Myron Ebell
-
say, why not just have "experts" say we need to tax food really high and make a lot of
money to send to...
poor countries.....
you know. redistribute Rich countries wealth to poor countries. Any kind of stupid tax will work.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2016/11/19/uk-researchers-tax-food-to-reduce-climate-change/
-
Ebell also did lobbying work for Monsanto where he stated that chemicals they were putting on soy beans were not effecting bee populations.
-
In the 1990s, while serving as Policy Director at the Frontiers of Freedom Institute, Ebell worked as part of a team to make regulating the tobacco industry "politically unpalatable".[33] In 2011, as part of its "Control Abuse of Power" (CAP) project, the CEI launched lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the 1998 tobacco Master Settlement Agreement (MSA).[34][35]
You can call the next election. Trump is already loading the dems up with ammo. If the dems manage to run someone who's not the most corrupt politician to ever run for office, it's a smoke out..no pun intended. If he can't even get big tobacco right, wow..just wow. I guess we should still be allowing the tobacco industries to market to children.
-
Generally, the participating manufacturers agree not to "take any action, directly or indirectly, to target Youth within any Settling State in the advertising, promotion or marketing of Tobacco Products, or take any action the primary purpose of which is to initiate, maintain or increase the incidence of Youth smoking within any Settling State." (§III(a))
The restrictions specified included bans on outdoor billboards, advertising on transit vehicles, as well as restrictions on sports marketing, event sponsorships and promotional products.
That was part of the agreement Ebell fought. Trump is really surrounding himself with the "best and brightest" huh?
-
Still waiting to hear from Ed on this
-
Really Ed?
I was all for giving Trump a chance. Drain the swamp and what not. But not to bring in people that are just as bad.
-
Really Ed?
I was all for giving Trump a chance. Drain the swamp and what not. But not to bring in people that are just as bad.
Really Ed?
I was all for giving Trump a chance. Drain the swamp and what not. But not to bring in people that are just as bad.

-
https://www.google.com/amp/mobile.nytimes.com/2016/11/12/science/myron-ebell-trump-epa.amp.html
Oh, don't want to piss off Pierre.
WSS
-
"Mr. Ebell, whose organization is financed in part by the coal industry,"
And the swamp just got 10 ft higher, beleive me
-
Really Ed?
I was all for giving Trump a chance. Drain the swamp and what not. But not to bring in people that are just as bad.

I take it that the "W" stands for woodpecker?
I ta -
Really Ed?
I was all for giving Trump a chance. Drain the swamp and what not. But not to bring in people that are just as bad.
Really Ed?
I was all for giving Trump a chance. Drain the swamp and what not. But not to bring in people that are just as bad.
He's bringing in a guy who's clueless about global warming. My question is what exactly should we be doing about global warming? We can't hamstring ourselves economically for the environment while India and China say fuck it and do whatever the hell they want and take advantage of whatever niche we'd be leaving.
-
Really Ed?
I was all for giving Trump a chance. Drain the swamp and what not. But not to bring in people that are just as bad.
He's bringing in a guy who's clueless about global warming. My question is what exactly should we be doing about global warming? We can't hamstring ourselves economically for the environment while India and China say fuck it and do whatever the hell they want and take advantage of whatever niche we'd be leaving.
He's bringing in a guy who's clueless about global warming. My question is what exactly should we be doing about global warming? We can't hamstring ourselves economically for the environment while India and China say fuck it and do whatever the hell they want and take advantage of whatever niche we'd be leaving.
Woody is our alarmist in chief and even he has no idea what to do about it.
The left just want somebody to whine and wring their hands over it, not really to take any action.
WSS
-
Really Ed?
I was all for giving Trump a chance. Drain the swamp and what not. But not to bring in people that are just as bad.
He's bringing in a guy who's clueless about global warming. My question is what exactly should we be doing about global warming? We can't hamstring ourselves economically for the environment while India and China say fuck it and do whatever the hell they want and take advantage of whatever niche we'd be leaving.
He's bringing in a guy who's clueless about global warming. My question is what exactly should we be doing about global warming? We can't hamstring ourselves economically for the environment while India and China say fuck it and do whatever the hell they want and take advantage of whatever niche we'd be leaving.
Right, but we can do that without a Climate Denier, pesticide harm Denier, and tobacco industry protector, that takes money for all of these, in charge of the EPA...
