Skip to content

Joe tore his tricep....

The Browns Board
105 29 2.7k
  • @flyingfooldoug said:

    It sounds like JT may call it a career. It's a shame that we never had a good QB for him to block for. 

    I think he's overwhelmed with being injured. I believe his competitive spirit will drive him to return. 

    @jcam222 said:

    I think he's overwhelmed with being injured. I believe his competitive spirit will drive him to return. 

    Not feeling that... certainly is somber.

    Joe's been hurt... has played hurt before (even on a bad knee he had cleaned up after one season a while ago IIRC)... but being injured to the point of not having a choice about playing? That's what's new.

    Even in that light he's said this is not the time to decide anything and he's right... it's not.

    In the end I think it'll be a battle between missing playing and potentially missing "the turn" for this franchise vs. his CTE concerns.

  • @clevfan4life said:

    Ur right ghoolie, about the browns lack of depth at that position. But ur also historically wrong about the importance of that position. This irganization squandered the carreer of one of the best LT's ever. They couldn't find a decent signal caller and offense in general to put behind him. But now our qb problems become even murkier. Now we have to find/groom a young qb who's now gonna get Sock dipped in him from the blindside on every down. 

    Whoa buddy,  I NEVER said the OL was not important, and I never minimized the key role of LT. All I ever said was that good OL are not that hard to come by. Certainly they can be had a lot lower than the first round in the draft. Pittsburgh and the Patriots both won SBs with a makeshift OL put together at the last minute. OL get hurt a lot, It is the nature of the beast. Only in Cleveland are OL so hard to find. Why don't other teams spend years fixing their OL? How come other teams can bring guys in and out and still win titles?

    Joe Thomas is a great LT, the best, absolutely. But irreplaceable? No, not at all. The only reason the Browns did not have an acceptable replacement for Joe is because the FO blows, and Hue is a useless HC.

    @ghoolie said:

    Whoa buddy,  I NEVER said the OL was not important, and I never minimized the key role of LT. All I ever said was that good OL are not that hard to come by. Certainly they can be had a lot lower than the first round in the draft. Pittsburgh and the Patriots both won SBs with a makeshift OL put together at the last minute. OL get hurt a lot, It is the nature of the beast. Only in Cleveland are OL so hard to find. Why don't other teams spend years fixing their OL? How come other teams can bring guys in and out and still win titles?

    Joe Thomas is a great LT, the best, absolutely. But irreplaceable? No, not at all. The only reason the Browns did not have an acceptable replacement for Joe is because the FO blows, and Hue is a useless HC.

    Same can be said of receivers. Patriots and Seahawks won super bowls with makeshift, low round receiving corps as well...

  • @jrb12711 said:

    Eh, I could be wrong but the formula of aging vet + major injury =release or otherwise new team is pretty common in the NFL. From Peyton Manning on down it's just how it goes.

    Especially with this FO, I could easily see them trading away JT for a mid-round pick.

    Then name a bet... monetary... beeratary... whatevertary...

    One... Joe's only 32... turns 33 in December. That is not old for an OT. And he showed absolutely no signs of slowing this season.

    Two... the injury is not "major"... it's frickin' Tommy John. Pitchers now come back regularly from this reparative procedure better than ever... stronger than ever.

    Three... he's stuck around looking to be part of a turn. I think he believes in our direction and if we post a good off-season, he'll be enticed to hang another year, his final contract year... and then extend.

    I get that he's never rehab'd before, but the man shows up in shape year after year, so it's not like the work will be more than he's accustomed to doing... just more focused.

    @gumby73 said:

    imo, JT should get the CTE testing done while he's down.

    Is that a thing? I thought detection was only by brain dissection, which would seem premature ATM... 😛

    @canton-dawg said:

    He followed that tweet with this one. . .

    MRI reveals torn tricep tendon. Surgery soon. Tough break.

    So basically he's looking at Tommy John surgery...

    Maybe has a future as a closer for the Tribe...

    @tour2ma said:

    Then name a bet... monetary... beeratary... whatevertary...

    One... Joe's only 32... turns 33 in December. That is not old for an OT. And he showed absolutely no signs of slowing this season.

