Skip to content

Myron Ebell

Political Discussion
85 14 2.3k
  • Generally, the participating manufacturers agree not to "take any action, directly or indirectly, to target Youth within any Settling State in the advertising, promotion or marketing of Tobacco Products, or take any action the primary purpose of which is to initiate, maintain or increase the incidence of Youth smoking within any Settling State." (ยงIII(a))

    The restrictions specified included bans on outdoor billboards, advertising on transit vehicles, as well as restrictions on sports marketing, event sponsorships and promotional products.

    That was part of the agreement Ebell fought. Trump is really surrounding himself with the "best and brightest" huh?

  • Still waiting to hear from Ed on this

  • Really Ed?

    I was all for giving Trump a chance. Drain the swamp and what not. But not to bring in people that are just as bad.

    @mld-woody said:

    Really Ed?

    I was all for giving Trump a chance.

    ๐Ÿ˜

    WSS

  • Really Ed?

    I was all for giving Trump a chance. Drain the swamp and what not. But not to bring in people that are just as bad.

    @mld-woody said:

    Really Ed?

    I was all for giving Trump a chance. Drain the swamp and what not. But not to bring in people that are just as bad.

    15094489_1305112272853001_41186654416246

  • "Mr. Ebell, whose organization is financed in part by the coal industry,"

    And the swamp just got 10 ft higher, beleive me

  • @mld-woody said:

    Really Ed?

    I was all for giving Trump a chance. Drain the swamp and what not. But not to bring in people that are just as bad.

    15094489_1305112272853001_41186654416246

    I take it that the "W" stands for woodpecker?

    @diehardbrownsfan said:

    15094489_1305112272853001_41186654416246I ta

  • Really Ed?

    I was all for giving Trump a chance. Drain the swamp and what not. But not to bring in people that are just as bad.

    @mld-woody said:

    Really Ed?

    I was all for giving Trump a chance. Drain the swamp and what not. But not to bring in people that are just as bad.

    He's bringing in a guy who's clueless about global warming. My question is what exactly should we be doing about global warming? We can't hamstring ourselves economically for the environment while India and China say fuck it and do whatever the hell they want and take advantage of whatever niche we'd be leaving.

  • @mld-woody said:

    Really Ed?

    I was all for giving Trump a chance. Drain the swamp and what not. But not to bring in people that are just as bad.

    He's bringing in a guy who's clueless about global warming. My question is what exactly should we be doing about global warming? We can't hamstring ourselves economically for the environment while India and China say fuck it and do whatever the hell they want and take advantage of whatever niche we'd be leaving.

    @vaportrail said:

    He's bringing in a guy who's clueless about global warming. My question is what exactly should we be doing about global warming? We can't hamstring ourselves economically for the environment while India and China say fuck it and do whatever the hell they want and take advantage of whatever niche we'd be leaving.

    Woody is our alarmist in chief and even he has no idea what to do about it.

    The left just want somebody to whine and wring their hands over it, not really to take any action.

    WSS

  • @mld-woody said:

    Really Ed?

    I was all for giving Trump a chance. Drain the swamp and what not. But not to bring in people that are just as bad.

    He's bringing in a guy who's clueless about global warming. My question is what exactly should we be doing about global warming? We can't hamstring ourselves economically for the environment while India and China say fuck it and do whatever the hell they want and take advantage of whatever niche we'd be leaving.

    @vaportrail said:

    He's bringing in a guy who's clueless about global warming. My question is what exactly should we be doing about global warming? We can't hamstring ourselves economically for the environment while India and China say fuck it and do whatever the hell they want and take advantage of whatever niche we'd be leaving.

    Right, but we can do that without a Climate Denier, pesticide harm Denier, and tobacco industry protector, that takes money for all of these, in charge of the EPA...

  • @vaportrail said:

    He's bringing in a guy who's clueless about global warming. My question is what exactly should we be doing about global warming? We can't hamstring ourselves economically for the environment while India and China say fuck it and do whatever the hell they want and take advantage of whatever niche we'd be leaving.

    Woody is our alarmist in chief and even he has no idea what to do about it.

    The left just want somebody to whine and wring their hands over it, not really to take any action.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Woody is our alarmist in chief and even he has no idea what to do about it.

    The left just want somebody to whine and wring their hands over it, not really to take any action.

    WSS

    I've given suggestions on what I think we could do, and yes, it involves regulation and taxes.

    Your responses on the subject have always been "we can't do anything, so why bother." Groundbreaking stuff.

    Jack shit will get done while we're still having to debate if climate change is happening. And now with this guy in charge, we are taking giant steps back.

    Fuck all of those scientists and experts any. What do they know? It's snowing outside!

    And fuck you trying to discredit me by calling me an alarmist. I haven't once come in here yelling about the world ending tomorrow. I'm listening to the experts on the subject, that say we're affecting the climate, and we should start doing something about it, to avoid negative consequences down the road.

  • Oh he's a pesticidal denier too? What u think about that cal? Being the natural farmer u claim to be.....

