Skip to content

Tyrod Taylor A Brown

The Browns Board
177 46 8.3k 1
  • @westside-steve said:

    Which still begs the question if Buffalo is sitting on a sure thing why they would they dump the guy? I'm sure they could have easily had some more Firepower to his Arsenal if he's a franchise QB? Must be some reason they Must be some reason they thought of him as a stumbling block.

    WSS

    Just my gut feel but BUF wanted another direction and the BROWNS were getting nervous about getting shut out of the experienced QB FA market.

    I think the BROWNS came out ahead on this deal. Then they jettisoned Kizer like yesterday's fish and lost their only really experienced QB.

    Obviously now they plan on having a true rookie as the "one snap away guy" as a backup? Gulp.

    ........edit add, oh yeah Kessler or whomever is there, not a big comfort for me.

    @mjp28 said:

    Just my gut feel but BUF wanted another direction and the BROWNS were getting nervous about getting shut out of the experienced QB FA market.

    I think the BROWNS came out ahead on this deal. Then they jettisoned Kizer like yesterday's fish and lost their only really experienced QB.

    Obviously now they plan on having a true rookie as the "one snap away guy" as a backup? Gulp.

    ........edit add, oh yeah Kessler or whomever is there, not a big comfort for me.

    Well as you know I didn't want Kizer, nor did I want him to start immediately, but thought he had potential and heard enough of the pundits saying that he showed some improvement of the season went on. Which I guess is the best you can ask being thrown into an untenable situation.

    On the other hand I don't suppose we get a straight answer about any of the inner workings of the NFL anyway.

    WSS

  • Interesting factoid...

    The Liberal Browns‏ @LiberalBrowns

    @TyrodTaylor owns teams who sit in Zone coverage. Coincidentally, The Steelers & Bengals are both in the Top 3 for Zone usage... with the Ravens not too far behind. Dorsey's decision to trade for Tyrod was no mistake #Browns fans. #AnalyticsAreForNerds

  • Interesting factoid...

    The Liberal Browns‏ @LiberalBrowns

    @TyrodTaylor owns teams who sit in Zone coverage. Coincidentally, The Steelers & Bengals are both in the Top 3 for Zone usage... with the Ravens not too far behind. Dorsey's decision to trade for Tyrod was no mistake #Browns fans. #AnalyticsAreForNerds

    @tour2ma said:

    Interesting factoid...

    The Liberal Browns‏ @LiberalBrowns

    @TyrodTaylor owns teams who sit in Zone coverage. Coincidentally, The Steelers & Bengals are both in the Top 3 for Zone usage... with the Ravens not too far behind. Dorsey's decision to trade for Tyrod was no mistake #Browns fans. #AnalyticsAreForNerds

    What does this mean?   I think you have to flesh this out a bit.

  • @tour2ma said:

    Interesting factoid...

    The Liberal Browns‏ @LiberalBrowns

    @TyrodTaylor owns teams who sit in Zone coverage. Coincidentally, The Steelers & Bengals are both in the Top 3 for Zone usage... with the Ravens not too far behind. Dorsey's decision to trade for Tyrod was no mistake #Browns fans. #AnalyticsAreForNerds

    What does this mean?   I think you have to flesh this out a bit.

    @the-gipper said:

    What does this mean?   I think you have to flesh this out a bit.

    Tyrod has great production against Zone Coverage. Our AFC North rivals are among the very top users of zone coverage in the entire league.

    Therefore, he appears to be a shrewd choice for Dorsey and the Browns.

    Zombo

  • @the-gipper said:

    What does this mean?   I think you have to flesh this out a bit.

    Tyrod has great production against Zone Coverage. Our AFC North rivals are among the very top users of zone coverage in the entire league.

    Therefore, he appears to be a shrewd choice for Dorsey and the Browns.

    Zombo

    Zombo said:

    Tyrod has great production against Zone Coverage. Our AFC North rivals are among the very top users of zone coverage in the entire league.

    Therefore, he appears to be a shrewd choice for Dorsey and the Browns.

    Zombo

    I got that much....I am just wondering about the statistics that bear that out. 

  • This ought to help...

    DaWfE_wUMAApxa0.jpg

  • This ought to help...

    DaWfE_wUMAApxa0.jpg

    @tour2ma said:

    This ought to help...

    DaWfE_wUMAApxa0.jpg

    Just beat the Steelers and the flying rats and the bungholes and I'm good with him.

    WSS

  • @the-gipper said:

    What does this mean?   I think you have to flesh this out a bit.

    Tyrod has great production against Zone Coverage. Our AFC North rivals are among the very top users of zone coverage in the entire league.

    Therefore, he appears to be a shrewd choice for Dorsey and the Browns.

    Zombo

    Zombo said:

    Therefore, he appears to be a shrewd choice for Dorsey and the Browns.

    Zombo

    When's the last time we had any kind of real plan in "team building" with a purpose? not sure who opened who's eyes on Tyrod, from FO to coaches? but it's New..Now to get a roster built with similar planning. Than a coaching staff, preparing their team to weaknesses from weekly game film of opponents..We may just surprise ourselves into finishing some games..a lot to like here..(good find tour)  

  • I hope Tyrod's shoulder mounted chip grows 10 fold by all of the QBOTF talk and the dude goes out there and phucking lights it the hell up, forcing the Browns to sign him to an extension by week 10. 

  • If we are forced to sign TT to an extension, then we drafted the wrong QB.

  • If we are forced to sign TT to an extension, then we drafted the wrong QB.

