Move Over Sashi .....
-
I'm not for scrapping the whole thing at all. Add a real football guy to the mix. It takes a sniper to get a sniper to put it in simple terms.
-
We have "real football guys"... the whole "have to have played the game" thing is a myth. Yes, some successful GMs are former players of note, but most are not.
The Browns approach is not "Analytics >> Scouting"... or over scouting... or however you want to state it.
Our approach is "Analytics + Scouting Consensus" which does not say anything about relative weighting. It only requires agreement.
I can easily see as many memos flowing from Scouting to Analytics them to quantify "this player" as I can see flowing from Analytics to Scouting to put their eyes on "that player".
-
Exactly.
Stole my anticipated reply to your reply...
So basically you are in favor of replacing a person whose name you do not know, let alone his abilities with a Polian.
I admit Bill is very knowledgeable. Can you admit you don't know why he was fired from Indy? Or that he once accosted an employee of another organization?
Do a google...
Spoiler alert... Bill does not play well with others. Therefore he does not fit in our consensus driven FO. Thus my original post... exactly my original post.
Stole my anticipated reply to your reply...
So basically you are in favor of replacing a person whose name you do not know, let alone his abilities with a Polian.
I admit Bill is very knowledgeable. Can you admit you don't know why he was fired from Indy? Or that he once accosted an employee of another organization?
Do a google...
Spoiler alert... Bill does not play well with others. Therefore he does not fit in our consensus driven FO. Thus my original post... exactly my original post.
Right. I don't know this mystery man's name. (and I don't think you really do either). But whomever he may be.....he be shit.
So, asshole, you can tell us who you think it is, or not. I don't care. Whoever the fuck he is fuck him.......he is easily replaceable by something/anything better.
-
Stole my anticipated reply to your reply...
So basically you are in favor of replacing a person whose name you do not know, let alone his abilities with a Polian.
I admit Bill is very knowledgeable. Can you admit you don't know why he was fired from Indy? Or that he once accosted an employee of another organization?
Do a google...
Spoiler alert... Bill does not play well with others. Therefore he does not fit in our consensus driven FO. Thus my original post... exactly my original post.
Right. I don't know this mystery man's name. (and I don't think you really do either). But whomever he may be.....he be shit.
So, asshole, you can tell us who you think it is, or not. I don't care. Whoever the fuck he is fuck him.......he is easily replaceable by something/anything better.
Right. I don't know this mystery man's name. (and I don't think you really do either). But whomever he may be.....he be shit.
So, asshole, you can tell us who you think it is, or not. I don't care. Whoever the fuck he is fuck him.......he is easily replaceable by something/anything better.
Well, if you don't trust him to be a good evaluator and you think he's terrible at his job, and the reports are that the Browns love Mitch Trubisky, it stands to reason that you don't believe Mitch Trubisky is a good football player.
Perfect. Problem solved. We'll just take Myles Garrett instead.
-
I have been clamoring for a bill Pollian to come here and run things.. But , it just doesn't seem like it will ever happen... If we procured someone with half of that kind of football savvy.. We would be in a better place for sure.. But.. I guess I can dream....
-
Right. I don't know this mystery man's name. (and I don't think you really do either). But whomever he may be.....he be shit.
So, asshole, you can tell us who you think it is, or not. I don't care. Whoever the fuck he is fuck him.......he is easily replaceable by something/anything better.
Well, if you don't trust him to be a good evaluator and you think he's terrible at his job, and the reports are that the Browns love Mitch Trubisky, it stands to reason that you don't believe Mitch Trubisky is a good football player.
Perfect. Problem solved. We'll just take Myles Garrett instead.
Well, if you don't trust him to be a good evaluator and you think he's terrible at his job, and the reports are that the Browns love Mitch Trubisky, it stands to reason that you don't believe Mitch Trubisky is a good football player.
No, it doesn't. That is illogical. I am nothing but logical. I am not trusting "his"...whoever the fuck "he" is.. evaluation of Trubisky. I am trusting my own and the fact that the Browns know they need a QB.
Perfect. Problem solved. We'll just take Myles Garrett instead.
-
Stole my anticipated reply to your reply...
So basically you are in favor of replacing a person whose name you do not know, let alone his abilities with a Polian.
I admit Bill is very knowledgeable. Can you admit you don't know why he was fired from Indy? Or that he once accosted an employee of another organization?
Do a google...
Spoiler alert... Bill does not play well with others. Therefore he does not fit in our consensus driven FO. Thus my original post... exactly my original post.
Right. I don't know this mystery man's name. (and I don't think you really do either). But whomever he may be.....he be shit.
So, asshole, you can tell us who you think it is, or not. I don't care. Whoever the fuck he is fuck him.......he is easily replaceable by something/anything better.
Right. I don't know this mystery man's name. (and I don't think you really do either). But whomever he may be.....he be shit.
So, asshole, you can tell us who you think it is, or not. I don't care. Whoever the fuck he is fuck him.......he is easily replaceable by something/anything better.
Temper, temper, Gip...
Didn't do the search did you? If you had, you'd know I don't think it is "one guy". The search term was a clue.
-
I have been clamoring for a bill Pollian to come here and run things.. But , it just doesn't seem like it will ever happen... If we procured someone with half of that kind of football savvy.. We would be in a better place for sure.. But.. I guess I can dream....
I have been clamoring for a bill Pollian to come here and run things.. But , it just doesn't seem like it will ever happen... If we procured someone with half of that kind of football savvy.. We would be in a better place for sure.. But.. I guess I can dream....
I don't know that we need a Polian to run things....but I think we need one to consult on things.
-
Right. I don't know this mystery man's name. (and I don't think you really do either). But whomever he may be.....he be shit.
So, asshole, you can tell us who you think it is, or not. I don't care. Whoever the fuck he is fuck him.......he is easily replaceable by something/anything better.
Temper, temper, Gip...
Didn't do the search did you? If you had, you'd know I don't think it is "one guy". The search term was a clue.
Temper, temper, Gip...
Didn't do the search did you? If you had, you'd know I don't think it is "one guy". The search term was a clue.
No, and I never will. Just fucking say it or shut the fuck up. In case you hadn't see the thread in the Barber Shop you should know that I am not feeling well enough to play stupid games at this point.
-
Well, if you don't trust him to be a good evaluator and you think he's terrible at his job, and the reports are that the Browns love Mitch Trubisky, it stands to reason that you don't believe Mitch Trubisky is a good football player.
No, it doesn't. That is illogical. I am nothing but logical. I am not trusting "his"...whoever the fuck "he" is.. evaluation of Trubisky. I am trusting my own and the fact that the Browns know they need a QB.
Perfect. Problem solved. We'll just take Myles Garrett instead.
Well, if you don't trust him to be a good evaluator and you think he's terrible at his job, and the reports are that the Browns love Mitch Trubisky, it stands to reason that you don't believe Mitch Trubisky is a good football player.
No, it doesn't. That is illogical. I am nothing but logical. I am not trusting "his"...whoever the fuck "he" is.. evaluation of Trubisky. I am trusting my own and the fact that the Browns know they need a QB.
Perfect. Problem solved. We'll just take Myles Garrett instead.
So you're saying that you have the same evaluation of talent of Trubisky that the Browns have?
But I thought the Browns talent evaluation was terrible? So either Trubisky is bad, you're bad, or the Browns know what they're doing.
-
Well, if you don't trust him to be a good evaluator and you think he's terrible at his job, and the reports are that the Browns love Mitch Trubisky, it stands to reason that you don't believe Mitch Trubisky is a good football player.
No, it doesn't. That is illogical. I am nothing but logical. I am not trusting "his"...whoever the fuck "he" is.. evaluation of Trubisky. I am trusting my own and the fact that the Browns know they need a QB.
Perfect. Problem solved. We'll just take Myles Garrett instead.
So you're saying that you have the same evaluation of talent of Trubisky that the Browns have?
But I thought the Browns talent evaluation was terrible? So either Trubisky is bad, you're bad, or the Browns know what they're doing.
So you're saying that you have the same evaluation of talent of Trubisky that the Browns have?
No. That is not what I am saying. I am saying that the Browns should have the same evaluation of his talent that I do. that they should recognize that they need a QB. That they should recognize that he is likely the prospect they should be "honing in" on.
But I thought the Browns talent evaluation was terrible? So either Trubisky is bad, you're bad, or the Browns know what they're doing.
Or Trubuski is good, I am good, and they are smart enough to follow along. Which hopefully they are.
-
So you're saying that you have the same evaluation of talent of Trubisky that the Browns have?
No. That is not what I am saying. I am saying that the Browns should have the same evaluation of his talent that I do. that they should recognize that they need a QB. That they should recognize that he is likely the prospect they should be "honing in" on.
