Skip to content

Browns to make pitch for Jimmy G // Trubisky #1 QB on their board

The Browns Board
170 39 5.4k
  • @stillmotion said:

    Cool Story Cuck.

    yeah defending the family that essentially ruined the franchise doesn't make you a browns fan, it makes you a cocksucker.

    Hahaha. Fucking cuck, that's priceless.

    It was probably tough to type that without spilling your chai latte all over your MacBook keyboard, wasn't it?

    I just realized I'm arguing with a hipster millennial. Dudes first memory of the Browns is probably Brady fucking Quinn.

    GTFO of here, vagina.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Hahaha. Fucking cuck, that's priceless.

    It was probably tough to type that without spilling your chai latte all over your MacBook keyboard, wasn't it?

    I just realized I'm arguing with a hipster millennial. Dudes first memory of the Browns is probably Brady fucking Quinn.

    GTFO of here, vagina.

    because you're a cuck. and you act like a child who instead of resorting to logic. you call people who don't agree with you names.....

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Hahaha. Fucking cuck, that's priceless.

    It was probably tough to type that without spilling your chai latte all over your MacBook keyboard, wasn't it?

    I just realized I'm arguing with a hipster millennial. Dudes first memory of the Browns is probably Brady fucking Quinn.

    GTFO of here, vagina.

    because you're a cuck. and you act like a child who instead of resorting to logic. you call people who don't agree with you names.....

    @stillmotion said:

    because you're a cuck. and you act like a child who instead of resorting to logic. you call people who don't agree with you names.....

    You don't even know what that word means, man. Get out of here with your weak nonsense, junior.

  • Zombo said:

    "I didn't look at the video. I'm dumb and would like to draft the big name of the year ... Because I'm really, really dumb."

    You wouldn't know a good QB if it bit you in the pussy lips, Chief Queef.

    Let's keep suckin' Belichick's rejects though. Maybe relive those glory years of the early 90's when the Browns were relevant and you were still a closeted cocksucker.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    You wouldn't know a good QB if it bit you in the pussy lips, Chief Queef.

    Let's keep suckin' Belichick's rejects though. Maybe relive those glory years of the early 90's when the Browns were relevant and you were still a closeted cocksucker.

    Is it your goal to shit all over every thread in which someone disagrees with you, Bitchtits?

    When did you start coming around again, anyway? Daddy find a new bottom?

    Zombo

  • @stillmotion said:

    Cool Story Cuck.

    yeah defending the family that essentially ruined the franchise doesn't make you a browns fan, it makes you a cocksucker.

    Hahaha. Fucking cuck, that's priceless.

    It was probably tough to type that without spilling your chai latte all over your MacBook keyboard, wasn't it?

    I just realized I'm arguing with a hipster millennial. Dudes first memory of the Browns is probably Brady fucking Quinn.

    GTFO of here, vagina.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Hahaha. Fucking cuck, that's priceless.

    It was probably tough to type that without spilling your chai latte all over your MacBook keyboard, wasn't it?

    I just realized I'm arguing with a hipster millennial. Dudes first memory of the Browns is probably Brady fucking Quinn.

    GTFO of here, vagina.

    Yooooo da fuq's wrong with a latte?!?!?!

  • @stillmotion said:

    because you're a cuck. and you act like a child who instead of resorting to logic. you call people who don't agree with you names.....

    You don't even know what that word means, man. Get out of here with your weak nonsense, junior.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    You don't even know what that word means, man. Get out of here with your weak nonsense, junior.

    cuck - Not simply a man who's wife/girlfriend cheats on him, but rather a man who actually gets aroused by knowing or seeing her in sexual situations with other men, such as flirting, kissing, fondling, or sex. In particular, situations where he is NOT participating but instead marginalized, just observing, or even completely ignored.
  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    You don't even know what that word means, man. Get out of here with your weak nonsense, junior.

    cuck - Not simply a man who's wife/girlfriend cheats on him, but rather a man who actually gets aroused by knowing or seeing her in sexual situations with other men, such as flirting, kissing, fondling, or sex. In particular, situations where he is NOT participating but instead marginalized, just observing, or even completely ignored.

    @stillmotion said:

    cuck - Not simply a man who's wife/girlfriend cheats on him, but rather a man who actually gets aroused by knowing or seeing her in sexual situations with other men, such as flirting, kissing, fondling, or sex. In particular, situations where he is NOT participating but instead marginalized, just observing, or even completely ignored.

    Someone did a Google! Yay!

