Youtube Scouting Report Series
-
how can you guys not like what you see on jabrils tape? This kid is the real deal. I'm happy with either hooker, that other guy, or Peppers at 12.
how can you guys not like what you see on jabrils tape? This kid is the real deal. I'm happy with either hooker, that other guy, or Peppers at 12.
Because I'm not Stevie Wonder and don't buy into hype without substance.
-
Clev, it takes full game tapes.Not just Highlight reels. Collins was a freelancer at Pats. Peppers was pretty much aloud to Rover,freelance,guesser you name it. He's a torpedo tackler with his head usually down missing wrap. Don't see him as a LB in this league. Pro scouts won't count on just highlight reels. Farmer may have
yeah i've looked at some of his "non highlight" tape and i still like it. He must be a very smart kid too cause he played what 4 different positions?
He must be a very smart kid too cause he played what 4 different positions?
If you watched his combine stuff? He loves playing the game. no doubt a fun full of Convenience kid. He loves some of he? nothing wrong with that but is he a "team"mate or a TO? I would start with Harbaugh than look deeper..(no way at #12, just far better talent)
Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends Team Brotherhood-"It's not about You,Me or I. It's about building We"..Hue Jackson -
Clev, it takes full game tapes.Not just Highlight reels. Collins was a freelancer at Pats. Peppers was pretty much aloud to Rover,freelance,guesser you name it. He's a torpedo tackler with his head usually down missing wrap. Don't see him as a LB in this league. Pro scouts won't count on just highlight reels. Farmer may have
yeah i've looked at some of his "non highlight" tape and i still like it. He must be a very smart kid too cause he played what 4 different positions?
yeah i've looked at some of his "non highlight" tape and i still like it. He must be a very smart kid too cause he played what 4 different positions?
15 positions
Harbaugh also said the top two college players he's coached in terms of football knowledge were Peppers and Andrew Luck
-
He must be a very smart kid too cause he played what 4 different positions?
If you watched his combine stuff? He loves playing the game. no doubt a fun full of Convenience kid. He loves some of he? nothing wrong with that but is he a "team"mate or a TO? I would start with Harbaugh than look deeper..(no way at #12, just far better talent)
If you watched his combine stuff? He loves playing the game. no doubt a fun full of Convenience kid. He loves some of he? nothing wrong with that but is he a "team"mate or a TO? I would start with Harbaugh than look deeper..(no way at #12, just far better talent)
In what world do you get the indication he's a TO? They guy played literally every position he was asked so that he could help the team win, at the expense of his draft stock.
-
how can you guys not like what you see on jabrils tape? This kid is the real deal. I'm happy with either hooker, that other guy, or Peppers at 12.
Because I'm not Stevie Wonder and don't buy into hype without substance.
Because I'm not Stevie Wonder and don't buy into hype without substance.
You just can't recognize substance then? Got it.
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
how can you guys not like what you see on jabrils tape? This kid is the real deal. I'm happy with either hooker, that other guy, or Peppers at 12.
Clev, it takes full game tapes.Not just Highlight reels. Collins was a freelancer at Pats. Peppers was pretty much aloud to Rover,freelance,guesser you name it. He's a torpedo tackler with his head usually down missing wrap. Don't see him as a LB in this league. Pro scouts won't count on just highlight reels. Farmer may have
Clev, it takes full game tapes.Not just Highlight reels. Collins was a freelancer at Pats. Peppers was pretty much aloud to Rover,freelance,guesser you name it. He's a torpedo tackler with his head usually down missing wrap. Don't see him as a LB in this league. Pro scouts won't count on just highlight reels. Farmer may have
I've watched every snap he's ever taken in college, plus high school tape. Peppers was not a "freelancer/guesser". He had a defined roll that encompassed a lot of things.
FYI, no one thinks he's going to be an NFL LB.
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
You just can't recognize substance then? Got it.
Your issue is that he's a UM player. Nothing more, nothing less.
I've offered several similar reviews of players that were hype and don't remember hearing so much as a peep from you.
Perhaps it's time to admit your own bias.
Meanwhile I'm more than objective regarding Buckeye players.
-
Oh oh oh. That's my favorite.
"You're bias and your opinion doesn't count because you're a Michigan fan. But even though I'm an OSU fan I'm perfectly objective."
Right. Silly me for forgetting.
Maybe because I either a) agree with you or
don't know enough about the player. While in this case I disagree and do know a fair amount about the player. Oh, wait, hold on. I know the next one...."I've actually followed [insert player] just as much as you have. Probably even know more about him. I'm actually more knowledgeable than paid draft analysts. Especially Kiper. One time in [insert year] he said [insert player] would be [good / bad]. What an idiot! I clearly always thought the opposite."
That save us some time?
-
Not bad, actually.
I'll just randomly rehash this conversation from time to time for the next couple years. Helps with perspective.
....unless WW3 starts then I reserve the right to fall off the grid.
-
Good. We disagree on Peppers and neither can claim bias. (though that's still open with other OSU fans on here....)
