The Browns could land a damaged Andrew Luck for the right price.
-
Dealing for Luck is a MASSIVE gamble. Draft a QB with the first round pick and pray #12 works out.
-
Dealing for Luck is a MASSIVE gamble. Draft a QB with the first round pick and pray #12 works out.
Dealing for Luck is a MASSIVE gamble. Draft a QB with the first round pick and pray #12 works out.
Wait, I'm confused... Are you saying the Browns should trade for Luck AND take a QB #1 overall?
-
I can imagine Murray Hill in the 70s was definitely colorful! Especially considering the on-going Danny Greene situation going on at the time.
I knew a couple of guys that knew Danny personally, no kidding! Quite an "interesting" and fun guy.
I did not know him.....at all.
I knew a couple of guys that knew Danny personally, no kidding! Quite an "interesting" and fun guy.
I did not know him.....at all.
I knew some guys that knew Danny Green as well. They liked him. They said Danny Green was The Bomb. (err, or was that Danny Green was going to be bombed?) Well....one or the other. Can't recall specifically right now.
-
@boo-fagley said:
So what? Ryan Fitzpatrick went to Harvard. You want him too?
Elway is not known for being a genius. Look at the cast of bums he drafted to play QB.
You don't follow along very well.....the OP said that Andrew LUck was a Stanford numbskull. I pointed out that Stanford may be the premier academic institution in the country....
Besides, everyone know that Harvard takes a back seat to Cornell.
But this conversation had nothing to do with football acumem.
-
@boo-fagley said:
Makes no sense to trade for a used Andy Luck when the Browns can draft a brand new QB and get him in his prime at probably less money.
I went to Carmax. I could buy a spanking new vehicle with 1 mile on it for the same price of their 30,000 mile shined up jalopies. No to QBmax.
Just a fact: Nearly half of the Super Bowl winning QBs were not drafted by the team they won the SB with.
Just pointing out that sometimes it does not hurt to bring in an experienced guy.
-
For $5m a year Browns might be lucky to get Anderson. You know, the guy who actually won games...
-
Dealing for Luck is a MASSIVE gamble. Draft a QB with the first round pick and pray #12 works out.
Wait, I'm confused... Are you saying the Browns should trade for Luck AND take a QB #1 overall?
Wait, I'm confused... Are you saying the Browns should trade for Luck AND take a QB #1 overall?
Yes. The Redskins drafted Kirk Cousins as insurance after trading for RG3. Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
-
Wait, I'm confused... Are you saying the Browns should trade for Luck AND take a QB #1 overall?
Yes. The Redskins drafted Kirk Cousins as insurance after trading for RG3. Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
Yes. The Redskins drafted Kirk Cousins as insurance after trading for RG3. Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
Or, maybe we just do what the Skins did: Draft a QB in round one....and another in round 4.
It can't hurt......and this FO has certainly blown enough 3rd/4th round picks.....getting another "egg" would be no big deal.
-
Sounds like my Rosen/Benkert plan...
I would not be shocked if they actually did it. The WR net the cast in 2016 was essentially that approach. And this draft will be the draft to fill our near, QB void.
Sounds like my Rosen/Benkert plan...
I would not be shocked if they actually did it. The WR net the cast in 2016 was essentially that approach. And this draft will be the draft to fill our near, QB void.
Interesting I've been thinking along the same lines of 1st overall and a 2nd rounder. It's a deeper class than anyone we have now in that position.
EDITL: However if Allen is there to pick in the 2nd, please use it on a WR, FS or some other position of greater need.

-
@boo-fagley said:
Awesome, you have a 49% chance at winning a Super Bowl.
A cursory list - Brady has 5, E Manning has 2, Ben has 2, Wilson has 1, Flacco has 1, Rodgers has 1, Elway has 2. Over the last 15 years the team that drafted its QB has won the Super Bowl.
And without one the odds are.... Zero!
-
Wait, I'm confused... Are you saying the Browns should trade for Luck AND take a QB #1 overall?
Yes. The Redskins drafted Kirk Cousins as insurance after trading for RG3. Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
Yes. The Redskins drafted Kirk Cousins as insurance after trading for RG3. Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
So if the Browns used their #1 overall on a QB, what would you give up to get Luck?
-
Yes. The Redskins drafted Kirk Cousins as insurance after trading for RG3. Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
So if the Browns used their #1 overall on a QB, what would you give up to get Luck?
So if the Browns used their #1 overall on a QB, what would you give up to get Luck?
Kizer?
WSS the
-
On the other hand not even that unless anybody here sees Andrew Luck as being a crafty old veteran who could mentor our high draft pick.
Rather than the guy that never lived up to the hype that he actually is.
WSS the
-
@boo-fagley said:
Awesome, you have a 49% chance at winning a Super Bowl.
A cursory list - Brady has 5, E Manning has 2, Ben has 2, Wilson has 1, Flacco has 1, Rodgers has 1, Elway has 2. Over the last 15 years the team that drafted its QB has won the Super Bowl.
Eli Manning was drafted by the then San Diego Chargers. It was a hell of a moment to forget about it.

