Skip to content

On Election Eve the Repub Congressional Candidate for Montana's Only House Seat "BodySlams" Reporter

Political Discussion
102 13 1.6k
  • Aside from a key witness pleading the 5th.

    Non what so ever.

  • Despite Allegations, No Evidence of Trump–Russia Collusion Found

    Breaking down the allegations that Trump colluded with Russia and the efforts to undermine his presidency


  • I love "evidence free". The cia basically said we know the russians were trying to worm into trumps campaign. Whether they succeeded or not is up in the air....but u.s spies know the russians were trying. Its all circumstantial still, and thats how OJ get off buttttt.....

  • No Evidence of Collusion

    GettyImages-464967120-e1495731320631.jpg
    (Bryan Thomas/Getty Images)

    “We did not include evidence in our report—and I say ‘our,’ that’s NSA, FBI, and CIA, with my office, the director of national intelligence—that had anything, that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians.”

    Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told MSNBC’s Chuck Todd on March 5. In response to Todd’s question about whether such evidence existed, Clapper said, “Not to my knowledge.” When asked under oath before a Senate Judiciary subcommittee on May 8 whether his statement is still accurate, he said, “It is.“

  • GettyImages-477827991.jpg
    (Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

    “There are all kinds of rumors around. There are newspaper stories, but that’s not necessarily evidence.”

    Senate Judiciary Committee ranking member Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), in an interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer on May 18, reaffirming that she had not seen any evidence showing collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia.

    “No, we have not.”

  • GettyImages-655575726.jpg
    (NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images)

    “I think he’s right about characterizing the report which you all have read.”

    Then-FBI Director James Comey, speaking under oath before a House Intelligence Committee on March 20, referring to a statement made by the former director of national intelligence that no evidence had been found of collusion between members of Trump’s team and Russia.

    GettyImages-481996433-e1495731838172.jpg
    (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

    “On the question of the Trump campaign conspiring with the Russians here, there is smoke, but there is no fire, at all. … There’s no little campfire, there’s no little candle, there’s no spark. And there’s a lot of people looking for it.”

    Michael Morell, former acting CIA director under the Obama administration, as quoted by NBC News

  • the only one I know of offhand, taking the fifth, is Flynn. I don't have much use for him, being an

    obaMao hack, then gone, then being in the Trump admin, then he lied to Pence, and he's gone.

    all this angst about reps/hacks taking the fifth, but never a complaint about the endless

    dancing around answering questions, and lying by lerner, higgardly, and all the rest.

  • I'm beginning to believe either you're incapable or unwilling to read. As I've said more than once I would closer identity myself as libertarian or a "socially liberal conservative". In the truest sense of the phrase. Tiamsies

    *******************************************************

    I read fine, always have. You need to understand what you post. You was gonna change from being a dem, but didn't.

    You didn't vote for obamao or higgardly...tough to believe.

    but, then you say your are more libertarian/socially liberal conservative."

    ROF,L. A socially liberal....person.... IS A FREAKING LIBERAL. NOT A CONSERVATIVE.

    Unless of course, you have obamao or some liberal corrupt federal judge order the word to be

    redefined.

    That is also what liberals do - they use words like they have no idea what the real definitions are. Like "marriage".

    "liberal". "conservative" Liberals vent emotionally, using words interchangeably any time it makes them feel "right".

    Not much right about liberals.... they emote leftly. 🙂

  • Caoatse doesnt know what a libertarian is. And per usual he wont educate himself. Libertarians are socially liberal coatse, u ignorant sock puppet

  • @clevfan4life said:

    good one OBF, the usual defense from conservatives.....flat out the kid in that video should have jaw jacked the congressman and quite honestly it would have been legit self defense. Your not allowed to grab someone like that because they asked you a question. That should have been your response OBF, instead of baselessly defending the Montana republican cause some similar asshole on the left did it. For once can one of you stand on principle? Just once? If someone here were to defend Etheridge's actions or try to make some distinction between the two, ok fine...but nobody has and nobody will.