I think Hooker is a beast and you probably like Jake Butt or something
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
Clev, it takes full game tapes.Not just Highlight reels. Collins was a freelancer at Pats. Peppers was pretty much aloud to Rover,freelance,guesser you name it. He's a torpedo tackler with his head usually down missing wrap. Don't see him as a LB in this league. Pro scouts won't count on just highlight reels. Farmer may have
I've watched every snap he's ever taken in college, plus high school tape. Peppers was not a "freelancer/guesser". He had a defined roll that encompassed a lot of things.
FYI, no one thinks he's going to be an NFL LB.
FYI, no one thinks he's going to be an NFL LB.
No that's me. If we were guaranteed the same Jake Butt before injury I'd take Jake over Peppers just to finish off our OL moves..As for Pep, Do you see him more of a FS or S? imo FS. I also see Pep as having to earn his rookie strips with a lot of tugging penalties.
Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends Team Brotherhood-"It's not about You,Me or I. It's about building We"..Hue Jackson -
Good. We disagree on Peppers and neither can claim bias. (though that's still open with other OSU fans on here....)
I think Hooker is a beast and you probably like Jake Butt or something
Good. We disagree on Peppers and neither can claim bias. (though that's still open with other OSU fans on here....)
I think Hooker is a beast and you probably like Jake Butt or something
Probably.
-
I remember looking at stats from rookie TE's the last 18 years and I'm pretty sure shockey and Gronk are the only two that eclipsed 7-800 yards.
In short - don't expect some offensive changing impact from a rookie at that spot.
It's another reason in my hesitancy of taking OJ that high. There's good value to be had mid rounds where you can find similar production.
FWIW my take on Peppers is that he's a very good player... maybe even very good at multiple positions, in multiple roles, but... is he great at any of them? I mean #12 overall great? That I do not see except possibly, and I've said this before, at running back, a position I will not spend a 12 upon. Otherwise, at his other positions, he's simply not among the "elites" of this draft class which, excepting "Edge", are classes of one or none.
As for Harbaugh's comment... his football smarts may stand out at the college level, but as with all player attributes any gap will be narrowed from August, '17 on. Besides "football smart" is a little like a roommate saying "she (or he) has a great personality."
It's another reason in my hesitancy of taking OJ that high. There's good value to be had mid rounds where you can find similar production.
Even if blocking efficiency is part of the "production" equation?
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
FWIW my take on Peppers is that he's a very good player... maybe even very good at multiple positions, in multiple roles, but... is he great at any of them? I mean #12 overall great? That I do not see except possibly, and I've said this before, at running back, a position I will not spend a 12 upon. Otherwise, at his other positions, he's simply not among the "elites" of this draft class which, excepting "Edge", are classes of one or none.
As for Harbaugh's comment... his football smarts may stand out at the college level, but as with all player attributes any gap will be narrowed from August, '17 on. Besides "football smart" is a little like a roommate saying "she (or he) has a great personality."
It's another reason in my hesitancy of taking OJ that high. There's good value to be had mid rounds where you can find similar production.
Even if blocking efficiency is part of the "production" equation?
FWIW my take on Peppers is that he's a very good player... maybe even very good at multiple positions, in multiple roles, but... is he great at any of them? I mean #12 overall great? That I do not see except possibly, and I've said this before, at running back, a position I will not spend a 12 upon. Otherwise, at his other positions, he's simply not among the "elites" of this draft class which, excepting "Edge", are classes of one or none.
Exactly.....as a straight up safety, he would not be a first or rank with these other guys......it's his return skills and versatility that push him up there.....
A bit like Adore Jackson(one of my faves).....but the difference is that I believe Jackson to be a second round CB, with or without those return and offensive skills.....ie: he's a better CB than Peppers is S
-
FWIW my take on Peppers is that he's a very good player... maybe even very good at multiple positions, in multiple roles, but... is he great at any of them? I mean #12 overall great? That I do not see except possibly, and I've said this before, at running back, a position I will not spend a 12 upon. Otherwise, at his other positions, he's simply not among the "elites" of this draft class which, excepting "Edge", are classes of one or none.
Exactly.....as a straight up safety, he would not be a first or rank with these other guys......it's his return skills and versatility that push him up there.....
A bit like Adore Jackson(one of my faves).....but the difference is that I believe Jackson to be a second round CB, with or without those return and offensive skills.....ie: he's a better CB than Peppers is S
Exactly.....as a straight up safety, he would not be a first or rank with these other guys......it's his return skills and versatility that push him up there.....
Good build... plus there are other "intangibles" that add to Peppers' value, e.g., the "locker-room presence", "joy of the game" that Woody's mentioned. But... the top half of Round One is a very steep climb from spot to spot. So I do not see these enhancements pushing him into, let alone up, that range.
The bottom half of the first? Not as steep and acceleratingly ever-shallowing the lower you go, so the "add-ons" impact increases.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Exactly.....as a straight up safety, he would not be a first or rank with these other guys......it's his return skills and versatility that push him up there.....
