We need an experienced backup QB
-
Jim is his uncle Steve.
Jim is his uncle Steve.
You mean Chad Kelly...of Ole Miss is Jim Kelly's nephew? Did not know that.
-
But what about "morale"??? If we don't add a career back-up that is sitting at home by the phone players will become sad...
The only way morale gets boosted is if the Browns sign Peyton Manning and he arrives in Cleveland via a Papa Johns funded time machine..... Oh yea, that'd get the inmates stoked alright.
-
I hear Manziel might be available.
-
I'd be against signing an experienced back up. Now if McCown goes down, then yes, get somebody in here.
I'd be against signing an experienced back up. Now if McCown goes down, then yes, get somebody in here.
Why then but not now? It doesn't make sense. If you want someone with experience in at QB, then you get him now to go in immediately upon an injury happening and not wait for the week after the injury. You get him in now to work in practice with the receivers etc.....not give him a rush job to start a game only after 2-3 days of being on the team.
If the plan were to be to have the rookies be the QBs of this team....then don't sign a vet at all. You either sign that vet now or not at all.
-
I hear Manziel might be available.
I hear Manziel might be available.
I heard he was down on the street giving Jimmy advice on the 2017 QB pick.
-
I hear Manziel might be available.
I heard he was down on the street giving Jimmy advice on the 2017 QB pick.
I heard he was down on the street giving Jimmy advice on the 2017 QB pick.
He's back in school
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2016/09/05/johnny-manziel-is-going-back-to-school/
-
I heard he was down on the street giving Jimmy advice on the 2017 QB pick.
He's back in school
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2016/09/05/johnny-manziel-is-going-back-to-school/
Well not exactly. He registered back at school which he will take on line while living in Lost Angels. So nothing has changed except the opportunity to get more incompletions.
-
I'd be against signing an experienced back up. Now if McCown goes down, then yes, get somebody in here.
Why then but not now? It doesn't make sense. If you want someone with experience in at QB, then you get him now to go in immediately upon an injury happening and not wait for the week after the injury. You get him in now to work in practice with the receivers etc.....not give him a rush job to start a game only after 2-3 days of being on the team.
If the plan were to be to have the rookies be the QBs of this team....then don't sign a vet at all. You either sign that vet now or not at all.
Why then but not now? It doesn't make sense.
Because I'd rather let Kessler and Hogan get more reps in practice. They have a degree of upside, where guys like Josh Freeman have flopped already.
We've seen this too many times already. Outside of 1988, when we used 4 QBs, every other time we use 3 QBs in a season, it's a lost cause.
-
Jim is his uncle Steve.
-
Jim is his uncle Steve.
-
That Steve Kelly, heckuva QB.
-
-
NFL Network described the Browns FO as having an 18 at the blackjack tables and tries to get a 3 dealt for 21. Just plain stupid for leaving a franchise QB on the table for unknowns later.
And they mentioned Wentz going 8 for 8 when blitzed.
-
NFL Network described the Browns FO as having an 18 at the blackjack tables and tries to get a 3 dealt for 21. Just plain stupid for leaving a franchise QB on the table for unknowns later.
And they mentioned Wentz going 8 for 8 when blitzed.
Using a Euchre deck?NFL Network described the Browns FO as having an 18 at the blackjack tables and tries to get a 3 dealt for 21. Just plain stupid for leaving a franchise QB on the table for unknowns later.
And they mentioned Wentz going 8 for 8 when blitzed.
-
Why would we waste time and money on getting a one-year deal backup QB?
-
Why would we waste time and money on getting a one-year deal backup QB?
Why would we waste time and money on getting a one-year deal backup QB?
Because we want to win now! Herpity derp!
-
Why would we waste time and money on getting a one-year deal backup QB?
Because we want to win now! Herpity derp!
Because we want to win now! Herpity derp!
If we're winning now, odds are we won't be using our backup QB for anything.
I just don't get it.
-
Mike Vick - Rumor that Browns are interested. I'll take Derek Anderson however.
Please say it ain't so.
http://www.inquisitr.com/3505277/nfl-rumors-cleveland-browns-could-sign-veteran-qb-michael-vick/
To spur on other discussion. I spent two years in North Carolina (just moved back to OH this past spring) and the fans of the Panthers loved Derek Anderson. Flame me all you want, but I would take Derek Anderson over any of the "floating" options out there right now. He's experienced and has an arm that could stretch the field and keep up with our receivers.
-
Panthers aren't trading Anderson, nor should we try to get him.
Then again, we shouldn't go after Vick either.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login