Skip to content

On Election Eve the Repub Congressional Candidate for Montana's Only House Seat "BodySlams" Reporter

Political Discussion
102 13 1.6k
  • Oh, and i also pointed out that when trump protesters were gettin sucker punched as thry were being escorted out of the rally.....y'all thought it was good stuff. So pls dont coatse with me and straw man me. I never condoned what went on in berkley. I just raise my hands and gave up. The civil war was long in the making, by both sides

  • wait... i thought liberals were all about "yeah, you have freedom of speech, but you

    have to accept consequences"

    odd how they think that always goes for only the republican/conservative side.

    @calfoxwc said:

    wait... i thought liberals were all about "yeah, you have freedom of speech, but you

    have to accept consequences"

    There is no misinterpretation of this ^^^.

    The old talk shit, get hit mantra. I know you took a certain satisfaction that he stuck it to liberal reporter. For the life of me I dont understand why you try to skirt around that.

    And no, I'm not advocating violence. Especially against the elderly. I'm saying by your example woody would be within his right to act on that (he wouldn't) and that's just not.right.

    relax, baby girl, I got yo back should the mean Bird try. Only if we can use that golden buckeye card at dennys after.

  • @calfoxwc said:

    wait... i thought liberals were all about "yeah, you have freedom of speech, but you

    have to accept consequences"

    There is no misinterpretation of this ^^^.

    The old talk shit, get hit mantra. I know you took a certain satisfaction that he stuck it to liberal reporter. For the life of me I dont understand why you try to skirt around that.

    And no, I'm not advocating violence. Especially against the elderly. I'm saying by your example woody would be within his right to act on that (he wouldn't) and that's just not.right.

    relax, baby girl, I got yo back should the mean Bird try. Only if we can use that golden buckeye card at dennys after.

    @tiamat63 said:

    Only if we can use that golden buckeye card at dennys after.

    Omglmfao, this wins the day

  • @calfoxwc said:

    wait... i thought liberals were all about "yeah, you have freedom of speech, but you

    have to accept consequences"

    There is no misinterpretation of this ^^^.

    The old talk shit, get hit mantra. I know you took a certain satisfaction that he stuck it to liberal reporter. For the life of me I dont understand why you try to skirt around that.

    And no, I'm not advocating violence. Especially against the elderly. I'm saying by your example woody would be within his right to act on that (he wouldn't) and that's just not.right.

    relax, baby girl, I got yo back should the mean Bird try. Only if we can use that golden buckeye card at dennys after.

    @tiamat63 said:

    There is no misinterpretation of this ^^^.

    The old talk shit, get hit mantra. I know you took a certain satisfaction that he stuck it to liberal reporter. For the life of me I dont understand why you try to skirt around that.

    But the kid didnt talk shit, he asked questions as reporters tend to do. Neither did those kids with the dem congressman. Both young men should have utterly flattened those old guys for daring to lay hands on them. I couldnt beleive the dem guy grabbing the kid around the shoulder like his last name was sandusky and this kid wasnt walking into the showers with him like he was told to.

    The nerve of these old cunts. Maybe the knockout game needs a comeback.....

  • Oh, and i also pointed out that when trump protesters were gettin sucker punched as thry were being escorted out of the rally.....y'all thought it was good stuff. So pls dont coatse with me and straw man me. I never condoned what went on in berkley. I just raise my hands and gave up. The civil war was long in the making, by both sides

    @clevfan4life said:

    Oh, and i also pointed out that when trump protesters were gettin sucker punched as thry were being escorted out of the rally.....y'all thought it was good stuff. So pls dont coatse with me and straw man me. I never condoned what went on in berkley. I just raise my hands and gave up. The civil war was long in the making, by both sides

    I condemned it and said it was wrong. In the incident I remember a black man was being escorted out of a Trump rally (deservedly for trying to disrupt it) when an old man came over and sucker punched him. I posted the black protestor was not resisting being escorted out and there was no reason for him to be attacked.

  • @calfoxwc said:

    wait... i thought liberals were all about "yeah, you have freedom of speech, but you

    have to accept consequences"

    There is no misinterpretation of this ^^^.

    The old talk shit, get hit mantra. I know you took a certain satisfaction that he stuck it to liberal reporter. For the life of me I dont understand why you try to skirt around that.