Good build... plus there are other "intangibles" that add to Peppers' value, e.g., the "locker-room presence", "joy of the game" that Woody's mentioned. But... the top half of Round One is a very steep climb from spot to spot. So I do not see these enhancements pushing him into, let alone up, that range.
The bottom half of the first? Not as steep and acceleratingly ever-shallowing the lower you go, so the "add-ons" impact increases.
Good build... plus there are other "intangibles" that add to Peppers' value, e.g., the "locker-room presence", "joy of the game" that Woody's mentioned. But... the top half of Round One is a very steep climb from spot to spot. So I do not see these enhancements pushing him into, let alone up, that range.
The bottom half of the first? Not as steep and acceleratingly ever-shallowing the lower you go, so the "add-ons" impact increases.
Agreed....and in the end, its which tangibles AND intangibles each team favors....
One thing I see about Peppers is they're not even sure where he should play....LB?...SS?....etc.....and that is troubling to me, when we are talking 1st round......the one thing I want is a someone who is VERY good at their position.....otherwise they are a "project" and I prefer my projects to come later in the draft.....no matter what their measurables or intangibles suggest....
-
FWIW my take on Peppers is that he's a very good player... maybe even very good at multiple positions, in multiple roles, but... is he great at any of them? I mean #12 overall great? That I do not see except possibly, and I've said this before, at running back, a position I will not spend a 12 upon. Otherwise, at his other positions, he's simply not among the "elites" of this draft class which, excepting "Edge", are classes of one or none.
As for Harbaugh's comment... his football smarts may stand out at the college level, but as with all player attributes any gap will be narrowed from August, '17 on. Besides "football smart" is a little like a roommate saying "she (or he) has a great personality."
It's another reason in my hesitancy of taking OJ that high. There's good value to be had mid rounds where you can find similar production.
Even if blocking efficiency is part of the "production" equation?
FWIW my take on Peppers is that he's a very good player... maybe even very good at multiple positions, in multiple roles, but... is he great at any of them? I mean #12 overall great? That I do not see except possibly, and I've said this before, at running back, a position I will not spend a 12 upon. Otherwise, at his other positions, he's simply not among the "elites" of this draft class which, excepting "Edge", are classes of one or none.
As for Harbaugh's comment... his football smarts may stand out at the college level, but as with all player attributes any gap will be narrowed from August, '17 on. Besides "football smart" is a little like a roommate saying "she (or he) has a great personality."
Even if blocking efficiency is part of the "production" equation?
Good point. OJ lead in that category, didn't he?
-
FYI, no one thinks he's going to be an NFL LB.
No that's me. If we were guaranteed the same Jake Butt before injury I'd take Jake over Peppers just to finish off our OL moves..As for Pep, Do you see him more of a FS or S? imo FS. I also see Pep as having to earn his rookie strips with a lot of tugging penalties.
No that's me. If we were guaranteed the same Jake Butt before injury I'd take Jake over Peppers just to finish off our OL moves..As for Pep, Do you see him more of a FS or S? imo FS. I also see Pep as having to earn his rookie strips with a lot of tugging penalties.
From what I've read on Butt's injury, he's ahead of schedule. Should be good to go before the season.
Pepper's college position was more of a SS. That would utilize his work in the box more. Setting edge, blitzing, etc. I definitely think he could be a FS too.
-
No that's me. If we were guaranteed the same Jake Butt before injury I'd take Jake over Peppers just to finish off our OL moves..As for Pep, Do you see him more of a FS or S? imo FS. I also see Pep as having to earn his rookie strips with a lot of tugging penalties.
From what I've read on Butt's injury, he's ahead of schedule. Should be good to go before the season.
Pepper's college position was more of a SS. That would utilize his work in the box more. Setting edge, blitzing, etc. I definitely think he could be a FS too.
From what I've read on Butt's injury, he's ahead of schedule. Should be good to go before the season.
Good News..Opens the door away from maybe going Howard at 12 to another needed position maybe. I don't see that much TE performance between the two. Except pick 12 verse top of 3rd at 65. most got Butt rated in the 80's. If no Howard at 12 I'd pull the trigger on Butt. our next pick from 65 is 108. No Butt 4 us
-
From what I've read on Butt's injury, he's ahead of schedule. Should be good to go before the season.
Good News..Opens the door away from maybe going Howard at 12 to another needed position maybe. I don't see that much TE performance between the two. Except pick 12 verse top of 3rd at 65. most got Butt rated in the 80's. If no Howard at 12 I'd pull the trigger on Butt. our next pick from 65 is 108. No Butt 4 us
Good News..Opens the door away from maybe going Howard at 12 to another needed position maybe. I don't see that much TE performance between the two. Except pick 12 verse top of 3rd at 65. most got Butt rated in the 80's. If no Howard at 12 I'd pull the trigger on Butt. our next pick from 65 is 108. No Butt 4 us
Not sure Butt will last that long. It depends on what they hear regarding his injury.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login