    Two... the injury is not "major"... it's frickin' Tommy John. Pitchers now come back regularly from this reparative procedure better than ever... stronger than ever.

    Before we bet, I feel like you're not understanding what I'm saying. I actually agree with everything you're saying here. I definitely see him coming back, but I see the Browns brass (if we're talking about the same FO) moving him. It's what we did with Joe Haden, and what happens with aging vets all the time in the NFL.

  • Capture1.PNG

  • Hope Joe makes a full recovery..

    But we should of drafted Carson Wentz..

  • @flyingfooldoug said:

    It sounds like JT may call it a career. It's a shame that we never had a good QB for him to block for. 

    I think he's overwhelmed with being injured. I believe his competitive spirit will drive him to return. 

    @jcam222 said:

    I think he's overwhelmed with being injured. I believe his competitive spirit will drive him to return. 

    I have had this injury in not one.. but both arms.. Joe will NOT be back.. Trust me...

  • @tour2ma said:

    Then name a bet... monetary... beeratary... whatevertary...

    One... Joe's only 32... turns 33 in December. That is not old for an OT. And he showed absolutely no signs of slowing this season.

    Two... the injury is not "major"... it's frickin' Tommy John. Pitchers now come back regularly from this reparative procedure better than ever... stronger than ever.

    Before we bet, I feel like you're not understanding what I'm saying. I actually agree with everything you're saying here. I definitely see him coming back, but I see the Browns brass (if we're talking about the same FO) moving him. It's what we did with Joe Haden, and what happens with aging vets all the time in the NFL.

    @jrb12711 said:

    Before we bet, I feel like you're not understanding what I'm saying. I actually agree with everything you're saying here. I definitely see him coming back, but I see the Browns brass (if we're talking about the same FO) moving him. It's what we did with Joe Haden, and what happens with aging vets all the time in the NFL.

    Cool... that criteria will work...

    "If Joe returns, then he will not remain a Brown if our current FO is still in control."

    Ye say Yay... I say nay...

  • @tacosman said:

    again, how can we get more screwed than losing every damn game?

    Pass on Wentz, then lose every damn game.  That's how!

    @flyingfooldoug said:

    Pass on Wentz, then lose every damn game.  That's how!

    Wentz would have been run out of cleveland by years end last year

  • Shmuck i love that guy. You know, if he wanted to be OC id be all for it. Let him learn on the job. Im dead serious. If he wanted to be OC id say let him have it, he's proved how much he loves this organization and city. Maybe he wants to be mayor even? Give it to him

  • @ghoolie said:

    Whoa buddy,  I NEVER said the OL was not important, and I never minimized the key role of LT. All I ever said was that good OL are not that hard to come by. Certainly they can be had a lot lower than the first round in the draft. Pittsburgh and the Patriots both won SBs with a makeshift OL put together at the last minute. OL get hurt a lot, It is the nature of the beast. Only in Cleveland are OL so hard to find. Why don't other teams spend years fixing their OL? How come other teams can bring guys in and out and still win titles?

    Joe Thomas is a great LT, the best, absolutely. But irreplaceable? No, not at all. The only reason the Browns did not have an acceptable replacement for Joe is because the FO blows, and Hue is a useless HC.

    Same can be said of receivers. Patriots and Seahawks won super bowls with makeshift, low round receiving corps as well...

    @roycerolls said:

    Same can be said of receivers. Patriots and Seahawks won super bowls with makeshift, low round receiving corps as well...

    No argument from me. The point is, you can't win without playmakers. You can win without #1 draft pick OL. Joe Thomas truly was a waste of a high draft pick. He did nothing to impact the Browns fortunes.

  • @roycerolls said:

    Same can be said of receivers. Patriots and Seahawks won super bowls with makeshift, low round receiving corps as well...

    No argument from me. The point is, you can't win without playmakers. You can win without #1 draft pick OL. Joe Thomas truly was a waste of a high draft pick. He did nothing to impact the Browns fortunes.

    @ghoolie said:

    . Joe Thomas truly was a waste of a high draft pick. He did nothing to impact the Browns fortunes.