But I thought the Browns talent evaluation was terrible? So either Trubisky is bad, you're bad, or the Browns know what they're doing.
Or Trubuski is good, I am good, and they are smart enough to follow along. Which hopefully they are.
So you're saying that you have the same evaluation of talent of Trubisky that the Browns have?
No. That is not what I am saying. I am saying that the Browns should have the same evaluation of his talent that I do. that they should recognize that they need a QB. That they should recognize that he is likely the prospect they should be "honing in" on.
But I thought the Browns talent evaluation was terrible? So either Trubisky is bad, you're bad, or the Browns know what they're doing.
Or Trubuski is good, I am good, and they are smart enough to follow along. Which hopefully they are.
So you had your own evaluation of Trubisky before the Browns ever did?
-
So you're saying that you have the same evaluation of talent of Trubisky that the Browns have?
No. That is not what I am saying. I am saying that the Browns should have the same evaluation of his talent that I do. that they should recognize that they need a QB. That they should recognize that he is likely the prospect they should be "honing in" on.
But I thought the Browns talent evaluation was terrible? So either Trubisky is bad, you're bad, or the Browns know what they're doing.
Or Trubuski is good, I am good, and they are smart enough to follow along. Which hopefully they are.
So you had your own evaluation of Trubisky before the Browns ever did?
So you had your own evaluation of Trubisky before the Browns ever did?
No, that is not what I said. Are you being purposely obtuse, or is this just the way of you?
I mean, now that Trump has been elected is it en vogue to be thick headed? (lets see the reaction that gets)
-
So you had your own evaluation of Trubisky before the Browns ever did?
No, that is not what I said. Are you being purposely obtuse, or is this just the way of you?
I mean, now that Trump has been elected is it en vogue to be thick headed? (lets see the reaction that gets)
No, that is not what I said. Are you being purposely obtuse, or is this just the way of you?
I mean, now that Trump has been elected is it en vogue to be thick headed? (lets see the reaction that gets)
"Or Trubuski is good, I am good, and they are smart enough to follow along."
Curious verbiage there for someone who isn't claiming they were the first to do something.
-
No, that is not what I said. Are you being purposely obtuse, or is this just the way of you?
I mean, now that Trump has been elected is it en vogue to be thick headed? (lets see the reaction that gets)
"Or Trubuski is good, I am good, and they are smart enough to follow along."
Curious verbiage there for someone who isn't claiming they were the first to do something.
"Or Trubuski is good, I am good, and they are smart enough to follow along."
Curious verbiage there for someone who isn't claiming they were the first to do something.
Well, I don't think it is me they have to follow, really. They just have to do the right, smart thing. And I believe drafting Trubisky is that thing.
But, if you want to give me credit, I will take it. How much does that pay?
-
i like the way some think or know it's a consensus thing, yet throw only one mug out there from the front office to speak of player acquisitions..........sashi.
if it's true that it is a consensus thing then i guess if one get's fired, they all get fired.
and berry was the guy for the colts since 2012? i can name only one good player they had drafted then AND since then.
thank god we got him!
-
i like the way some think or know it's a consensus thing, yet throw only one mug out there from the front office to speak of player acquisitions..........sashi.
if it's true that it is a consensus thing then i guess if one get's fired, they all get fired.
and berry was the guy for the colts since 2012? i can name only one good player they had drafted then AND since then.
thank god we got him!
i like the way some think or know it's a consensus thing, yet throw only one mug out there from the front office to speak of player acquisitions..........sashi.
if it's true that it is a consensus thing then i guess if one get's fired, they all get fired.
and berry was the guy for the colts since 2012? i can name only one good player they had drafted then AND since then.
thank god we got him!
Yeah, if one gets fired, they probably all get fired. That's normally how these things work.
-
i like the way some think or know it's a consensus thing, yet throw only one mug out there from the front office to speak of player acquisitions..........sashi.
if it's true that it is a consensus thing then i guess if one get's fired, they all get fired.
and berry was the guy for the colts since 2012? i can name only one good player they had drafted then AND since then.
thank god we got him!
Yeah, if one gets fired, they probably all get fired. That's normally how these things work.
Yeah, if one gets fired, they probably all get fired. That's normally how these things work.
yeah, i know arod. amazing how some can think a coordinator here or there can get canned and keep the rest of the staff together BUT in the FO that's unheard of,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,??
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login