Indians To Stop Using Chief Wahoo Logo In Their Uniforms in 2019
-
Indians announced this morning.
http://fox8.com/2018/01/29/indians-removing-chief.wahoo-logo-from-uniforms
-
Inevitable.
-
Pathetic.
-
Pathetic beyond words.
-
Major Cleveland sports news belongs on the main board, Nazi mod.
-
Well I wonder what the odds are that the Indians will lead the MLB in apparel sales in 2018.
It was inevitable that this was going to happen. Not a shock, time to move on
-
Pathetic beyond words.
Pathetic beyond words.
I’m a millennial. Don’t understand how this is pathetic. Could you elaborate? With logic, not emotional sentiments.
Btw, I’m a conservative, and Trump supporter and believe we are way too PC. Even still, I don’t see a logical argument against getting rid of Chief Wahoo
-
Major Cleveland sports news belongs on the main board, Nazi mod.
Its a Tribe story...not a Browns story....so I see no problem with the move.
-
Pathetic beyond words.
I’m a millennial. Don’t understand how this is pathetic. Could you elaborate? With logic, not emotional sentiments.
Btw, I’m a conservative, and Trump supporter and believe we are way too PC. Even still, I don’t see a logical argument against getting rid of Chief Wahoo
I’m a millennial. Don’t understand how this is pathetic. Could you elaborate? With logic, not emotional sentiments.
Btw, I’m a conservative, and Trump supporter and believe we are way too PC. Even still, I don’t see a logical argument against getting rid of Chief Wahoo
Your a 'millennial' nuff said.
-
I’m a millennial. Don’t understand how this is pathetic. Could you elaborate? With logic, not emotional sentiments.
Btw, I’m a conservative, and Trump supporter and believe we are way too PC. Even still, I don’t see a logical argument against getting rid of Chief Wahoo
Your a 'millennial' nuff said.
Your a 'millennial' nuff said.
See, you’re further proving my point. “You’re a millennial” is not a logical argument against this. You’re just a grumpy old man. Prove otherwise, or you’re just playing identity politics. You’re better than this.
You won’t give me a logical response, because there is none.
-
I don't need to give you Sheet. Pocohantas.
-
-
-
Pathetic beyond words.
I’m a millennial. Don’t understand how this is pathetic. Could you elaborate? With logic, not emotional sentiments.
Btw, I’m a conservative, and Trump supporter and believe we are way too PC. Even still, I don’t see a logical argument against getting rid of Chief Wahoo
I’m a millennial. Don’t understand how this is pathetic. Could you elaborate? With logic, not emotional sentiments.
Btw, I’m a conservative, and Trump supporter and believe we are way too PC. Even still, I don’t see a logical argument against getting rid of Chief Wahoo
Don't say you believe we are way too PC and support this. Here's a logical argument: he's been the Indians logo since 1928 and the fans love him.
Now, without making a PC and yes, quite millennial, argument, tell us why it should be done.
-
I’m a millennial. Don’t understand how this is pathetic. Could you elaborate? With logic, not emotional sentiments.
Btw, I’m a conservative, and Trump supporter and believe we are way too PC. Even still, I don’t see a logical argument against getting rid of Chief Wahoo
Don't say you believe we are way too PC and support this. Here's a logical argument: he's been the Indians logo since 1928 and the fans love him.
Now, without making a PC and yes, quite millennial, argument, tell us why it should be done.
Don't say you believe we are way too PC and support this. Here's a logical argument: he's been the Indians logo since 1928 and the fans love him.
Now, without making a PC and yes, quite millennial, argument, tell us why it should be done.
It should be done because the Cleveland Indians organization wanted it to be done. It wasn’t the government telling them what to do, it was a business decision made by the owners. End of discussion.
Clearly not all fans loved it. If all fans loved it, it would’ve stayed. The owners deemed it more profitable to get rid of it, because there were enough fans that didn’t like it. Simple business decision. That’s how you run a business that stays afloat.
I don't need to give you Sheet. Pocohantas.
Because you don’t have a logical response. You’re playing identity politics. It’s ok to admit that.
-
Don't say you believe we are way too PC and support this. Here's a logical argument: he's been the Indians logo since 1928 and the fans love him.
Now, without making a PC and yes, quite millennial, argument, tell us why it should be done.
It should be done because the Cleveland Indians organization wanted it to be done. It wasn’t the government telling them what to do, it was a business decision made by the owners. End of discussion.
Clearly not all fans loved it. If all fans loved it, it would’ve stayed. The owners deemed it more profitable to get rid of it, because there were enough fans that didn’t like it. Simple business decision. That’s how you run a business that stays afloat.
I don't need to give you Sheet. Pocohantas.
Because you don’t have a logical response. You’re playing identity politics. It’s ok to admit that.
It should be done because the Cleveland Indians organization wanted it to be done. It wasn’t the government telling them what to do, it was a business decision made by the owners. End of discussion.
Clearly not all fans loved it. If all fans loved it, it would’ve stayed. The owners deemed it more profitable to get rid of it, because there were enough fans that didn’t like it. Simple business decision. That’s how you run a business that stays afloat.
So the guy who thinks we're too PC doesn't think it's stupid to pander to the people who are too PC. That's the "logical response." Got it.
-
It should be done because the Cleveland Indians organization wanted it to be done. It wasn’t the government telling them what to do, it was a business decision made by the owners. End of discussion.
Clearly not all fans loved it. If all fans loved it, it would’ve stayed. The owners deemed it more profitable to get rid of it, because there were enough fans that didn’t like it. Simple business decision. That’s how you run a business that stays afloat.
So the guy who thinks we're too PC doesn't think it's stupid to pander to the people who are too PC. That's the "logical response." Got it.
So the guy who thinks we're too PC doesn't think it's stupid to pander to the people who are too PC. That's the "logical response." Got it.
When did I ever say you’re too PC? I said America is too PC.
There is a distinct difference. Take for example the new lawsuit “Walmart is racist” because they lock up the black hair care products due to theft. There is a hard line reason to keep the black hair products locked up. If Walmart caves and takes the locks off, THAT’S pandering to PC people. There is no hard line reason to keep Chief Wahoo.
-
-
-

Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login
