Skip to content

Camp Barkley #1 Overall

Locked The Browns Board
550 48 16.5k
  • So that's the PoG and Ghoolie kiss of death.  

    That makes Barkley a hard pass anywhere in the 1st then.

  • So that's the PoG and Ghoolie kiss of death.  

    That makes Barkley a hard pass anywhere in the 1st then.

    @tiamat63 said:

    So that's the PoG and Ghoolie kiss of death.  

    That makes Barkley a hard pass anywhere in the 1st then.

    TR2

  • @ghoolie said:

    You are NEVER crazy about taking pkaymakers. You want to block your way to the fukcing SB. We don't need play makers we have assets.

    He was talking about taking a QB #1 overall.   Do you not consider a QB a play maker?

    I mean...you have grumbled about the Browns not drafting playmakers...yet in the last several years they have drafted all of the following in the first round:

    QBs Quinn,  Weeden, Manziel

    RB  Richardson

    WR Coleman

    TE Njoku

    What you mean to say is that "I applaud the Browns for taking what seemed to be playmakers...yet I acknowledge that the choices they have made for playmakers have been busts".

    @the-gipper said:

    He was talking about taking a QB #1 overall.   Do you not consider a QB a play maker?

    I mean...you have grumbled about the Browns not drafting playmakers...yet in the last several years they have drafted all of the following in the first round:

    QBs Quinn,  Weeden, Manziel

    RB  Richardson

    WR Coleman

    TE Njoku

    What you mean to say is that "I applaud the Browns for taking what seemed to be playmakers...yet I acknowledge that the choices they have made for playmakers have been busts".

    Dude, NOBODY WANTED QUINN, MANZIEL AND WEEDEN. Don't be a jackoff. THe fact that the Browns took someone high does not mean they took premium playmakers. The fukcking list of people they passed on is the problem. 

    You are a goddamned moron. You think the Browns get a pass for taking Quinn? Dude, NOBODY was jumping on that turd.  The Browns are a laughing stock. COLEMAN? COLEMAN? ROTFLMAO.................. COLEMAN is your example of the Browns going after play makers? How many times were you dropped on your head as a child? Seriously?

    They take homosexual Garrett at #1, but could have had Bosa, a year earlier, for less? Get the Fukck out of here with your impotent analytical apologies. They Browns draft schidt. Garrett, Coleman, both schidt. Totally wasted draft picks.

    The Browns DO NOT PARTICIPATE in drafting the top playmakers. Who TF do you take Coleman over Doctson? What next? " Ooh, I have a chance to take Jennifer Lopez on a date..........but I am going to take Whoopie Goldturd..................... I mean, she is just as popular....................... so yea.............. I choose Whoopie.

    THat is your dumb asss fukcing logic, just because the Browns take someone at a certain position does not have any correlation to whether the guy is an impact player or not.

  • Hey Jackoffs, you didn't like Ben, Petersen, Julio Jones, Goff, , Wentz, and last year Trubisky. We passed on Watt, Bosa, and Doctson.

    BUT BUT BUT................... we got a Zumba instructor, and Corey Coleslaw.

    If the Browns do not take Barkley at #1, a smarter team will tke him at #2, and the Browns will AGAIN be a laughing stock letting the top player go to another team.

    There will be a QB available at 4, and the Browns can package Joe THomas and the #4 to move up and get Mayfield, or whoever they want. Barkley, won't be around.

  • Hey Jackoffs, you didn't like Ben, Petersen, Julio Jones, Goff, , Wentz, and last year Trubisky. We passed on Watt, Bosa, and Doctson.

    BUT BUT BUT................... we got a Zumba instructor, and Corey Coleslaw.

    If the Browns do not take Barkley at #1, a smarter team will tke him at #2, and the Browns will AGAIN be a laughing stock letting the top player go to another team.

    There will be a QB available at 4, and the Browns can package Joe THomas and the #4 to move up and get Mayfield, or whoever they want. Barkley, won't be around.

    @ghoolie said:

    Hey Jackoffs, you didn't like Ben, Petersen, Julio Jones, Goff, , Wentz, and last year Trubisky. We passed on Watt, Bosa, and Doctson.

    BUT BUT BUT................... we got a Zumba instructor, and Corey Coleslaw.

