Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Josh Cribbs Is Expected To Skip Browns Minicamp

Josh Cribbs Is Expected To Skip Browns Minicamp

The Browns Board
162 26 6.5k

  • If you don't care, there is no need to respond.

    All of my posts are my opinion. That should go without saying. I dont know any of these people personally, and I'm not omniscient. Every article or source or assumption I am using can be found in this thread. I'm not going to footnote my posts to avoid having to explain that over and over again. If you want to know where I got something, ask or look yourself. If you have an opinion on Cribbs, post it. If you're just looking to criticize my posting style, you're wasting your time and mine.

    You just went out of your way to post on a football thread to what, insult a poster? I don't get it, really.

    chocoC 1 Reply

  • IMHO cribbs has outplayed his contract he is deserving of a base raise that should be full of lucrative incentives if he fares well as a SS and or a WR with the ability to renegotiate the base pay contract in a year if he meets certain criteria...

    Honestly i thought JC would be the last guy to hold out of voluntary camp but on the otherhand mankok needs to get this address this issue and get it resolved so cribbs is just pushing the point...i dont blame him. 😉

    We have been rebuilding since 1964, Why stop now? GO BROWNS!
  • W We need Tom Tupa

    @ytownbrownsbacker said:

    I ABSOLUTELY abide by any promise Lerner made to him, and I certainly dont treat him like shit publicly. I don't care what kind of tough guy rep Mangini wants to maintain. We have enough problems without building a permanent rift between players and management.

    The Cribbs situation will get ironed out and everyone will be happy. He signed for 6 years with $2 million up front, with his salaries he has made over $3.2 million in the two years. That isn't working for free or being underpaid. Now if he has to play out the contract then it is a crime, but as of now he hasn't been mistreated, especially if he gets a new contract done this year.

    But to mention anything about Mangini and him trying to maintain his tough guy rep is pure bullshit. How does Mangini get dragged into this? He isn't the owner or GM and he hasn't said shit about anything. Not a very credible statement if you wantyour argument to be taken serious.

    I appreciate that you and Neb want to discredit anything I say based on small phrases here or there, but you're really stretching it now. Kok was brought in as Mangini's guy. Mangini was hired first because Lerner wants the HC to run the show. Lerner's position has been that he doesnt have any say over contracts (that's part of his total disclaimer of ever mentioning contracts to Cribbs). To think that this situation has gotten where it is without Mangini is "pure bullshit". And this situation is a little to similar to some that occurred when he was with the Jets to just ignore that this might be a consistent MO for Mangini (as was noted in the very first post in this thread).

    Thanks for the attempt at a tangent though.

    @we-need-tom-tupa said:

    Kok was brought in as Mangini's guy. Mangini was hired first because Lerner wants the HC to run the show. Lerner's position has been that he doesnt have any say over contracts (that's part of his total disclaimer of ever mentioning contracts to Cribbs). To think that this situation has gotten where it is without Mangini is "pure bullshit".

    At the very least, Mangini has a strong voice in the decision-making process. Pioli-Belichick seems to be the model.

    Ironically, the same person who's saying Mangini has nothing to do with Cribbs' contract dispute also argued that the excitement over our draft disproved any concerns about Mangini. And before that said that Pioli shouldn't get any credit for the Patriots' good drafts because Belichick did everything. I guess the coach controls all personnel decisions relating to the draft but nothing after that.

    I just don't get the logic there. Maybe someone can explain it to me.

    Y 1 Reply

  • Rudy Rudy Rudy

    This now , officially has the stink of bad publicity for both.

    guns don't kill kids-pitt bulls do.
  • W We need Tom Tupa

    If you don't care, there is no need to respond.

    All of my posts are my opinion. That should go without saying. I dont know any of these people personally, and I'm not omniscient. Every article or source or assumption I am using can be found in this thread. I'm not going to footnote my posts to avoid having to explain that over and over again. If you want to know where I got something, ask or look yourself. If you have an opinion on Cribbs, post it. If you're just looking to criticize my posting style, you're wasting your time and mine.

    You just went out of your way to post on a football thread to what, insult a poster? I don't get it, really.

    @we-need-tom-tupa said:

    You just went out of your way to post on a football thread to what, insult a poster? I don't get it, really.

    im not tryin to insult ya tup.....just wasn't sure if you understood opinion from fact.

    my retort was to illustrate where you are going wrong...

    you say...

