On Election Eve the Repub Congressional Candidate for Montana's Only House Seat "BodySlams" Reporter
-
there is no mounting evidence, just mounting hostility at losing the election and
the undoing of Obamao's marxist attempts at "transforming" our country.
sore losers. dang.
-
There is no misinterpretation of this ^^^.
The old talk shit, get hit mantra. I know you took a certain satisfaction that he stuck it to liberal reporter. For the life of me I dont understand why you try to skirt around that.
And no, I'm not advocating violence. Especially against the elderly. I'm saying by your example woody would be within his right to act on that (he wouldn't) and that's just not.right.
relax, baby girl, I got yo back should the mean Bird try. Only if we can use that golden buckeye card at dennys after.
of course there is misrepresentation. I don't care about whoever this guy is, I don't know if the reporter was physically
intimidating him, or simply asking a question, and this politician grabbed him and threw him down...
your liberal hypocrisy is on display, that is all. You libs pick and choose depending on what sissy mood you are feeling in
at the time.
good for you to backtrack on your trying to start some kind of serious problem. The point is, you may rail against this nut
republican who bodyslammed some reporter, whatever the whole story is... but if higgardly slapped a reporter,
your tune would be opposite because of the politics.
Neither you nor woody ever want to try to jack my jaw - I'm old school. I will walk away from a fight before it happens, but
when it's on, it's going to be over fast, and I'm the guy who walks away fine. So, Sissy Tiasmsies, whether or not you live up
to your online hostility, it is no problem to me. I'm just one guy who notices how you operate.
of course there is misrepresentation. I don't care about whoever this guy is, I don't know if the reporter was physically
intimidating him, or simply asking a question, and this politician grabbed him and threw him down...
e.
If u dont know something u could always look it up, and see thst the fox news crew backs up the kids story. I know i know, asking that of u is like asking an ill kept clunker to go cross country. But give it the ole college try every now and then eh?
-
there is no mounting evidence, just mounting hostility at losing the election and
the undoing of Obamao's marxist attempts at "transforming" our country.
sore losers. dang.
-
don't care. if the guy is guilty of assault, he gets charged and can end up in the slammer.
Not much of a political subject to me.
-
There is no misinterpretation of this ^^^.
The old talk shit, get hit mantra. I know you took a certain satisfaction that he stuck it to liberal reporter. For the life of me I dont understand why you try to skirt around that.
And no, I'm not advocating violence. Especially against the elderly. I'm saying by your example woody would be within his right to act on that (he wouldn't) and that's just not.right.
relax, baby girl, I got yo back should the mean Bird try. Only if we can use that golden buckeye card at dennys after.
of course there is misrepresentation. I don't care about whoever this guy is, I don't know if the reporter was physically
intimidating him, or simply asking a question, and this politician grabbed him and threw him down...
your liberal hypocrisy is on display, that is all. You libs pick and choose depending on what sissy mood you are feeling in
at the time.
good for you to backtrack on your trying to start some kind of serious problem. The point is, you may rail against this nut
republican who bodyslammed some reporter, whatever the whole story is... but if higgardly slapped a reporter,
your tune would be opposite because of the politics.
Neither you nor woody ever want to try to jack my jaw - I'm old school. I will walk away from a fight before it happens, but
when it's on, it's going to be over fast, and I'm the guy who walks away fine. So, Sissy Tiasmsies, whether or not you live up
to your online hostility, it is no problem to me. I'm just one guy who notices how you operate.
If Hilary slapped a reporter Id call for her to dropout of the race and politics In general. She (isn't) would not be fit to lead if you cannot maintain composure.of course there is misrepresentation. I don't care about whoever this guy is, I don't know if the reporter was physically
intimidating him, or simply asking a question, and this politician grabbed him and threw him down...
your liberal hypocrisy is on display, that is all. You libs pick and choose depending on what sissy mood you are feeling in
at the time.
good for you to backtrack on your trying to start some kind of serious problem. The point is, you may rail against this nut
republican who bodyslammed some reporter, whatever the whole story is... but if higgardly slapped a reporter,
your tune would be opposite because of the politics.
Neither you nor woody ever want to try to jack my jaw - I'm old school. I will walk away from a fight before it happens, but
when it's on, it's going to be over fast, and I'm the guy who walks away fine. So, Sissy Tiasmsies, whether or not you live up
to your online hostility, it is no problem to me. I'm just one guy who notices how you operate.
