Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. Trade Kizer and release Gordon ?

Trade Kizer and release Gordon ?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Browns Board
50 Posts 21 Posters 1.6k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
    • 57k Posts
    • 4k Reputation
    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #16

    Yea, we know all about him....what's your point?

    DieHardBrownsFanD 1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • tiamat63T tiamat63

      247 is trash and Canfora is a hack.

      stillmotion stillmotionS Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
      • 2k Posts
      • 453 Reputation
      stillmotionS stillmotion wrote on last edited by
      #17

      @tiamat63 said:

      247 is trash and Canfora is a hack.

      we usually don't agree on much, but you're dead right.

      1 Reply Last reply
      👍
      Quote Reply
      • Ghoolie GhoolieG One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
        • 2k Posts
        • 1k Reputation
        GhoolieG Ghoolie wrote on last edited by
        #18

        I would have never drafted the kid. That said, I will repeat myself for #201, he has more upside, and greater physical skills than any QB we have, and more than likely, any QB we are considering.

        The kid had the Steelers dead to rights. Fumble fingers Coleman screwed the kid over. Kizer can play. Unfortunately, he mixes in enough horseschidt to sour an entire game. Decision making? He can get better. Really, is he costing so much that releasing him is a big bonus? WHo would we put in his place? 

        Sorry, this kid has better skills than RG3. He likes his job, the players like him, he isn't making a mess off the field and reportedly he is a hard butt worker. Black Tarkenton or not, you gotta be nuts to get rid of a kid of this caliber. 

        The Cleveland Browns have the hardest hit players in the NFL
        T The GipperT 2 Replies Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • The GipperT The Gipper

          Yea, we know all about him....what's your point?

          DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
          • 28k Posts
          • 6k Reputation
          DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
          #19

          @the-gipper said:

          Yea, we know all about him....what's your point?

          He sucks.

          "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
          1 Reply Last reply
          😂
          Quote Reply
          • jiggins7919 jiggins7919J Conversation Starter Dedicated Very Popular Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
            • 5k Posts
            • 1k Reputation
            jiggins7919J jiggins7919 wrote on last edited by
            #20

            Trading Kizer makes no sense. Although he had a miserable season, he still got a TON of experience. If the game ever slows down for him, we may have a solid backup QB worst case, and best case we have a guy who could start (although severely unlikely). Kizer was 21 people, and he showed toughness, grit, and best of all, heart. That last game against Pittsburgh really showed me something, and although he started off MISERABLY and our team was down 14 early, he didn't lose his head and probably finished playing the best game of the year. And don't give me any crap about Pittsburgh resting their players because they didn't. The ONLY defensive player who didn't play was their star DT. 

            It's not worth discussing trading Josh Gordon because that's dumb. 

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • GhoolieG Ghoolie

              I would have never drafted the kid. That said, I will repeat myself for #201, he has more upside, and greater physical skills than any QB we have, and more than likely, any QB we are considering.

              The kid had the Steelers dead to rights. Fumble fingers Coleman screwed the kid over. Kizer can play. Unfortunately, he mixes in enough horseschidt to sour an entire game. Decision making? He can get better. Really, is he costing so much that releasing him is a big bonus? WHo would we put in his place? 

              Sorry, this kid has better skills than RG3. He likes his job, the players like him, he isn't making a mess off the field and reportedly he is a hard butt worker. Black Tarkenton or not, you gotta be nuts to get rid of a kid of this caliber. 

              TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
              • 23k Posts
              • 6k Reputation
              T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by TexasAg1969
              #21

              @ghoolie said:

              I would have never drafted the kid. That said, I will repeat myself for #201, he has more upside, and greater physical skills than any QB we have, and more than likely, any QB we are considering.

              The kid had the Steelers dead to rights. Fumble fingers Coleman screwed the kid over. Kizer can play. Unfortunately, he mixes in enough horseschidt to sour an entire game. Decision making? He can get better. Really, is he costing so much that releasing him is a big bonus? WHo would we put in his place? 

