Skip to content

Orchard moving to DE Kirksey to OLB

The Browns Board
72 16 2.3k
  • @tour2ma said:

    On the numbers game... keep maybe 9 DL? Four pure DTs and DEs and one swingman? And Orchard as a DE/LB swingman helps as well...

    DTs (tech)

    • Danny (0/1)
    • Meder (0-3)
    • Ojund (1-5)
    • Brantley (3/5)

    DEs (tech)

    • Myles (5-9)
    • Ogbah (5-7)
    • Nassib (5-7)
    • Orchard (7/9/LB)

    Swing (tech)

    • Bryant (3-7)

    Seems a reasonble blend...

    Good stuff! I could see us keep the 9 you list.

    I like Bryant's flexibility to play virtually any technique upfront. There's even been occasions where Bryant lined up on the Nose vrs Cincy (the last time we beat them in 2014). He's been a great guy to have especially when we were working around injuries. Me thinks he still could be if there isn't a hurry to race him out of here due to his age. He should have fresh legs after missing last season. I'd love to see this guy in Gregg Williams' D.

    Right now, the depth for the dline depth looks good on paper. That said, injuries in training camp and preseason can change that quickly.

    OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
    #27

    @flugel said:

    He's been a great guy to have .........

    Me thinks he still could be if there isn't a hurry to race him out of here due to his age.

    It almost seems that their analytic software makes the computers boot out veterans.

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by Tour2ma
    #28

    Certainly a tendency, O, but not if other factors, e.g., performance/production, outweigh clearing the spot to develop a youngster.

    I think that applies to Bryant... plus missing 2016 does make him a fairly low-mileage 30-yo...

  • @flugel said:

    He's been a great guy to have .........

    Me thinks he still could be if there isn't a hurry to race him out of here due to his age.

    It almost seems that their analytic software makes the computers boot out veterans.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #29

    @orion said:

    It almost seems that their analytic software makes the computers boot out veterans.

    That is why I say that Dez Bryant will likely be on the chopping block. At this point he may not fit their computer model.

  • @orion said:

    It almost seems that their analytic software makes the computers boot out veterans.

    That is why I say that Dez Bryant will likely be on the chopping block. At this point he may not fit their computer model.

    C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
    #30

    @the-gipper said:

    That is why I say that Dez Bryant will likely be on the chopping block. At this point he may not fit their computer model.

    i probably agree. Way too much depth at DE so he'll have to compete with some very good young DT's to see the field much.

  • @the-gipper said:

    That is why I say that Dez Bryant will likely be on the chopping block. At this point he may not fit their computer model.

    i probably agree. Way too much depth at DE so he'll have to compete with some very good young DT's to see the field much.

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
    #31

    @clevfan4life said:

    i probably agree. Way too much depth at DE so he'll have to compete with some very good young DT's to see the field much.

    Whom? Not Danny, he's locked in at the nose and doesn't threaten getting by guards like Des.

    Jobi is the rookie rotational man at the spot. Meder swings between the two.

    Bryant may be a roster casualty, but it won't be until a competent 3tech and depth is established.

  • @clevfan4life said:

    i probably agree. Way too much depth at DE so he'll have to compete with some very good young DT's to see the field much.

    Whom? Not Danny, he's locked in at the nose and doesn't threaten getting by guards like Des.

    Jobi is the rookie rotational man at the spot. Meder swings between the two.

    Bryant may be a roster casualty, but it won't be until a competent 3tech and depth is established.

    gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by
    #32

    @tiamat63 said:

    Whom? Not Danny, he's locked in at the nose and doesn't threaten getting by guards like Des.

    Jobi is the rookie rotational man at the spot. Meder swings between the two.

    Bryant may be a roster casualty, but it won't be until a competent 3tech and depth is established.

    Agreed Tia, Danny's not going anywhere. Jobi is a bull-dozing 3tech tank..straight forward..but check out Jobi's tape & watch his lateral foot work/movement? Williams has got some work on him just like any other draftee..but Williams did have his hands on him at senior bowl

  • @clevfan4life said:

    i probably agree. Way too much depth at DE so he'll have to compete with some very good young DT's to see the field much.

