Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Bright spot? You're talking about a bright spot?

Bright spot? You're talking about a bright spot?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
32 Posts 14 Posters 1.6k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • hoortaH hoorta

    @tour2ma said:

    So we can't type "Sheet" anymore either? Shmuckin' nanny state website...

    You rang? FWIW I don't think that much of Dunlap, Shon handled him.

    Apparently McCourty and Taylor are alternating weeks of good play.

    And FG... smiel-goal... that call on the lateral cost us a spirit raising scoop and score. That throw was the very defintion of "lateral".

    Finally got around to watching the tape Tour. Not only was that clearly a lateral (replay showed the ball didn't go one inch forward) the crack officiating crew blew a couple other calls. Was wondering why everyone was screaming "face mask" on the Bungle TD right before the half. Didn't see it- until I saw the replay. If you still have the tape, take a look. Downfield, one of our guys about has his helmet ripped off. Add in, (the announcers noted it) they missed a delay of game on Cinci big gain.  🙁

    gumby73 gumby73G Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 11k Posts
    • 4k Reputation
    gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by
    #22

    @hoorta said:

    Finally got around to watching the tape Tour. Not only was that clearly a lateral (replay showed the ball didn't go one inch forward) the crack officiating crew blew a couple other calls. Was wondering why everyone was screaming "face mask" on the Bungle TD right before the half. Didn't see it- until I saw the replay. If you still have the tape, take a look. Downfield, one of our guys about has his helmet ripped off. Add in, (the announcers noted it) they missed a delay of game on Cinci big gain.  🙁

    right on H, The women ref that blew the Skins Duke fumble blew this call by being out of position..Doubt 21-7 would have made any difference. but even with the whistle being blown..The possible TD return was dead due to whistle?..Now that pylon cam is possible, I got no clue why the down marker stick does not have a camera for LOS plays..The word "conclusive" in the rule book..Forgot the **'s with conclusive camera angle only..or it has no chance  

    Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends Team Brotherhood-"It's not about You,Me or I. It's about building We"..Hue Jackson
    Tour2maT 1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • U Unsympathetic

      @tour2ma said:

      So we can't type "Sheet" anymore either?

      We can, in fact, still type "Browns."

      Ghoolie GhoolieG One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
      • 2k Posts
      • 1k Reputation
      GhoolieG Ghoolie wrote on last edited by Ghoolie
      #23

      @unsympathetic said:

      We can, in fact, still type "Browns."

      Zombow wants to ban the word pee pee

      The Cleveland Browns have the hardest hit players in the NFL
      The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • Tour2maT Tour2ma

        @hoorta said:

        ... they missed a delay of game on Cinci big gain. 

        Had forgotten about that... and the snap wasn't even close unless you count two-second late as close.

        @unsympathetic said:

        Feature article at PFF on Shon Coleman

        • Offensive tackle Shon Coleman was one of the few bright spots Sunday in the Cleveland Browns 31-7 loss against the Cincinnati Bengals. He finished the game with an overall grade of 86.3, the highest grade among all Browns’ players and the third-highest among all tackles in Week 4.
        • With a tough matchup against the 29th-rated edge defender Carlos Dunlap, Coleman held his own, allowing three total pressures (all hurries) on 47 pass snaps. He has not allowed a sack since Week 1.
        • Continually showing improvement, Coleman currently grades 18th among 68 qualifying tackles, with an overall grade of 76.4. His run-block grade of 81.5 currently ranks 18th as well.

        I am feeling a father's pride...

        If anyone still has full PFF access, I'd appreciate a note on where Schwartz lines up in the 68. I know last year he posted an 80.9 grade for the season.

        wargograw W One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 5k Posts
        • 363 Reputation
        W wargograw wrote on last edited by
        #24

        @tour2ma said:

        Had forgotten about that... and the snap wasn't even close unless you count two-second late as close.

