Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. If you hate the Cleveland Browns rebuild, ignore this: Podcast

If you hate the Cleveland Browns rebuild, ignore this: Podcast

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
86 Posts 23 Posters 2.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • LondonBrown L Dedicated Conversation Starter Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
    • 4k Posts
    • 918 Reputation
    L LondonBrown wrote on last edited by LondonBrown
    #10

    The problem with the fans and this plan is because they stripped the entire roster bare people seem to be expecting them to hit on EVERY draft pick. Or it’s a failure  

    No front office gets it right every time and nor will this one. I’ve always thought  their idea of plan was the right one, I still do, but that doesn’t mean all the picks are going to work. They clearly won’t 

    gumby73G 1 Reply Last reply
    👍
    Quote Reply
    • Hempman H
      • 136 Posts
      • 7 Reputation
      H Hempman wrote on last edited by
      #11

      Absolutely. Never before in modern NFL history as a team torn down like the Browns. The best part is Sashi giving Berry Kizer in the last draft so he can tank for the top QB in 2018. Sashi is a cold stoned butt in that one. The main problem with that is if the team rebels from Kizer being QB and asks for Hogan to win games..........sooner than later.

      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
        • 39k Posts
        • 9k Reputation
        W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by Westside Steve
        #12

        Well that has to be the attitude as opposed to saying we focked up and we really don't know our asses from holes in the ground. And I'm sure these people know a million times more than I do, or we do, about professional football. If and when it works out I'll be happy as a pig  shitt to eat my words.

        Still if I'd been the general manager of the Cleveland Browns for the last decade or so  I don't suppose we'd have been much worse . Just saying.

        😄

        WSS

        www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
        F gumby73G 2 Replies Last reply
        👍
        Quote Reply
        • Orion OrionO Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
          • 9k Posts
          • 4k Reputation
          OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
          #13

          I'm going to post this gumby73 thought from another thread because it DOES make sense.

          The cupboards did not need to get stripped bare..We needed a QB..Once the plan of re-boot took place. We cut 4 Veterans.Tail-Telling soon after Benji, Mack & Schwartz "am booting out of here myself". Thinner than even the Harvards thought. Some bad decisions such as Gabriel with a few good moves also. Than leading to 2 drafts. #1.Taking 2nd hand draft picks while adding Draft Quantity to refill cupboards. That's really why Cory is here. #2.Moved down once gaining another 1st(Watson) while moving up more often than down to add....well whats 4 games tell ya..We need better Talented picks, not less value with more picks.
          BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE
          1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • wargograw W One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 5k Posts
            • 363 Reputation
            W wargograw wrote on last edited by
            #14

            I think he’s wrong on that. We did need to strip them bare. Well, maybe not needed to. But it was certainly the best plan. Makes for more long term success. 

            T MudflyM 2 Replies Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • Mudfly MudflyM Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Dedicated One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 7k Posts
              • 1k Reputation
              MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by Mudfly
              #15

              Can somebody name one team that has stripped down(like the Browns have) then gone on to win a championship OR have "sustained" success....????......I already know the answer, which is no.....but I could name a 100 teams that have improved w/o stripping down.....one team please(and it should be a LOT more than one, if it's the "right" way to do it)

              Please....someone....show me the precedent that says stripping down is the way to go.....

              Gumby once posted the stat for 1-15 teams and what they did the next year.....the very worst of them all won 4 and most won more than that.....so, will we now be the worst 1-15 team ever?....yes......and this is some type of proof that stripping down is better?(please)

              I would like to build up my savings account....perhaps emptying the account is the best way to start...???

              and when all this "youth" comes of age at exactly the same moment, how will we afford to retain them?.....just curious....

              We are building an unbalanced team....with very suspect players....and will continue to set records for ineptitude in drafting. FA acquisition, talent evaluation, game planning and coaching.....<<<<<<<and I dont think anyone can show me where this statement is wrong either......

