Saquon at the Combine!!!!
-
He runs Official 4.0 in the 40.
Zoom-Zoom!
The secret of getting ahead is getting started. The secret of getting started is breaking your complex overwhelming tasks into small manageable tasks, and then starting on the first one. -Mark Twain- "It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog." -Mark Twain- -
-
I moved to rack pulls being I wanted to isolate some stuff and I'm 29. But if you're a professional athlete with professional trainers like these kids and you throw your back out doing set of 3 deads.... Just can't see it happening. Meanwhile repping 225 to failure and worrying about form later lends it self towards injury. As such you saw with Price and possibly some of the reasons you hear about shoulder and pec issues after the combine.
My goal is to not pay for the 72 oz steak out in Amarillo which is free if you can eat it without throwing up. Takes two hands I think.
My goal is to not pay for the 72 oz steak out in Amarillo which is free if you can eat it without throwing up. Takes two hands I think.
Bill,
Is it true that that particular steak is marinated in syrup of ipecac ??
Mike
-
Still don't want a HB that high
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
-
-
Saquon, Saquon! He doing about what I expected him to do.
4.41 and 4.42 - 40 yard dash + *233 lbs at 4.4 is pretty impressive despite expectations
Verticle Jump - 41 inches ++
Bench Press - 29 reps +++
Saquon, Saquon! He doing about what I expected him to do.
4.41 and 4.42 - 40 yard dash + *233 lbs at 4.4 is pretty impressive despite expectations
Verticle Jump - 41 inches ++
Bench Press - 29 reps +++
Very impressive. But shouldn't we all be extremely disappointed since you told us he would run sub 4.3?
You told us to trust you on him, and you obviously know all about him, so he will not live up to your monstrous expectations?
-
The guy is a dynamic playmaker, don't pass him up. Depending on which QB you like best, there is an excellent chance of getting him at four, with no pressure on him if we bring in a bridge QB as well.
Zombo
--I like Darnold best, but Barkley/Rosen or Barkley/Mayfield could be a great combo, if our war room likes those guys more or as much.
-
Dorsey word was Best "Player" Available. Not sure where best "Athlete" would fall? Either way, Huejax has not been given a QB talent that will still be sitting at pick #4..get your QB wizard outfit ready again Huey..( some QB, in Dorseys eyes, better really seperate in coming weeks)
Browns & Buffett: Got to go fishin, Down to rock bottom again, with just a few Friends -
Since when did 4.40 or 4.42 equal 4.0?
He forgot about the leading 4 Ag. Just too excited.
Yeah, Barkley is good- as Mayock said "he checks all the boxes". Checked them enough that we might potentially have to go with the third best QB? Remains to be seen.
EDIT: I'll (sort of) take that back. To flip picks with the Colts to move up from #4 to #3- should only cost us our #35, which his plenty- going by draft value chart. If we have two quarterbacks rated exactly equal, and another team doesn't offer the Colts a King's Ransom for the #3.
-
The guy is a dynamic playmaker, don't pass him up. Depending on which QB you like best, there is an excellent chance of getting him at four, with no pressure on him if we bring in a bridge QB as well.
Zombo
--I like Darnold best, but Barkley/Rosen or Barkley/Mayfield could be a great combo, if our war room likes those guys more or as much.
Zombo said:
The guy is a dynamic playmaker, don't pass him up. Depending on which QB you like best, there is an excellent chance of getting him at four, with no pressure on him if we bring in a bridge QB as well.
Zombo
--I like Darnold best, but Barkley/Rosen or Barkley/Mayfield could be a great combo, if our war room likes those guys more or as much.
Well Z, we take Barkley @ #1 overall, guaranteed one of Darnold, Rosen, or Mayfield will be there. Even better if a team either trades up foolishly (IMHO) or takes Allen @ #2 or #3.
BUT- if we see one of the quarterbacks as a "can't miss" franchise guy- we'll just have to go that route, and take a consolation prize in Guice, or Michel later on in the draft.
-
Zombo said:
The guy is a dynamic playmaker, don't pass him up. Depending on which QB you like best, there is an excellent chance of getting him at four, with no pressure on him if we bring in a bridge QB as well.