    Ur gripe shouldve about every high pick we missed on since joes draft. Picking joe wasnt the problem, it was every draft after that where we missed on everything.

    joes 2007 draft had peterson and lynch available, but how good would they have been on clevelands perennially bad o line? Calvin johnson was in that class but he went before our pick. Its hard to fault the browns for taking jt. If johnson were available maybe that changes. But thank god we didnt have the #1 or we would have drafted jamarcus

  • @ghoolie said:

    . Joe Thomas truly was a waste of a high draft pick. He did nothing to impact the Browns fortunes.

    Ur gripe shouldve about every high pick we missed on since joes draft. Picking joe wasnt the problem, it was every draft after that where we missed on everything.

    joes 2007 draft had peterson and lynch available, but how good would they have been on clevelands perennially bad o line? Calvin johnson was in that class but he went before our pick. Its hard to fault the browns for taking jt. If johnson were available maybe that changes. But thank god we didnt have the #1 or we would have drafted jamarcus

    @clevfan4life said:

    Ur gripe shouldve about every high pick we missed on since joes draft. Picking joe wasnt the problem, it was every draft after that where we missed on everything.

    Put another way...

    We should be so lucky as to have half our picks turn out as well as Joe...

  • @flyingfooldoug said:

    Pass on Wentz, then lose every damn game.  That's how!

    Wentz would have been run out of cleveland by years end last year

    @clevfan4life said:

    Wentz would have been run out of cleveland by years end last year

    This. 

  • @clevfan4life said:

    Wentz would have been run out of cleveland by years end last year

    This. 

    @wargograw said:

    This. 

    Ikr? These same asshats would have gad wentz's picture up next to weedons by midseason with the caption "really? did none of us see this coming?"

  • @roycerolls said:

    Same can be said of receivers. Patriots and Seahawks won super bowls with makeshift, low round receiving corps as well...

    No argument from me. The point is, you can't win without playmakers. You can win without #1 draft pick OL. Joe Thomas truly was a waste of a high draft pick. He did nothing to impact the Browns fortunes.

    @ghoolie said:

    No argument from me. The point is, you can't win without playmakers. You can win without #1 draft pick OL. Joe Thomas truly was a waste of a high draft pick. He did nothing to impact the Browns fortunes.

    Ghoolie you are wrong on this subject. You said the top teams in NFL dont waste top picks on OL.

    Well, here is the list of just 1st round OL with good teams recently. There will be a few that were 1st round picks and switched teams, but they still were 1sr rounders that helped their team succeed.

    Atlanta: Jake Matthews, Alex Mack

    Carolina Panthers: Matt Kalil

    Dallas Cowboys: Zach Martin, Travis Frederick, Tyron Smith

    Green Bay Packers: Bryan Bulaga

    New England Patriots: Nate Solder

    Philadelphia Eagles: Lane Johnson (just look at Wentz W-L record with and without him),

    Pittsburgh Steelers: David Decastro, Maurkice Pouncey

    Seattle Seahawks: Russell Okung

    That is just since Joe Thomas was drafted. There has been a few 2nd rounders as well who turned into Pro Bowlers for competing teams.

    I could have missed someone as I dont know every teams lineman

  • @ghoolie said:

    No argument from me. The point is, you can't win without playmakers. You can win without #1 draft pick OL. Joe Thomas truly was a waste of a high draft pick. He did nothing to impact the Browns fortunes.

    Ghoolie you are wrong on this subject. You said the top teams in NFL dont waste top picks on OL.

    Well, here is the list of just 1st round OL with good teams recently. There will be a few that were 1st round picks and switched teams, but they still were 1sr rounders that helped their team succeed.

    Atlanta: Jake Matthews, Alex Mack

    Carolina Panthers: Matt Kalil

    Dallas Cowboys: Zach Martin, Travis Frederick, Tyron Smith

    Green Bay Packers: Bryan Bulaga

    New England Patriots: Nate Solder

    Philadelphia Eagles: Lane Johnson (just look at Wentz W-L record with and without him),

    Pittsburgh Steelers: David Decastro, Maurkice Pouncey

    Seattle Seahawks: Russell Okung

    That is just since Joe Thomas was drafted. There has been a few 2nd rounders as well who turned into Pro Bowlers for competing teams.