    If the Browns do not take Barkley at #1, a smarter team will tke him at #2, and the Browns will AGAIN be a laughing stock letting the top player go to another team.

    There will be a QB available at 4, and the Browns can package Joe THomas and the #4 to move up and get Mayfield, or whoever they want. Barkley, won't be around.

    Don't presume us fans are as ignorant as the Front office has been. I wanted Ben, Wentz, and along with Gipper- Trubisky. Didn't want- or like any of the #22 QB busts. For the record, "it's a sin if we draft Quinn."

    Like us fans have any say what the FO is going to do? All I can do is hope Dorsey & Wolfe do a better job of assessing talent than their predesessors. 

  • The noise from the pulpit is kind of loud, especially coming from a guy that hailed Paxton Shmucking Lynch as the future.       

    Oh, I already know - "He's an athlete that hasn't gotten his fair shot yet".

  • @the-gipper said:

    He was talking about taking a QB #1 overall.   Do you not consider a QB a play maker?

    I mean...you have grumbled about the Browns not drafting playmakers...yet in the last several years they have drafted all of the following in the first round:

    QBs Quinn,  Weeden, Manziel

    RB  Richardson

    WR Coleman

    TE Njoku

    What you mean to say is that "I applaud the Browns for taking what seemed to be playmakers...yet I acknowledge that the choices they have made for playmakers have been busts".

    Dude, NOBODY WANTED QUINN, MANZIEL AND WEEDEN. Don't be a jackoff. THe fact that the Browns took someone high does not mean they took premium playmakers. The fukcking list of people they passed on is the problem. 

    You are a goddamned moron. You think the Browns get a pass for taking Quinn? Dude, NOBODY was jumping on that turd.  The Browns are a laughing stock. COLEMAN? COLEMAN? ROTFLMAO.................. COLEMAN is your example of the Browns going after play makers? How many times were you dropped on your head as a child? Seriously?

    They take homosexual Garrett at #1, but could have had Bosa, a year earlier, for less? Get the Fukck out of here with your impotent analytical apologies. They Browns draft schidt. Garrett, Coleman, both schidt. Totally wasted draft picks.

    The Browns DO NOT PARTICIPATE in drafting the top playmakers. Who TF do you take Coleman over Doctson? What next? " Ooh, I have a chance to take Jennifer Lopez on a date..........but I am going to take Whoopie Goldturd..................... I mean, she is just as popular....................... so yea.............. I choose Whoopie.

    THat is your dumb asss fukcing logic, just because the Browns take someone at a certain position does not have any correlation to whether the guy is an impact player or not.

    @ghoolie said:

    Dude, NOBODY WANTED QUINN, MANZIEL AND WEEDEN. Don't be a jackoff. THe fact that the Browns took someone high does not mean they took premium playmakers. The fukcking list of people they passed on is the problem. 

    You are a goddamned moron. You think the Browns get a pass for taking Quinn? Dude, NOBODY was jumping on that turd.  The Browns are a laughing stock. COLEMAN? COLEMAN? ROTFLMAO.................. COLEMAN is your example of the Browns going after play makers? How many times were you dropped on your head as a child? Seriously?

    They take homosexual Garrett at #1, but could have had Bosa, a year earlier, for less? Get the Fukck out of here with your impotent analytical apologies. They Browns draft schidt. Garrett, Coleman, both schidt. Totally wasted draft picks.

    The Browns DO NOT PARTICIPATE in drafting the top playmakers. Who TF do you take Coleman over Doctson? What next? " Ooh, I have a chance to take Jennifer Lopez on a date..........but I am going to take Whoopie Goldturd..................... I mean, she is just as popular....................... so yea.............. I choose Whoopie.

    THat is your dumb asss fukcing logic, just because the Browns take someone at a certain position does not have any correlation to whether the guy is an impact player or not.

    ALL of the guys that the Browns drafted:  TR, Weeden, Coleman, Quinn, JMZ etc.   ALL of them would have been drafted by someone within likely 5 picks of where the Browns took them. 

    I realize that you likely pay not one moment of attention to the draft ratings, the Mock Drafts, etc.  ...but the fact is EVERY one of the "skill" players the Browns selected were basically unanimously rated to have been taken about precisely where they were taken.