    We're opening the flood gates here to some really nasty despicable, and now physical, political discourse in this country and none of you seem to care. You're almost giddy about it. It's ok for some congressman in Montana to channel his inner undertaker and chokeslam a journalist but some dudes in Berkley who went there "explicitly" for a fight got bike locked to the dome and you pussy boys bleed from your vagina all over this board.

    The article I posted only pointed out the hypocrisy in the liberal media. If you read it that should have been clear. In no place was the assault being condoned. In fact the article even stated there was a good argument not to vote for Gianforte over the incident.

    BTW - weren't you the guy who giddily posted about Trump supporters getting beat up...if you check prior threads I am sure it was you Cleve.

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    The article I posted only pointed out the hypocrisy in the liberal media. If you read it that should have been clear. In no place was the assault being condoned. In fact the article even stated there was a good argument not to vote for Gianforte over the incident.

    BTW - weren't you the guy who giddily posted about Trump supporters getting beat up...if you check prior threads I am sure it was you Cleve.

    Do we just forget Fox News' coverage of the Bush Administration? How about Rush, Bill, Glenn & Hannity? These all unbiased far right journalists? Can we at least be honest in here.

  • @oldbrownsfan said:

    The article I posted only pointed out the hypocrisy in the liberal media. If you read it that should have been clear. In no place was the assault being condoned. In fact the article even stated there was a good argument not to vote for Gianforte over the incident.

    BTW - weren't you the guy who giddily posted about Trump supporters getting beat up...if you check prior threads I am sure it was you Cleve.

    Do we just forget Fox News' coverage of the Bush Administration? How about Rush, Bill, Glenn & Hannity? These all unbiased far right journalists? Can we at least be honest in here.

    @baconhound said:

    Can we at least be honest in here.

    Nope. Aint happenin

  • Fox is/was right down the middle.....never waivered. Im not one of these partisan headlice so i'll pkainly state the constant anti trump narrative, daily...hourly......its on my last nerve. Why did i have to be subjected to melanoma slapping trumps hand away? Why is this fucking news?

  • Cal, so if a person differs just on one thing they are a liberal? Even if they are for small government, fiscal conservatism, pro 2nd Am. etc.? Logic would be that then means any person who identifies as liberal but is pro-life would be a conservative.

    Am I missing something or are you just fishing to get one on Tia?

  • Fox is/was right down the middle.....never waivered. Im not one of these partisan headlice so i'll pkainly state the constant anti trump narrative, daily...hourly......its on my last nerve. Why did i have to be subjected to melanoma slapping trumps hand away? Why is this fucking news?

    @clevfan4life said:

    Fox is/was right down the middle.....never waivered. Im not one of these partisan headlice so i'll pkainly state the constant anti trump narrative, daily...hourly......its on my last nerve. Why did i have to be subjected to melanoma slapping trumps hand away? Why is this fucking news?

    I was equally annoyed when Fox was harping on the amount of corn in Obama's shit. A constant deluge of bitching about any president just turns into background noise eventually.

  • I love "evidence free". The cia basically said we know the russians were trying to worm into trumps campaign. Whether they succeeded or not is up in the air....but u.s spies know the russians were trying. Its all circumstantial still, and thats how OJ get off buttttt.....

    @clevfan4life said:

    I love "evidence free". The cia basically said we know the russians were trying to worm into trumps campaign. Whether they succeeded or not is up in the air....but u.s spies know the russians were trying. Its all circumstantial still, and thats how OJ get off buttttt.....

    No, it really wasn't.

    WSS

  • @oldbrownsfan said:

    The article I posted only pointed out the hypocrisy in the liberal media. If you read it that should have been clear. In no place was the assault being condoned. In fact the article even stated there was a good argument not to vote for Gianforte over the incident.

    BTW - weren't you the guy who giddily posted about Trump supporters getting beat up...if you check prior threads I am sure it was you Cleve.

    Do we just forget Fox News' coverage of the Bush Administration? How about Rush, Bill, Glenn & Hannity? These all unbiased far right journalists? Can we at least be honest in here.

    @baconhound said:

    Do we just forget Fox News' coverage of the Bush Administration? How about Rush, Bill, Glenn & Hannity? These all unbiased far right journalists? Can we at least be honest in here.