See the enthusiasm?
-
@boo-fagley said:
Awesome, you have a 49% chance at winning a Super Bowl.
A cursory list - Brady has 5, E Manning has 2, Ben has 2, Wilson has 1, Flacco has 1, Rodgers has 1, Elway has 2. Over the last 15 years the team that drafted its QB has won the Super Bowl.
Eli Manning was drafted by the then San Diego Chargers. It was a hell of a moment to forget about it.

See the enthusiasm?
-
Sounds like my Rosen/Benkert plan...
I would not be shocked if they actually did it. The WR net the cast in 2016 was essentially that approach. And this draft will be the draft to fill our near, QB void.
-
@boo-fagley said:
Awesome, you have a 49% chance at winning a Super Bowl.
A cursory list - Brady has 5, E Manning has 2, Ben has 2, Wilson has 1, Flacco has 1, Rodgers has 1, Elway has 2. Over the last 15 years the team that drafted its QB has won the Super Bowl.
Peyton Manning was not drafted by the Broncos.....Colts
Drew Brees was not drafted by the Saints....Chargers
Eli Manning was not drafted by the Giants....Chargers
Brad Johnson was not drafted by the Bucs....Vikings
So you are factually, demonstrably wrong.
And you included Elway....he was not drafted by the Broncos....Colts
And if you are going back....none of these SB winners won with the team that drafted them:
Dilfer
Warner
Young
Favre
Williams
Plunkett
Unitas
Dawson
Theisman
-
@boo-fagley said:
I follow along just fine.
Apparently not so much
The person that I responded to was extolling the virtues of a Stanford education as if it is some factor playing QB in the NFL. When in fact playing at Stanford doe not amount to a hill of beans.Just like playing at Harvard. Luck is never going to be Elway. Elway was a winner his whole career going back to Pop Warner. Luck might be the next Jim Plunkett, but Im not betting a dollar that he will be.
Notre Dame is not a QB factory either. A Notre Dame interception looks just like a Stanford interception, though 1 cost more.
I was taking the whole football factor out of it. Sure....a guy that went to Stanford (see Browns #1 overall QB Bobby Garrett) may not have any advantage at playing QB than a guy that went to North Dakota St.
But the fact is....academically speaking, Stanford is right at the top of the pinnacle of education in this country (which makes it there for the entire world).
-
Sounds like my Rosen/Benkert plan...
I would not be shocked if they actually did it. The WR net the cast in 2016 was essentially that approach. And this draft will be the draft to fill our near, QB void.
Interesting I've been thinking along the same lines of 1st overall and a 2nd rounder. It's a deeper class than anyone we have now in that position.
EDITL: However if Allen is there to pick in the 2nd, please use it on a WR, FS or some other position of greater need.

While technically accurrate, Gip, many on your list violate the spirit of the discussion, e.g., E. Manning, who never played with the team that drafted him. And many others are simply journeymen who fell into te right situation and/or had a career year. Even P. Manning won one for his original team, so at minimum bsides falling into the right situation he counts on both sides of the argument.
Interesting I've been thinking along the same lines of 1st overall and a 2nd rounder. It's a deeper class than anyone we have now in that position.
EDITL: However if Allen is there to pick in the 2nd, please use it on a WR, FS or some other position of greater need.

First, not sure how you'll know Allen will be there in the 2nd when you are picking #1 overall...
Second, you just may like my "Way Too Early" mock... or at least Round 1.
On the other hand not even that unless anybody here sees Andrew Luck as being a crafty old veteran who could mentor our high draft pick.
Rather than the guy that never lived up to the hype that he actually is.
Not really a fair assessment. Kid had a lot to do with the three 11-5 seasons the Colts posted in his first three years. We know this since about the same Manningless team went 2-14 to win the Luck Lottery.
Or Rudolph/Falk?
Not for me... just not anywhere near the same quality IMO. Not even near anywhere near...
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login