    The reason these picks did not turn out is because these players flopped.  If they had not flopped for the Browns...they would have flopped for someone else.  Its just that the Browns have the unlucky streak of taking these flops.  Just because this level of analysis is above your level of comprehension doesn't mean the Browns didn't make the effort.  E.g.  of why you have no clue:  you mention Josh Doctson.  You apparently pay no attention to anything:  Doctson has basically been a bigger flop than Coleman.  He has caught 37 passes in two years. As for nobody wanting somebody...you have been all over Lynch's nutsack....yet he is simply another Quinn, Weeden.JMZ.  So, no. You have zero credibility.

  • @ghoolie said:

    Hey Jackoffs, you didn't like Ben, Petersen, Julio Jones, Goff, , Wentz, and last year Trubisky. We passed on Watt, Bosa, and Doctson.

    BUT BUT BUT................... we got a Zumba instructor, and Corey Coleslaw.

    If the Browns do not take Barkley at #1, a smarter team will tke him at #2, and the Browns will AGAIN be a laughing stock letting the top player go to another team.

    There will be a QB available at 4, and the Browns can package Joe THomas and the #4 to move up and get Mayfield, or whoever they want. Barkley, won't be around.

    Don't presume us fans are as ignorant as the Front office has been. I wanted Ben, Wentz, and along with Gipper- Trubisky. Didn't want- or like any of the #22 QB busts. For the record, "it's a sin if we draft Quinn."

    Like us fans have any say what the FO is going to do? All I can do is hope Dorsey & Wolfe do a better job of assessing talent than their predesessors. 

    @hoorta said:

    Don't presume us fans are as ignorant as the Front office has been. I wanted Ben, Wentz, and along with Gipper- Trubisky. Didn't want- or like any of the #22 QB busts. For the record, "it's a sin if we draft Quinn."

    Like us fans have any say what the FO is going to do? All I can do is hope Dorsey & Wolfe do a better job of assessing talent than their predesessors. 

    Yes, I wanted Trubisky...and I wanted Bosa.  I didn't pull for Wentz...because I wanted Bosa.  So I was not favoring any of those QBs over any other.

    As far as going for Ben R and Julio Jones....I don't remember where I stood on them.  And that is just his revisionist history claiming that he wanted those guys. I do remember thinking that the year after BR...when we had like Dilfer or Garcia at QB that I thought we needed a QB...and I thought that a kid from Cal should be given a serious look. Of course, he didn't get picked until #24...and then spent 3 years on the bench behind Brett Favre.

    And I am not sure who he means when he says Peterson.   Patrick? Adrian?

    It is ironic though...that the two posters on the exteme end of the spectrum both want the same guy. 

    But...I don't know about that guy....and for the #4 spot....I would rather see a playmaker......on defense.

  • The noise from the pulpit is kind of loud, especially coming from a guy that hailed Paxton Shmucking Lynch as the future.       

    Oh, I already know - "He's an athlete that hasn't gotten his fair shot yet".

    @tiamat63 said:

    The noise from the pulpit is kind of loud, especially coming from a guy that hailed Paxton Shmucking Lynch as the future.       

    Oh, I already know - "He's an athlete that hasn't gotten his fair shot yet".

    It's not quite time yet, but getting pretty close, with Elway scouting every top QB that's going to be in the draft this year- including asking for and getting Mayfield and Allen for the Senior Bowl. "Can't stay healthy & when he is can't beat out Siemian or our reject Osweiler" Paxton is about done in Denver. 

  • @ghoolie said:

    Dude, NOBODY WANTED QUINN, MANZIEL AND WEEDEN. Don't be a jackoff. THe fact that the Browns took someone high does not mean they took premium playmakers. The fukcking list of people they passed on is the problem. 

    You are a goddamned moron. You think the Browns get a pass for taking Quinn? Dude, NOBODY was jumping on that turd.  The Browns are a laughing stock. COLEMAN? COLEMAN? ROTFLMAO.................. COLEMAN is your example of the Browns going after play makers? How many times were you dropped on your head as a child? Seriously?

    They take homosexual Garrett at #1, but could have had Bosa, a year earlier, for less? Get the Fukck out of here with your impotent analytical apologies. They Browns draft schidt. Garrett, Coleman, both schidt. Totally wasted draft picks.

    The Browns DO NOT PARTICIPATE in drafting the top playmakers. Who TF do you take Coleman over Doctson? What next? " Ooh, I have a chance to take Jennifer Lopez on a date..........but I am going to take Whoopie Goldturd..................... I mean, she is just as popular....................... so yea.............. I choose Whoopie.