    " Lerner's position has been that he doesnt have any say over contracts (that's part of his total disclaimer of ever mentioning contracts to Cribbs)."

    if this is lerner position, as you say, then why on gods green earth are you assuming cribbs is the one being truthful. if lerner does not get involved in contracts, why would cribbs call him DIRECTLY? i haven't found anything stating that lerner has ever weighed in on contract negotiations.....it may indeed exist, but i just haven't saw it. considering cribbs has a new greedy agent, i have a hard time believe his camp at all.

    somone aint stirrin the kool-aide.....

  • chocoC choco

    @we-need-tom-tupa said:

    You just went out of your way to post on a football thread to what, insult a poster? I don't get it, really.

    im not tryin to insult ya tup.....just wasn't sure if you understood opinion from fact.

    my retort was to illustrate where you are going wrong...

    you say...

    " Lerner's position has been that he doesnt have any say over contracts (that's part of his total disclaimer of ever mentioning contracts to Cribbs)."

    if this is lerner position, as you say, then why on gods green earth are you assuming cribbs is the one being truthful. if lerner does not get involved in contracts, why would cribbs call him DIRECTLY? i haven't found anything stating that lerner has ever weighed in on contract negotiations.....it may indeed exist, but i just haven't saw it. considering cribbs has a new greedy agent, i have a hard time believe his camp at all.

    somone aint stirrin the kool-aide.....

    @choco said:

    im not tryin to insult ya tup.....just wasn't sure if you understood opinion from fact.

    my retort was to illustrate where you are going wrong...

    you say...

    " Lerner's position has been that he doesnt have any say over contracts (that's part of his total disclaimer of ever mentioning contracts to Cribbs)."

    if this is lerner position, as you say, then why on gods green earth are you assuming cribbs is the one being truthful. if lerner does not get involved in contracts, why would cribbs call him DIRECTLY? i haven't found anything stating that lerner has ever weighed in on contract negotiations.....it may indeed exist, but i just haven't saw it. considering cribbs has a new greedy agent, i have a hard time believe his camp at all.

    somone aint stirrin the kool-aide.....

    I dont think Cribbs is claiming that he called Lerner, he says Lerner called him. And I've discussed why I believe Cribbs over Lerner several times, meaning that I have explained why I hold the opinion that I do. In fact, I have stated that it is possible that Cribbs is lying. Clearly I'm not claiming fact where there is none.

    As for Lerner's claim that he never weighs in on contracts, I believe him in general. But there was no front office for several weeks and there were players looking for assurances that they wouldnt be forgotten. It would surprise me if Lerner just stonewalled everyone until Mankok was in place.

    What I took to be a wasted attempt at an insult was "we get it, and still don't care". Did that have anything to do with the thread? No, it was just a strange shot at me. I still don't know why you waste your time on things you dont care about. Are you punishing yourself?

  • W We need Tom Tupa

    @ytownbrownsbacker said:

    I ABSOLUTELY abide by any promise Lerner made to him, and I certainly dont treat him like shit publicly. I don't care what kind of tough guy rep Mangini wants to maintain. We have enough problems without building a permanent rift between players and management.

    The Cribbs situation will get ironed out and everyone will be happy. He signed for 6 years with $2 million up front, with his salaries he has made over $3.2 million in the two years. That isn't working for free or being underpaid. Now if he has to play out the contract then it is a crime, but as of now he hasn't been mistreated, especially if he gets a new contract done this year.

    But to mention anything about Mangini and him trying to maintain his tough guy rep is pure bullshit. How does Mangini get dragged into this? He isn't the owner or GM and he hasn't said shit about anything. Not a very credible statement if you wantyour argument to be taken serious.

    I appreciate that you and Neb want to discredit anything I say based on small phrases here or there, but you're really stretching it now. Kok was brought in as Mangini's guy. Mangini was hired first because Lerner wants the HC to run the show. Lerner's position has been that he doesnt have any say over contracts (that's part of his total disclaimer of ever mentioning contracts to Cribbs). To think that this situation has gotten where it is without Mangini is "pure bullshit". And this situation is a little to similar to some that occurred when he was with the Jets to just ignore that this might be a consistent MO for Mangini (as was noted in the very first post in this thread).

    Thanks for the attempt at a tangent though.

