The Curious Case of Eli Manning
-
I wonder - Peyton Manning is the qb that is what Eli isn't. (from Wikipedia)
His numbers 61.8 (freshman) 64.2, 63.9, 60.2
I still be a slight fluctuation, probably due to changes each graduating class, but I have to admit -
didn't fall below 60%. he's that accurate. It's confusing - Mike White at Kentucky -
53.1 (Freshman), 50.4, but then as a junior - a whopping 67.3, 65.4 as a senior.
Interesting - especially when they changed offenses, I think - starting his senior year.
So, I"m confused. lol. Peyton - the accuracy light was always on. Eli, on-off-on-off, and Mike White? off, then on the last two years?
Then there's Tom Brady - Freshman year- 1996 60%, 1997 a huge 80%, then 61.9 and 61 his jr and sr years.
So, Brady and Peyton - they were just locked in accurate when they started? Some qb's can develop accuracy like Mike White did?
Maybe some are locked in to inconsistent accuracy forever? The more I look at it, the more I'm not sure.
Maybe Mike White is the best pro-ready qb in this draft.
I wonder - Peyton Manning is the qb that is what Eli isn't. (from Wikipedia)
His numbers 61.8 (freshman) 64.2, 63.9, 60.2
I still be a slight fluctuation, probably due to changes each graduating class, but I have to admit -
didn't fall below 60%. he's that accurate. It's confusing - Mike White at Kentucky -
53.1 (Freshman), 50.4, but then as a junior - a whopping 67.3, 65.4 as a senior.
Interesting - especially when they changed offenses, I think - starting his senior year.
So, I"m confused. lol. Peyton - the accuracy light was always on. Eli, on-off-on-off, and Mike White? off, then on the last two years?
Then there's Tom Brady - Freshman year- 1996 60%, 1997 a huge 80%, then 61.9 and 61 his jr and sr years.
So, Brady and Peyton - they were just locked in accurate when they started? Some qb's can develop accuracy like Mike White did?
Maybe some are locked in to inconsistent accuracy forever? The more I look at it, the more I'm not sure.
Maybe Mike White is the best pro-ready qb in this draft.
First... please don't just cite percentages. They are not all equal.
In his first two seasons at UM Brady was not the starter, so as a Frosh he had five attempts and as a Soph a whopping 15. Clearly those seasons' stats deserve no weight in any analysis. https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/tom-brady-1.html His Jr and Sr years are valid, but under rigorous statistical analysis the completion percentages are likely no different. What does look different are his TD:INT ratio. They suggest greater care with the ball that possibly is reflected in the slight drop in accuracy, but that'd never be provable.
White? Special case all around given that he changed schools in the middle of his 4 years... and sat a year to boot. His rushing stats don't suggest a significantly different offensive use at the two schools. Looks like he was splitting time at USF and was "the man" at WKU. Looks like WKU's passing attacked suited the skill set of a more mature kid better... but a kid that was overloaded his Sr year when his pass attempt total skyrocketed.
"Accuracy" is an output dependent on many variables. Some are innate... some learned... some circumstantial. Certainly there's not one magical combination of factors to the top. Certainly there are varying sensitivities of the output to variations in the variables.
-
I wonder - Peyton Manning is the qb that is what Eli isn't. (from Wikipedia)
His numbers 61.8 (freshman) 64.2, 63.9, 60.2
I still be a slight fluctuation, probably due to changes each graduating class, but I have to admit -
didn't fall below 60%. he's that accurate. It's confusing - Mike White at Kentucky -
53.1 (Freshman), 50.4, but then as a junior - a whopping 67.3, 65.4 as a senior.
Interesting - especially when they changed offenses, I think - starting his senior year.
So, I"m confused. lol. Peyton - the accuracy light was always on. Eli, on-off-on-off, and Mike White? off, then on the last two years?
Then there's Tom Brady - Freshman year- 1996 60%, 1997 a huge 80%, then 61.9 and 61 his jr and sr years.
So, Brady and Peyton - they were just locked in accurate when they started? Some qb's can develop accuracy like Mike White did?
Maybe some are locked in to inconsistent accuracy forever? The more I look at it, the more I'm not sure.
Maybe Mike White is the best pro-ready qb in this draft.
First... please don't just cite percentages. They are not all equal.
In his first two seasons at UM Brady was not the starter, so as a Frosh he had five attempts and as a Soph a whopping 15. Clearly those seasons' stats deserve no weight in any analysis. https://www.sports-reference.com/cfb/players/tom-brady-1.html His Jr and Sr years are valid, but under rigorous statistical analysis the completion percentages are likely no different. What does look different are his TD:INT ratio. They suggest greater care with the ball that possibly is reflected in the slight drop in accuracy, but that'd never be provable.
White? Special case all around given that he changed schools in the middle of his 4 years... and sat a year to boot. His rushing stats don't suggest a significantly different offensive use at the two schools. Looks like he was splitting time at USF and was "the man" at WKU. Looks like WKU's passing attacked suited the skill set of a more mature kid better... but a kid that was overloaded his Sr year when his pass attempt total skyrocketed.
"Accuracy" is an output dependent on many variables. Some are innate... some learned... some circumstantial. Certainly there's not one magical combination of factors to the top. Certainly there are varying sensitivities of the output to variations in the variables.
-
The phrase is “the curious incident of the dog in the night-time”. Not case.
I also can’t find a single thing that indicates Fitzgerald was referencing that line. So Nero is right.
-
The phrase is “the curious incident of the dog in the night-time”. Not case.
I also can’t find a single thing that indicates Fitzgerald was referencing that line. So Nero is right.
The phrase is “the curious incident of the dog in the night-time”. Not case.
I also can’t find a single thing that indicates Fitzgerald was referencing that line. So Nero is right.
Case/ incident whatever the Genesis is the same. It comes from Sherlock Holmes.
-
The phrase is “the curious incident of the dog in the night-time”. Not case.
I also can’t find a single thing that indicates Fitzgerald was referencing that line. So Nero is right.
Case/ incident whatever the Genesis is the same. It comes from Sherlock Holmes.
Case/ incident whatever the Genesis is the same. It comes from Sherlock Holmes.
The curious incident line comes from Holmes.
This isn’t that line.
So Nero was right. Good job Nero.
-
Case/ incident whatever the Genesis is the same. It comes from Sherlock Holmes.
The curious incident line comes from Holmes.
This isn’t that line.
So Nero was right. Good job Nero.
The curious incident line comes from Holmes.
This isn’t that line.
So Nero was right. Good job Nero.
Are you two going to be put on ignored by tour because you were unnecessarily argumentative
-
The curious incident line comes from Holmes.
This isn’t that line.
So Nero was right. Good job Nero.
Are you two going to be put on ignored by tour because you were unnecessarily argumentative
Are you two going to be put on ignored by tour because you were unnecessarily argumentative
Probably not. I’m not arguing, I’m stating a fact.
-
Allen has some nice tools.. I just doubt he has the masculinity to lead men... We don't need the white version of Kizer...
-
Are you two going to be put on ignored by tour because you were unnecessarily argumentative
Probably not. I’m not arguing, I’m stating a fact.
Probably not.
Definitely not...
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login
