How the hell can you go 1-27.....
-
How the hell can you go 1-27.....
Welll... you start with 1-15 and then...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
On the plus side-SF won today so we have some leeway.
And Houston lost again so up goes #1-#2.
-
every 1-1.5 years, this same sht. Bring someone new in surely things will get better. And they don't. How many 1-2 yr coaching staffs do we have to go through before some of you clowns get it?
every 1-1.5 years, this same sht. Bring someone new in surely things will get better. And they don't. How many 1-2 yr coaching staffs do we have to go through before some of you clowns get it?
Butch, Romeo if you can't tell a lame duck staff after 2 years then theres something wrong
-
On the plus side-SF won today so we have some leeway.
And Houston lost again so up goes #1-#2.
On the plus side-SF won today so we have some leeway.
Yeah this gives us a little leeway for a win or two?
How are we looking for that 1st pick if we were tie with the Giants and 49ers with 2 wins
-
every 1-1.5 years, this same sht. Bring someone new in surely things will get better. And they don't. How many 1-2 yr coaching staffs do we have to go through before some of you clowns get it?
every 1-1.5 years, this same sht. Bring someone new in surely things will get better. And they don't. How many 1-2 yr coaching staffs do we have to go through before some of you clowns get it?
I've been saying this for years when Mangini, Shurmur, Chud & Pettine were schit canned.
-
On the plus side-SF won today so we have some leeway.
Yeah this gives us a little leeway for a win or two?
How are we looking for that 1st pick if we were tie with the Giants and 49ers with 2 wins
Yeah this gives us a little leeway for a win or two?
How are we looking for that 1st pick if we were tie with the Giants and 49ers with 2 wins
First we have to win 2----not happening.
2nd then it goes to strength of schedule.
-
Yeah this gives us a little leeway for a win or two?
How are we looking for that 1st pick if we were tie with the Giants and 49ers with 2 wins
First we have to win 2----not happening.
2nd then it goes to strength of schedule.
First we have to win 2----not happening.
2nd then it goes to strength of schedule.
And remember, the team with the weakest strength of schedule wins the tie-breaker.
-
FIRE ALL OF THEM
Start over
I told you all this in 2016...First QTR of preseason game #1. I would fire all the players. There really is nobody in there that can't be found in the 5th and 6th rounds of the draft.
-
FIRE ALL OF THEM
Start over
I told you all this in 2016...First QTR of preseason game #1. I would fire all the players. There really is nobody in there that can't be found in the 5th and 6th rounds of the draft.
I told you all this in 2016...First QTR of preseason game #1. I would fire all the players. There really is nobody in there that can't be found in the 5th and 6th rounds of the draft.
You have to tender a first round offer to Gordon
-
every 1-1.5 years, this same sht. Bring someone new in surely things will get better. And they don't. How many 1-2 yr coaching staffs do we have to go through before some of you clowns get it?
every 1-1.5 years, this same sht. Bring someone new in surely things will get better. And they don't. How many 1-2 yr coaching staffs do we have to go through before some of you clowns get it?
This reminds me of that old saying "if you put a frog in boiling water then he'll jump right out, but if you put him in cold water and slowly heat it up to a boil, then he'll just sit there and boil to death".
If you knew about pro sports, yet knew nothing about the Browns, then you would wonder how the Hell the head coach was even still around to go 1-27....... Jump right out.
But since the Browns under JTC (Jimmy The Criminal) have been known to have a quick hook, then some of us are willing to go so far beyond historic levels of losing that it isn't even funny, just to prove that we are not the same team that makes rash decisions...... Sit there and boil to death.
I smell boiled chicken................
-
every 1-1.5 years, this same sht. Bring someone new in surely things will get better. And they don't. How many 1-2 yr coaching staffs do we have to go through before some of you clowns get it?
This reminds me of that old saying "if you put a frog in boiling water then he'll jump right out, but if you put him in cold water and slowly heat it up to a boil, then he'll just sit there and boil to death".
If you knew about pro sports, yet knew nothing about the Browns, then you would wonder how the Hell the head coach was even still around to go 1-27....... Jump right out.
But since the Browns under JTC (Jimmy The Criminal) have been known to have a quick hook, then some of us are willing to go so far beyond historic levels of losing that it isn't even funny, just to prove that we are not the same team that makes rash decisions...... Sit there and boil to death.
I smell boiled chicken................
This reminds me of that old saying "if you put a frog in boiling water then he'll jump right out, but if you put him in cold water and slowly heat it up to a boil, then he'll just sit there and boil to death".
If you knew about pro sports, yet knew nothing about the Browns, then you would wonder how the Hell the head coach was even still around to go 1-27....... Jump right out.
But since the Browns under JTC (Jimmy The Criminal) have been known to have a quick hook, then some of us are willing to go so far beyond historic levels of losing that it isn't even funny, just to prove that we are not the same team that makes rash decisions...... Sit there and boil to death.
I smell boiled chicken................
I agree in every other NFL city this would be a no-brainer but I'm not sure how many teams fit the Browns post 1999. I haven't added it up but it's gotta be the worst 18 year stretch in NFL history.
-
This reminds me of that old saying "if you put a frog in boiling water then he'll jump right out, but if you put him in cold water and slowly heat it up to a boil, then he'll just sit there and boil to death".
If you knew about pro sports, yet knew nothing about the Browns, then you would wonder how the Hell the head coach was even still around to go 1-27....... Jump right out.
But since the Browns under JTC (Jimmy The Criminal) have been known to have a quick hook, then some of us are willing to go so far beyond historic levels of losing that it isn't even funny, just to prove that we are not the same team that makes rash decisions...... Sit there and boil to death.
I smell boiled chicken................