  • @westside-steve said:

    Woody is our alarmist in chief and even he has no idea what to do about it.

    The left just want somebody to whine and wring their hands over it, not really to take any action.

    WSS

    I've given suggestions on what I think we could do, and yes, it involves regulation and taxes.

    Your responses on the subject have always been "we can't do anything, so why bother." Groundbreaking stuff.

    Jack shit will get done while we're still having to debate if climate change is happening. And now with this guy in charge, we are taking giant steps back.

    Fuck all of those scientists and experts any. What do they know? It's snowing outside!

    And fuck you trying to discredit me by calling me an alarmist. I haven't once come in here yelling about the world ending tomorrow. I'm listening to the experts on the subject, that say we're affecting the climate, and we should start doing something about it, to avoid negative consequences down the road.

    @mld-woody said:

    I've given suggestions on what I think we could do, and yes, it involves regulation and taxes.

    Your responses on the subject have always been "we can't do anything, so why bother." Groundbreaking stuff.

    Jack shit will get done while we're still having to debate if climate change is happening. And now with this guy in charge, we are taking giant steps back.

    Fuck all of those scientists and experts any. What do they know? It's snowing outside!

    And fuck you trying to discredit me by calling me an alarmist. I haven't once come in here yelling about the world ending tomorrow. I'm listening to the experts on the subject, that say we're affecting the climate, and we should start doing something about it, to avoid negative consequences down the road.

    Waaaaaaaa, waaaaaaaaaaa, waaaaaaaaaa.

  • @westside-steve said:

    Woody is our alarmist in chief and even he has no idea what to do about it.

    The left just want somebody to whine and wring their hands over it, not really to take any action.

    WSS

    I've given suggestions on what I think we could do, and yes, it involves regulation and taxes.

    Your responses on the subject have always been "we can't do anything, so why bother." Groundbreaking stuff.

    Jack shit will get done while we're still having to debate if climate change is happening. And now with this guy in charge, we are taking giant steps back.

    Fuck all of those scientists and experts any. What do they know? It's snowing outside!

    And fuck you trying to discredit me by calling me an alarmist. I haven't once come in here yelling about the world ending tomorrow. I'm listening to the experts on the subject, that say we're affecting the climate, and we should start doing something about it, to avoid negative consequences down the road.

    @mld-woody said:

    I've given suggestions on what I think we could do, and yes, it involves regulation and taxes.

    My issue with it is that the government and corporations will never do anything for long-term good at the expense short-term profits. We aren't going to see major attempts to slow manmade climate change until the climate makes it too expensive to fill up your tank or put food on your plate. As such, it's at the bottom of my list of priorities.

  • @mld-woody said:

    I've given suggestions on what I think we could do, and yes, it involves regulation and taxes.

    My issue with it is that the government and corporations will never do anything for long-term good at the expense short-term profits. We aren't going to see major attempts to slow manmade climate change until the climate makes it too expensive to fill up your tank or put food on your plate. As such, it's at the bottom of my list of priorities.

    @vaportrail said:

    My issue with it is that the government and corporations will never do anything for long-term good at the expense short-term profits. We aren't going to see major attempts to slow manmade climate change until the climate makes it too expensive to fill up your tank or put food on your plate. As such, it's at the bottom of my list of priorities.

    So don't do anything about it until it is a real problem?

  • 1.5 trillion dollars annually. Seems excessive. Wonder how much everyone else kicked in?

  • In fairness Woody jack shit has gotten done over the last 8 years of Obama rule.

    WSS

  • In fairness Woody jack shit has gotten done over the last 8 years of Obama rule.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    In fairness Woody jack shit has gotten done over the last 8 years of Obama rule.

    WSS

    The Paris agreement is something. We also generate more renewable energy now.

    It is hard to do much when you have to fight ignorant politicians at every turn. Ex:

    Which gets back to my point. It will be hard to do much when a sizable (and now controlling) portion of our govt. doesn't even believe it's an issue.

  • "And someday we may see this as the moment that we finally decided to save our planet."

    Hallelujah

    WSS

  • @vaportrail said:

    My issue with it is that the government and corporations will never do anything for long-term good at the expense short-term profits. We aren't going to see major attempts to slow manmade climate change until the climate makes it too expensive to fill up your tank or put food on your plate. As such, it's at the bottom of my list of priorities.

    So don't do anything about it until it is a real problem?

    @mld-woody said:

    So don't do anything about it until it is a real problem?

    Practically, I think that's where we are. We've got wind farms, solar farms, and nuclear power plants all over the country. We're working on fusion, but nowhere near a practical solution. A huge amount of greenhouse gas comes from the meat industry, and unless we either collectively go vegan (fuck that) or start using insects as a major protein source (much more open to this, but people will think it's disgusting), nothing is going to change. The other major culprit is the auto industry, and we seem to be making progress towards an electric car.

    What else should we be doing? If we back off shale and fracking, then we're living off the whims of the assholes in OPEC. I'm okay with taking steps toward combating it, but I don't think any serious changes will fly with the majority of taxpayers, therefore, it's at the bottom of my priorities.