              Sorry, this kid has better skills than RG3. He likes his job, the players like him, he isn't making a mess off the field and reportedly he is a hard butt worker. Black Tarkenton or not, you gotta be nuts to get rid of a kid of this caliber. 

              With a real HC the rookie could have had 4-5 wins in 2017. Huey Fig Newton did him no favors and his so called "receivers" even less so. I have not given up on him either.

              1 Reply Last reply
              👍
              Quote Reply
              • The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                • 57k Posts
                • 4k Reputation
                The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                #22

                Yea, we know all about him....what's your point?

                He sucks.

                OK, Fair point! 😆

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • GhoolieG Ghoolie

                  I would have never drafted the kid. That said, I will repeat myself for #201, he has more upside, and greater physical skills than any QB we have, and more than likely, any QB we are considering.

                  The kid had the Steelers dead to rights. Fumble fingers Coleman screwed the kid over. Kizer can play. Unfortunately, he mixes in enough horseschidt to sour an entire game. Decision making? He can get better. Really, is he costing so much that releasing him is a big bonus? WHo would we put in his place? 

                  Sorry, this kid has better skills than RG3. He likes his job, the players like him, he isn't making a mess off the field and reportedly he is a hard butt worker. Black Tarkenton or not, you gotta be nuts to get rid of a kid of this caliber. 

                  The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                  • 57k Posts
                  • 4k Reputation
                  The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                  #23

                  @ghoolie said:

                  I would have never drafted the kid. That said, I will repeat myself for #201, he has more upside, and greater physical skills than any QB we have, and more than likely, any QB we are considering.

                  The kid had the Steelers dead to rights. Fumble fingers Coleman screwed the kid over. Kizer can play. Unfortunately, he mixes in enough horseschidt to sour an entire game. Decision making? He can get better. Really, is he costing so much that releasing him is a big bonus? WHo would we put in his place? 

                  Sorry, this kid has better skills than RG3. He likes his job, the players like him, he isn't making a mess off the field and reportedly he is a hard butt worker. Black Tarkenton or not, you gotta be nuts to get rid of a kid of this caliber. 

                  Agree that we do not dump him.  He does have that raw potential....but no, no reason to get rid of him.  That does not mean though that we do not bring in his potential replacement.  

                  GhoolieG 1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • hoortaH hoorta

                    @mld-woody said:

                    We'd be idiots to trade Kizer

                    Exactly Woodster- he's still on his rookie 2nd round deal (looked it up on spotrac just over $1 million) and at worst he'll be third string this year. 

                    mjp28 mjp28M In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
                    • 18k Posts
                    • 4k Reputation
                    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
                    #24

                    @hoorta said:

                    Exactly Woodster- he's still on his rookie 2nd round deal (looked it up on spotrac just over $1 million) and at worst he'll be third string this year. 

                    Some people may not realize that Kizer didn't really have that much experience at ND plus he was a passing and running QB there, doesn't always translate to the NFL game. And maybe he had recievers that could catch? 

                    Passing

                        Passing
                    Year School Conf Class Pos G Cmp Att Pct Yds Y/A AY/A TD Int Rate
                    Career Notre Dame         422 695 60.7 5805 8.4 8.5 47 19 147.7
                    *2015 Notre Dame Ind SO QB 13 210 334 62.9 2880 8.6 8.5 21 10 150.1
                    2016 Notre Dame Ind JR QB 12 212 361 58.7 2925 8.1 8.4 26 9 145.6
                        Rushing Receiving Scrimmage
                    Year School Conf Class Pos G Att Yds Avg TD Rec Yds Avg TD Plays Yds Avg TD
                    Career Notre Dame         264 997 3.8 18 1 4 4.0 0 265 1001 3.8 18
                    *2015 Notre Dame Ind SO QB 13 135 525 3.9 10 0 0   0 135 525 3.9 10
                    2016 Notre Dame Ind JR QB 12 129 472 3.7 8 1 4 4.0 0 130 476 3.7 8
                    GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND!
                    The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • mjp28M mjp28

                      @hoorta said:

                      Exactly Woodster- he's still on his rookie 2nd round deal (looked it up on spotrac just over $1 million) and at worst he'll be third string this year. 