    And no, I'm not advocating violence. Especially against the elderly. I'm saying by your example woody would be within his right to act on that (he wouldn't) and that's just not.right.

    relax, baby girl, I got yo back should the mean Bird try. Only if we can use that golden buckeye card at dennys after.

    @tiamat63 said:

    There is no misinterpretation of this ^^^.

    The old talk shit, get hit mantra. I know you took a certain satisfaction that he stuck it to liberal reporter. For the life of me I dont understand why you try to skirt around that.

    And no, I'm not advocating violence. Especially against the elderly. I'm saying by your example woody would be within his right to act on that (he wouldn't) and that's just not.right.

    relax, baby girl, I got yo back should the mean Bird try. Only if we can use that golden buckeye card at dennys after.

    of course there is misrepresentation. I don't care about whoever this guy is, I don't know if the reporter was physically

    intimidating him, or simply asking a question, and this politician grabbed him and threw him down...

    your liberal hypocrisy is on display, that is all. You libs pick and choose depending on what sissy mood you are feeling in

    at the time.

    good for you to backtrack on your trying to start some kind of serious problem. The point is, you may rail against this nut

    republican who bodyslammed some reporter, whatever the whole story is... but if higgardly slapped a reporter,

    your tune would be opposite because of the politics.

    Neither you nor woody ever want to try to jack my jaw - I'm old school. I will walk away from a fight before it happens, but

    when it's on, it's going to be over fast, and I'm the guy who walks away fine. So, Sissy Tiasmsies, whether or not you live up

    to your online hostility, it is no problem to me. I'm just one guy who notices how you operate.

  • @tiamat63 said:

    There is no misinterpretation of this ^^^.

    The old talk shit, get hit mantra. I know you took a certain satisfaction that he stuck it to liberal reporter. For the life of me I dont understand why you try to skirt around that.

    But the kid didnt talk shit, he asked questions as reporters tend to do. Neither did those kids with the dem congressman. Both young men should have utterly flattened those old guys for daring to lay hands on them. I couldnt beleive the dem guy grabbing the kid around the shoulder like his last name was sandusky and this kid wasnt walking into the showers with him like he was told to.

    The nerve of these old cunts. Maybe the knockout game needs a comeback.....

    @clevfan4life said:

    But the kid didnt talk shit, he asked questions as reporters tend to do. Neither did those kids with the dem congressman. Both young men should have utterly flattened those old guys for daring to lay hands on them. I couldnt beleive the dem guy grabbing the kid around the shoulder like his last name was sandusky and this kid wasnt walking into the showers with him like he was told to.

    The nerve of these old cunts. Maybe the knockout game needs a comeback.....

    That's my point, "pressing questions" now are an excuse to assail anyone bold enough to ask them because it's somehow offensive to a degree allowing that response.

    Or at least, to some here it is cause enough.

  • @clevfan4life said:

    Oh, and i also pointed out that when trump protesters were gettin sucker punched as thry were being escorted out of the rally.....y'all thought it was good stuff. So pls dont coatse with me and straw man me. I never condoned what went on in berkley. I just raise my hands and gave up. The civil war was long in the making, by both sides

    I condemned it and said it was wrong. In the incident I remember a black man was being escorted out of a Trump rally (deservedly for trying to disrupt it) when an old man came over and sucker punched him. I posted the black protestor was not resisting being escorted out and there was no reason for him to be attacked.

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    I condemned it and said it was wrong. In the incident I remember a black man was being escorted out of a Trump rally (deservedly for trying to disrupt it) when an old man came over and sucker punched him. I posted the black protestor was not resisting being escorted out and there was no reason for him to be attacked.

    Perhaps u did, perhaps not. Prrhaps u haedged ur condemnation, who knows. Like it or not ur now part of "you people" because too many times you tow the line instead of standing on common principle. Like everyone here was appalled at the hillary bullshit that got leaked, but the insistent defense against ever mounting evidence that trump has hos own shit is pathetic. Psul ryan has the right idea, we'll ser where these investigations go......and for that "you people" labrl him a rino

  • there is no mounting evidence, just mounting hostility at losing the election and

    the undoing of Obamao's marxist attempts at "transforming" our country.

    sore losers. dang.

  • @tiamat63 said:

    There is no misinterpretation of this ^^^.

    The old talk shit, get hit mantra. I know you took a certain satisfaction that he stuck it to liberal reporter. For the life of me I dont understand why you try to skirt around that.