    THat is your dumb asss fukcing logic, just because the Browns take someone at a certain position does not have any correlation to whether the guy is an impact player or not.

    ALL of the guys that the Browns drafted:  TR, Weeden, Coleman, Quinn, JMZ etc.   ALL of them would have been drafted by someone within likely 5 picks of where the Browns took them. 

    I realize that you likely pay not one moment of attention to the draft ratings, the Mock Drafts, etc.  ...but the fact is EVERY one of the "skill" players the Browns selected were basically unanimously rated to have been taken about precisely where they were taken.

    The reason these picks did not turn out is because these players flopped.  If they had not flopped for the Browns...they would have flopped for someone else.  Its just that the Browns have the unlucky streak of taking these flops.  Just because this level of analysis is above your level of comprehension doesn't mean the Browns didn't make the effort.  E.g.  of why you have no clue:  you mention Josh Doctson.  You apparently pay no attention to anything:  Doctson has basically been a bigger flop than Coleman.  He has caught 37 passes in two years. As for nobody wanting somebody...you have been all over Lynch's nutsack....yet he is simply another Quinn, Weeden.JMZ.  So, no. You have zero credibility.

    @the-gipper said:

    The reason these picks did not turn out is because these players flopped.  If they had not flopped for the Browns...they would have flopped for someone else.  Its just that the Browns have the unlucky streak of taking these flops.  Just because this level of analysis is above your level of comprehension doesn't mean the Browns didn't make the effort.  E.g.  of why you have no clue:  you mention Josh Doctson.  You apparently pay no attention to anything:  Doctson has basically been a bigger flop than Coleman.  He has caught 37 passes in two years. As for nobody wanting somebody...you have been all over Lynch's nutsack....yet he is simply another Quinn, Weeden.JMZ.  So, no. You have zero credibility.

    Exactly Gip Quinn and Weeden got second chances with other teams- and they flopped there too... 

    Booger talks out of both sides of his mouth- has already claimed Garrett & Coleman are busts, but Lynch "needs more time"  

  • The noise from the pulpit is kind of loud, especially coming from a guy that hailed Paxton Shmucking Lynch as the future.       

    Oh, I already know - "He's an athlete that hasn't gotten his fair shot yet".

    @tiamat63 said:

    The noise from the pulpit is kind of loud, especially coming from a guy that hailed Paxton Shmucking Lynch as the future.       

    Oh, I already know - "He's an athlete that hasn't gotten his fair shot yet".

    Similar to Kevin Hogan. Yet we ride Deshone Kizer's bum azz to a perfect 0-16 record. smh 

    Browns, don't be a bitch and be scared by dogma, own this moment and bring back the run game to Cleveland. 

    Tretter is okay but I'm not the biggest fan. What do you think of Price in the 2nd to lay the groundwork for the top rushing/receiving duo in the NFL. Barkley and Gordon 2018 Superstars!

  • @ghoolie said:

    Dude, NOBODY WANTED QUINN, MANZIEL AND WEEDEN. Don't be a jackoff. THe fact that the Browns took someone high does not mean they took premium playmakers. The fukcking list of people they passed on is the problem. 

    You are a goddamned moron. You think the Browns get a pass for taking Quinn? Dude, NOBODY was jumping on that turd.  The Browns are a laughing stock. COLEMAN? COLEMAN? ROTFLMAO.................. COLEMAN is your example of the Browns going after play makers? How many times were you dropped on your head as a child? Seriously?

    They take homosexual Garrett at #1, but could have had Bosa, a year earlier, for less? Get the Fukck out of here with your impotent analytical apologies. They Browns draft schidt. Garrett, Coleman, both schidt. Totally wasted draft picks.

    The Browns DO NOT PARTICIPATE in drafting the top playmakers. Who TF do you take Coleman over Doctson? What next? " Ooh, I have a chance to take Jennifer Lopez on a date..........but I am going to take Whoopie Goldturd..................... I mean, she is just as popular....................... so yea.............. I choose Whoopie.

    THat is your dumb asss fukcing logic, just because the Browns take someone at a certain position does not have any correlation to whether the guy is an impact player or not.

