Skip to content

Jonathan Paul Manziel

The Browns Board
16.0k 396 570.2k 1
  • @the-gipper said:

    He was talking about the real NFL league.

    @texasag1969 said:

    He was talking about the real NFL league.

    So who's the bigger risk, Manziel or Gordon?

  • @texasag1969 said:

    He was talking about the real NFL league.

    So who's the bigger risk, Manziel or Gordon?

    @hoorta said:

    So who's the bigger risk, Manziel or Gordon?

    I think they are both equally high risk at this point, but expectations for Gordon out of the gate would be much higher as a starter rather than Manziel as a backup.

  • @texasag1969 said:

    He was talking about the real NFL league.

    So who's the bigger risk, Manziel or Gordon?

    @hoorta said:

    So who's the bigger risk, Manziel or Gordon?

    The one with the less talent. Guess who. There IS a reason they have not yet released Gordon. And there was a reason they did release JMZ

  • @hoorta said:

    So who's the bigger risk, Manziel or Gordon?

    The one with the less talent. Guess who. There IS a reason they have not yet released Gordon. And there was a reason they did release JMZ

    @the-gipper said:

    The one with the less talent. Guess who. There IS a reason they have not yet released Gordon. And there was a reason they did release JMZ

    I think there is a lot of truth to that. Not to mention. For as much of a dipshit Gordon is, he's not a distraction to the team or an embarassment to the organization like TMZ Johnny fuckhead.

  • Ian Rappaport on NFL Total Access tonight reports there will be several teams interested in him as a backup.

    @texasag1969 said:

    Ian Rappaport on NFL Total Access tonight reports there will be several teams interested in him as a backup.

    Because that has worked out so well twice now...

    @texasag1969 said:

    I think they are both equally high risk at this point, but expectations for Gordon out of the gate would be much higher as a starter rather than Manziel as a backup.

    OMFG... You, sir, need another rehab stint...

  • @hoorta said:

    So who's the bigger risk, Manziel or Gordon?

    The one with the less talent. Guess who. There IS a reason they have not yet released Gordon. And there was a reason they did release JMZ

    @the-gipper said:

    The one with the less talent. Guess who. There IS a reason they have not yet released Gordon. And there was a reason they did release JMZ

    And that reason is nothing more than it costs them nothing more than dealing with his updates in life and media questions.
  • @texasag1969 said:

    Ian Rappaport on NFL Total Access tonight reports there will be several teams interested in him as a backup.

    Because that has worked out so well twice now...

    @texasag1969 said:

    I think they are both equally high risk at this point, but expectations for Gordon out of the gate would be much higher as a starter rather than Manziel as a backup.

    OMFG... You, sir, need another rehab stint...

    @tour2ma said:

    Because that has worked out so well twice now...

    OMFG... You, sir, need another rehab stint...

  • Johnny on the field wasn't terrible overall. Some learning curves, but we've seen much worse.

    Johnny off the field was a complete and utter disaster.

    If the latter can be fixed, the former can carve out a niche somewhere doing something...even if it is holding the clipboard.

  • He would be better off going to the CFL.

  • @the-gipper said:

    The one with the less talent. Guess who. There IS a reason they have not yet released Gordon. And there was a reason they did release JMZ

    And that reason is nothing more than it costs them nothing more than dealing with his updates in life and media questions.

    @choco said:

    And that reason is nothing more than it costs them nothing more than dealing with his updates in life and media questions.

    Right. It costs them nothing but what you say. And it wouldn't even cost them that if they let him go. So...there is a reason they don't let him go.....because they may still want him.

  • Johnny on the field wasn't terrible overall. Some learning curves, but we've seen much worse.

    Johnny off the field was a complete and utter disaster.

    If the latter can be fixed, the former can carve out a niche somewhere doing something...even if it is holding the clipboard.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Johnny on the field wasn't terrible overall. Some learning curves, but we've seen much worse.

    Johnny off the field was a complete and utter disaster.