I agree in every other NFL city this would be a no-brainer but I'm not sure how many teams fit the Browns post 1999. I haven't added it up but it's gotta be the worst 18 year stretch in NFL history.
I agree in every other NFL city this would be a no-brainer but I'm not sure how many teams fit the Browns post 1999. I haven't added it up but it's gotta be the worst 18 year stretch in NFL history.
I would totally agree...... modern history too, none of that "In 1932 the Iowa Hay Balers lost 37 of their first 39 games, before moving to Nome Alaska to become the Nome Ice Cubes where they were disbanded after their 3rd year."
Gotta be modern history's (SB era) worst team....... Although it wouldn't shock me if we couldn't even get that right either.
-
I agree in every other NFL city this would be a no-brainer but I'm not sure how many teams fit the Browns post 1999. I haven't added it up but it's gotta be the worst 18 year stretch in NFL history.
I would totally agree...... modern history too, none of that "In 1932 the Iowa Hay Balers lost 37 of their first 39 games, before moving to Nome Alaska to become the Nome Ice Cubes where they were disbanded after their 3rd year."
Gotta be modern history's (SB era) worst team....... Although it wouldn't shock me if we couldn't even get that right either.
I would totally agree...... modern history too, none of that "In 1932 the Iowa Hay Balers lost 37 of their first 39 games, before moving to Nome Alaska to become the Nome Ice Cubes where they were disbanded after their 3rd year."
Gotta be modern history's (SB era) worst team....... Although it wouldn't shock me if we couldn't even get that right either.
88 wins in 19 seasons. Averaging less than 5 per year for 19 years, ugh.
-
I would totally agree...... modern history too, none of that "In 1932 the Iowa Hay Balers lost 37 of their first 39 games, before moving to Nome Alaska to become the Nome Ice Cubes where they were disbanded after their 3rd year."
Gotta be modern history's (SB era) worst team....... Although it wouldn't shock me if we couldn't even get that right either.
88 wins in 19 seasons. Averaging less than 5 per year for 19 years, ugh.
88 wins in 19 seasons. Averaging less than 5 per year for 19 years, ugh.
So less than 5 wins per season for 1/5 of a century??? Phuck Me.
I can only hope that Tour, War and a few others are right, and the rest of us are proclaiming them 'The Greatest Browns Fans Ever' in a few years, otherwise..... man I don't even want to think about the otherwise.
-
I agree in every other NFL city this would be a no-brainer but I'm not sure how many teams fit the Browns post 1999. I haven't added it up but it's gotta be the worst 18 year stretch in NFL history.
I would totally agree...... modern history too, none of that "In 1932 the Iowa Hay Balers lost 37 of their first 39 games, before moving to Nome Alaska to become the Nome Ice Cubes where they were disbanded after their 3rd year."
Gotta be modern history's (SB era) worst team....... Although it wouldn't shock me if we couldn't even get that right either.
I would totally agree...... modern history too, none of that "In 1932 the Iowa Hay Balers lost 37 of their first 39 games, before moving to Nome Alaska to become the Nome Ice Cubes where they were disbanded after their 3rd year."
Gotta be modern history's (SB era) worst team....... Although it wouldn't shock me if we couldn't even get that right either.
The New Orleans Saints between 1967-1985 went 83-187-5, for a win % of .311. They did not have one winning season during this stretch.
-
I would totally agree...... modern history too, none of that "In 1932 the Iowa Hay Balers lost 37 of their first 39 games, before moving to Nome Alaska to become the Nome Ice Cubes where they were disbanded after their 3rd year."
Gotta be modern history's (SB era) worst team....... Although it wouldn't shock me if we couldn't even get that right either.
The New Orleans Saints between 1967-1985 went 83-187-5, for a win % of .311. They did not have one winning season during this stretch.
The New Orleans Saints between 1967-1985 went 83-187-5, for a win % of .311. They did not have one winning season during this stretch.
See.... we couldn't even get that right. 🥷
-
I would totally agree...... modern history too, none of that "In 1932 the Iowa Hay Balers lost 37 of their first 39 games, before moving to Nome Alaska to become the Nome Ice Cubes where they were disbanded after their 3rd year."
Gotta be modern history's (SB era) worst team....... Although it wouldn't shock me if we couldn't even get that right either.
The New Orleans Saints between 1967-1985 went 83-187-5, for a win % of .311. They did not have one winning season during this stretch.
The New Orleans Saints between 1967-1985 went 83-187-5, for a win % of .311. They did not have one winning season during this stretch.
There you go, good research. So we are suffering through the 2nd worst stretch in NFL history
-
The New Orleans Saints between 1967-1985 went 83-187-5, for a win % of .311. They did not have one winning season during this stretch.
There you go, good research. So we are suffering through the 2nd worst stretch in NFL history
There you go, good research. So we are suffering through the 2nd worst stretch in NFL history
Don't worry, guys...
We can make it the 1st worst.
-
The New Orleans Saints between 1967-1985 went 83-187-5, for a win % of .311. They did not have one winning season during this stretch.
There you go, good research. So we are suffering through the 2nd worst stretch in NFL history
There you go, good research. So we are suffering through the 2nd worst stretch in NFL history
Not true.
The Browns from 1999-today have gone 88-212-0, for a win % of .293.
-
The New Orleans Saints between 1967-1985 went 83-187-5, for a win % of .311. They did not have one winning season during this stretch.
There you go, good research. So we are suffering through the 2nd worst stretch in NFL history
There you go, good research. So we are suffering through the 2nd worst stretch in NFL history
Don't worry, guys...
We can make it the 1st worst.
Not true.
The Browns from 1999-today have gone 88-212-0, for a win % of .293.
Told ya.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login