    Whom? Not Danny, he's locked in at the nose and doesn't threaten getting by guards like Des.

    Jobi is the rookie rotational man at the spot. Meder swings between the two.

    Bryant may be a roster casualty, but it won't be until a competent 3tech and depth is established.

    C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
    #33

    @tiamat63 said:

    Whom? Not Danny, he's locked in at the nose and doesn't threaten getting by guards like Des.

    .

    You really think williams is going to runnalot of 3-4 looks? I dont see it. Dannys not gonna be lined up over center much if at all imo. Williams is one of the best 4-3 DC's in football,

  • @tiamat63 said:

    Whom? Not Danny, he's locked in at the nose and doesn't threaten getting by guards like Des.

    .

    You really think williams is going to runnalot of 3-4 looks? I dont see it. Dannys not gonna be lined up over center much if at all imo. Williams is one of the best 4-3 DC's in football,

    tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by tiamat63
    #34

    @clevfan4life said:

    You really think williams is going to runnalot of 3-4 looks? I dont see it. Dannys not gonna be lined up over center much if at all imo. Williams is one of the best 4-3 DC's in football,

    I think you need to verse yourself on an 'over' call, bud... I'd venture we see it quite a bit.

    Even then, playing the nose guard position doesn't mean lining up as a 0tech. He can draw double teams between the center and guard.

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #35

    Danny will live at the 0/1...

    I still think Des is the best 1-5 flex we've got and will make the squad.

  • @mudfly said:

    4-3 DE for Orchard.....should be a good fit.....(fingers crossed)....and, yeah, lets hope he DOES beat out the older - over paid Bryant.....that would be a sign of improvement on a line that has performed poorly....(consistently).....

    Sir Mud, all we got to go on is the last time we saw Orch..It was a preseason game at GB after Hue stated all previous draftees would be re-evaluated..May not mean a thing**** but why was Orch out there still playing with 3rd & 4th on depth chart in 4th qtr??..we shall see, it is not Horton's defense

    MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by
    #36

    @gumby73 said:

    Why?..

    .........because this FO put their guys in well before they earned the position......Schobert did nothing, yet was rewarded with a starting position(which he promptly lost to a UDFA we had already cut, then "needed" to re-sign.....

    @tiamat63 said:

    Des Bryant?

    Both.....A Bryant on the coverage comment.....got burned covering a TE(once) and we cried and cried for weeks(months?) about it....acting as if an OLB shouldnt be asked to cover a TE......

    @orion said:

    Not for nothin' but I ain't ever seen Orchard do much of anything.

    We have a new D-Coordinator, so, all bets might be off.

    Much of anything?.....in 6 or 7 starts ever?......started 3 games....did ok.....then came on with 3 sacks in the last 4 games.....so, by my count, he sacked the QB in 50% of his starts, as a rookie.....

    Pretty good, if yer askin me....(certainly not cutting material).....of course, with this FO, maybe it is.....

    @the-gipper said:

    What is Bryant anyway? A DE, a DT. A hybrid?

    yes

    @tiamat63 said:

    Bryant may be a roster casualty, but it won't be until a competent 3tech and depth is established.

    Hmmm....I dont know.....Shashi tends to lose them well ahead of establishing depth or who the replacement might be.....just ask Gipson, Whitner, Kruges, Orchard, Mingo, Hawkins, Gabriel, Hartline, Schwartz, Mack, etc etc etc.....

  • @gumby73 said:

    Why?..

    .........because this FO put their guys in well before they earned the position......Schobert did nothing, yet was rewarded with a starting position(which he promptly lost to a UDFA we had already cut, then "needed" to re-sign.....

    @tiamat63 said:

    Des Bryant?

    Both.....A Bryant on the coverage comment.....got burned covering a TE(once) and we cried and cried for weeks(months?) about it....acting as if an OLB shouldnt be asked to cover a TE......

    @orion said:

    Not for nothin' but I ain't ever seen Orchard do much of anything.

    We have a new D-Coordinator, so, all bets might be off.

