How the hell can you go 1-27.....
-
On the plus side-SF won today so we have some leeway.
Yeah this gives us a little leeway for a win or two?
How are we looking for that 1st pick if we were tie with the Giants and 49ers with 2 wins
Yeah this gives us a little leeway for a win or two?
How are we looking for that 1st pick if we were tie with the Giants and 49ers with 2 wins
First we have to win 2----not happening.
2nd then it goes to strength of schedule.
-
Yeah this gives us a little leeway for a win or two?
How are we looking for that 1st pick if we were tie with the Giants and 49ers with 2 wins
First we have to win 2----not happening.
2nd then it goes to strength of schedule.
First we have to win 2----not happening.
2nd then it goes to strength of schedule.
And remember, the team with the weakest strength of schedule wins the tie-breaker.
-
FIRE ALL OF THEM
Start over
I told you all this in 2016...First QTR of preseason game #1. I would fire all the players. There really is nobody in there that can't be found in the 5th and 6th rounds of the draft.
-
FIRE ALL OF THEM
Start over
I told you all this in 2016...First QTR of preseason game #1. I would fire all the players. There really is nobody in there that can't be found in the 5th and 6th rounds of the draft.
I told you all this in 2016...First QTR of preseason game #1. I would fire all the players. There really is nobody in there that can't be found in the 5th and 6th rounds of the draft.
You have to tender a first round offer to Gordon
-
every 1-1.5 years, this same sht. Bring someone new in surely things will get better. And they don't. How many 1-2 yr coaching staffs do we have to go through before some of you clowns get it?
every 1-1.5 years, this same sht. Bring someone new in surely things will get better. And they don't. How many 1-2 yr coaching staffs do we have to go through before some of you clowns get it?
This reminds me of that old saying "if you put a frog in boiling water then he'll jump right out, but if you put him in cold water and slowly heat it up to a boil, then he'll just sit there and boil to death".
If you knew about pro sports, yet knew nothing about the Browns, then you would wonder how the Hell the head coach was even still around to go 1-27....... Jump right out.
But since the Browns under JTC (Jimmy The Criminal) have been known to have a quick hook, then some of us are willing to go so far beyond historic levels of losing that it isn't even funny, just to prove that we are not the same team that makes rash decisions...... Sit there and boil to death.
I smell boiled chicken................
-
every 1-1.5 years, this same sht. Bring someone new in surely things will get better. And they don't. How many 1-2 yr coaching staffs do we have to go through before some of you clowns get it?
This reminds me of that old saying "if you put a frog in boiling water then he'll jump right out, but if you put him in cold water and slowly heat it up to a boil, then he'll just sit there and boil to death".
If you knew about pro sports, yet knew nothing about the Browns, then you would wonder how the Hell the head coach was even still around to go 1-27....... Jump right out.
But since the Browns under JTC (Jimmy The Criminal) have been known to have a quick hook, then some of us are willing to go so far beyond historic levels of losing that it isn't even funny, just to prove that we are not the same team that makes rash decisions...... Sit there and boil to death.
I smell boiled chicken................
This reminds me of that old saying "if you put a frog in boiling water then he'll jump right out, but if you put him in cold water and slowly heat it up to a boil, then he'll just sit there and boil to death".
If you knew about pro sports, yet knew nothing about the Browns, then you would wonder how the Hell the head coach was even still around to go 1-27....... Jump right out.
But since the Browns under JTC (Jimmy The Criminal) have been known to have a quick hook, then some of us are willing to go so far beyond historic levels of losing that it isn't even funny, just to prove that we are not the same team that makes rash decisions...... Sit there and boil to death.
I smell boiled chicken................
I agree in every other NFL city this would be a no-brainer but I'm not sure how many teams fit the Browns post 1999. I haven't added it up but it's gotta be the worst 18 year stretch in NFL history.
-
This reminds me of that old saying "if you put a frog in boiling water then he'll jump right out, but if you put him in cold water and slowly heat it up to a boil, then he'll just sit there and boil to death".