        • Offensive tackle Shon Coleman was one of the few bright spots Sunday in the Cleveland Browns 31-7 loss against the Cincinnati Bengals. He finished the game with an overall grade of 86.3, the highest grade among all Browns’ players and the third-highest among all tackles in Week 4.
        • With a tough matchup against the 29th-rated edge defender Carlos Dunlap, Coleman held his own, allowing three total pressures (all hurries) on 47 pass snaps. He has not allowed a sack since Week 1.
        • Continually showing improvement, Coleman currently grades 18th among 68 qualifying tackles, with an overall grade of 76.4. His run-block grade of 81.5 currently ranks 18th as well.

        I am feeling a father's pride...

        If anyone still has full PFF access, I'd appreciate a note on where Schwartz lines up in the 68. I know last year he posted an 80.9 grade for the season.

        Schwartz is down at #43. Grade of 53.4 on the year. 

        1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • wargograw W One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
          • 5k Posts
          • 363 Reputation
          W wargograw wrote on last edited by
          #25

          Mack, however, is back at the top of the center rankings. Highest grade of all OL. 

          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • gumby73G gumby73

            @hoorta said:

            Finally got around to watching the tape Tour. Not only was that clearly a lateral (replay showed the ball didn't go one inch forward) the crack officiating crew blew a couple other calls. Was wondering why everyone was screaming "face mask" on the Bungle TD right before the half. Didn't see it- until I saw the replay. If you still have the tape, take a look. Downfield, one of our guys about has his helmet ripped off. Add in, (the announcers noted it) they missed a delay of game on Cinci big gain.  🙁

            right on H, The women ref that blew the Skins Duke fumble blew this call by being out of position..Doubt 21-7 would have made any difference. but even with the whistle being blown..The possible TD return was dead due to whistle?..Now that pylon cam is possible, I got no clue why the down marker stick does not have a camera for LOS plays..The word "conclusive" in the rule book..Forgot the **'s with conclusive camera angle only..or it has no chance  

            Tour2ma Tour2maT In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
            • 30k Posts
            • 6k Reputation
            Tour2maT Tour2ma wrote on last edited by
            #26

            @gumby73 said:

            he possible TD return was dead due to whistle?

            Yup... ball should have been ours at the spot of the recovery.

            You are hearing more and more about officials not making close calls/ blowing whistles in change of possession situations so replay can sort it out. Of course that only works where replays are conclusive and can either "confirm" or "change" the (non)ruling on the field. Letting either a bad call or non-call "stand" is always going to be unsatisfying, but the percentages say that is a significant minority of replay rulings. Camera coverage is pretty damn complete for every game these days.

            @wargograw said:

            Schwartz is down at #43. Grade of 53.4 on the year. 

            Gracias... Mitchell looked pretty good the plays where I focused on him Monday nite, but not so much in the opener vs. the Pats.

            @wargograw said:

            Mack, however, is back at the top of the center rankings. Highest grade of all OL. 

            Not terribly surprising is it... but unless Julio and Sanu get back in the games PDQ that's going to change. Ryan was holding the ball longer vs. the Bills.

            "When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196
            T 1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • GhoolieG Ghoolie

              @unsympathetic said:

              We can, in fact, still type "Browns."

              Zombow wants to ban the word pee pee

              The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
              • 57k Posts
              • 4k Reputation
              The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
              #27

              @ghoolie said:

              Zombow wants to ban the word pee pee

              It was Stan that instituted the changes, not Zombo.

              hoortaH 1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • Tour2maT Tour2ma

                @gumby73 said:

                he possible TD return was dead due to whistle?

                Yup... ball should have been ours at the spot of the recovery.

                You are hearing more and more about officials not making close calls/ blowing whistles in change of possession situations so replay can sort it out. Of course that only works where replays are conclusive and can either "confirm" or "change" the (non)ruling on the field. Letting either a bad call or non-call "stand" is always going to be unsatisfying, but the percentages say that is a significant minority of replay rulings. Camera coverage is pretty damn complete for every game these days.

                @wargograw said:

                Schwartz is down at #43. Grade of 53.4 on the year. 

                Gracias... Mitchell looked pretty good the plays where I focused on him Monday nite, but not so much in the opener vs. the Pats.

                @wargograw said:

                Mack, however, is back at the top of the center rankings. Highest grade of all OL. 