  • @stillmotion said:

    cuck - Not simply a man who's wife/girlfriend cheats on him, but rather a man who actually gets aroused by knowing or seeing her in sexual situations with other men, such as flirting, kissing, fondling, or sex. In particular, situations where he is NOT participating but instead marginalized, just observing, or even completely ignored.

    Someone did a Google! Yay!

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Someone did a Google! Yay!

    Someone doesn't deny being a cuck.....

    lololololol

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Someone did a Google! Yay!

    Someone doesn't deny being a cuck.....

    lololololol

    @stillmotion said:

    Someone doesn't deny being a cuck.....

    lololololol

    I never had a girl that felt like she needed to get side dick to feel satisfied.

    Sounds like a personal issue of yours to me, Sally.

  • i wouldn't be mad if we get Jimmy G this year. It's better that than Kizer or god forbid Watson.

  • i wouldn't be mad if we get Jimmy G this year. It's better that than Kizer or god forbid Watson.

    @cainedesoulis said:

    i wouldn't be mad if we get Jimmy G this year. It's better that than Kizer or god forbid Watson.

    I've said all along my interest in Garropolo is totally dependent on the asking price. (And like I just mentioned) anything higher than our #52 is too damn much. If Bill wants what Minnesota gave up for Bradford, he's crazy. Any team willing to give up that much is crazy.

    I'm seeing a guy who has the potential to be decent- but nothing special. & pretty sad if we're willing to settle for "decent".

  • The problem with your argument for JG is that it completely disregards the fact that every QB who has filled in for Brady has performed exceedingly well for the most part, which makes a true evaluation of JG awfully hard.

    He's worth no later than a second round pick, however I wouldn't sacrifice a top 15 pick for a guy in the last year of his contract. It doesn't make any sense from a cap perspective. You're essentially sacrificing four years of rookie wages for a guy that, in all honesty, is still almost as much of an unknown.

    Could he be great? Sure. But so could the rookie you draft at #12. I'm not going to trade away four years of cheap "could" for one year of cheap "could".

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    The problem with your argument for JG is that it completely disregards the fact that every QB who has filled in for Brady has performed exceedingly well for the most part, which makes a true evaluation of JG awfully hard.

    He's worth no later than a second round pick, however I wouldn't sacrifice a top 15 pick for a guy in the last year of his contract. It doesn't make any sense from a cap perspective. You're essentially sacrificing four years of rookie wages for a guy that, in all honesty, is still almost as much of an unknown.

    Could he be great? Sure. But so could the rookie you draft at #12. I'm not going to trade away four years of cheap "could" for one year of cheap "could".

    I'd like to see JG for our 2nd this year and a 4th next year with the ability to make it a 2nd based on his performance. If we do that and grab Garrett or Allen and Hooker I'd call it a coup. I'd also like that trade along with Garrett or Allen and Mike Williams. Draft a center in the 3rd, trade back up into the 3rd and draft Mahomes too. Steal Trumaine Johnson, find a safety boom Super Bowl lol
  • i wouldn't be mad if we get Jimmy G this year. It's better that than Kizer or god forbid Watson.

    @cainedesoulis said:

    i wouldn't be mad if we get Jimmy G this year. It's better that than Kizer or god forbid Watson.

    The kid is solid, smart, and has a quick release. We liked him and Derek Carr the year we drafted Manziel. I think Jimmy G has the ability to develop into a great QB.

  • @stillmotion said:

    Dude is gonna be a stud. but you'd probably rather have a project, another black tarkenton, or bortles, right?

    I'd take any of the QBs in this draft for four years over one year of JG.

    Even trash bag Chad Kelly.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Even trash bag Chad Kelly.

    I knew you'd come around...

  • @stillmotion said:

    Dude is gonna be a stud. but you'd probably rather have a project, another black tarkenton, or bortles, right?

    I'd take any of the QBs in this draft for four years over one year of JG.

    Even trash bag Chad Kelly.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    I'd take any of the QBs in this draft for four years over one year of JG.

    Even trash bag Chad Kelly.

    TCPO went from "Garroppollo is worth no later than a 2nd (maybe it was 3rd) to "I'd take any of the QBs in this draft over him." What gives?

  • @harry-buffalo said:

    Thats not what I mean. What I am getting at is every fucking time one of Brady's back ups become available via trade of waivers, everyone loses their shit. A QB who learned under Brady!!! Wow he must be good. But stats point to the opposite. I mean the most successful Brady back up was Hoyer, and he was out of 6+ Qb's to be released or traded. Look at him, thats fine. But don't proclaim him a franchise QB just because of where he came from and what he did in the 2 games he played this season.