    If the latter can be fixed, the former can carve out a niche somewhere doing something...even if it is holding the clipboard.

    Johnny lacks the mental makeup to be an "NFL" player let alone , be an NFL QB.

  • Johnny on the field wasn't terrible overall. Some learning curves, but we've seen much worse.

    Johnny off the field was a complete and utter disaster.

    If the latter can be fixed, the former can carve out a niche somewhere doing something...even if it is holding the clipboard.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Johnny on the field wasn't terrible overall. Some learning curves, but we've seen much worse.

    Then we were watching two very different games.

  • Johnny on the field wasn't terrible overall. Some learning curves, but we've seen much worse.

    Johnny off the field was a complete and utter disaster.

    If the latter can be fixed, the former can carve out a niche somewhere doing something...even if it is holding the clipboard.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Johnny on the field wasn't terrible overall. Some learning curves, but we've seen much worse.

    Johnny off the field was a complete and utter disaster.

    If the latter can be fixed, the former can carve out a niche somewhere doing something...even if it is holding the clipboard.

    We have seen much worse.....which is pretty sad.

  • Hasn't he lost a bunch of weight and gained a bunch of new tats?

    No way any NFL team will give him a chance, he'd have to start in Canada first.

    2 years ago I said he would be Johnny Canada and someone (bleacher report blog guy?) said I was an idiot and I had no idea what I was talking about.

  • Hasn't he lost a bunch of weight and gained a bunch of new tats?

    No way any NFL team will give him a chance, he'd have to start in Canada first.

    2 years ago I said he would be Johnny Canada and someone (bleacher report blog guy?) said I was an idiot and I had no idea what I was talking about.

    @bbedward said:

    Hasn't he lost a bunch of weight and gained a bunch of new tats?

    No way any NFL team will give him a chance, he'd have to start in Canada first.

    2 years ago I said he would be Johnny Canada and someone (bleacher report blog guy?) said I was an idiot and I had no idea what I was talking about.

    With as bad as the QB play is in the league, I wouldn't be surprised to see some team give him a shot in camp.

  • @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Johnny on the field wasn't terrible overall. Some learning curves, but we've seen much worse.

    Then we were watching two very different games.

    @tiamat63 said:

    Then we were watching two very different games.

    Or you're just incapable of being objective.

    If you think Manziel was the worst QB we've had on the field over the last 15 years...you're extremely mistaken. I wouldn't even put him top ten worst.

  • @tiamat63 said:

    Then we were watching two very different games.

    Or you're just incapable of being objective.

    If you think Manziel was the worst QB we've had on the field over the last 15 years...you're extremely mistaken. I wouldn't even put him top ten worst.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Or you're just incapable of being objective.

    If you think Manziel was the worst QB we've had on the field over the last 15 years...you're extremely mistaken. I wouldn't even put him top ten worst.

    Ok...just for fun...who would be the top 10 worst? I'd think Ken Dorsey has to be on that list. Spergeon Wynn as well.

  • @tiamat63 said:

    Then we were watching two very different games.

    Or you're just incapable of being objective.

    If you think Manziel was the worst QB we've had on the field over the last 15 years...you're extremely mistaken. I wouldn't even put him top ten worst.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    Or you're just incapable of being objective.

    If you think Manziel was the worst QB we've had on the field over the last 15 years...you're extremely mistaken. I wouldn't even put him top ten worst.

    Give me the 10 before him. Johnny had trouble with the playbook and spitting out call strings. That alone puts him up there.

  • Bill Belicheck, see what you have done...Pure Posturing at it's finest 🙂(or is that impersonating a billy)

  • @tiamat63 said:

    Then we were watching two very different games.

    Or you're just incapable of being objective.

    If you think Manziel was the worst QB we've had on the field over the last 15 years...you're extremely mistaken. I wouldn't even put him top ten worst.

    @tim-couch-pulls-out said:

    If you think Manziel was the worst QB we've had on the field over the last 15 years...you're extremely mistaken. I wouldn't even put him top ten worst.

    I'd like to see that list.