    ALL of the guys that the Browns drafted:  TR, Weeden, Coleman, Quinn, JMZ etc.   ALL of them would have been drafted by someone within likely 5 picks of where the Browns took them. 

    I realize that you likely pay not one moment of attention to the draft ratings, the Mock Drafts, etc.  ...but the fact is EVERY one of the "skill" players the Browns selected were basically unanimously rated to have been taken about precisely where they were taken.

    The reason these picks did not turn out is because these players flopped.  If they had not flopped for the Browns...they would have flopped for someone else.  Its just that the Browns have the unlucky streak of taking these flops.  Just because this level of analysis is above your level of comprehension doesn't mean the Browns didn't make the effort.  E.g.  of why you have no clue:  you mention Josh Doctson.  You apparently pay no attention to anything:  Doctson has basically been a bigger flop than Coleman.  He has caught 37 passes in two years. As for nobody wanting somebody...you have been all over Lynch's nutsack....yet he is simply another Quinn, Weeden.JMZ.  So, no. You have zero credibility.

    @the-gipper said:

    ALL of the guys that the Browns drafted:  TR, Weeden, Coleman, Quinn, JMZ etc.   ALL of them would have been drafted by someone within likely 5 picks of where the Browns took them. 

    I realize that you likely pay not one moment of attention to the draft ratings, the Mock Drafts, etc.  ...but the fact is EVERY one of the "skill" players the Browns selected were basically unanimously rated to have been taken about precisely where they were taken.

    The reason these picks did not turn out is because these players flopped.  If they had not flopped for the Browns...they would have flopped for someone else.  Its just that the Browns have the unlucky streak of taking these flops.  Just because this level of analysis is above your level of comprehension doesn't mean the Browns didn't make the effort.  E.g.  of why you have no clue:  you mention Josh Doctson.  You apparently pay no attention to anything:  Doctson has basically been a bigger flop than Coleman.  He has caught 37 passes in two years. As for nobody wanting somebody...you have been all over Lynch's nutsack....yet he is simply another Quinn, Weeden.JMZ.  So, no. You have zero credibility.

    NOBODY was taking Weedone at close to 30 years old with a first round draft pick and probably not with a second either... 

    We still should have taken Trent and built the team up around Colt. We would have been better off. And the next QB that walked through the door would have been better off, that next QB could have been Derek Carr... 

    I guess some people just don't have the vison. When I buy this team, we'll build a dynasty better than the Patriots. 

  • @ghoolie said:

    Dude, NOBODY WANTED QUINN, MANZIEL AND WEEDEN. Don't be a jackoff. THe fact that the Browns took someone high does not mean they took premium playmakers. The fukcking list of people they passed on is the problem. 

    You are a goddamned moron. You think the Browns get a pass for taking Quinn? Dude, NOBODY was jumping on that turd.  The Browns are a laughing stock. COLEMAN? COLEMAN? ROTFLMAO.................. COLEMAN is your example of the Browns going after play makers? How many times were you dropped on your head as a child? Seriously?

    They take homosexual Garrett at #1, but could have had Bosa, a year earlier, for less? Get the Fukck out of here with your impotent analytical apologies. They Browns draft schidt. Garrett, Coleman, both schidt. Totally wasted draft picks.

    The Browns DO NOT PARTICIPATE in drafting the top playmakers. Who TF do you take Coleman over Doctson? What next? " Ooh, I have a chance to take Jennifer Lopez on a date..........but I am going to take Whoopie Goldturd..................... I mean, she is just as popular....................... so yea.............. I choose Whoopie.

    THat is your dumb asss fukcing logic, just because the Browns take someone at a certain position does not have any correlation to whether the guy is an impact player or not.

    ALL of the guys that the Browns drafted:  TR, Weeden, Coleman, Quinn, JMZ etc.   ALL of them would have been drafted by someone within likely 5 picks of where the Browns took them. 

    I realize that you likely pay not one moment of attention to the draft ratings, the Mock Drafts, etc.  ...but the fact is EVERY one of the "skill" players the Browns selected were basically unanimously rated to have been taken about precisely where they were taken.