    @tour2ma said:

    If we are forced to sign TT to an extension, then we drafted the wrong QB.

    Well it took Rodgers 3 years to be ready to take over at GB, so an extension may very well be in order.

  • @tour2ma said:

    If we are forced to sign TT to an extension, then we drafted the wrong QB.

    Well it took Rodgers 3 years to be ready to take over at GB, so an extension may very well be in order.

    @texasag1969 said:

    Well it took Rodgers 3 years to be ready to take over at GB, so an extension may very well be in order.

    More like it took Favre three years to get out of the way.

    There's no indication that Rodgers needed to wait one year let alone 3.

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Well it took Rodgers 3 years to be ready to take over at GB, so an extension may very well be in order.

    More like it took Favre three years to get out of the way.

    There's no indication that Rodgers needed to wait one year let alone 3.

    @tour2ma said:

    More like it took Favre three years to get out of the way.

    There's no indication that Rodgers needed to wait one year let alone 3.

    Nevertheless how many times have the Browns rushed in QBs who were not really ready? And if TT is playing well, why not extend him? It's not like he's Brady's age.

  • @tour2ma said:

    More like it took Favre three years to get out of the way.

    There's no indication that Rodgers needed to wait one year let alone 3.

    Nevertheless how many times have the Browns rushed in QBs who were not really ready? And if TT is playing well, why not extend him? It's not like he's Brady's age.

    @texasag1969 said:

    And if TT is playing well, why not extend him?

    Because we are at the end of the bridge... or should be.

    Don't get me wrong, if Tyrod is cheap enough I'd consider him, but I don't think he'll be "cheap". He'll be in that 2nd tier $15mm-ish per year area and still want to start.

  • @tour2ma said:

    More like it took Favre three years to get out of the way.

    There's no indication that Rodgers needed to wait one year let alone 3.

    Nevertheless how many times have the Browns rushed in QBs who were not really ready? And if TT is playing well, why not extend him? It's not like he's Brady's age.

    @texasag1969 said:

    Nevertheless how many times have the Browns rushed in QBs who were not really ready? And if TT is playing well, why not extend him? It's not like he's Brady's age.

    Browns fans were very loudly clamouring for Jonny with a 7-4 record, I was in the stadium at the time and heard it first hand. 

    You draft a QB at #1 and you start 2-4/2-5 the fans will be demanding you play him. Bank it. 

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Nevertheless how many times have the Browns rushed in QBs who were not really ready? And if TT is playing well, why not extend him? It's not like he's Brady's age.

    Browns fans were very loudly clamouring for Jonny with a 7-4 record, I was in the stadium at the time and heard it first hand. 

    You draft a QB at #1 and you start 2-4/2-5 the fans will be demanding you play him. Bank it. 

    @londonbrown said:

    Browns fans were very loudly clamouring for Jonny with a 7-4 record, I was in the stadium at the time and heard it first hand. 

    You draft a QB at #1 and you start 2-4/2-5 the fans will be demanding you play him. Bank it. 

    actually the phrase is  "book it" or you could have said "you can take that to the bank" just trying to help man 

  • @texasag1969 said:

    Nevertheless how many times have the Browns rushed in QBs who were not really ready? And if TT is playing well, why not extend him? It's not like he's Brady's age.

    Browns fans were very loudly clamouring for Jonny with a 7-4 record, I was in the stadium at the time and heard it first hand. 

    You draft a QB at #1 and you start 2-4/2-5 the fans will be demanding you play him. Bank it. 

    @londonbrown said:

    Browns fans were very loudly clamouring for Jonny with a 7-4 record, I was in the stadium at the time and heard it first hand. 

    You draft a QB at #1 and you start 2-4/2-5 the fans will be demanding you play him. Bank it. 

    Shmuck the fans.  90% of them WANTED Johnny.

  • @londonbrown said:

    Browns fans were very loudly clamouring for Jonny with a 7-4 record, I was in the stadium at the time and heard it first hand. 

    You draft a QB at #1 and you start 2-4/2-5 the fans will be demanding you play him. Bank it. 

    Shmuck the fans.  90% of them WANTED Johnny.

    @tiamat63 said:

    Shmuck the fans.  90% of them WANTED Johnny.

    Silly gooses, all of them.

    They probably were the same fans who wanted the Browns to use the #3 overall pick on Troy Smith. 

  • @tiamat63 said:

    Shmuck the fans.  90% of them WANTED Johnny.

    Silly gooses, all of them.

    They probably were the same fans who wanted the Browns to use the #3 overall pick on Troy Smith. 

    @dutch-oven said:

    Silly gooses, all of them.

    They probably were the same fans who wanted the Browns to use the #3 overall pick on Troy Smith. 

    Can't hate them for that.  I wanted Troy.  Granted not first round but I liked him more than Brady.  A Cleveland boy that wanted to stay home and wasn't an off field distraction?  Yes please.  

  • @londonbrown said:

    Browns fans were very loudly clamouring for Jonny with a 7-4 record, I was in the stadium at the time and heard it first hand. 

    You draft a QB at #1 and you start 2-4/2-5 the fans will be demanding you play him. Bank it. 

    Shmuck the fans.  90% of them WANTED Johnny.

    @tiamat63 said:

    Shmuck the fans.  90% of them WANTED Johnny.

    Happy to say I was in the minority...   

    @dutch-oven said:

    Silly gooses, all of them.

    They probably were the same fans who wanted the Browns to use the #3 overall pick on Troy Smith. 

    Or the the guys who say Saquon at #1, or worse- don't take QB at all this year in the first round.