Also in our other thread I said I've been registered as unaffiliated since day 1 and never once voted for Obama and on this forum itself in the early days of the race even gave praise to Trump for his stance on TPP and NAFTA. Denouncing Hilary in general.
Your response was that "I'm still registered as a Dem".
I'm beginning to believe either you're incapable or unwilling to read. As I've said more than once I would closer identity myself as libertarian or a "socially liberal conservative". In the truest sense of the phrase.
Has.any of that escaped you or do you only believe there are "Real Americans" and liberals?
-
I condemned it and said it was wrong. In the incident I remember a black man was being escorted out of a Trump rally (deservedly for trying to disrupt it) when an old man came over and sucker punched him. I posted the black protestor was not resisting being escorted out and there was no reason for him to be attacked.
Perhaps u did, perhaps not. Prrhaps u haedged ur condemnation, who knows. Like it or not ur now part of "you people" because too many times you tow the line instead of standing on common principle. Like everyone here was appalled at the hillary bullshit that got leaked, but the insistent defense against ever mounting evidence that trump has hos own shit is pathetic. Psul ryan has the right idea, we'll ser where these investigations go......and for that "you people" labrl him a rino
Perhaps u did, perhaps not. Prrhaps u haedged ur condemnation, who knows. Like it or not ur now part of "you people" because too many times you tow the line instead of standing on common principle. Like everyone here was appalled at the hillary bullshit that got leaked, but the insistent defense against ever mounting evidence that trump has hos own shit is pathetic. Psul ryan has the right idea, we'll ser where these investigations go......and for that "you people" labrl him a rino
No perhaps about it I have been consistent about condemning violence. And Paul Ryan is a RINO and Cal is right there is no mounting evidence of collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign. This investigation has been going on for a year or so and still there in no evidence to support collusion. None.
Fighting the Politicized, Evidence-Free ‘Collusion with Russia’ NarrativeRead more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/447915/trump-russia-collusion-john-brennan-testimony-how-fight-politicized-narrative
-
Perhaps u did, perhaps not. Prrhaps u haedged ur condemnation, who knows. Like it or not ur now part of "you people" because too many times you tow the line instead of standing on common principle. Like everyone here was appalled at the hillary bullshit that got leaked, but the insistent defense against ever mounting evidence that trump has hos own shit is pathetic. Psul ryan has the right idea, we'll ser where these investigations go......and for that "you people" labrl him a rino
No perhaps about it I have been consistent about condemning violence. And Paul Ryan is a RINO and Cal is right there is no mounting evidence of collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign. This investigation has been going on for a year or so and still there in no evidence to support collusion. None.
Fighting the Politicized, Evidence-Free ‘Collusion with Russia’ NarrativeRead more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/447915/trump-russia-collusion-john-brennan-testimony-how-fight-politicized-narrative
No perhaps about it I have been consistent about condemning violence. And Paul Ryan is a RINO and Cal is right there is no mounting evidence of collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign. This investigation has been going on for a year or so and still there in no evidence to support collusion. None.
Exactly as i thought you'd respond. Dudes are taken ng the 5th, which trump himself derided as a clear sign of guilt....but when his guys do it ur all cool. Exactly as predicted
-
Aside from a key witness pleading the 5th.
Non what so ever.
-
Despite Allegations, No Evidence of Trump–Russia Collusion FoundBreaking down the allegations that Trump colluded with Russia and the efforts to undermine his presidency
-
I love "evidence free". The cia basically said we know the russians were trying to worm into trumps campaign. Whether they succeeded or not is up in the air....but u.s spies know the russians were trying. Its all circumstantial still, and thats how OJ get off buttttt.....
-
No Evidence of Collusion
(Bryan Thomas/Getty Images)“We did not include evidence in our report—and I say ‘our,’ that’s NSA, FBI, and CIA, with my office, the director of national intelligence—that had anything, that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians.”
Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told MSNBC’s Chuck Todd on March 5. In response to Todd’s question about whether such evidence existed, Clapper said, “Not to my knowledge.” When asked under oath before a Senate Judiciary subcommittee on May 8 whether his statement is still accurate, he said, “It is.“
-
(Mark Wilson/Getty Images)“There are all kinds of rumors around. There are newspaper stories, but that’s not necessarily evidence.”
Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), in an interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer on May 18, reaffirming that she had not seen any evidence showing collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.
“No, we have not.”
-
(NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images)“I think he’s right about characterizing the report which you all have read.”