    The reason these picks did not turn out is because these players flopped.  If they had not flopped for the Browns...they would have flopped for someone else.  Its just that the Browns have the unlucky streak of taking these flops.  Just because this level of analysis is above your level of comprehension doesn't mean the Browns didn't make the effort.  E.g.  of why you have no clue:  you mention Josh Doctson.  You apparently pay no attention to anything:  Doctson has basically been a bigger flop than Coleman.  He has caught 37 passes in two years. As for nobody wanting somebody...you have been all over Lynch's nutsack....yet he is simply another Quinn, Weeden.JMZ.  So, no. You have zero credibility.

    @the-gipper said:

    ALL of the guys that the Browns drafted:  TR, Weeden, Coleman, Quinn, JMZ etc.   ALL of them would have been drafted by someone within likely 5 picks of where the Browns took them. 

    HOSRE SCHIDT...................... QUINN and Weeden would not have gone in the first round.Quinn was shidding his pants he was dropping so fast. HOWEVER...................THE POINT IS NOT WOULD SOMEONE ELSE HAVE BEEN DUMB ENOUGH TO TAKE THE HORSE SCHIDT PLAYERS WE DID............Of course there are teams almost as stupid............. ALMOST.................... The point is that the Browns do not participate in taking the top playmakers, and have not since Art Modell was forced to leave Cleveland.

    I realize that you likely pay not one moment of attention to the draft ratings, the Mock Drafts, etc.  ...but the fact is EVERY one of the "skill" players the Browns selected were basically unanimously rated to have been taken about precisely where they were taken.

    AGAIN, NOT TRUE. ALL WERE RATED LOWER THAN WE TOOK THEM. COLEMAN OVER DOCTSON? ARE YOU OUT OF YOUR FUKCING MIND? WHEN WE PASSED ON BOSA, THIS BOARD WAS FULL OF ASSHULES CHIRPING THAT " YOU DON'T TAKE AN EDGE RUSHER THAT HIGH"................. SO WE TURN AROUND AND TAKE A FUKCING HOMOSEXUAL ZUMBA INSTRUCTOR, TWO-TACKLE=TEXAS WHO WANTS TO WEAR PANTYHOSE AND CHEER FOR THE COWBOYS  A YEAR LATER WITH #1 #1.  tHIS IS THE DUMBEST FRANCHISE WITH COLLECTIVELY THE DUMBEST FANS OF ANY NFL TEAM.

    The reason these picks did not turn out is because these players flopped.  If they had not flopped for the Browns...they would have flopped for someone else.  Its just that the Browns have the unlucky streak of taking these flops.

    NICE TRY. THE BROWNS HAVE A HISTORY OF TAKING PEOPLE THAT GHOOLIE PRONOUNCED AS FLOPS WAY AHEAD OF TIME. ISN'T IT FUNNY HOW THE BROWNS TAKE ALL THE PLAYERS THAT THE MEDIA TELLS US ARE DIAMONDS IN THE ROUGH, AND POTENTIALLY THE STEALS FO THE DRAFT? EVERY FUKCKING YEAR I HAVE TO LISTEN TO YOU JACKOFFS DO A HOMO DANCE ABOUT HOW OUR SMART FO JUST STUCK IT TO ALL OTHER 3 TEAMS IN THE DRAFT. ONLY TO COME BACK AT 0 - 16 WITH MORE STUPID EXCUSES FOR WHY THE DRAFT SUCKED.

    THE BROWNS HAVE NOT DRAFTED ONE TOP TIER PLAY MAKER IN THE PAST 18 DRAFTS. NOBODY THEY TOOK WAS EAR MARKED AS A GAME CHANGER. AGAIN, ZUMBATITS IS NOT A GAME CHANGER. HE IS A HOMO, A REINCARNATION OF THE BODY BY JAKE GUY.

    Just because this level of analysis is above your level of comprehension doesn't mean the Browns didn't make the effort.  E.g.  of why you have no clue:  you mention Josh Doctson.  You apparently pay no attention to anything:  Doctson has basically been a bigger flop than Coleman.  He has caught 37 passes in two years. As for nobody wanting somebody...you have been all over Lynch's nutsack....yet he is simply another Quinn, Weeden.JMZ.  So, no. You have zero credibility.

    LYNCH IS STILL AWAITING VERDICT. THE JACKOFFS YOU MENTIONED WERE DONE BEFORE 1 YEAR WAS OVER.................BIG BIG BIG DIFFERENCE.

