has a plan. That plan included sucking nuts this year, churning the roster with young draft players and seeing who will stick. It's going to be the same thing next year as well to some degree.
- There it is... "the plan". The difference next year is that some players will have stuck.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
3. Also any defense out there that long is giving up a lot of first downs... just sayin'...
Yep - even if our O sucks, if we force them to go three-and-out in return, the D doesn't stay on the field all the time.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login