Then-FBI Director James Comey, speaking under oath before a House Intelligence Committee on March 20, referring to a statement made by the former director of national intelligence that no evidence had been found of collusion between members of Trump’s team and Russia.
(Win McNamee/Getty Images)“On the question of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians here, there is smoke, but there is no fire, at all. … There’s no little campfire, there’s no little candle, there’s no spark. And there’s a lot of people looking for it.”
Michael Morell, former acting CIA director under the Obama administration, as quoted by NBC News
-
the only one I know of offhand, taking the fifth, is Flynn. I don't have much use for him, being an
obaMao hack, then gone, then being in the Trump admin, then he lied to Pence, and he's gone.
all this angst about reps/hacks taking the fifth, but never a complaint about the endless
dancing around answering questions, and lying by lerner, higgardly, and all the rest.
-
I'm beginning to believe either you're incapable or unwilling to read. As I've said more than once I would closer identity myself as libertarian or a "socially liberal conservative". In the truest sense of the phrase. Tiamsies
*******************************************************
I read fine, always have. You need to understand what you post. You was gonna change from being a dem, but didn't.
You didn't vote for obamao or higgardly...tough to believe.
but, then you say your are more libertarian/socially liberal conservative."
ROF,L. A socially liberal....person.... IS A FREAKING LIBERAL. NOT A CONSERVATIVE.
Unless of course, you have obamao or some liberal corrupt federal judge order the word to be
redefined.
That is also what liberals do - they use words like they have no idea what the real definitions are. Like "marriage".
"liberal". "conservative" Liberals vent emotionally, using words interchangeably any time it makes them feel "right".
Not much right about liberals.... they emote leftly.
-
Caoatse doesnt know what a libertarian is. And per usual he wont educate himself. Libertarians are socially liberal coatse, u ignorant sock puppet
-
good one OBF, the usual defense from conservatives.....flat out the kid in that video should have jaw jacked the congressman and quite honestly it would have been legit self defense. Your not allowed to grab someone like that because they asked you a question. That should have been your response OBF, instead of baselessly defending the Montana republican cause some similar asshole on the left did it. For once can one of you stand on principle? Just once? If someone here were to defend Etheridge's actions or try to make some distinction between the two, ok fine...but nobody has and nobody will.
We're opening the flood gates here to some really nasty despicable, and now physical, political discourse in this country and none of you seem to care. You're almost giddy about it. It's ok for some congressman in Montana to channel his inner undertaker and chokeslam a journalist but some dudes in Berkley who went there "explicitly" for a fight got bike locked to the dome and you pussy boys bleed from your vagina all over this board.
The article I posted only pointed out the hypocrisy in the liberal media. If you read it that should have been clear. In no place was the assault being condoned. In fact the article even stated there was a good argument not to vote for Gianforte over the incident.
BTW - weren't you the guy who giddily posted about Trump supporters getting beat up...if you check prior threads I am sure it was you Cleve.
The article I posted only pointed out the hypocrisy in the liberal media. If you read it that should have been clear. In no place was the assault being condoned. In fact the article even stated there was a good argument not to vote for Gianforte over the incident.
BTW - weren't you the guy who giddily posted about Trump supporters getting beat up...if you check prior threads I am sure it was you Cleve.
Do we just forget Fox News' coverage of the Bush Administration? How about Rush, Bill, Glenn & Hannity? These all unbiased far right journalists? Can we at least be honest in here.
-
The article I posted only pointed out the hypocrisy in the liberal media. If you read it that should have been clear. In no place was the assault being condoned. In fact the article even stated there was a good argument not to vote for Gianforte over the incident.
BTW - weren't you the guy who giddily posted about Trump supporters getting beat up...if you check prior threads I am sure it was you Cleve.
Do we just forget Fox News' coverage of the Bush Administration? How about Rush, Bill, Glenn & Hannity? These all unbiased far right journalists? Can we at least be honest in here.
Can we at least be honest in here.
Nope. Aint happenin
-
Fox is/was right down the middle.....never waivered. Im not one of these partisan headlice so i'll pkainly state the constant anti trump narrative, daily...hourly......its on my last nerve. Why did i have to be subjected to melanoma slapping trumps hand away? Why is this fucking news?
-
Cal, so if a person differs just on one thing they are a liberal? Even if they are for small government, fiscal conservatism, pro 2nd Am. etc.? Logic would be that then means any person who identifies as liberal but is pro-life would be a conservative.
Am I missing something or are you just fishing to get one on Tia?
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login