    @we-need-tom-tupa said:

    I appreciate that you and Neb want to discredit anything I say based on small phrases here or there, but you're really stretching it now. Kok was brought in as Mangini's guy. Mangini was hired first because Lerner wants the HC to run the show. Lerner's position has been that he doesnt have any say over contracts (that's part of his total disclaimer of ever mentioning contracts to Cribbs). To think that this situation has gotten where it is without Mangini is "pure bullshit". And this situation is a little to similar to some that occurred when he was with the Jets to just ignore that this might be a consistent MO for Mangini (as was noted in the very first post in this thread).

    Thanks for the attempt at a tangent though.

    Your opinion about Cribbs and his contract has merit and I never said it didn't. Personally, I think he got money up front, guaranteed and should have to abide by more then two years of the contract. I'm not saying hold him hostage for 4 more years and I was the one that said I'd be fine with adding some roster bonuses and incentive money, but no new contract.

    But, talking about Mangini and his hard ass ways is, as you put it, pure bullshit. This is another Savage mess and time will tell what Lerner and Cribbs did or did not talk about. Why diss Mangini and call him a hard ass? Seems that many of his players followed him and don't think he is unfair.

  • ? Guest

    @we-need-tom-tupa said:

    Kok was brought in as Mangini's guy. Mangini was hired first because Lerner wants the HC to run the show. Lerner's position has been that he doesnt have any say over contracts (that's part of his total disclaimer of ever mentioning contracts to Cribbs). To think that this situation has gotten where it is without Mangini is "pure bullshit".

    At the very least, Mangini has a strong voice in the decision-making process. Pioli-Belichick seems to be the model.

    Ironically, the same person who's saying Mangini has nothing to do with Cribbs' contract dispute also argued that the excitement over our draft disproved any concerns about Mangini. And before that said that Pioli shouldn't get any credit for the Patriots' good drafts because Belichick did everything. I guess the coach controls all personnel decisions relating to the draft but nothing after that.

    I just don't get the logic there. Maybe someone can explain it to me.

    Aloysius said:

    At the very least, Mangini has a strong voice in the decision-making process. Pioli-Belichick seems to be the model.

    Ironically, the same person who's saying Mangini has nothing to do with Cribbs' contract dispute also argued that the excitement over our draft disproved any concerns about Mangini. And before that said that Pioli shouldn't get any credit for the Patriots' good drafts because Belichick did everything. I guess the coach controls all personnel decisions relating to the draft but nothing after that.

    I just don't get the logic there. Maybe someone can explain it to me.

    Here's an explanation; any time someone takes a shit that smells in Berea Mangini is called an asshole or a hard ass. Come on, this was a Savage and RAC problem and maybe Lerner or not Lerner, only time will tell. It's not fair to say the problem is there because Mangini is a hard ass. Yes, I believe he and Kokinis are tied at the hip as Pioli and Belichick were tied at the hip, but Cribbs's agent has not said one word about Mangini, he has tried to start to get talks going with Kokinis.

    Personally, something will get done as long as everybody involved are reasonable. I am sure Mangini will have a say. But one thing you need to understand is Kokinis isn't on strings being controlled by Mangini. He has a big voice and is way more involved in contracts then Mangini will ever be. Mangini looks at talent and requests signings but he doesn't dictate contracts to the FO. They may ask him how important the signing is to the team and discuss a ballpark salary but in no way does Mangini decide contracts.

    I know personally that he wanted to get rid of a guy and Kokinis said no because of the salary ramifications. He also wanted Milloy before the draft and Kokinis said no, wait until after the draft and see where they were with the Safety position and cap money. So, I personally don't believe Mangini has anything (so far) to do with the Cribbs contract mess. So, why diss Mangini because Cribbs isn't happy with a contract he signed 2 years ago and was promised a redo by guys who aren't around.

    One thing to remember here is beside Cribbs, Dawson and Jackson want new contracts or extensions and they have to sign all there draft picks. You can't get this all done by the end of May. The business side of football sucks, but is Mangini an asshole because Dawson and Jackson aren't happy either.

  • W We need Tom Tupa

    @ytownbrownsbacker said:

    I ABSOLUTELY abide by any promise Lerner made to him, and I certainly dont treat him like shit publicly. I don't care what kind of tough guy rep Mangini wants to maintain. We have enough problems without building a permanent rift between players and management.

    The Cribbs situation will get ironed out and everyone will be happy. He signed for 6 years with $2 million up front, with his salaries he has made over $3.2 million in the two years. That isn't working for free or being underpaid. Now if he has to play out the contract then it is a crime, but as of now he hasn't been mistreated, especially if he gets a new contract done this year.