                      Some people may not realize that Kizer didn't really have that much experience at ND plus he was a passing and running QB there, doesn't always translate to the NFL game. And maybe he had recievers that could catch? 

                      Passing

                          Passing
                      Year School Conf Class Pos G Cmp Att Pct Yds Y/A AY/A TD Int Rate
                      Career Notre Dame         422 695 60.7 5805 8.4 8.5 47 19 147.7
                      *2015 Notre Dame Ind SO QB 13 210 334 62.9 2880 8.6 8.5 21 10 150.1
                      2016 Notre Dame Ind JR QB 12 212 361 58.7 2925 8.1 8.4 26 9 145.6
                          Rushing Receiving Scrimmage
                      Year School Conf Class Pos G Att Yds Avg TD Rec Yds Avg TD Plays Yds Avg TD
                      Career Notre Dame         264 997 3.8 18 1 4 4.0 0 265 1001 3.8 18
                      *2015 Notre Dame Ind SO QB 13 135 525 3.9 10 0 0   0 135 525 3.9 10
                      2016 Notre Dame Ind JR QB 12 129 472 3.7 8 1 4 4.0 0 130 476 3.7 8
                      The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                      • 57k Posts
                      • 4k Reputation
                      The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                      #25

                      @mjp28 said:

                      Some people may not realize that Kizer didn't really have that much experience at ND plus he was a passing and running QB there, doesn't always translate to the NFL game. And maybe he had recievers that could catch? 

                       

                       

                      There are a lot of times that I wish he would have run instead of thrown.  How many of his Ints. were in the red zone?  A fair number.  If he had just run instead of throwing all those picks....the Browns may have actually won a couple of games.  It would at least have given us FG opportunities, rather than being a turnover.

                      jcam222J 1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • The GipperT The Gipper

                        @mjp28 said:

                        Some people may not realize that Kizer didn't really have that much experience at ND plus he was a passing and running QB there, doesn't always translate to the NFL game. And maybe he had recievers that could catch? 

                         

                         

                        There are a lot of times that I wish he would have run instead of thrown.  How many of his Ints. were in the red zone?  A fair number.  If he had just run instead of throwing all those picks....the Browns may have actually won a couple of games.  It would at least have given us FG opportunities, rather than being a turnover.

                        jcam222 jcam222J Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                        • 3k Posts
                        • 873 Reputation
                        jcam222J jcam222 wrote on last edited by jcam222
                        #26

                        @the-gipper said:

                        There are a lot of times that I wish he would have run instead of thrown.  How many of his Ints. were in the red zone?  A fair number.  If he had just run instead of throwing all those picks....the Browns may have actually won a couple of games.  It would at least have given us FG opportunities, rather than being a turnover.

                        There are really only two situations in which I wish he had ran last year 1) When he was under center 2) When he took snaps in shotgun. 

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        😂
                        Quote Reply
                        • The GipperT The Gipper

                          @ghoolie said:

                          I would have never drafted the kid. That said, I will repeat myself for #201, he has more upside, and greater physical skills than any QB we have, and more than likely, any QB we are considering.

                          The kid had the Steelers dead to rights. Fumble fingers Coleman screwed the kid over. Kizer can play. Unfortunately, he mixes in enough horseschidt to sour an entire game. Decision making? He can get better. Really, is he costing so much that releasing him is a big bonus? WHo would we put in his place? 

                          Sorry, this kid has better skills than RG3. He likes his job, the players like him, he isn't making a mess off the field and reportedly he is a hard butt worker. Black Tarkenton or not, you gotta be nuts to get rid of a kid of this caliber. 

                          Agree that we do not dump him.  He does have that raw potential....but no, no reason to get rid of him.  That does not mean though that we do not bring in his potential replacement.  

                          Ghoolie GhoolieG One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                          • 2k Posts
                          • 1k Reputation
                          GhoolieG Ghoolie wrote on last edited by
                          #27

                          @the-gipper said:

                          Agree that we do not dump him.  He does have that raw potential....but no, no reason to get rid of him.  That does not mean though that we do not bring in his potential replacement.  