              Last year we were gonna "gel" and cream our jeans as we watched this team grow,,,,,,then it was gonna be this year.....but, wait, now it's next year?....is the 3rd year when we stop looking inept?.....then how many years till the playoffs?.....and is someone gonna tell me 5 year rebuilds are the way to go?......oh man.....

              MudflyM Tour2maT 2 Replies Last reply
              👍
              Quote Reply
              • Mudfly MudflyM Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Dedicated One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                • 7k Posts
                • 1k Reputation
                MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by Mudfly
                #16

                we have taken the losing culture to new levels.....unprecedented levels for this org and the NFL.....these kids are gonna bail, lose interest, stop buying into Hues promises of success......and the good ones will move on, if we dont win very soon.....

                Who wants to work for a company that is the worst in the industry?

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • W wargograw

                  I think he’s wrong on that. We did need to strip them bare. Well, maybe not needed to. But it was certainly the best plan. Makes for more long term success. 

                  TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 23k Posts
                  • 6k Reputation
                  T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
                  #17

                  @wargograw said:

                  I think he’s wrong on that. We did need to strip them bare. Well, maybe not needed to. But it was certainly the best plan. Makes for more long term success. 

                  Under the proviso that we actually pick really well and far better than the normal "fail" rate.

                  MudflyM 1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • T TexasAg1969

                    @wargograw said:

                    I think he’s wrong on that. We did need to strip them bare. Well, maybe not needed to. But it was certainly the best plan. Makes for more long term success. 

                    Under the proviso that we actually pick really well and far better than the normal "fail" rate.

                    Mudfly MudflyM Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Dedicated One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                    • 7k Posts
                    • 1k Reputation
                    MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by Mudfly
                    #18

                    @texasag1969 said:

                    Under the proviso that we actually pick really well and far better than the normal "fail" rate.

                    and our FO has clearly stated that they cannot do that......which is why they need triple the picks everyone else needs.....

                    lets be clear......23 picks in 2 years(plus 15 FA's).....that is 37 hand picked players.....and a lot more than most teams get in 3 years.....so, technically, we should consider this equal to 3 drafts.....yet we see zero improvement in the win column......

                    nickersN 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • MudflyM Mudfly

                      @texasag1969 said:

                      Under the proviso that we actually pick really well and far better than the normal "fail" rate.

                      and our FO has clearly stated that they cannot do that......which is why they need triple the picks everyone else needs.....

                      lets be clear......23 picks in 2 years(plus 15 FA's).....that is 37 hand picked players.....and a lot more than most teams get in 3 years.....so, technically, we should consider this equal to 3 drafts.....yet we see zero improvement in the win column......

                      nickers nickersN Conversation Starter Dedicated Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done Very Popular
                      • 14k Posts
                      • 5k Reputation
                      nickersN nickers wrote on last edited by
                      #19

                      @mudfly said:

                      and our FO has clearly stated that they cannot do that......which is why they need triple the picks everyone else needs.....

                      lets be clear......23 picks in 2 years(plus 15 FA's).....that is 37 hand picked players.....and a lot more than most teams get in 3 years.....so, technically, we should consider this equal to 3 drafts.....yet we see zero improvement in the win column......

                      Which still boggles my mind , as to why we hired harvard boys instead of real football people to procure talent..

                      Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • Mudfly MudflyM Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Dedicated One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                        • 7k Posts
                        • 1k Reputation
                        MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by Mudfly
                        #20

                        They are so bad that they are showing madden highlights on their facebook page, promoting this weeks game......

                        You cannot make this schit up.....seriously....

                        https://www.facebook.com/clevelandbrowns/videos/10155971786799684/

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        😂
                        Quote Reply
                        • MudflyM Mudfly

                          Can somebody name one team that has stripped down(like the Browns have) then gone on to win a championship OR have "sustained" success....????......I already know the answer, which is no.....but I could name a 100 teams that have improved w/o stripping down.....one team please(and it should be a LOT more than one, if it's the "right" way to do it)

                          Please....someone....show me the precedent that says stripping down is the way to go.....