    DOCTSON HAS BEEN HURT, BUT THE GUY CAN FLAT OUT PLAY. HE GOES UP INTO THE SKY AND DOES NOT DROP FOOTBALLS. COLEMAN SUCKS DOCTSONS GAME DAY JACKSTRAP.

  • I think that Coleman still has a chance. Two seasons with freak accidents breaking his hand? That's some voodoo Sheet right there. If he breaks another hand we should cut him loose, but for now he's getting some slack from me. 

    Coleman is super fast, if he could just stay on the field he could contribute. He did drop that last pass but as I said before, it was the biggest moment in a winless season, time was running out, it was 4th down; He was probably so damn surprised that Kizer actually threw a perfect pass that he dropped it in shock. I firmly believe that Kizer's erratic throws, no matter how fast or with what ungodly velocity(or whatever the buzz word is for the hot QBs these days) he threw it with is the main problem with the offense. I digressed, but really, Coleman has a chance here this season to redeem himself. I think that he'll be much, much better off with a 100% Josh Gordon beside him! 

    I hope you guys haven't forgotten how good Josh Gordon is. He's really, really, really real. 

    If my hope is correct, that Saquon is as good as Sanders- imagine a young Randy Moss and Barry Sanders on the same team... I mean it's nice and all but does is it really matter who is going to play QB? 

    Hell, Gipper could take em to the Superbowl. 😉

  • Wow, somebody said BO?

  • A really good feature with some good insights. I really, really liked what the OL had to say.

    Plus, I guess Zeke told him after the Ohio State game that Barkley was the truth. Zeke said Saquon is THE TRUTH> 

  • The noise from the pulpit is kind of loud, especially coming from a guy that hailed Paxton Shmucking Lynch as the future.       

    Oh, I already know - "He's an athlete that hasn't gotten his fair shot yet".

    @tiamat63 said:

    The noise from the pulpit is kind of loud, especially coming from a guy that hailed Paxton Shmucking Lynch as the future.       

    Oh, I already know - "He's an athlete that hasn't gotten his fair shot yet".

    I never said he has not been given a fair shot yet. John Elway, the QB who post game, moist schidt from his asss with Bernie Kosar and Marty Stinkenhiemer is the one saying it. He pulled his QB and named Lynch as the starter. That Lynch got hurt again, has nothing to do with his abilities, WHICH............... are superior to any QB who the Browns have had since Testeverde.

    If I missed the mark on Lynch? I won't be the first time that I missed one, but it WILL be a rare time.

    I don't see you saying Sheet about my calling for Romeo's head in the second qtr of his 1st pre season game, or guaranteeing Hue would be a flop. I called out Holmgren, Sewage, Crennell, Policy, W Green Quinn, Weeden, Ben, Wentz, Goff, Petersen, Trubisky, Julio Jones, Bosa, Elliot, Jackoff Greg WIlliams, ............ on an on it goes............... you jackoffs dare to give ME schidt about ONE GUY?  One guy who is STILL in the hunt. 

    Fukcking idiots.

    Celebrating jackoff Joe Thomas. The only HOF player who cannot demonstrate ONE SINGLE STATISTIC that improved the day this lardass arrived. Only in Cleveland can a player be "guaranteed HOF"...and have made do fukcing difference on his team.

    GTFOH, Go spread yhour horse schidt in Hoorta's front yard. He has a factory of it.

  • I think that Coleman still has a chance. Two seasons with freak accidents breaking his hand? That's some voodoo Sheet right there. If he breaks another hand we should cut him loose, but for now he's getting some slack from me. 

    Coleman is super fast, if he could just stay on the field he could contribute. He did drop that last pass but as I said before, it was the biggest moment in a winless season, time was running out, it was 4th down; He was probably so damn surprised that Kizer actually threw a perfect pass that he dropped it in shock. I firmly believe that Kizer's erratic throws, no matter how fast or with what ungodly velocity(or whatever the buzz word is for the hot QBs these days) he threw it with is the main problem with the offense. I digressed, but really, Coleman has a chance here this season to redeem himself. I think that he'll be much, much better off with a 100% Josh Gordon beside him! 

    I hope you guys haven't forgotten how good Josh Gordon is. He's really, really, really real. 

    If my hope is correct, that Saquon is as good as Sanders- imagine a young Randy Moss and Barry Sanders on the same team... I mean it's nice and all but does is it really matter who is going to play QB? 