                          You know Gip, who are you, Hue, me, or anyone else to say that a veteran or new draftee will be his replacement? The new guy is still going to have to compete. The last time I looked, nobody gave Kizer the starting job. Whatever the level of talent we had, Kizer beat them. How do we know that Kizer won't beat out McCarron, et. al?

                          Here is what bothers me about this schidt pile. At QB, we aren't looking for a QB, we are looking for a savior, a miracle worker, someone to magically save the jobs of management and make the owner look respectable.

                          If we are looking for a QB? Then Kizer is not a question mark. He is part of this team and it is in everyone's interest to make this kid all he can be. I think Hue and the Browns treated this kid like schidt. Pulling him, not giving him confidence, not giving him weapons, and giving him an unimaginative, sitting duck offense that Joe Montana couldn't succeed in.

                          Anyone can draft talent. All these kids have talent. Developing players, that's what the Browns suck at. Kizer is a solid athlete, and a solid young man. You don't get rid of that spirit, you build on it.

                          The Cleveland Browns have the hardest hit players in the NFL
                          B The GipperT 2 Replies Last reply
                          Quote Reply
                          • alzado82 A
                            • 1 Posts
                            • 0 Reputation
                            A alzado82 wrote on last edited by
                            #28

                            Hey guys, first post and life long Raider fan here. I applaud the Browns for sticking with Gordon and the way he is humbly dedicated to the team. I hope he retires a Brown.

                            I wanted to pop in and offer my input to you guys and to be honest you are not that far of. Some things I would consider:

                            Sign McCarron and by all means keep Kizer, but stash as the #2 and let him settle down from 2017.

                            Miami just tagged Landry. Make a serious run at him ( you got cap, use it now $15 - $16 mil per annum), send Miami your #4 this year and next yrs first.You have all those second rnd picks to make up for the loss of #4. Landry on one side, Gordon on the other (drool)

                            Sign Gordon, I believe he would sign for a reasonable amount

                            Draft Barkley #1

                            Good luck on the season

                            The GipperT tiamat63T L 3 Replies Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • GhoolieG Ghoolie

                              @the-gipper said:

                              Agree that we do not dump him.  He does have that raw potential....but no, no reason to get rid of him.  That does not mean though that we do not bring in his potential replacement.  

                              You know Gip, who are you, Hue, me, or anyone else to say that a veteran or new draftee will be his replacement? The new guy is still going to have to compete. The last time I looked, nobody gave Kizer the starting job. Whatever the level of talent we had, Kizer beat them. How do we know that Kizer won't beat out McCarron, et. al?

                              Here is what bothers me about this schidt pile. At QB, we aren't looking for a QB, we are looking for a savior, a miracle worker, someone to magically save the jobs of management and make the owner look respectable.

                              If we are looking for a QB? Then Kizer is not a question mark. He is part of this team and it is in everyone's interest to make this kid all he can be. I think Hue and the Browns treated this kid like schidt. Pulling him, not giving him confidence, not giving him weapons, and giving him an unimaginative, sitting duck offense that Joe Montana couldn't succeed in.

                              Anyone can draft talent. All these kids have talent. Developing players, that's what the Browns suck at. Kizer is a solid athlete, and a solid young man. You don't get rid of that spirit, you build on it.

                              boo fagley B Banned
                              • 754 Posts
                              • 363 Reputation
                              B boo fagley wrote on last edited by
                              #29

                              @ghoolie said:

                              You know Gip, who are you, Hue, me, or anyone else to say that a veteran or new draftee will be his replacement? The new guy is still going to have to compete. The last time I looked, nobody gave Kizer the starting job. Whatever the level of talent we had, Kizer beat them. How do we know that Kizer won't beat out McCarron, et. al?

                              Hue gave him the job.

                              The pee wee football coach naming his bench warmer son starting QB doesnt make it right. 

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              👍
                              Quote Reply
                              • boo fagley B Banned
                                • 754 Posts
                                • 363 Reputation
                                B boo fagley wrote on last edited by
                                #30

                                The only team that Kizer has any value to at all is the Browns. The Browns QB lineup should be 1 - Vet FA who plays now, 2 - Kizer if he earns the spot, 3 - 2018 1st or 4th draft pick QB who is supposed to sit unless there is no other choice.