    Much of anything?.....in 6 or 7 starts ever?......started 3 games....did ok.....then came on with 3 sacks in the last 4 games.....so, by my count, he sacked the QB in 50% of his starts, as a rookie.....

    Pretty good, if yer askin me....(certainly not cutting material).....of course, with this FO, maybe it is.....

    @the-gipper said:

    What is Bryant anyway? A DE, a DT. A hybrid?

    yes

    @tiamat63 said:

    Bryant may be a roster casualty, but it won't be until a competent 3tech and depth is established.

    Hmmm....I dont know.....Shashi tends to lose them well ahead of establishing depth or who the replacement might be.....just ask Gipson, Whitner, Kruges, Orchard, Mingo, Hawkins, Gabriel, Hartline, Schwartz, Mack, etc etc etc.....

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #37

    @mudfly said:

    .........because this FO put their guys in well before they earned the position......Schobert did nothing, yet was rewarded with a starting position(which he promptly lost to a UDFA we had already cut, then "needed" to re-sign.....

    Who was that?

  • @mudfly said:

    .........because this FO put their guys in well before they earned the position......Schobert did nothing, yet was rewarded with a starting position(which he promptly lost to a UDFA we had already cut, then "needed" to re-sign.....

    Who was that?

    MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by
    #38

    @the-gipper said:

    @mudfly said:

    .........because this FO put their guys in well before they earned the position......Schobert did nothing, yet was rewarded with a starting position(which he promptly lost to a UDFA we had already cut, then "needed" to re-sign.....

    Who was that?

    Cam Johnson.....cut, then signed in week 4 and then installed as starter over Schobert.....

  • @tour2ma said:

    Yeah... even that one flew over my head... standing on a chair.

    On the numbers game... keep maybe 9 DL? Four pure DTs and DEs and one swingman? And Orchard as a DE/LB swingman helps as well...

    DTs (tech)

    • Danny (0/1)
    • Meder (0-3)
    • Ojund (1-5)
    • Brantley (3/5)

    DEs (tech)

    • Myles (5-9)
    • Ogbah (5-7)
    • Nassib (5-7)
    • Orchard (7/9/LB)

    Swing (tech)

    • Bryant (3-7)

    Seems a reasonble blend...

    Seems fair. Will they keep that many? If so, we will have to add an O to the GOOONS squad. Or to the GOOOMBaS.

    PoeticGP PoeticG wrote on last edited by
    #39

    @the-gipper said:

    Seems fair. Will they keep that many? If so, we will have to add an O to the GOOONS squad. Or to the GOOOMBaS.

    Or...

    DOOOMSquad!

  • PoeticGP PoeticG wrote on last edited by
    #40

    Danny

    Ogunjobi

    Ogbah

    Orchard

    Meder

    Sacksquad

    Kinda originally added Shelton on the end by accident but it kinda still works. 🙂

    -been gone for a week but just got back from Columbus last night, can't wait to get back on here though!~ Super excited about this season. The talent is EVERYWHERE. I fucking LOVE the way this defense is starting to look. And THE OFFENSE!>? Wow, I'm stoked by our young QB group. I think that this could be the best crop of QBs that we've had for a long time. This is sorta draggin on so, yeah; excited, excited, excited!

  • @gumby73 said:

    Why?..

    .........because this FO put their guys in well before they earned the position......Schobert did nothing, yet was rewarded with a starting position(which he promptly lost to a UDFA we had already cut, then "needed" to re-sign.....

    @tiamat63 said:

    Des Bryant?

    Both.....A Bryant on the coverage comment.....got burned covering a TE(once) and we cried and cried for weeks(months?) about it....acting as if an OLB shouldnt be asked to cover a TE......

    @orion said:

    Not for nothin' but I ain't ever seen Orchard do much of anything.

    We have a new D-Coordinator, so, all bets might be off.

    Much of anything?.....in 6 or 7 starts ever?......started 3 games....did ok.....then came on with 3 sacks in the last 4 games.....so, by my count, he sacked the QB in 50% of his starts, as a rookie.....

    Pretty good, if yer askin me....(certainly not cutting material).....of course, with this FO, maybe it is.....

    @the-gipper said:

    What is Bryant anyway? A DE, a DT. A hybrid?

    yes

    @tiamat63 said:

    Bryant may be a roster casualty, but it won't be until a competent 3tech and depth is established.

    Hmmm....I dont know.....Shashi tends to lose them well ahead of establishing depth or who the replacement might be.....just ask Gipson, Whitner, Kruges, Orchard, Mingo, Hawkins, Gabriel, Hartline, Schwartz, Mack, etc etc etc.....

    gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by gumby73
    #41

    @mudfly said:

    .........because this FO put their guys in well before they earned the position......Schobert did nothing, yet was rewarded with a starting position(which he promptly lost to a UDFA we had already cut, then "needed" to re-sign.....

    Hmmm....I dont know.....Shashi tends to lose them well ahead of establishing depth or who the replacement might be.....just ask Gipson, Whitner, Kruges, Orchard, Mingo, Hawkins, Gabriel, Hartline, Schwartz, Mack, etc etc etc.....

    Greg Robertson says hello..The Hue's war cry was they would all including the Erving's of the world get a chance to prove their worth..Schobert & Cam will be interesting cut desicisions on the FO that drafted them than not..tic tic boom

  • Danny

    Ogunjobi

    Ogbah

    Orchard

    Meder

    Sacksquad

    Kinda originally added Shelton on the end by accident but it kinda still works. 🙂

    -been gone for a week but just got back from Columbus last night, can't wait to get back on here though!~ Super excited about this season. The talent is EVERYWHERE. I fucking LOVE the way this defense is starting to look. And THE OFFENSE!>? Wow, I'm stoked by our young QB group. I think that this could be the best crop of QBs that we've had for a long time. This is sorta draggin on so, yeah; excited, excited, excited!

    Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
    #42

    @poeticg said:

    Sacksquad

    Were we for Minnysotah... I'd be all over: Sacksquatch!

  • @clevfan4life said:

    You really think williams is going to runnalot of 3-4 looks? I dont see it. Dannys not gonna be lined up over center much if at all imo. Williams is one of the best 4-3 DC's in football,

    I think you need to verse yourself on an 'over' call, bud... I'd venture we see it quite a bit.

    Even then, playing the nose guard position doesn't mean lining up as a 0tech. He can draw double teams between the center and guard.

    C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
    #43

    @tiamat63 said:

    I think you need to verse yourself on an 'over' call, bud... I'd venture we see it quite a bit.

    Even then, playing the nose guard position doesn't mean lining up as a 0tech. He can draw double teams between the center and guard.

    Thats what i thought the over meant, one gapping the bigger DT, between guard annd center like u said. Is that wrong?

  • thenew23T thenew23 wrote on last edited by
    #44

    You guys seeem to fail to realize that our entire front 7 (almost) will be switching back to their natural positions in a 4-3. The OP is not news, it was clearly going to happen based on a new system.

  • Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by Tour2ma
    #45

    Cleveland Browns have Terry Talkin' (Kirksey) -- Terry Pluto (photos)


    Posted on May 27, 2017 at 7:42 AM



    By Terry Pluto, The Plain Dealer


    [email protected]



    ABOUT KIRKSEY AND CROWELL


    The Browns believe these two players are ready to make a significant step forward.



    Christian Kirksey became a starting linebacker in 2016 and impressed with his energy and toughness. The Browns love his attitude.



    While Kirksey declined to discuss his contract situation, I hear the Browns are making progress in signing him to an extension. It's not done. But Kirksey does want to stay. He has one more year on his 2014 rookie contract.



    The Browns starting linebackers in the 4-3 defense look like Jamie Collins and Kirksey at the outside linebackers, Demario Davis as the middle linebacker. At least, that's how Gregg Williams opened his defense at the OTA.



  • L LondonBrown wrote on last edited by
    #46

    An article on the struggle Orchard faces has been released today

    http://nflspinzone.com/2017/05/27/cleveland-browns-nate-orchard-difficult-road/