    I could have missed someone as I dont know every teams lineman

    @gunz41 said:

    Ghoolie you are wrong on this subject. You said the top teams in NFL dont waste top picks on OL.

    Well, here is the list of just 1st round OL with good teams recently. There will be a few that were 1st round picks and switched teams, but they still were 1sr rounders that helped their team succeed.

    Atlanta: Jake Matthews, Alex Mack

    Carolina Panthers: Matt Kalil

    Dallas Cowboys: Zach Martin, Travis Frederick, Tyron Smith

    Green Bay Packers: Bryan Bulaga

    New England Patriots: Nate Solder

    Philadelphia Eagles: Lane Johnson (just look at Wentz W-L record with and without him),

    Pittsburgh Steelers: David Decastro, Maurkice Pouncey

    Seattle Seahawks: Russell Okung

    That is just since Joe Thomas was drafted. There has been a few 2nd rounders as well who turned into Pro Bowlers for competing teams.

    I could have missed someone as I dont know every teams lineman

    Those teams had playmakers, They didn't have the total vacuum of playmakers the Browns did. TOTALLY different issue.

  • To be honest, the best thing that could have happened to the Browns is for Thomas to get hurt. Without the circle jerk over how phenomenal he is, now the Browns organization will face real scrutiny. 

    Thanks for your service Joe, now run along.

  • @gunz41 said:

    Ghoolie you are wrong on this subject. You said the top teams in NFL dont waste top picks on OL.

    Well, here is the list of just 1st round OL with good teams recently. There will be a few that were 1st round picks and switched teams, but they still were 1sr rounders that helped their team succeed.

    Atlanta: Jake Matthews, Alex Mack

    Carolina Panthers: Matt Kalil

    Dallas Cowboys: Zach Martin, Travis Frederick, Tyron Smith

    Green Bay Packers: Bryan Bulaga

    New England Patriots: Nate Solder

    Philadelphia Eagles: Lane Johnson (just look at Wentz W-L record with and without him),

    Pittsburgh Steelers: David Decastro, Maurkice Pouncey

    Seattle Seahawks: Russell Okung

    That is just since Joe Thomas was drafted. There has been a few 2nd rounders as well who turned into Pro Bowlers for competing teams.

    I could have missed someone as I dont know every teams lineman

    Those teams had playmakers, They didn't have the total vacuum of playmakers the Browns did. TOTALLY different issue.

    @ghoolie said:

    Those teams had playmakers, They didn't have the total vacuum of playmakers the Browns did. TOTALLY different issue.

    Ur right ghoolie but the feeling in the nfl usually is that everything stsrts with the qb. Sonu can have calvin johnson on the team and it doesnt mean Sheet if the qb is on his butt 2 sec after the snap. 

    Joe didnt have much of  an impact because the rest of the line was habitual garbage. Teams just moved their primary edge rushers to the right side. 

  • To be honest, the best thing that could have happened to the Browns is for Thomas to get hurt. Without the circle jerk over how phenomenal he is, now the Browns organization will face real scrutiny. 

    Thanks for your service Joe, now run along.

    @ghoolie said:

    Thanks for your service Joe, now run along.

    Thats so wrong ghoolie. I understand to an extent ur gripe about not having playmakers but JT was one of the greatest browns in history and he never left. Telling him to run along? Cmon dude

  • @ghoolie said:

    Thanks for your service Joe, now run along.

    Thats so wrong ghoolie. I understand to an extent ur gripe about not having playmakers but JT was one of the greatest browns in history and he never left. Telling him to run along? Cmon dude

    @clevfan4life said:

    Thats so wrong ghoolie. I understand to an extent ur gripe about not having playmakers but JT was one of the greatest browns in history and he never left. Telling him to run along? Cmon dude

    It’s really sad being subject to the cycles of Ghoolie’s life. Guy’s grieving and we get nice Ghoolie. Browns fan Ghoolie. He starts to recover and the worthless poster comes out. Really weird.