                                Gordon is the best player on the team.

                                The GipperT 1 Reply Last reply
                                👍
                                Quote Reply
                                • GhoolieG Ghoolie

                                  @the-gipper said:

                                  Agree that we do not dump him.  He does have that raw potential....but no, no reason to get rid of him.  That does not mean though that we do not bring in his potential replacement.  

                                  You know Gip, who are you, Hue, me, or anyone else to say that a veteran or new draftee will be his replacement? The new guy is still going to have to compete. The last time I looked, nobody gave Kizer the starting job. Whatever the level of talent we had, Kizer beat them. How do we know that Kizer won't beat out McCarron, et. al?

                                  Here is what bothers me about this schidt pile. At QB, we aren't looking for a QB, we are looking for a savior, a miracle worker, someone to magically save the jobs of management and make the owner look respectable.

                                  If we are looking for a QB? Then Kizer is not a question mark. He is part of this team and it is in everyone's interest to make this kid all he can be. I think Hue and the Browns treated this kid like schidt. Pulling him, not giving him confidence, not giving him weapons, and giving him an unimaginative, sitting duck offense that Joe Montana couldn't succeed in.

                                  Anyone can draft talent. All these kids have talent. Developing players, that's what the Browns suck at. Kizer is a solid athlete, and a solid young man. You don't get rid of that spirit, you build on it.

                                  The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                                  • 57k Posts
                                  • 4k Reputation
                                  The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                                  #31

                                  @ghoolie said:

                                  You know Gip, who are you, Hue, me, or anyone else to say that a veteran or new draftee will be his replacement? The new guy is still going to have to compete. The last time I looked, nobody gave Kizer the starting job. Whatever the level of talent we had, Kizer beat them. How do we know that Kizer won't beat out McCarron, et. al?

                                  Here is what bothers me about this schidt pile. At QB, we aren't looking for a QB, we are looking for a savior, a miracle worker, someone to magically save the jobs of management and make the owner look respectable.

                                  If we are looking for a QB? Then Kizer is not a question mark. He is part of this team and it is in everyone's interest to make this kid all he can be. I think Hue and the Browns treated this kid like schidt. Pulling him, not giving him confidence, not giving him weapons, and giving him an unimaginative, sitting duck offense that Joe Montana couldn't succeed in.

                                  Anyone can draft talent. All these kids have talent. Developing players, that's what the Browns suck at. Kizer is a solid athlete, and a solid young man. You don't get rid of that spirit, you build on it.

                                  Yea....that is a great theory....that it is the Browns that suck at developing QBs....that it is just the Browns that are the problem. If only these boys had gone somewhere else they would have all been successful QBs elsewhere.

                                  Only problem with that theory is that when all these QBs we have taken have gone elsewhere....they have sucked worse than the did here. 

                                  Nevertheless...the Browns WERE at fault:   they were at fault for selecting all these crap arsebags in the first place.  They HAVE sucked at selecting talent...not necessarily at developing it.   Some talent is never "developable".  Don't know yet about Kizer.  But based on evidence....I for one am not really willing to just hand the future over to this 0-15 guy at this point. 

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply
                                  • A alzado82

                                    Hey guys, first post and life long Raider fan here. I applaud the Browns for sticking with Gordon and the way he is humbly dedicated to the team. I hope he retires a Brown.

                                    I wanted to pop in and offer my input to you guys and to be honest you are not that far of. Some things I would consider:

                                    Sign McCarron and by all means keep Kizer, but stash as the #2 and let him settle down from 2017.

                                    Miami just tagged Landry. Make a serious run at him ( you got cap, use it now $15 - $16 mil per annum), send Miami your #4 this year and next yrs first.You have all those second rnd picks to make up for the loss of #4. Landry on one side, Gordon on the other (drool)

                                    Sign Gordon, I believe he would sign for a reasonable amount

                                    Draft Barkley #1

                                    Good luck on the season

                                    The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                                    • 57k Posts
                                    • 4k Reputation
                                    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                                    #32

                                    @alzado82 said:

                                    Hey guys, first post and life long Raider fan here. I applaud the Browns for sticking with Gordon and the way he is humbly dedicated to the team. I hope he retires a Brown.