    But to mention anything about Mangini and him trying to maintain his tough guy rep is pure bullshit. How does Mangini get dragged into this? He isn't the owner or GM and he hasn't said shit about anything. Not a very credible statement if you wantyour argument to be taken serious.

    I appreciate that you and Neb want to discredit anything I say based on small phrases here or there, but you're really stretching it now. Kok was brought in as Mangini's guy. Mangini was hired first because Lerner wants the HC to run the show. Lerner's position has been that he doesnt have any say over contracts (that's part of his total disclaimer of ever mentioning contracts to Cribbs). To think that this situation has gotten where it is without Mangini is "pure bullshit". And this situation is a little to similar to some that occurred when he was with the Jets to just ignore that this might be a consistent MO for Mangini (as was noted in the very first post in this thread).

    Thanks for the attempt at a tangent though.

    @we-need-tom-tupa said:

    I appreciate that you and Neb want to discredit anything I say based on small phrases here or there, but you're really stretching it now. Kok was brought in as Mangini's guy. Mangini was hired first because Lerner wants the HC to run the show. Lerner's position has been that he doesnt have any say over contracts (that's part of his total disclaimer of ever mentioning contracts to Cribbs). To think that this situation has gotten where it is without Mangini is "pure bullshit". And this situation is a little to similar to some that occurred when he was with the Jets to just ignore that this might be a consistent MO for Mangini (as was noted in the very first post in this thread).

    Thanks for the attempt at a tangent though.

    Oh woe is me....cry me a freakin river. I haven't discredited everything you say. I even agreed on some points. I just totally disagree with you on backing Cribbs wholeheartedly based on a lot of "sources". You also posted outright misinformation at least twice. So god forbid someone point that out. I still stand by my post that dissing Mangini is bullshit. His name has yet to come up in these reports.

    Back on topic...as I said, I'm all for Cribbs getting incentives into his contract, IF Cribbs is just looking for incentives. But with a new agent who won't get paid by just adding incentives, I just don't see that as his position. IMO he's wanting new guaranteed money and more per year, based on an EXPECTED expanded role. Thus I disagree with the method he is using to try to force the team into giving in, a method in which he has no leverage whatsoever.

  • N NebBrownsFan

    @we-need-tom-tupa said:

    I appreciate that you and Neb want to discredit anything I say based on small phrases here or there, but you're really stretching it now. Kok was brought in as Mangini's guy. Mangini was hired first because Lerner wants the HC to run the show. Lerner's position has been that he doesnt have any say over contracts (that's part of his total disclaimer of ever mentioning contracts to Cribbs). To think that this situation has gotten where it is without Mangini is "pure bullshit". And this situation is a little to similar to some that occurred when he was with the Jets to just ignore that this might be a consistent MO for Mangini (as was noted in the very first post in this thread).

    Thanks for the attempt at a tangent though.

    Oh woe is me....cry me a freakin river. I haven't discredited everything you say. I even agreed on some points. I just totally disagree with you on backing Cribbs wholeheartedly based on a lot of "sources". You also posted outright misinformation at least twice. So god forbid someone point that out. I still stand by my post that dissing Mangini is bullshit. His name has yet to come up in these reports.

    Back on topic...as I said, I'm all for Cribbs getting incentives into his contract, IF Cribbs is just looking for incentives. But with a new agent who won't get paid by just adding incentives, I just don't see that as his position. IMO he's wanting new guaranteed money and more per year, based on an EXPECTED expanded role. Thus I disagree with the method he is using to try to force the team into giving in, a method in which he has no leverage whatsoever.

    @nebbrownsfan said:

    Thus I disagree with the method he is using to try to force the team into giving in, a method in which he has no leverage whatsoever.

    Hence why Cribbs and his agent took this situation to the media. Because getting fan support for Cribbs could give Cribbs and his agent some leverage.