If you knew about pro sports, yet knew nothing about the Browns, then you would wonder how the Hell the head coach was even still around to go 1-27....... Jump right out.
But since the Browns under JTC (Jimmy The Criminal) have been known to have a quick hook, then some of us are willing to go so far beyond historic levels of losing that it isn't even funny, just to prove that we are not the same team that makes rash decisions...... Sit there and boil to death.
I smell boiled chicken................
I agree in every other NFL city this would be a no-brainer but I'm not sure how many teams fit the Browns post 1999. I haven't added it up but it's gotta be the worst 18 year stretch in NFL history.
I agree in every other NFL city this would be a no-brainer but I'm not sure how many teams fit the Browns post 1999. I haven't added it up but it's gotta be the worst 18 year stretch in NFL history.
I would totally agree...... modern history too, none of that "In 1932 the Iowa Hay Balers lost 37 of their first 39 games, before moving to Nome Alaska to become the Nome Ice Cubes where they were disbanded after their 3rd year."
Gotta be modern history's (SB era) worst team....... Although it wouldn't shock me if we couldn't even get that right either.
-
I agree in every other NFL city this would be a no-brainer but I'm not sure how many teams fit the Browns post 1999. I haven't added it up but it's gotta be the worst 18 year stretch in NFL history.
I would totally agree...... modern history too, none of that "In 1932 the Iowa Hay Balers lost 37 of their first 39 games, before moving to Nome Alaska to become the Nome Ice Cubes where they were disbanded after their 3rd year."
Gotta be modern history's (SB era) worst team....... Although it wouldn't shock me if we couldn't even get that right either.
I would totally agree...... modern history too, none of that "In 1932 the Iowa Hay Balers lost 37 of their first 39 games, before moving to Nome Alaska to become the Nome Ice Cubes where they were disbanded after their 3rd year."
Gotta be modern history's (SB era) worst team....... Although it wouldn't shock me if we couldn't even get that right either.
88 wins in 19 seasons. Averaging less than 5 per year for 19 years, ugh.
-
I would totally agree...... modern history too, none of that "In 1932 the Iowa Hay Balers lost 37 of their first 39 games, before moving to Nome Alaska to become the Nome Ice Cubes where they were disbanded after their 3rd year."
Gotta be modern history's (SB era) worst team....... Although it wouldn't shock me if we couldn't even get that right either.
88 wins in 19 seasons. Averaging less than 5 per year for 19 years, ugh.
88 wins in 19 seasons. Averaging less than 5 per year for 19 years, ugh.
So less than 5 wins per season for 1/5 of a century??? Phuck Me.
I can only hope that Tour, War and a few others are right, and the rest of us are proclaiming them 'The Greatest Browns Fans Ever' in a few years, otherwise..... man I don't even want to think about the otherwise.
-
I agree in every other NFL city this would be a no-brainer but I'm not sure how many teams fit the Browns post 1999. I haven't added it up but it's gotta be the worst 18 year stretch in NFL history.
I would totally agree...... modern history too, none of that "In 1932 the Iowa Hay Balers lost 37 of their first 39 games, before moving to Nome Alaska to become the Nome Ice Cubes where they were disbanded after their 3rd year."
Gotta be modern history's (SB era) worst team....... Although it wouldn't shock me if we couldn't even get that right either.
I would totally agree...... modern history too, none of that "In 1932 the Iowa Hay Balers lost 37 of their first 39 games, before moving to Nome Alaska to become the Nome Ice Cubes where they were disbanded after their 3rd year."
Gotta be modern history's (SB era) worst team....... Although it wouldn't shock me if we couldn't even get that right either.
The New Orleans Saints between 1967-1985 went 83-187-5, for a win % of .311. They did not have one winning season during this stretch.
-
I would totally agree...... modern history too, none of that "In 1932 the Iowa Hay Balers lost 37 of their first 39 games, before moving to Nome Alaska to become the Nome Ice Cubes where they were disbanded after their 3rd year."
Gotta be modern history's (SB era) worst team....... Although it wouldn't shock me if we couldn't even get that right either.
The New Orleans Saints between 1967-1985 went 83-187-5, for a win % of .311. They did not have one winning season during this stretch.