                Not terribly surprising is it... but unless Julio and Sanu get back in the games PDQ that's going to change. Ryan was holding the ball longer vs. the Bills.

                TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 23k Posts
                • 6k Reputation
                T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
                #28

                @tour2ma said:

                Yup... ball should have been ours at the spot of the recovery.

                You are hearing more and more about officials not making close calls/ blowing whistles in change of possession situations so replay can sort it out. Of course that only works where replays are conclusive and can either "confirm" or "change" the (non)ruling on the field. Letting either a bad call or non-call "stand" is always going to be unsatisfying, but the percentages say that is a significant minority of replay rulings. Camera coverage is pretty damn complete for every game these days.

                N.Y. (or whomever reviewed it) was way wrong on that and it was no stretch at all to see it was a lateral. More than enough evidence for the "overcall".

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • The GipperT The Gipper

                  @ghoolie said:

                  Zombow wants to ban the word pee pee

                  It was Stan that instituted the changes, not Zombo.

                  hoorta hoortaH Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 20k Posts
                  • 5k Reputation
                  hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
                  #29

                  @the-gipper said:

                  It was Stan that instituted the changes, not Zombo.

                  Because every other word from a certain poster was gutter language. Take a bow.

                  The GipperT GhoolieG 2 Replies Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • hoortaH hoorta

                    @the-gipper said:

                    It was Stan that instituted the changes, not Zombo.

                    Because every other word from a certain poster was gutter language. Take a bow.

                    The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                    • 57k Posts
                    • 4k Reputation
                    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                    #30

                    @hoorta said:

                    Because every other word from a certain poster was gutter language. Take a bow.

                    And just Whoolie would that certain poster have been?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • hoortaH hoorta

                      @the-gipper said:

                      It was Stan that instituted the changes, not Zombo.

                      Because every other word from a certain poster was gutter language. Take a bow.

                      Ghoolie GhoolieG One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 2k Posts
                      • 1k Reputation
                      GhoolieG Ghoolie wrote on last edited by
                      #31

                      @hoorta said:

                      Because every other word from a certain poster was gutter language. Take a bow.

                      I didn't comment on that. I said Zombow wanted to ban the word PeePee.

                      Stan didn't ban the words because of me you blooming idiot. he did it as parody............a slap in the face to all you fukcing whiners who bother him endlessly with complaints. He made the board a fauhking Joke, you idiot. If the cuss words bothered him he would have either called me............. OR.............. banned me.

                      Jesus are you people dumb.

                      The Cleveland Browns have the hardest hit players in the NFL
                      The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • GhoolieG Ghoolie

                        @hoorta said:

                        Because every other word from a certain poster was gutter language. Take a bow.

                        I didn't comment on that. I said Zombow wanted to ban the word PeePee.

                        Stan didn't ban the words because of me you blooming idiot. he did it as parody............a slap in the face to all you fukcing whiners who bother him endlessly with complaints. He made the board a fauhking Joke, you idiot. If the cuss words bothered him he would have either called me............. OR.............. banned me.

                        Jesus are you people dumb.

                        The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                        • 57k Posts
                        • 4k Reputation
                        The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                        #32

                        @ghoolie said:

                        I didn't comment on that. I said Zombow wanted to ban the word PeePee.

                        Stan didn't ban the words because of me you blooming idiot. he did it as parody............a slap in the face to all you fukcing whiners who bother him endlessly with complaints. He made the board a fauhking Joke, you idiot. If the cuss words bothered him he would have either called me............. OR.............. banned me.

                        Jesus are you people dumb.

                        There may be some truth to this.  But it sounds like the impetus for this came not because of what is on the Browns Board, but from all the crapola that goes on in the Political Board.  It seems apparently, per Stan's comments, that certain people who claim to be rough and tumble individualists could not apparently handle a few minor rebukes.   Ergo, we have this. That is what I gathered from what Stan said....though I don't know because I generally do not participate in the cacophony over there.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        Theme
                        • System
                        • Light
                        • Dark
                        The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                        The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Forums
                        • Recent
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Donate