    Every time? Enough people have seen what happened to Matt Cassell, Brian Hoyer and Ryan Mallett in life after NE (like previous coaches from NE in particular) to know these aren't franchise QBs. Having said that, Hoyer got us off to a 7-4 start in 2014 which was a pleasant surprise to say the least. I know he had a horrible game in the playoffs for Houston last year.

    Is there a more overused phrase than "franchise QB" while so many college offenses and coaches aren't preparing their QBs for the NFL ahead throughout their #1 priority of winning. For example, which of the unbeatable college teams in the National Championship are/did build up their QB's resume for the NFL ahead? Not much different than the rest of college football right now challenging those with the task of projecting great football ahead from QB prospects in today's crapshoot.

    At this time, I'll settle for a freakin keeper out of the draft especially since the last time we were able to do so required the supplemental draft of 1985. Before that, we have to go all the way back to the 13th round of 1972 to remind ourselves how much vision and poise should be counted as much as arm strength in our QB evaluations. Vision, poise and accuracy were the assets behind the only League MVP caliber QB we've seen here in the last 50 years. In our quest to reach on the bionic arm of Brandon Weeden, we refused to allow ourselves the alternative to enjoy the vision, poise and accuracy of Russell Wilson. He's frequenting playoffs in spite of some very bad offensive lines. In order to spot vision, we have to hope our front office has finally has vision.

    @flugel said:

    Every time? Enough people have seen what happened to Matt Cassell, Brian Hoyer and Ryan Mallett in life after NE (like previous coaches from NE in particular) to know these aren't franchise QBs. Having said that, Hoyer got us off to a 7-4 start in 2014 which was a pleasant surprise to say the least. I know he had a horrible game in the playoffs for Houston last year.

    Is there a more overused phrase than "franchise QB" while so many college offenses and coaches aren't preparing their QBs for the NFL ahead throughout their #1 priority of winning. For example, which of the unbeatable college teams in the National Championship are/did build up their QB's resume for the NFL ahead? Not much different than the rest of college football right now challenging those with the task of projecting great football ahead from QB prospects in today's crapshoot.

    At this time, I'll settle for a freakin keeper out of the draft especially since the last time we were able to do so required the supplemental draft of 1985. Before that, we have to go all the way back to the 13th round of 1972 to remind ourselves how much vision and poise should be counted as much as arm strength in our QB evaluations. Vision, poise and accuracy were the assets behind the only League MVP caliber QB we've seen here in the last 50 years. In our quest to reach on the bionic arm of Brandon Weeden, we refused to allow ourselves the alternative to enjoy the vision, poise and accuracy of Russell Wilson. He's frequenting playoffs in spite of some very bad offensive lines. In order to spot vision, we have to hope our front office has finally has vision.

    I would say everytime. I get that people liked Jimmy during the draft, hell I liked him too. But its always seems like the media's mission to help NE inflate any potential trade value their backup QBs have.

  • How many of Brady's back ups have gone on to have careers as at least average starters? Every fucking one was touted as the next coming of Christ but they all never lived up to the bill.

    @harry-buffalo said:

    Every fucking one was touted as the next coming of Christ but they all never lived up to the bill.

    Really?.....touted as the next coming of Christ?.....Cassel Mallet Hoyer???....by who?

    How does one live up to the bill of getting waived....or traded for a 7th?.....

    Not much to live up to, eh?

    @harry-buffalo said:

    Thats not what I mean. What I am getting at is every fucking time one of Brady's back ups become available via trade of waivers, everyone loses their shit. A QB who learned under Brady!!! ...... But don't proclaim him a franchise QB just because of where he came from and what he did in the 2 games he played this season.

    Who is saying that JG is great "because he learned under Brady?".....dont see one single comment ...anywhere.... saying that...

    Assuming?....or do you actually have an example....

    @harry-buffalo said:

    I would say everytime. I get that people liked Jimmy during the draft, hell I liked him too. But its always seems like the media's mission to help NE inflate any potential trade value their backup QBs have.

    So...the media inflated the trade value of these guys...???

    Hoyer was so inflated, that he was waived...then sat for 3 months before getting picked up.....

    Mallett was inflated off the charts, to the point that he was traded for a 7th round pick, then waived......