    And no, I'm not advocating violence. Especially against the elderly. I'm saying by your example woody would be within his right to act on that (he wouldn't) and that's just not.right.

    relax, baby girl, I got yo back should the mean Bird try. Only if we can use that golden buckeye card at dennys after.

    of course there is misrepresentation. I don't care about whoever this guy is, I don't know if the reporter was physically

    intimidating him, or simply asking a question, and this politician grabbed him and threw him down...

    your liberal hypocrisy is on display, that is all. You libs pick and choose depending on what sissy mood you are feeling in

    at the time.

    good for you to backtrack on your trying to start some kind of serious problem. The point is, you may rail against this nut

    republican who bodyslammed some reporter, whatever the whole story is... but if higgardly slapped a reporter,

    your tune would be opposite because of the politics.

    Neither you nor woody ever want to try to jack my jaw - I'm old school. I will walk away from a fight before it happens, but

    when it's on, it's going to be over fast, and I'm the guy who walks away fine. So, Sissy Tiasmsies, whether or not you live up

    to your online hostility, it is no problem to me. I'm just one guy who notices how you operate.

    @calfoxwc said:

    of course there is misrepresentation. I don't care about whoever this guy is, I don't know if the reporter was physically

    intimidating him, or simply asking a question, and this politician grabbed him and threw him down...

    e.

    If u dont know something u could always look it up, and see thst the fox news crew backs up the kids story. I know i know, asking that of u is like asking an ill kept clunker to go cross country. But give it the ole college try every now and then eh?

  • there is no mounting evidence, just mounting hostility at losing the election and

    the undoing of Obamao's marxist attempts at "transforming" our country.

    sore losers. dang.

    @calfoxwc said:

    there is no mounting evidence

    Theres so little mounting evidence ur so right

  • don't care. if the guy is guilty of assault, he gets charged and can end up in the slammer.

    Not much of a political subject to me.

  • @tiamat63 said:

    There is no misinterpretation of this ^^^.

    The old talk shit, get hit mantra. I know you took a certain satisfaction that he stuck it to liberal reporter. For the life of me I dont understand why you try to skirt around that.

    And no, I'm not advocating violence. Especially against the elderly. I'm saying by your example woody would be within his right to act on that (he wouldn't) and that's just not.right.

    relax, baby girl, I got yo back should the mean Bird try. Only if we can use that golden buckeye card at dennys after.

    of course there is misrepresentation. I don't care about whoever this guy is, I don't know if the reporter was physically

    intimidating him, or simply asking a question, and this politician grabbed him and threw him down...

    your liberal hypocrisy is on display, that is all. You libs pick and choose depending on what sissy mood you are feeling in

    at the time.

    good for you to backtrack on your trying to start some kind of serious problem. The point is, you may rail against this nut

    republican who bodyslammed some reporter, whatever the whole story is... but if higgardly slapped a reporter,

    your tune would be opposite because of the politics.

    Neither you nor woody ever want to try to jack my jaw - I'm old school. I will walk away from a fight before it happens, but

    when it's on, it's going to be over fast, and I'm the guy who walks away fine. So, Sissy Tiasmsies, whether or not you live up

    to your online hostility, it is no problem to me. I'm just one guy who notices how you operate.

    @calfoxwc said:

    of course there is misrepresentation. I don't care about whoever this guy is, I don't know if the reporter was physically

    intimidating him, or simply asking a question, and this politician grabbed him and threw him down...

    your liberal hypocrisy is on display, that is all. You libs pick and choose depending on what sissy mood you are feeling in

    at the time.

    good for you to backtrack on your trying to start some kind of serious problem. The point is, you may rail against this nut

    republican who bodyslammed some reporter, whatever the whole story is... but if higgardly slapped a reporter,

    your tune would be opposite because of the politics.

    Neither you nor woody ever want to try to jack my jaw - I'm old school. I will walk away from a fight before it happens, but

    when it's on, it's going to be over fast, and I'm the guy who walks away fine. So, Sissy Tiasmsies, whether or not you live up

    to your online hostility, it is no problem to me. I'm just one guy who notices how you operate.

    If Hilary slapped a reporter Id call for her to dropout of the race and politics In general. She (isn't) would not be fit to lead if you cannot maintain composure.

    Also in our other thread I said I've been registered as unaffiliated since day 1 and never once voted for Obama and on this forum itself in the early days of the race even gave praise to Trump for his stance on TPP and NAFTA. Denouncing Hilary in general.