                          Gumby once posted the stat for 1-15 teams and what they did the next year.....the very worst of them all won 4 and most won more than that.....so, will we now be the worst 1-15 team ever?....yes......and this is some type of proof that stripping down is better?(please)

                          I would like to build up my savings account....perhaps emptying the account is the best way to start...???

                          and when all this "youth" comes of age at exactly the same moment, how will we afford to retain them?.....just curious....

                          We are building an unbalanced team....with very suspect players....and will continue to set records for ineptitude in drafting. FA acquisition, talent evaluation, game planning and coaching.....<<<<<<<and I dont think anyone can show me where this statement is wrong either......

                          Last year we were gonna "gel" and cream our jeans as we watched this team grow,,,,,,then it was gonna be this year.....but, wait, now it's next year?....is the 3rd year when we stop looking inept?.....then how many years till the playoffs?.....and is someone gonna tell me 5 year rebuilds are the way to go?......oh man.....

                          Mudfly MudflyM Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Dedicated One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                          • 7k Posts
                          • 1k Reputation
                          MudflyM Mudfly wrote on last edited by
                          #21

                          @mudfly said:

                          Can somebody name one team that has stripped down(like the Browns have) then gone on to win a championship OR have "sustained" success....????......

                          Ill be waiting for an answer on this......a "quality" answer, that is/////

                          W 1 Reply Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • Orion OrionO Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                            • 9k Posts
                            • 4k Reputation
                            OrionO Orion wrote on last edited by
                            #22

                            Here's a quote from mudfly on another thread

                            --------------

                            Here is a look at 2016 and 2017 top free agents we brought in(and lost)......for example.....contributing players are in red...

                            2016 Signed: Robert Earth Mover Griffin(gone), Demario Thomas(gone), Rahim Moore(gone), Justin Tuggle(gone), Alvin Bailey(gone), Don Jones(gone), Terrell Pryor(gone), Austin Paztor(gone).....and Jamal Taylor(the one and only still here....and kind of sucking right now)

                            2016 Lost: Mack, Schwartz, Gabriel, Benjiman, Robertson, Dansby, Gipson and Bademosi.....who are all contributing to better teams....and several are playing at a very high level right now....

                            Also lost Whitner, Bowe, Soloman and Manziel who all make sense....

                            So....2016....we let a bunch of good ones go and have benefitted exactly zero from the ones we signed.....and of the ones I see gone, Im not sure we have placed a "better" player at any of those positions.......I see 2 decent WR's(we have none).....I see 2 DB's that would, at least, add quality depth(and one who woulda started)....I see 2 LB's we coulds used.....

                            2017 signed.....J. Tretter(who isnt that good), Keven Zietler and Kenny Britt(terrible)

                            2017 we traded for Asspiler(gone), Calvin Pryor(gone), Sammy Coates (ugh)

                            2017 lost/released/traded....Greco(depth & versatility), Demario Thomas(last years "big" signing....traded for garbage and replaced by his backup Carder....as per usual), Pryor, Haden, Paztor.....

                            So....in 2 years we have signed or traded for 15 veteran players and have exactly 3 contributing(and our team bites....my grandma could contribute)....to me, that represents a team that is clueless...

                            ------------------end quote.

                            I agree that we did not have to strip down the roster the way that the brainiacs did.   They think they're so friggin' smaaaat.

                            Other teams can use what they have and ADD talent to improve their team.  But the Harvard Think Tank thought they'd just trash the roster and bring in college kids from the 4th round and beat the rest of the league.

                            After letting our OL go to the crapper and SEEING for themselves what happened, they spent a kazzioion dollars on the OL to try and fix what they screwed up.  

                            At the moment the Harvard Think Tank doesn't look any smarter than graduates from an online college.

                            BEING A BROWNS FAN IS A TEST TO SEE HOW MUCH YOU CAN TAKE
                            T 1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • OrionO Orion

                              Here's a quote from mudfly on another thread

                              --------------

                              Here is a look at 2016 and 2017 top free agents we brought in(and lost)......for example.....contributing players are in red...