    Cassel was inflated by the media??....or by New England?.....who franchised him.....then traded him, with an All Pro LB for a 2nd....

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    I'd take any of the QBs in this draft for four years over one year of JG.

    Even trash bag Chad Kelly.

    TCPO went from "Garroppollo is worth no later than a 2nd (maybe it was 3rd) to "I'd take any of the QBs in this draft over him." What gives?

    @wargograw said:

    TCPO went from "Garroppollo is worth no later than a 2nd (maybe it was 3rd) to "I'd take any of the QBs in this draft over him." What gives?

    I meant I'd take any of the QBs in the draft over trading a first for JG.

    You don't trade a first round pick for an expiring contract.

  • @harry-buffalo said:

    Every fucking one was touted as the next coming of Christ but they all never lived up to the bill.

    Really?.....touted as the next coming of Christ?.....Cassel Mallet Hoyer???....by who?

    How does one live up to the bill of getting waived....or traded for a 7th?.....

    Not much to live up to, eh?

    @harry-buffalo said:

    Thats not what I mean. What I am getting at is every fucking time one of Brady's back ups become available via trade of waivers, everyone loses their shit. A QB who learned under Brady!!! ...... But don't proclaim him a franchise QB just because of where he came from and what he did in the 2 games he played this season.

    Who is saying that JG is great "because he learned under Brady?".....dont see one single comment ...anywhere.... saying that...

    Assuming?....or do you actually have an example....

    @harry-buffalo said:

    I would say everytime. I get that people liked Jimmy during the draft, hell I liked him too. But its always seems like the media's mission to help NE inflate any potential trade value their backup QBs have.

    So...the media inflated the trade value of these guys...???

    Hoyer was so inflated, that he was waived...then sat for 3 months before getting picked up.....

    Mallett was inflated off the charts, to the point that he was traded for a 7th round pick, then waived......

    Cassel was inflated by the media??....or by New England?.....who franchised him.....then traded him, with an All Pro LB for a 2nd....

    @mudfly said:

    Really?.....touted as the next coming of Christ?.....Cassel Mallet Hoyer???....by who?

    How does one live up to the bill of getting waived....or traded for a 7th?.....

    Not much to live up to, eh?

    Who is saying that JG is great "because he learned under Brady?".....dont see one single comment ...anywhere.... saying that...

    Assuming?....or do you actually have an example....

    So...the media inflated the trade value of these guys...???

    Hoyer was so inflated, that he was waived...then sat for 3 months before getting picked up.....

    Mallett was inflated off the charts, to the point that he was traded for a 7th round pick, then waived......

    Cassel was inflated by the media??....or by New England?.....who franchised him.....then traded him, with an All Pro LB for a 2nd....

    OK, Harry was being a little hyperbolic. What was the last we heard (current radio silence)? We want a first and a fourth? Compared to a seventh? Just Lombardi beating the drums for his pal Bill? About as inflated as it gets Mud. If the Patriots can get that for Jimmy- more power to 'em. I hope and pray it's not the Browns who are going to be that dumb.

    Hey, I'm on board for Jimmy for a 7th.

  • @mudfly said:

    Really?.....touted as the next coming of Christ?.....Cassel Mallet Hoyer???....by who?

    How does one live up to the bill of getting waived....or traded for a 7th?.....

    Not much to live up to, eh?

    Who is saying that JG is great "because he learned under Brady?".....dont see one single comment ...anywhere.... saying that...

    Assuming?....or do you actually have an example....

    So...the media inflated the trade value of these guys...???

    Hoyer was so inflated, that he was waived...then sat for 3 months before getting picked up.....

    Mallett was inflated off the charts, to the point that he was traded for a 7th round pick, then waived......

    Cassel was inflated by the media??....or by New England?.....who franchised him.....then traded him, with an All Pro LB for a 2nd....

    OK, Harry was being a little hyperbolic. What was the last we heard (current radio silence)? We want a first and a fourth? Compared to a seventh? Just Lombardi beating the drums for his pal Bill? About as inflated as it gets Mud. If the Patriots can get that for Jimmy- more power to 'em. I hope and pray it's not the Browns who are going to be that dumb.

    Hey, I'm on board for Jimmy for a 7th.

    @hoorta said:

    What was the last we heard (current radio silence)?

    Not his strongest track, but I like the original...

  • @hoorta said:

    What was the last we heard (current radio silence)?

    Not his strongest track, but I like the original...

    @tour2ma said:

    Not his strongest track, but I like the original...

    Pretty fucking gay.