  • I welcome anyone to show me where i used the word ass in reference to anyone in the Browns organization. The same goes for asshole or hardass. Show it to me and I will apologize to you and cede whatever point it is you think you are making. If not, let me stomp out the fire on your straw man and move past this bullshit (I use that word because it seems to have become an obligatory part of these posts at this point). As part of a string of hypotheticals, I said that I wouldn't treat Cribbs poorly to protect Mangini's attempt at establishing a rep as a tough coach. Elsewhere on this thread, and on PFT.com, others have allooded to the fact that he has a history of players getting into extremely similar situations. I was not pulling it out of thin air, I was attempting to address all the possibilities in my list of hypatheticals. I was not "dissing" Mangini (although seeing the word used so many times was pretty funny, thanks). I'm sorry if I offended you by not labeling the post with a disclaimer. At this point I'm willing to add one to all my posts so I can talk football and not argue semantacs on football threads. Just tell me what I need to put there to help you out, and I'll do it.

    Anyway, it seems like you agree with the opinion I gave 2 days ago and again yesterday. He is entitled to have incentives added to his deal. If Lerner promised him more, then he should get more. Other than that, he just deserves to be dealt with honestly. I'll leave the thread to you now. I misspelled some words so you can spend some time patting each other on the back for catching it (there are at least 3, in case you're wondering).

    N B Y 3 Replies
  • W We need Tom Tupa

    I welcome anyone to show me where i used the word ass in reference to anyone in the Browns organization. The same goes for asshole or hardass. Show it to me and I will apologize to you and cede whatever point it is you think you are making. If not, let me stomp out the fire on your straw man and move past this bullshit (I use that word because it seems to have become an obligatory part of these posts at this point). As part of a string of hypotheticals, I said that I wouldn't treat Cribbs poorly to protect Mangini's attempt at establishing a rep as a tough coach. Elsewhere on this thread, and on PFT.com, others have allooded to the fact that he has a history of players getting into extremely similar situations. I was not pulling it out of thin air, I was attempting to address all the possibilities in my list of hypatheticals. I was not "dissing" Mangini (although seeing the word used so many times was pretty funny, thanks). I'm sorry if I offended you by not labeling the post with a disclaimer. At this point I'm willing to add one to all my posts so I can talk football and not argue semantacs on football threads. Just tell me what I need to put there to help you out, and I'll do it.

    Anyway, it seems like you agree with the opinion I gave 2 days ago and again yesterday. He is entitled to have incentives added to his deal. If Lerner promised him more, then he should get more. Other than that, he just deserves to be dealt with honestly. I'll leave the thread to you now. I misspelled some words so you can spend some time patting each other on the back for catching it (there are at least 3, in case you're wondering).

    @we-need-tom-tupa said:

    I welcome anyone to show me where i used the word ass in reference to anyone in the Browns organization. The same goes for asshole or hardass. Show it to me and I will apologize to you and cede whatever point it is you think you are making. If not, let me stomp out the fire on your straw man and move past this bullshit (I use that word because it seems to have become an obligatory part of these posts at this point). As part of a string of hypotheticals, I said that I wouldn't treat Cribbs poorly to protect Mangini's attempt at establishing a rep as a tough coach. Elsewhere on this thread, and on PFT.com, others have allooded to the fact that he has a history of players getting into extremely similar situations. I was not pulling it out of thin air, I was attempting to address all the possibilities in my list of hypatheticals. I was not "dissing" Mangini (although seeing the word used so many times was pretty funny, thanks). I'm sorry if I offended you by not labeling the post with a disclaimer. At this point I'm willing to add one to all my posts so I can talk football and not argue semantacs on football threads. Just tell me what I need to put there to help you out, and I'll do it.

    Anyway, it seems like you agree with the opinion I gave 2 days ago and again yesterday. He is entitled to have incentives added to his deal. If Lerner promised him more, then he should get more. Other than that, he just deserves to be dealt with honestly. I'll leave the thread to you now. I misspelled some words so you can spend some time patting each other on the back for catching it (there are at least 3, in case you're wondering).

    Awww....poor Tom...everybody is ganging up on me....lol Go back and read the things you post as opposed to how you're trying to explain them now. Big difference. Sorta like how Lerner never called Cribbs....oops, my bad, never talked about contract on the phone. Or how this owner has gone through 5 coaches...ooops, except it wasn't this owner and we're only on the 4th coach now. Dude, you post a number of things and backtrack to explain what wasn't said in your original posting. Why is that?

    B 1 Reply

  • @shepwrite said:

    I agree with Toop: Should be a lot of if-then in the deal, escalators added to the existing base for defensive or offense plays and performance there AND as a kick/punt returner.

    He'll want some cash. Every player does. The Browns could toss him $6 mill upfront on 4 years for sure.

    Just to get a few other players deciding they want more up-front money based on expected expanded roles on the team. No thanks. Incentives, yes. But nothing more up-front until he is used more consistently in these expanded roles.