    Hell, Gipper could take em to the Superbowl. 😉

    @poeticg said:

    I think that Coleman still has a chance. Two seasons with freak accidents breaking his hand? That's some voodoo Sheet right there. If he breaks another hand we should cut him loose, but for now he's getting some slack from me. 

    Coleman is super fast, if he could just stay on the field he could contribute. He did drop that last pass but as I said before, it was the biggest moment in a winless season, time was running out, it was 4th down; He was probably so damn surprised that Kizer actually threw a perfect pass that he dropped it in shock. I firmly believe that Kizer's erratic throws, no matter how fast or with what ungodly velocity(or whatever the buzz word is for the hot QBs these days) he threw it with is the main problem with the offense. I digressed, but really, Coleman has a chance here this season to redeem himself. I think that he'll be much, much better off with a 100% Josh Gordon beside him! 

    I hope you guys haven't forgotten how good Josh Gordon is. He's really, really, really real. 

    If my hope is correct, that Saquon is as good as Sanders- imagine a young Randy Moss and Barry Sanders on the same team... I mean it's nice and all but does is it really matter who is going to play QB? 

    Hell, Gipper could take em to the Superbowl. 😉

    Dude, he is super poosy. He played in a touch football league. He hates inside routes and is not physical enough to win the routes outside the numbers, He is no Antonio Brown. Not even close.

    The guy had an 11% drop rate in college, if you look at only inside the numbers catches, he is about 20%.

    You saw what caliber of man he is. Kizer threw him a perfect pass at the end of the Steelers game, and the fukcing guy dropped it. 

    He blows, is is a bigger waste of a pick than Myles Garrett................... and THAT is really bad.

  • Know why I didn't have anything to say about you and a crennel rant...? Because I wasnt Shmucking here.     Chances are, it was pretty shitty too.

    Doesn't take much to see when the Browns Shmuck up.  

  • @tiamat63 said:

    The noise from the pulpit is kind of loud, especially coming from a guy that hailed Paxton Shmucking Lynch as the future.       

    Oh, I already know - "He's an athlete that hasn't gotten his fair shot yet".

    I never said he has not been given a fair shot yet. John Elway, the QB who post game, moist schidt from his asss with Bernie Kosar and Marty Stinkenhiemer is the one saying it. He pulled his QB and named Lynch as the starter. That Lynch got hurt again, has nothing to do with his abilities, WHICH............... are superior to any QB who the Browns have had since Testeverde.

    If I missed the mark on Lynch? I won't be the first time that I missed one, but it WILL be a rare time.

    I don't see you saying Sheet about my calling for Romeo's head in the second qtr of his 1st pre season game, or guaranteeing Hue would be a flop. I called out Holmgren, Sewage, Crennell, Policy, W Green Quinn, Weeden, Ben, Wentz, Goff, Petersen, Trubisky, Julio Jones, Bosa, Elliot, Jackoff Greg WIlliams, ............ on an on it goes............... you jackoffs dare to give ME schidt about ONE GUY?  One guy who is STILL in the hunt. 

    Fukcking idiots.

    Celebrating jackoff Joe Thomas. The only HOF player who cannot demonstrate ONE SINGLE STATISTIC that improved the day this lardass arrived. Only in Cleveland can a player be "guaranteed HOF"...and have made do fukcing difference on his team.

    GTFOH, Go spread yhour horse schidt in Hoorta's front yard. He has a factory of it.

    @ghoolie said:

    I never said he has not been given a fair shot yet. John Elway, the QB who post game, moist schidt from his asss with Bernie Kosar and Marty Stinkenhiemer is the one saying it. He pulled his QB and named Lynch as the starter. That Lynch got hurt again, has nothing to do with his abilities, WHICH............... are superior to any QB who the Browns have had since Testeverde.

    GTFOH, Go spread your horse schidt in Hoorta's front yard. He has a factory of it.

    Oh, because I've been right on more draft flops than you have? Second rate troll.  Lame. Garret is certainly a bust, but zero production to date Lynch needs more chances?  FU. We'll ride your sorry butt out of Dodge the minute the Broncos cut him. 

    Romeo may have sucked as a HC, but he's one of the best DCs in the NFL. You predicting he sucks, Savage sucks, everything sucks since 1999 is about as hard as saying water is wet. 

    When the big turnaround happens don't go blowing your phony horn you saw it all along.