The New Orleans Saints between 1967-1985 went 83-187-5, for a win % of .311. They did not have one winning season during this stretch.
See.... we couldn't even get that right. 🥷
-
I would totally agree...... modern history too, none of that "In 1932 the Iowa Hay Balers lost 37 of their first 39 games, before moving to Nome Alaska to become the Nome Ice Cubes where they were disbanded after their 3rd year."
Gotta be modern history's (SB era) worst team....... Although it wouldn't shock me if we couldn't even get that right either.
The New Orleans Saints between 1967-1985 went 83-187-5, for a win % of .311. They did not have one winning season during this stretch.
The New Orleans Saints between 1967-1985 went 83-187-5, for a win % of .311. They did not have one winning season during this stretch.
There you go, good research. So we are suffering through the 2nd worst stretch in NFL history
-
The New Orleans Saints between 1967-1985 went 83-187-5, for a win % of .311. They did not have one winning season during this stretch.
There you go, good research. So we are suffering through the 2nd worst stretch in NFL history
There you go, good research. So we are suffering through the 2nd worst stretch in NFL history
Don't worry, guys...
We can make it the 1st worst.
-
The New Orleans Saints between 1967-1985 went 83-187-5, for a win % of .311. They did not have one winning season during this stretch.
There you go, good research. So we are suffering through the 2nd worst stretch in NFL history
There you go, good research. So we are suffering through the 2nd worst stretch in NFL history
Not true.
The Browns from 1999-today have gone 88-212-0, for a win % of .293.
-
The New Orleans Saints between 1967-1985 went 83-187-5, for a win % of .311. They did not have one winning season during this stretch.
There you go, good research. So we are suffering through the 2nd worst stretch in NFL history
There you go, good research. So we are suffering through the 2nd worst stretch in NFL history
Don't worry, guys...
We can make it the 1st worst.
Not true.
The Browns from 1999-today have gone 88-212-0, for a win % of .293.
Told ya.
-
There you go, good research. So we are suffering through the 2nd worst stretch in NFL history
Not true.
The Browns from 1999-today have gone 88-212-0, for a win % of .293.
Not true.
The Browns from 1999-today have gone 88-212-0, for a win % of .293.
But how did the Saints bounce back with “football guys” making decisions? “Math guys” are the only answer.
-
Not true.
The Browns from 1999-today have gone 88-212-0, for a win % of .293.
But how did the Saints bounce back with “football guys” making decisions? “Math guys” are the only answer.
But how did the Saints bounce back with “football guys” making decisions? “Math guys” are the only answer.
They all played for Yale I think.
-
FIRE ALL OF THEM
Start over
this current bunch is really no different than the old bunch...just more of the same bs.
I'd fire the coaching staff and give the FO one more draft at least. Regardless of who the FO is we are going to take one of the qbs high,so it doesnt matter with respect to that.....
we need a front office and coaching staff that makes data driven decisions and one in which there are consequences for misses.
this current bunch is really no different than the old bunch...just more of the same bs.
I'd fire the coaching staff and give the FO one more draft at least. Regardless of who the FO is we are going to take one of the qbs high,so it doesnt matter with respect to that.....
we need a front office and coaching staff that makes data driven decisions and one in which there are consequences for misses.
That's the deal with the current set up. there are no consequences for being HISTORICALLY BAD .
I’m thinking we beat the Bears. I might bet hard money line in Vegas.
One win is OK now, we still have that "protected" #1 overall pick. Just hope they're not laughing at us too hard come Draft Day 2018.
The New Orleans Saints between 1967-1985 went 83-187-5, for a win % of .311. They did not have one winning season during this stretch.
and we had one or was it two, I forget...
-
Browns went 9-7 in 2002 and 10-6 in 2007.
-
When I get some time, I'm going to see if I can find ANY team that had such a bad stretch, post WWII.
Now I'm starting to wonder just how godawful this Browns 2.0 team has been.
There were some horrible Steelers, Packers and Cardinals teams in the 50s, but I don't think for this long of a stretch.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login