    Your response was that "I'm still registered as a Dem".

    I'm beginning to believe either you're incapable or unwilling to read. As I've said more than once I would closer identity myself as libertarian or a "socially liberal conservative". In the truest sense of the phrase.

    Has.any of that escaped you or do you only believe there are "Real Americans" and liberals?

  • @oldbrownsfan said:

    I condemned it and said it was wrong. In the incident I remember a black man was being escorted out of a Trump rally (deservedly for trying to disrupt it) when an old man came over and sucker punched him. I posted the black protestor was not resisting being escorted out and there was no reason for him to be attacked.

    Perhaps u did, perhaps not. Prrhaps u haedged ur condemnation, who knows. Like it or not ur now part of "you people" because too many times you tow the line instead of standing on common principle. Like everyone here was appalled at the hillary bullshit that got leaked, but the insistent defense against ever mounting evidence that trump has hos own shit is pathetic. Psul ryan has the right idea, we'll ser where these investigations go......and for that "you people" labrl him a rino

    @clevfan4life said:

    Perhaps u did, perhaps not. Prrhaps u haedged ur condemnation, who knows. Like it or not ur now part of "you people" because too many times you tow the line instead of standing on common principle. Like everyone here was appalled at the hillary bullshit that got leaked, but the insistent defense against ever mounting evidence that trump has hos own shit is pathetic. Psul ryan has the right idea, we'll ser where these investigations go......and for that "you people" labrl him a rino

    No perhaps about it I have been consistent about condemning violence. And Paul Ryan is a RINO and Cal is right there is no mounting evidence of collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign. This investigation has been going on for a year or so and still there in no evidence to support collusion. None.

    Fighting the Politicized, Evidence-Free ‘Collusion with Russia’ Narrative

    Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/447915/trump-russia-collusion-john-brennan-testimony-how-fight-politicized-narrative

  • @clevfan4life said:

    Perhaps u did, perhaps not. Prrhaps u haedged ur condemnation, who knows. Like it or not ur now part of "you people" because too many times you tow the line instead of standing on common principle. Like everyone here was appalled at the hillary bullshit that got leaked, but the insistent defense against ever mounting evidence that trump has hos own shit is pathetic. Psul ryan has the right idea, we'll ser where these investigations go......and for that "you people" labrl him a rino

    No perhaps about it I have been consistent about condemning violence. And Paul Ryan is a RINO and Cal is right there is no mounting evidence of collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign. This investigation has been going on for a year or so and still there in no evidence to support collusion. None.

    Fighting the Politicized, Evidence-Free ‘Collusion with Russia’ Narrative

    Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/447915/trump-russia-collusion-john-brennan-testimony-how-fight-politicized-narrative

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    No perhaps about it I have been consistent about condemning violence. And Paul Ryan is a RINO and Cal is right there is no mounting evidence of collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign. This investigation has been going on for a year or so and still there in no evidence to support collusion. None.

    Exactly as i thought you'd respond. Dudes are taken ng the 5th, which trump himself derided as a clear sign of guilt....but when his guys do it ur all cool. Exactly as predicted

  • Aside from a key witness pleading the 5th.

    Non what so ever.

  • Despite Allegations, No Evidence of Trump–Russia Collusion Found

    Breaking down the allegations that Trump colluded with Russia and the efforts to undermine his presidency


  • I love "evidence free". The cia basically said we know the russians were trying to worm into trumps campaign. Whether they succeeded or not is up in the air....but u.s spies know the russians were trying. Its all circumstantial still, and thats how OJ get off buttttt.....

  • No Evidence of Collusion

    GettyImages-464967120-e1495731320631.jpg
    (Bryan Thomas/Getty Images)

    “We did not include evidence in our report—and I say ‘our,’ that’s NSA, FBI, and CIA, with my office, the director of national intelligence—that had anything, that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians.”

    Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told MSNBC’s Chuck Todd on March 5. In response to Todd’s question about whether such evidence existed, Clapper said, “Not to my knowledge.” When asked under oath before a Senate Judiciary subcommittee on May 8 whether his statement is still accurate, he said, “It is.“

  • GettyImages-477827991.jpg
    (Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

    “There are all kinds of rumors around. There are newspaper stories, but that’s not necessarily evidence.”

    Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), in an interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer on May 18, reaffirming that she had not seen any evidence showing collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

    “No, we have not.”