-
He's bringing in a guy who's clueless about global warming. My question is what exactly should we be doing about global warming? We can't hamstring ourselves economically for the environment while India and China say fuck it and do whatever the hell they want and take advantage of whatever niche we'd be leaving.
Woody is our alarmist in chief and even he has no idea what to do about it.
The left just want somebody to whine and wring their hands over it, not really to take any action.
WSS
Woody is our alarmist in chief and even he has no idea what to do about it.
The left just want somebody to whine and wring their hands over it, not really to take any action.
WSS
I've given suggestions on what I think we could do, and yes, it involves regulation and taxes.
Your responses on the subject have always been "we can't do anything, so why bother." Groundbreaking stuff.
Jack shit will get done while we're still having to debate if climate change is happening. And now with this guy in charge, we are taking giant steps back.
Fuck all of those scientists and experts any. What do they know? It's snowing outside!
And fuck you trying to discredit me by calling me an alarmist. I haven't once come in here yelling about the world ending tomorrow. I'm listening to the experts on the subject, that say we're affecting the climate, and we should start doing something about it, to avoid negative consequences down the road.
-
Oh he's a pesticidal denier too? What u think about that cal? Being the natural farmer u claim to be.....
-
Woody is our alarmist in chief and even he has no idea what to do about it.
The left just want somebody to whine and wring their hands over it, not really to take any action.
WSS
I've given suggestions on what I think we could do, and yes, it involves regulation and taxes.
Your responses on the subject have always been "we can't do anything, so why bother." Groundbreaking stuff.
Jack shit will get done while we're still having to debate if climate change is happening. And now with this guy in charge, we are taking giant steps back.
Fuck all of those scientists and experts any. What do they know? It's snowing outside!
And fuck you trying to discredit me by calling me an alarmist. I haven't once come in here yelling about the world ending tomorrow. I'm listening to the experts on the subject, that say we're affecting the climate, and we should start doing something about it, to avoid negative consequences down the road.
I've given suggestions on what I think we could do, and yes, it involves regulation and taxes.
Your responses on the subject have always been "we can't do anything, so why bother." Groundbreaking stuff.
Jack shit will get done while we're still having to debate if climate change is happening. And now with this guy in charge, we are taking giant steps back.
Fuck all of those scientists and experts any. What do they know? It's snowing outside!
And fuck you trying to discredit me by calling me an alarmist. I haven't once come in here yelling about the world ending tomorrow. I'm listening to the experts on the subject, that say we're affecting the climate, and we should start doing something about it, to avoid negative consequences down the road.
Waaaaaaaa, waaaaaaaaaaa, waaaaaaaaaa.
-
Woody is our alarmist in chief and even he has no idea what to do about it.
The left just want somebody to whine and wring their hands over it, not really to take any action.
WSS
I've given suggestions on what I think we could do, and yes, it involves regulation and taxes.
Your responses on the subject have always been "we can't do anything, so why bother." Groundbreaking stuff.
Jack shit will get done while we're still having to debate if climate change is happening. And now with this guy in charge, we are taking giant steps back.
Fuck all of those scientists and experts any. What do they know? It's snowing outside!
And fuck you trying to discredit me by calling me an alarmist. I haven't once come in here yelling about the world ending tomorrow. I'm listening to the experts on the subject, that say we're affecting the climate, and we should start doing something about it, to avoid negative consequences down the road.
I've given suggestions on what I think we could do, and yes, it involves regulation and taxes.
My issue with it is that the government and corporations will never do anything for long-term good at the expense short-term profits. We aren't going to see major attempts to slow manmade climate change until the climate makes it too expensive to fill up your tank or put food on your plate. As such, it's at the bottom of my list of priorities.
-
I've given suggestions on what I think we could do, and yes, it involves regulation and taxes.
My issue with it is that the government and corporations will never do anything for long-term good at the expense short-term profits. We aren't going to see major attempts to slow manmade climate change until the climate makes it too expensive to fill up your tank or put food on your plate. As such, it's at the bottom of my list of priorities.
My issue with it is that the government and corporations will never do anything for long-term good at the expense short-term profits. We aren't going to see major attempts to slow manmade climate change until the climate makes it too expensive to fill up your tank or put food on your plate. As such, it's at the bottom of my list of priorities.
So don't do anything about it until it is a real problem?
-
1.5 trillion dollars annually. Seems excessive. Wonder how much everyone else kicked in?
-
In fairness Woody jack shit has gotten done over the last 8 years of Obama rule.
WSS
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login