Zombo
--I like Darnold best, but Barkley/Rosen or Barkley/Mayfield could be a great combo, if our war room likes those guys more or as much.
Well Z, we take Barkley @ #1 overall, guaranteed one of Darnold, Rosen, or Mayfield will be there. Even better if a team either trades up foolishly (IMHO) or takes Allen @ #2 or #3.
BUT- if we see one of the quarterbacks as a "can't miss" franchise guy- we'll just have to go that route, and take a consolation prize in Guice, or Michel later on in the draft.
Well Z, we take Barkley @ #1 overall, guaranteed one of Darnold, Rosen, or Mayfield will be there. Even better if a team either trades up foolishly (IMHO) or takes Allen @ #2 or #3.
BUT- if we see one of the quarterbacks as a "can't miss" franchise guy- we'll just have to go that route, and take a consolation prize in Guice, or Michel later on in the draft.
Yep, it's a beautiful thing having 1 and 4 this year ... you can get the BPA AND a "franchise QB".
The wild cards are: what happens at #2 and #3? Giants expected to take a QB, Colts could either take a QB or trade out to someone who does, and there is a risk of getting out third choice .. but it all depends on who we like the best and who they like the best ... and no one knows. Those two teams could also become trading partners if we take Barkley and "have to have" another guy. All very interesting.
Zombo
-
You know it's funny everyone saying about this amazing draft capital that the Browns have, and they certainly do. Even talking about getting 2 great players, whether that is 1 QB and 4 Barkley or Minkah or 1 Barkley and 4 QB
But the complaining last year when they traded 12 and the Browns didn't get Hooker or Howard. Seems like the Browns made a good call on that trade last year huh.
-
You know it's funny everyone saying about this amazing draft capital that the Browns have, and they certainly do. Even talking about getting 2 great players, whether that is 1 QB and 4 Barkley or Minkah or 1 Barkley and 4 QB
But the complaining last year when they traded 12 and the Browns didn't get Hooker or Howard. Seems like the Browns made a good call on that trade last year huh.
You know it's funny everyone saying about this amazing draft capital that the Browns have, and they certainly do. Even talking about getting 2 great players, whether that is 1 QB and 4 Barkley or Minkah or 1 Barkley and 4 QB
But the complaining last year when they traded 12 and the Browns didn't get Hooker or Howard. Seems like the Browns made a good call on that trade last year huh.
Sssshhhhhh
Don't start that again, lol
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
Saquon, Saquon! He doing about what I expected him to do.
4.41 and 4.42 - 40 yard dash + *233 lbs at 4.4 is pretty impressive despite expectations
Verticle Jump - 41 inches ++
Bench Press - 29 reps +++
Saquon, Saquon! He doing about what I expected him to do.
4.41 and 4.42 - 40 yard dash + *233 lbs at 4.4 is pretty impressive despite expectations
Verticle Jump - 41 inches ++
Bench Press - 29 reps +++
Dri Archer ran a 4.26.....and where does he stand among all the great RBs in NFL history? And he has been cut by 3 teams. So...pure speed is irrelevant. It does not hurt to be fast....and his numbers are above average....but that alone mean little. The other numbers are good...bu...again...t also mostly irrelevant to a RB. Maybe he will have to jump high to catch a few passes. And he has to be strong to block and to break through lines....but otherwise, meh
-
Still don't want a HB that high
Or a Wingback? if we are going with outdated terminology?
-
Dorsey word was Best "Player" Available. Not sure where best "Athlete" would fall? Either way, Huejax has not been given a QB talent that will still be sitting at pick #4..get your QB wizard outfit ready again Huey..( some QB, in Dorseys eyes, better really seperate in coming weeks)
Dorsey word was Best "Player" Available. Not sure where best "Athlete" would fall? Either way, Huejax has not been given a QB talent that will still be sitting at pick #4..get your QB wizard outfit ready again Huey..( some QB, in Dorseys eyes, better really seperate in coming weeks)
The guy considered the best "Player" in this draft....is likely the OG out of Notre Dame.....Quenton Tarantino Nelson. So....we likely will not be going for the best player available.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login