                                    I wanted to pop in and offer my input to you guys and to be honest you are not that far of. Some things I would consider:

                                    Sign McCarron and by all means keep Kizer, but stash as the #2 and let him settle down from 2017.

                                    Miami just tagged Landry. Make a serious run at him ( you got cap, use it now $15 - $16 mil per annum), send Miami your #4 this year and next yrs first.You have all those second rnd picks to make up for the loss of #4. Landry on one side, Gordon on the other (drool)

                                    Sign Gordon, I believe he would sign for a reasonable amount

                                    Draft Barkley #1

                                    Good luck on the season

                                    Uh...NO.   If sending all that for Landry is such a good deal...they why don't you go to your Raider board and suggest that they give 2 first round picks up for Jarvis Landry.  And see how fast your fellow Raiders fans put you in a Black Hole you would never escape from (along with your team)

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    Quote Reply
                                    • B boo fagley

                                      The only team that Kizer has any value to at all is the Browns. The Browns QB lineup should be 1 - Vet FA who plays now, 2 - Kizer if he earns the spot, 3 - 2018 1st or 4th draft pick QB who is supposed to sit unless there is no other choice.

                                      Gordon is the best player on the team.

                                      The Gipper The GipperT In Memoriam Very Popular
                                      • 57k Posts
                                      • 4k Reputation
                                      The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
                                      #33

                                      @boo-fagley said:

                                      The only team that Kizer has any value to at all is the Browns. The Browns QB lineup should be 1 - Vet FA who plays now, 2 - Kizer if he earns the spot, 3 - 2018 1st or 4th draft pick QB who is supposed to sit unless there is no other choice.

                                      Gordon is the best player on the team.

                                      Or put the rookie at #2 and Kizer #3.....but sure....at least let the rookie and Kizer have a competition for the backup position.

                                      mjp28M 1 Reply Last reply
                                      Quote Reply
                                      • The GipperT The Gipper

                                        @boo-fagley said:

                                        The only team that Kizer has any value to at all is the Browns. The Browns QB lineup should be 1 - Vet FA who plays now, 2 - Kizer if he earns the spot, 3 - 2018 1st or 4th draft pick QB who is supposed to sit unless there is no other choice.

                                        Gordon is the best player on the team.

                                        Or put the rookie at #2 and Kizer #3.....but sure....at least let the rookie and Kizer have a competition for the backup position.

                                        mjp28 mjp28M In Memoriam Dedicated Conversation Starter Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Reacting Well Week One Done One Month Later One Year In
                                        • 18k Posts
                                        • 4k Reputation
                                        mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
                                        #34

                                        @the-gipper said:

                                        Or put the rookie at #2 and Kizer #3.....but sure....at least let the rookie and Kizer have a competition for the backup position.

                                        Strangly Kizer now has some real NFL in the trenches actual experience and maybe with a quarterback guru and many reps he might improve......a good draft will help.

                                        ALSO 2018 is a rebuilding year, I was hoping for better in 2016 and 2017, "once bitten twice shy" so "twice bitten ???".

                                        Oh boo, Gordon might be pro bowl material as long as he plays 16 games.

                                        GO BUCKEYES, BROWNS, INDIANS, CAVS, YSU, NAVY and yes I like ND!
                                        jiggins7919J 1 Reply Last reply
                                        Quote Reply
                                        • Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                                          • 39k Posts
                                          • 9k Reputation
                                          W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
                                          #35

                                          https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/josh-gordon-reportedly-wont-be-restricted-free-agent-so-its-browns-or-nothing/

                                          www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
                                          hoortaH 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Quote Reply

                                          Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                          Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                          With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                          Register Login
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          Theme
                                          • System
                                          • Light
                                          • Dark
                                          The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                          The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Forums
                                          • Recent
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Donate