    Rush Limbaugh: not a journalist, never claimed to be one.

    Bill O'Reilly: not a journalist, never claimed to be one.

    Sean Hannity: not a journalist, never claimed to be one.

    Glen Beck: Not a journalist, never claimed to be one.

    These guys are commentators. They give out their opinions and they are free to do so because they only claim to be commentators and not journalists. It is on the left where journalists have gone off the rails of being unbiased reporters to activists and making commentary when journalists should not be doing that.

  • Cal, so if a person differs just on one thing they are a liberal? Even if they are for small government, fiscal conservatism, pro 2nd Am. etc.? Logic would be that then means any person who identifies as liberal but is pro-life would be a conservative.

    Am I missing something or are you just fishing to get one on Tia?

    @logicisforsquares said:

    Cal, so if a person differs just on one thing they are a liberal? Even if they are for small government, fiscal conservatism, pro 2nd Am. etc.? Logic would be that then means any person who identifies as liberal but is pro-life would be a conservative.

    Am I missing something or are you just fishing to get one on Tia?

    This is because home girl ain't a conservative or centrist, he's been pushed so far alt right that anything reasonable he has the option of respectfully disagreeing with is dirty and liberal. A man so hell bent against marxism, communism and socialism. Though I'm sure he draws SS at his age.

    I believe in limiting government (especially federal) hands when and whereever reasonable and possible. That is the hallmark of comversative as it were. This is the smell test Cal doesn't pass and why he isn't my people - I don't give a flying fuck about gay marriage. If the queer couple down the road keeps their home nice thus positively impacting property values in my area, I'm good. The rest is none of my business and again, simply don't care. The government should have no say in that as I'm all for getting them out of.marriage all together in essence.

    Cal would shed tears of joy to even think an EO that banned gay marriage could be legally upheld. Or that in the perfect, Christian American it would be made illegal entirely.

    Because he's good with big brother determining morality and legislating when it suits his beliefs.

    False conservative. False republican. He's Alt right Christian. Nothing more.

    My stance is at least consistent.

  • Cal is a FAKE conservative? Hmmm, good point.

  • Cal, so if a person differs just on one thing they are a liberal? Even if they are for small government, fiscal conservatism, pro 2nd Am. etc.? Logic would be that then means any person who identifies as liberal but is pro-life would be a conservative.

    Am I missing something or are you just fishing to get one on Tia?

    @logicisforsquares said:

    Cal, so if a person differs just on one thing they are a liberal? Even if they are for small government, fiscal conservatism, pro 2nd Am. etc.? Logic would be that then means any person who identifies as liberal but is pro-life would be a conservative.

    Am I missing something or are you just fishing to get one on Tia?

    You know this answer. If you've ever presented a differing opinion on ANYTHING, you've been called a liberal.

  • @baconhound said:

    Do we just forget Fox News' coverage of the Bush Administration? How about Rush, Bill, Glenn & Hannity? These all unbiased far right journalists? Can we at least be honest in here.

    Rush Limbaugh: not a journalist, never claimed to be one.

    Bill O'Reilly: not a journalist, never claimed to be one.

    Sean Hannity: not a journalist, never claimed to be one.

    Glen Beck: Not a journalist, never claimed to be one.

    These guys are commentators. They give out their opinions and they are free to do so because they only claim to be commentators and not journalists. It is on the left where journalists have gone off the rails of being unbiased reporters to activists and making commentary when journalists should not be doing that.

    @oldbrownsfan said:

    Rush Limbaugh: not a journalist, never claimed to be one.

    Bill O'Reilly: not a journalist, never claimed to be one.

    Sean Hannity: not a journalist, never claimed to be one.

    Glen Beck: Not a journalist, never claimed to be one.

    These guys are commentators. They give out their opinions and they are free to do so because they only claim to be commentators and not journalists. It is on the left where journalists have gone off the rails of being unbiased reporters to activists and making commentary when journalists should not be doing that.

    I started with Beck. First link...

    And let's be real, these people are on a NEWS station. Whether or not they call themselves journalists, their viewers treat them as such.