                              2016 Signed: Robert Earth Mover Griffin(gone), Demario Thomas(gone), Rahim Moore(gone), Justin Tuggle(gone), Alvin Bailey(gone), Don Jones(gone), Terrell Pryor(gone), Austin Paztor(gone).....and Jamal Taylor(the one and only still here....and kind of sucking right now)

                              2016 Lost: Mack, Schwartz, Gabriel, Benjiman, Robertson, Dansby, Gipson and Bademosi.....who are all contributing to better teams....and several are playing at a very high level right now....

                              Also lost Whitner, Bowe, Soloman and Manziel who all make sense....

                              So....2016....we let a bunch of good ones go and have benefitted exactly zero from the ones we signed.....and of the ones I see gone, Im not sure we have placed a "better" player at any of those positions.......I see 2 decent WR's(we have none).....I see 2 DB's that would, at least, add quality depth(and one who woulda started)....I see 2 LB's we coulds used.....

                              2017 signed.....J. Tretter(who isnt that good), Keven Zietler and Kenny Britt(terrible)

                              2017 we traded for Asspiler(gone), Calvin Pryor(gone), Sammy Coates (ugh)

                              2017 lost/released/traded....Greco(depth & versatility), Demario Thomas(last years "big" signing....traded for garbage and replaced by his backup Carder....as per usual), Pryor, Haden, Paztor.....

                              So....in 2 years we have signed or traded for 15 veteran players and have exactly 3 contributing(and our team bites....my grandma could contribute)....to me, that represents a team that is clueless...

                              ------------------end quote.

                              I agree that we did not have to strip down the roster the way that the brainiacs did.   They think they're so friggin' smaaaat.

                              Other teams can use what they have and ADD talent to improve their team.  But the Harvard Think Tank thought they'd just trash the roster and bring in college kids from the 4th round and beat the rest of the league.

                              After letting our OL go to the crapper and SEEING for themselves what happened, they spent a kazzioion dollars on the OL to try and fix what they screwed up.  

                              At the moment the Harvard Think Tank doesn't look any smarter than graduates from an online college.

                              TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                              • 23k Posts
                              • 6k Reputation
                              T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
                              #23

                              @orion said:

                              At the moment the Harvard Think Tank doesn't look any smarter than graduates from an online college.
                               

                              All hail Trump U.😛

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              😂
                              Quote Reply
                              • MudflyM Mudfly

                                @mudfly said:

                                Can somebody name one team that has stripped down(like the Browns have) then gone on to win a championship OR have "sustained" success....????......

                                Ill be waiting for an answer on this......a "quality" answer, that is/////

                                wargograw W One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                • 5k Posts
                                • 363 Reputation
                                W wargograw wrote on last edited by
                                #24

                                @mudfly said:

                                Ill be waiting for an answer on this......a "quality" answer, that is/////

                                It’s never been tried. So while we can’t provide you a stripped down team that has had success, you also can’t provide a team that’s stripped their team down and NOT had success. 

                                F T 2 Replies Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • tiamat63 tiamat63T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Week One Done One Month Later One Year In Very Popular
                                  • 13k Posts
                                  • 5k Reputation
                                  tiamat63T tiamat63 wrote on last edited by
                                  #25

                                  Fine with the rebuild strategy.  I question the players we take and more importantly the ones we don't. 

                                  Dutch OvenD 1 Reply Last reply
                                  👍
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • tiamat63T tiamat63

                                    Fine with the rebuild strategy.  I question the players we take and more importantly the ones we don't. 

                                    Dutch Oven Dutch OvenD Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                    • 15k Posts
                                    • 8k Reputation
                                    Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
                                    #26

                                    @tiamat63 said:

                                    Fine with the rebuild strategy.  I question the players we take and more importantly the ones we don't. 

                                    Absolutely.

