***Official Browns Vs. Vikings In London, England, UK, Game Night Thread***
-
Refs are taking over
-
Vikings TD.
-
Shmuck the Browns 0-8, 1-23
-
if it's short of 5 yards from the LOS and it's not a hold/grab/tug whatever and the ball isn't in the air, no it's not a penalty. You can make a contact with a reciever like that. The rules are very clear on that.
Unless the ball is thrown to said receiver and the contact impedes his ability to catch the ball. The rules are even more clear on that.
Unless the ball is thrown to said receiver and the contact impedes his ability to catch the ball. The rules are even more clear on that.
*if* the ball is in the air. It wasn't. you are making rules up. It cant be pass interference because the ball wasnt thrown yet. Thats where you 'impedes' argument comes in. You can't call PI on a ball that hasnt been thrown. And it cant be illegal contact(what I guess you are arguing for) because the contact was within 5 yards. And it can't be defensive holding because there was no hold. Please show me this rule about 'impedes ability to catch the ball' before the ball is thrown because it doesnt exist and thats why you can't cite it.
-
This is far from over, The Viks are going to get 2 more touchdowns, The refs will be sure of it
-
We're 0 - 8 because of Haslam, not the refs.
-
Njoku stinks, thank god he has good measureables
Njoku stinks, thank god he has good measureables
He stinks because the defender got his hands between him and the ball? Wow!
-
Who thought he was better than Parky or whatever his name was?
Who thought he was better than Parky or whatever his name was?
You mean Cody Parkey, kicking for the Fins?
Yeah, he’s currently 8 out 9 on FG’s on the year.
Two things that will define you: Your determination when you have nothing. Your attitude when you have everything. - Mike McCartney -
Unless the ball is thrown to said receiver and the contact impedes his ability to catch the ball. The rules are even more clear on that.
*if* the ball is in the air. It wasn't. you are making rules up. It cant be pass interference because the ball wasnt thrown yet. Thats where you 'impedes' argument comes in. You can't call PI on a ball that hasnt been thrown. And it cant be illegal contact(what I guess you are arguing for) because the contact was within 5 yards. And it can't be defensive holding because there was no hold. Please show me this rule about 'impedes ability to catch the ball' before the ball is thrown because it doesnt exist and thats why you can't cite it.
*if* the ball is in the air. It wasn't. you are making rules up. It cant be pass interference because the ball wasnt thrown yet. Thats where you 'impedes' argument comes in. You can't call PI on a ball that hasnt been thrown. And it cant be illegal contact(what I guess you are arguing for) because the contact was within 5 yards. And it can't be defensive holding because there was no hold. Please show me this rule about 'impedes ability to catch the ball' before the ball is thrown because it doesnt exist and thats why you can't cite it.
The ball was literally going over the head of the guys when we ran into him. Are you watching the game? Trent green said that was a missed call, because it was.
Here you go: http://www.nfl.com/rulebook/passinterference go ahead and take time to read it. Or do you need more citation
-
Unless the ball is thrown to said receiver and the contact impedes his ability to catch the ball. The rules are even more clear on that.
*if* the ball is in the air. It wasn't. you are making rules up. It cant be pass interference because the ball wasnt thrown yet. Thats where you 'impedes' argument comes in. You can't call PI on a ball that hasnt been thrown. And it cant be illegal contact(what I guess you are arguing for) because the contact was within 5 yards. And it can't be defensive holding because there was no hold. Please show me this rule about 'impedes ability to catch the ball' before the ball is thrown because it doesnt exist and thats why you can't cite it.
*if* the ball is in the air. It wasn't. you are making rules up. It cant be pass interference because the ball wasnt thrown yet. Thats where you 'impedes' argument comes in. You can't call PI on a ball that hasnt been thrown. And it cant be illegal contact(what I guess you are arguing for) because the contact was within 5 yards. And it can't be defensive holding because there was no hold. Please show me this rule about 'impedes ability to catch the ball' before the ball is thrown because it doesnt exist and thats why you can't cite it.
It really is a moot point since Treggs of Society was wide open and Kizer didn't see it and if he did they would've called the obvious pick Devalve set
-
So... what? 33-19 final score? 40-23?
Or the Browns make it close?
-
I swear the refs love to make it harder for us and to kick us when we are down. PI on like what 3 or 4 plays now, then a roughing the passer? Give me a break When will they start giving us calls? They never call PI when it happens on us,
-
Njoku stinks, thank god he has good measureables
He stinks because the defender got his hands between him and the ball? Wow!
He stinks because the defender got his hands between him and the ball? Wow!
No he stinks because he is a first round project who doesn't win 50/50 battles or make routine catches.
-
Who thought he was better than Parky or whatever his name was?
You mean Cody Parkey, kicking for the Fins?
Yeah, he’s currently 8 out 9 on FG’s on the year.
You mean Cody Parkey, kicking for the Fins?
Yeah, he’s currently 8 out 9 on FG’s on the year.
And he is better than what we have. We had him but kept a kicker who can't kick
-
now we see what the Browns are made of, plenty of time on the clock to get 2 TDs for any decent NFL team. Why does scoring 2 TDs seem so insurmountable for the Browns?
-
Here comes another Vik td
-
we were winning i finally turned the game on
-
Well...hmm... nice punt?
-
Who thought he was better than Parky or whatever his name was?
You mean Cody Parkey, kicking for the Fins?
Yeah, he’s currently 8 out 9 on FG’s on the year.
You mean Cody Parkey, kicking for the Fins?
Yeah, he’s currently 8 out 9 on FG’s on the year.
Which is precisely what I was saying in another thread when talking about Gonzales. We need to give him time. He's a rookie.
-
Most teams seem to come together more when the season goes by, Not us, we get worse. Does Sashi not see we don't have a deep threat wide out? Or a kicker? a RB who just loves to miss the hole and fumble and miss pitches, We are the joke of the NFL and now London sees it first hand
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login