  • W We need Tom Tupa

    I welcome anyone to show me where i used the word ass in reference to anyone in the Browns organization. The same goes for asshole or hardass. Show it to me and I will apologize to you and cede whatever point it is you think you are making. If not, let me stomp out the fire on your straw man and move past this bullshit (I use that word because it seems to have become an obligatory part of these posts at this point). As part of a string of hypotheticals, I said that I wouldn't treat Cribbs poorly to protect Mangini's attempt at establishing a rep as a tough coach. Elsewhere on this thread, and on PFT.com, others have allooded to the fact that he has a history of players getting into extremely similar situations. I was not pulling it out of thin air, I was attempting to address all the possibilities in my list of hypatheticals. I was not "dissing" Mangini (although seeing the word used so many times was pretty funny, thanks). I'm sorry if I offended you by not labeling the post with a disclaimer. At this point I'm willing to add one to all my posts so I can talk football and not argue semantacs on football threads. Just tell me what I need to put there to help you out, and I'll do it.

    Anyway, it seems like you agree with the opinion I gave 2 days ago and again yesterday. He is entitled to have incentives added to his deal. If Lerner promised him more, then he should get more. Other than that, he just deserves to be dealt with honestly. I'll leave the thread to you now. I misspelled some words so you can spend some time patting each other on the back for catching it (there are at least 3, in case you're wondering).

    @we-need-tom-tupa said:

    I welcome anyone to show me where i used the word ass in reference to anyone in the Browns organization. The same goes for asshole or hardass. Show it to me and I will apologize to you and cede whatever point it is you think you are making. If not, let me stomp out the fire on your straw man and move past this bullshit (I use that word because it seems to have become an obligatory part of these posts at this point). As part of a string of hypotheticals, I said that I wouldn't treat Cribbs poorly to protect Mangini's attempt at establishing a rep as a tough coach. Elsewhere on this thread, and on PFT.com, others have allooded to the fact that he has a history of players getting into extremely similar situations. I was not pulling it out of thin air, I was attempting to address all the possibilities in my list of hypatheticals. I was not "dissing" Mangini (although seeing the word used so many times was pretty funny, thanks). I'm sorry if I offended you by not labeling the post with a disclaimer. At this point I'm willing to add one to all my posts so I can talk football and not argue semantacs on football threads. Just tell me what I need to put there to help you out, and I'll do it.

    Anyway, it seems like you agree with the opinion I gave 2 days ago and again yesterday. He is entitled to have incentives added to his deal. If Lerner promised him more, then he should get more. Other than that, he just deserves to be dealt with honestly. I'll leave the thread to you now. I misspelled some words so you can spend some time patting each other on the back for catching it (there are at least 3, in case you're wondering).

    Creed your teeth called your breath stinks. Boom roasted.

  • N NebBrownsFan

    @we-need-tom-tupa said:

    I welcome anyone to show me where i used the word ass in reference to anyone in the Browns organization. The same goes for asshole or hardass. Show it to me and I will apologize to you and cede whatever point it is you think you are making. If not, let me stomp out the fire on your straw man and move past this bullshit (I use that word because it seems to have become an obligatory part of these posts at this point). As part of a string of hypotheticals, I said that I wouldn't treat Cribbs poorly to protect Mangini's attempt at establishing a rep as a tough coach. Elsewhere on this thread, and on PFT.com, others have allooded to the fact that he has a history of players getting into extremely similar situations. I was not pulling it out of thin air, I was attempting to address all the possibilities in my list of hypatheticals. I was not "dissing" Mangini (although seeing the word used so many times was pretty funny, thanks). I'm sorry if I offended you by not labeling the post with a disclaimer. At this point I'm willing to add one to all my posts so I can talk football and not argue semantacs on football threads. Just tell me what I need to put there to help you out, and I'll do it.

    Anyway, it seems like you agree with the opinion I gave 2 days ago and again yesterday. He is entitled to have incentives added to his deal. If Lerner promised him more, then he should get more. Other than that, he just deserves to be dealt with honestly. I'll leave the thread to you now. I misspelled some words so you can spend some time patting each other on the back for catching it (there are at least 3, in case you're wondering).

    Awww....poor Tom...everybody is ganging up on me....lol Go back and read the things you post as opposed to how you're trying to explain them now. Big difference. Sorta like how Lerner never called Cribbs....oops, my bad, never talked about contract on the phone. Or how this owner has gone through 5 coaches...ooops, except it wasn't this owner and we're only on the 4th coach now. Dude, you post a number of things and backtrack to explain what wasn't said in your original posting. Why is that?

    @nebbrownsfan said:

    Awww....poor Tom...everybody is ganging up on me....lol Go back and read the things you post as opposed to how you're trying to explain them now. Big difference. Sorta like how Lerner never called Cribbs....oops, my bad, never talked about contract on the phone. Or how this owner has gone through 5 coaches...ooops, except it wasn't this owner and we're only on the 4th coach now. Dude, you post a number of things and backtrack to explain what wasn't said in your original posting. Why is that?

    I'm sorry, as long as we are rehashing all of our zingers from yesterday... How is it that it matters whether he said the call never happened or that he didnt talk about the contract on the phone? For Lerner to come out and say either one directly is him saying: "Josh Cribbs is not telling the truth." How does that help the situation at all?

    Was the number of coaches really the thrust of his argument? Or was it that the ownership is as culpable if not more so than one player when deciding why the team has yet to win a super bowl? All of your arguments have to do with nuance rather than substance. Try advancing the conversation for once.

  • B budcarson

    @nebbrownsfan said:

    Awww....poor Tom...everybody is ganging up on me....lol Go back and read the things you post as opposed to how you're trying to explain them now. Big difference. Sorta like how Lerner never called Cribbs....oops, my bad, never talked about contract on the phone. Or how this owner has gone through 5 coaches...ooops, except it wasn't this owner and we're only on the 4th coach now. Dude, you post a number of things and backtrack to explain what wasn't said in your original posting. Why is that?

    I'm sorry, as long as we are rehashing all of our zingers from yesterday... How is it that it matters whether he said the call never happened or that he didnt talk about the contract on the phone? For Lerner to come out and say either one directly is him saying: "Josh Cribbs is not telling the truth." How does that help the situation at all?

    Was the number of coaches really the thrust of his argument? Or was it that the ownership is as culpable if not more so than one player when deciding why the team has yet to win a super bowl? All of your arguments have to do with nuance rather than substance. Try advancing the conversation for once.

    @budcarson said:

    I'm sorry, as long as we are rehashing all of our zingers from yesterday... How is it that it matters whether he said the call never happened or that he didnt talk about the contract on the phone? For Lerner to come out and say either one directly is him saying: "Josh Cribbs is not telling the truth." How does that help the situation at all?

    Was the number of coaches really the thrust of his argument? Or was it that the ownership is as culpable if not more so than one player when deciding why the team has yet to win a super bowl? All of your arguments have to do with nuance rather than substance. Try advancing the conversation for once.

    How do you know what the thrust of his argument was? Unless you're him also. The main point is, ownership is NOT the same as his claim implied and he doesn't even know how many coaches have been with this version of the Browns. You seriously have no room telling someone else to advance the conversation for once. Most of your posts in this thread have been pot-shots because someone disagreed with your buddy. So Mr. Pot, go talk to Mr. Kettle for a bit and come back when you can post on topic.

    I notice you only pulled out ONE part of my post and of course did not address the part dealing with Cribbs.

  • N NebBrownsFan

    @budcarson said:

    I'm sorry, as long as we are rehashing all of our zingers from yesterday... How is it that it matters whether he said the call never happened or that he didnt talk about the contract on the phone? For Lerner to come out and say either one directly is him saying: "Josh Cribbs is not telling the truth." How does that help the situation at all?

    Was the number of coaches really the thrust of his argument? Or was it that the ownership is as culpable if not more so than one player when deciding why the team has yet to win a super bowl? All of your arguments have to do with nuance rather than substance. Try advancing the conversation for once.

    How do you know what the thrust of his argument was? Unless you're him also. The main point is, ownership is NOT the same as his claim implied and he doesn't even know how many coaches have been with this version of the Browns. You seriously have no room telling someone else to advance the conversation for once. Most of your posts in this thread have been pot-shots because someone disagreed with your buddy. So Mr. Pot, go talk to Mr. Kettle for a bit and come back when you can post on topic.

    I notice you only pulled out ONE part of my post and of course did not address the part dealing with Cribbs.

    @nebbrownsfan said:

    How do you know what the thrust of his argument was? Unless you're him also. The main point is, ownership is NOT the same as his claim implied and he doesn't even know how many coaches have been with this version of the Browns. You seriously have no room telling someone else to advance the conversation for once. Most of your posts in this thread have been pot-shots because someone disagreed with your buddy. So Mr. Pot, go talk to Mr. Kettle for a bit and come back when you can post on topic.

    I notice you only pulled out ONE part of my post and of course did not address the part dealing with Cribbs.

    YAWN.

  • B budcarson

    @nebbrownsfan said:

    How do you know what the thrust of his argument was? Unless you're him also. The main point is, ownership is NOT the same as his claim implied and he doesn't even know how many coaches have been with this version of the Browns. You seriously have no room telling someone else to advance the conversation for once. Most of your posts in this thread have been pot-shots because someone disagreed with your buddy. So Mr. Pot, go talk to Mr. Kettle for a bit and come back when you can post on topic.

    I notice you only pulled out ONE part of my post and of course did not address the part dealing with Cribbs.

    YAWN.

    @budcarson said:

    YAWN.

    LOL...I see its bedtime for you. Make sure your mommy tucks you in. Otherwise, great and witty comeback!

  • W We need Tom Tupa

    I welcome anyone to show me where i used the word ass in reference to anyone in the Browns organization. The same goes for asshole or hardass. Show it to me and I will apologize to you and cede whatever point it is you think you are making. If not, let me stomp out the fire on your straw man and move past this bullshit (I use that word because it seems to have become an obligatory part of these posts at this point). As part of a string of hypotheticals, I said that I wouldn't treat Cribbs poorly to protect Mangini's attempt at establishing a rep as a tough coach. Elsewhere on this thread, and on PFT.com, others have allooded to the fact that he has a history of players getting into extremely similar situations. I was not pulling it out of thin air, I was attempting to address all the possibilities in my list of hypatheticals. I was not "dissing" Mangini (although seeing the word used so many times was pretty funny, thanks). I'm sorry if I offended you by not labeling the post with a disclaimer. At this point I'm willing to add one to all my posts so I can talk football and not argue semantacs on football threads. Just tell me what I need to put there to help you out, and I'll do it.

    Anyway, it seems like you agree with the opinion I gave 2 days ago and again yesterday. He is entitled to have incentives added to his deal. If Lerner promised him more, then he should get more. Other than that, he just deserves to be dealt with honestly. I'll leave the thread to you now. I misspelled some words so you can spend some time patting each other on the back for catching it (there are at least 3, in case you're wondering).

    @we-need-tom-tupa said:

    I welcome anyone to show me where i used the word ass in reference to anyone in the Browns organization. The same goes for asshole or hardass. Show it to me and I will apologize to you and cede whatever point it is you think you are making. If not, let me stomp out the fire on your straw man and move past this bullshit (I use that word because it seems to have become an obligatory part of these posts at this point). As part of a string of hypotheticals, I said that I wouldn't treat Cribbs poorly to protect Mangini's attempt at establishing a rep as a tough coach. Elsewhere on this thread, and on PFT.com, others have allooded to the fact that he has a history of players getting into extremely similar situations. I was not pulling it out of thin air, I was attempting to address all the possibilities in my list of hypatheticals. I was not "dissing" Mangini (although seeing the word used so many times was pretty funny, thanks). I'm sorry if I offended you by not labeling the post with a disclaimer. At this point I'm willing to add one to all my posts so I can talk football and not argue semantacs on football threads. Just tell me what I need to put there to help you out, and I'll do it.

    Anyway, it seems like you agree with the opinion I gave 2 days ago and again yesterday. He is entitled to have incentives added to his deal. If Lerner promised him more, then he should get more. Other than that, he just deserves to be dealt with honestly. I'll leave the thread to you now. I misspelled some words so you can spend some time patting each other on the back for catching it (there are at least 3, in case you're wondering).

    Grow up and quit whinning. If you can't take it then sign off............................WTF with the tears

  • @shepwrite said:

    I agree with Toop: Should be a lot of if-then in the deal, escalators added to the existing base for defensive or offense plays and performance there AND as a kick/punt returner.

    He'll want some cash. Every player does. The Browns could toss him $6 mill upfront on 4 years for sure.

    The Brown could toss him a yearly roster bonus. Not guaranteed, but a roster bonus and some incentives on performance as a returner, receiver and DB. Keep the 4 years left and the roster bonus would allow the Browns to bail if they don't feel he is worth the money.

Log in to reply