                                    I didn't have a problem with the idea of a complete rebuild, but I do have a problem with the execution of it so far.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • L LondonBrown

                                      The problem with the fans and this plan is because they stripped the entire roster bare people seem to be expecting them to hit on EVERY draft pick. Or it’s a failure  

                                      No front office gets it right every time and nor will this one. I’ve always thought  their idea of plan was the right one, I still do, but that doesn’t mean all the picks are going to work. They clearly won’t 

                                      gumby73 gumby73G Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                      • 11k Posts
                                      • 4k Reputation
                                      gumby73G gumby73 wrote on last edited by gumby73
                                      #27

                                      @londonbrown said:

                                      The problem with the fans and this plan is because they stripped the entire roster bare people seem to be expecting them to hit on EVERY draft pick. Or it’s a failure  

                                      No front office gets it right every time and nor will this one. I’ve always thought  their idea of plan was the right one, I still do, but that doesn’t mean all the picks are going to work. They clearly won’t 

                                      Right, Right, Your Bloody well right..Hail the King of London Games 

                                      @mudfly said:

                                      and our FO has clearly stated that they cannot do that......which is why they need triple the picks everyone else needs.....

                                      lets be clear......23 picks in 2 years(plus 15 FA's).....that is 37 hand picked players.....and a lot more than most teams get in 3 years.....so, technically, we should consider this equal to 3 drafts.....yet we see zero improvement in the win column......

                                      The wins should come Mud. Hue must get better in a lot of ways. Seems were either on The Highway to Hell trail or on the Fast Track to maybe more deserved Bitonio & Kirksey contract Extensions.. Light should shine brighter in next season. But it will take as always both drafting better pieces & more good FA additions such as Collins & maybe McCourty down the road..The TE Position looks promising for a while. Would you extend any of these Players? Duke,Telfer,Shelton,Orchard,Schobert,Campbell,Kindred,B.Calhoun,D.Alexander or Crow? Some boarder line players still in that group. These need just more field simmering to evaluate as a late riser as Kirksey did imo.. Naz,Ogbah,C.Coleman,Drango...I really like the early arrival of Shon Coleman & Ogunjobi..With this next QB class, why not 2? BTW-The next WR class may end up short of any NFL depth? Looks like the FO anal-lynic dept. is all over it taking some shots now..

                                      Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends Team Brotherhood-"It's not about You,Me or I. It's about building We"..Hue Jackson
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • W Westside Steve

                                        Well that has to be the attitude as opposed to saying we focked up and we really don't know our asses from holes in the ground. And I'm sure these people know a million times more than I do, or we do, about professional football. If and when it works out I'll be happy as a pig  shitt to eat my words.

                                        Still if I'd been the general manager of the Cleveland Browns for the last decade or so  I don't suppose we'd have been much worse . Just saying.

                                        😄

                                        WSS

                                        Furious Styles F
                                        • 456 Posts
                                        • 65 Reputation
                                        F Furious Styles wrote on last edited by
                                        #28

                                        @westside-steve said:

                                        Still if I'd been the general manager of the Cleveland Browns for the last decade or so  I don't suppose we'd have been much worse . Just saying.

                                        WSS

                                        I don't know you at all, but I bet if you were GM you could produce more than 1 win.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • W wargograw

                                          @mudfly said:

                                          Ill be waiting for an answer on this......a "quality" answer, that is/////

                                          It’s never been tried. So while we can’t provide you a stripped down team that has had success, you also can’t provide a team that’s stripped their team down and NOT had success. 

                                          Furious Styles F
                                          • 456 Posts
                                          • 65 Reputation
                                          F Furious Styles wrote on last edited by Furious Styles
                                          #29

                                          @wargograw said:

                                          It’s never been tried. So while we can’t provide you a stripped down team that has had success, you also can’t provide a team that’s stripped their team down and NOT had success. 

                                          Browns ?

                                          What we're seeing is BELOW expansion team quality.

                                          Remember, Billy Beane, for all the "money ball" hype, never won a title.

                                          Dutch OvenD 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate