Skip to content

It's confirmed ... Sashi Sucked

The Browns Board
122 30 4.3k 1
  • @westside-steve said:

    That's not really the point I'm trying to make. Just drawing the distinction of two plans of action for 2017. Aim for a modicum of respectability mentor Deshone Kizer or just tank the season for the number one pick. 

    No matter what the plan was the second scenario is what we got. Now it's time to do what we need to do going forward. That's it.

    WSS

    I think probably the idea that Hue Jackson would be all Kizer needed was relied on too heavily when weighing whether to retain McCown.

    @mike-h said:

    I think probably the idea that Hue Jackson would be all Kizer needed was relied on too heavily when weighing whether to retain McCown.

    Oops.

    ?

    WSS

  • McCarron always did suck - and always will.  Sashi was correct to find anything, everything to deep-six that trade.

    I don't want my job performance review based on opinions of people I have to fight -- because of course those people "Don't Like" someone who holds the line against them.  Sashi was absolutely not working with these people... Sashi was entirely against them, as he should have been.  Agents see Browns purely as leverage against other teams and as money trains for their clients who don't get offers from "The Good" teams.... period.  Betcha if I ask 20 GM's regarding their opinion of Drew Rosenhaus that they'll unanimously hate Drew.  So that means Drew sucks?

    The "revelation" that Sashi was unanimously disliked by agents suggests to me that Sashi was in reality GOOD at his job.

  • @canton-mike said:

    They are also NOT real fans. REAL Fans would not embarass, belittle, & make fun of their "alleged" team. That isn't support.

    Just one old guy's opinion.

    Mike

    @westside-steve said:

    Those "fans" are cork soakers.

    WSS

    Either of you boys season ticket holders?  Seeing as how it appears a good lot of the parade go-ers were - not sure it's entirely right to question "fanhood" here.  

    @tiamat63 said:

    Either of you boys season ticket holders?  Seeing as how it appears a good lot of the parade go-ers were - not sure it's entirely right to question "fanhood" here.  

    Season ticket holders aren't the only ones that pay money to watch the Browns T.   Those of us that don't live in Ohio pay DirecTV to sustain their NFL Monopoly in order to watch Cleveland play all 16 weeks.  And if people congregate at Browns Backers bars to watch - they usually pay for the meals and the beverages and tip the hotties waiting on them every Sunday.  It all adds up.  I read where NFL owners are actually getting significantly more revenue via the profit sharing from the television contract than they are bringing in from home attendance for whatever that's worth.

    All that being the case, there's a difference between being frustrated with losing and shitting on this franchise because it's happening.  Players, coaches and FO staff put so much time into their football careers that I can't imagine any of them being happy they went the 0-16 they will have to wear like a scarlet letter for the rest of their careers.  I don't see as much wrong with fans sharing their frustration with the Browns as I do with them taking frustration out on the Browns.  I think that parade was a very bad reflection of a VERY loyal, devoted and passionate fan base that has been here through thick and thin for whatever my 2 cents means.

  • @tiamat63 said:

    Either of you boys season ticket holders?  Seeing as how it appears a good lot of the parade go-ers were - not sure it's entirely right to question "fanhood" here.  

    Season ticket holders aren't the only ones that pay money to watch the Browns T.   Those of us that don't live in Ohio pay DirecTV to sustain their NFL Monopoly in order to watch Cleveland play all 16 weeks.  And if people congregate at Browns Backers bars to watch - they usually pay for the meals and the beverages and tip the hotties waiting on them every Sunday.  It all adds up.  I read where NFL owners are actually getting significantly more revenue via the profit sharing from the television contract than they are bringing in from home attendance for whatever that's worth.

    All that being the case, there's a difference between being frustrated with losing and shitting on this franchise because it's happening.  Players, coaches and FO staff put so much time into their football careers that I can't imagine any of them being happy they went the 0-16 they will have to wear like a scarlet letter for the rest of their careers.  I don't see as much wrong with fans sharing their frustration with the Browns as I do with them taking frustration out on the Browns.  I think that parade was a very bad reflection of a VERY loyal, devoted and passionate fan base that has been here through thick and thin for whatever my 2 cents means.

    @flugel said:

    Season ticket holders aren't the only ones that pay money to watch the Browns T.   Those of us that don't live in Ohio pay DirecTV to sustain their NFL Monopoly in order to watch Cleveland play all 16 weeks.  And if people congregate at Browns Backers bars to watch - they usually pay for the meals and the beverages and tip the hotties waiting on them every Sunday.  It all adds up.  I read where NFL owners are actually getting significantly more revenue via the profit sharing from the television contract than they are bringing in from home attendance for whatever that's worth.

    All that being the case, there's a difference between being frustrated with losing and shitting on this franchise because it's happening.  Players, coaches and FO staff put so much time into their football careers that I can't imagine any of them being happy they went the 0-16 they will have to wear like a scarlet letter for the rest of their careers.  I don't see as much wrong with fans sharing their frustration with the Browns as I do with them taking frustration out on the Browns.  I think that parade was a very bad reflection of a VERY loyal, devoted and passionate fan base that has been here through thick and thin for whatever my 2 cents means.

    I look at it as a cleansing.  The parade was the monument to 2 decades worth of frustration that, as opposed to crying, was really just a giant collective laugh at how bad this ownership has been.     I don't think the fans were putting anything at the feet of the players.   Maybe the coaches, and sometimes that is well deserved.    Mostly, the collective vitriol is/was aimed at Haslam, of which he has earned more than his fair share.

  • @westside-steve said:

    Again we're talking about 2017. By the way in 2017 1 + 10 looks pretty good in hindsight.

    5 + 11 looks even better.

    Of course at 5 and 11 we wouldn't have the number one pick.

    WSS

    Ya, I know we are talking about 2017, and I am a fan of McCown ... but I understand the process that led them to release him.

    They figured they were going to take another shot at QB in the draft. And they had Kessler from the 3rd round the year before who had started half the season. So they let the 38 yo oft-injured McCown go and took a stab at Brock Osweiler (netting a second rounder in the meantime) to come in and be the "veteran" while the rookie got his feet wet. It didn't work out, because Oz was awful. And Kess was awful. And then the rookie turned out to be awful. Not good personnel decisions ... but they were taking a shot. I think the real criticism lies in who they drafted, and when they drafted him, and who they passed up in the draft ... not that they might have won three games with McCown and still be in the same boat this year anyway.

    Zombo

    Zombo said:

    Ya, I know we are talking about 2017, and I am a fan of McCown ... but I understand the process that led them to release him.

    They figured they were going to take another shot at QB in the draft. And they had Kessler from the 3rd round the year before who had started half the season. So they let the 38 yo oft-injured McCown go and took a stab at Brock Osweiler (netting a second rounder in the meantime) to come in and be the "veteran" while the rookie got his feet wet. It didn't work out, because Oz was awful. And Kess was awful. And then the rookie turned out to be awful. Not good personnel decisions ... but they were taking a shot. I think the real criticism lies in who they drafted, and when they drafted him, and who they passed up in the draft ... not that they might have won three games with McCown and still be in the same boat this year anyway.

    Zombo

    Thanks. I've been saying this for months.

    Anyway, I think that 2017 being a poor QB class and as promising this 2018 class was at the time had something to do on taking a shot with Kizer in the second round instead of taking it with any other in the first round. 

    We don't know how good is Mahomes, Trubisky looks average to me and Watson played lights out... Only the 7 games he was available. 

    Yeah, Kizer sucked. But other teams which drafted QBs last year didn't end up with way better scenarios. 

  • @flugel said:

    Season ticket holders aren't the only ones that pay money to watch the Browns T.   Those of us that don't live in Ohio pay DirecTV to sustain their NFL Monopoly in order to watch Cleveland play all 16 weeks.  And if people congregate at Browns Backers bars to watch - they usually pay for the meals and the beverages and tip the hotties waiting on them every Sunday.  It all adds up.  I read where NFL owners are actually getting significantly more revenue via the profit sharing from the television contract than they are bringing in from home attendance for whatever that's worth.

    All that being the case, there's a difference between being frustrated with losing and shitting on this franchise because it's happening.  Players, coaches and FO staff put so much time into their football careers that I can't imagine any of them being happy they went the 0-16 they will have to wear like a scarlet letter for the rest of their careers.  I don't see as much wrong with fans sharing their frustration with the Browns as I do with them taking frustration out on the Browns.  I think that parade was a very bad reflection of a VERY loyal, devoted and passionate fan base that has been here through thick and thin for whatever my 2 cents means.

    I look at it as a cleansing.  The parade was the monument to 2 decades worth of frustration that, as opposed to crying, was really just a giant collective laugh at how bad this ownership has been.     I don't think the fans were putting anything at the feet of the players.   Maybe the coaches, and sometimes that is well deserved.    Mostly, the collective vitriol is/was aimed at Haslam, of which he has earned more than his fair share.

    @tiamat63 said:

    I look at it as a cleansing.

    I don't remember seeing it put that way before.

    @nero said:

    ... and Watson played lights out... Only the 7 games he was available.

    Agree with the general sentiment of your complete post, but is the above really the case? I think we romanticize "those that got away" more than a little.

    Year Age Tm Pos No. G GS QBrec Cmp Att Cmp% Yds TD TD% Int Int% Lng Y/A AY/A Y/C Y/G Rate QBR Sk Yds NY/A ANY/A Sk% 4QC GWD AV
    2017 22 HOU qb 4 7 6 3-3-0 126 204 61.8 1699 19 9.3 8 3.9 72 8.3 8.4 13.5 242.7 103.0 81.5 19 116 7.10 7.19 8.5 0 0 7
  • Daryl Ruiter‏Verified account @RuiterWrongFAN

    Great graphic on @nflnetwork showing #Browns have netted a lot of players & picks with all their trades the last few years

    DbfXKTnW0AA90M7.jpg:large

  • Sashi had to go.  

    He guided the organization to one win and thirty one losses.     

    He had a quarterback starved team, for eons, with the #2 pick and Wentz to be available, and traded it away stating that they didn't think Wentz would be too good.

    Well, you can do that, but you cannot be wrong.  If that QB turns out to be good, and your QB's continue to suck such that you lose a lot (or always in our case), then you make the organization look like dopes.  But had you TAKEN the QB, even if he failed you would've been seen as TRYING to fix the problem and just being unlucky.

    He had to go.

    @orion said:

    Sashi had to go.  

    He guided the organization to one win and thirty one losses.     

    He had a quarterback starved team, for eons, with the #2 pick and Wentz to be available, and traded it away stating that they didn't think Wentz would be too good.

    Well, you can do that, but you cannot be wrong.  If that QB turns out to be good, and your QB's continue to suck such that you lose a lot (or always in our case), then you make the organization look like dopes.  But had you TAKEN the QB, even if he failed you would've been seen as TRYING to fix the problem and just being unlucky.

    He had to go.

    No, Hue did that.    Get it right.

  • Zombo said:

    Ya, I know we are talking about 2017, and I am a fan of McCown ... but I understand the process that led them to release him.

    They figured they were going to take another shot at QB in the draft. And they had Kessler from the 3rd round the year before who had started half the season. So they let the 38 yo oft-injured McCown go and took a stab at Brock Osweiler (netting a second rounder in the meantime) to come in and be the "veteran" while the rookie got his feet wet. It didn't work out, because Oz was awful. And Kess was awful. And then the rookie turned out to be awful. Not good personnel decisions ... but they were taking a shot. I think the real criticism lies in who they drafted, and when they drafted him, and who they passed up in the draft ... not that they might have won three games with McCown and still be in the same boat this year anyway.

    Zombo

    Thanks. I've been saying this for months.

    Anyway, I think that 2017 being a poor QB class and as promising this 2018 class was at the time had something to do on taking a shot with Kizer in the second round instead of taking it with any other in the first round. 

    We don't know how good is Mahomes, Trubisky looks average to me and Watson played lights out... Only the 7 games he was available. 

    Yeah, Kizer sucked. But other teams which drafted QBs last year didn't end up with way better scenarios. 

    @nero said:

    Thanks.  

    Yeah, Kizer sucked.  

    See That? Deshone Kizer GIF by NFL

  • @westside-steve said:

    Those "fans" are cork soakers.

    WSS

    They are also NOT real fans. REAL Fans would not embarass, belittle, & make fun of their "alleged" team. That isn't support.

    Just one old guy's opinion.

    Mike

    @canton-mike said:

    They are also NOT real fans. REAL Fans would not embarass, belittle, & make fun of their "alleged" team. That isn't support.

    Just one old guy's opinion.

    Mike

    Any my opinion is that a REAL team wouldn't embarrass, humiliate, and make fans suffer for almost two decades of being the worst run franchise in professional sports.

    Just a young guys opinion.

  • @canton-mike said:

    They are also NOT real fans. REAL Fans would not embarass, belittle, & make fun of their "alleged" team. That isn't support.

    Just one old guy's opinion.

    Mike

    Any my opinion is that a REAL team wouldn't embarrass, humiliate, and make fans suffer for almost two decades of being the worst run franchise in professional sports.

    Just a young guys opinion.

    @jrb12711 said:

    Any my opinion is that a REAL team wouldn't embarrass, humiliate, and make fans suffer for almost two decades of being the worst run franchise in professional sports.

    Just a young guys opinion.

    So choose another team. The Browns will live without you.

    Mike

  • I'm starting to understand how "America: Love It Or Leave It" was a thing... 

  • I'm starting to understand how "America: Love It Or Leave It" was a thing... 

    @dutch-oven said:

    I'm starting to understand how "America: Love It Or Leave It" was a thing... 

    hhhmmm then Archie Bunker would have made a good G.M

  • @westside-steve said:

    Those "fans" are cork soakers.

    WSS

    They are also NOT real fans. REAL Fans would not embarass, belittle, & make fun of their "alleged" team. That isn't support.

    Just one old guy's opinion.

    Mike

    @canton-mike said:

    They are also NOT real fans. REAL Fans would not embarass, belittle, & make fun of their "alleged" team. That isn't support.

    Just one old guy's opinion.

    Mike

    What's wrong, snowflake? Do you need a safe space where your weak mind can somehow remain sheltered from all those mean, mean people who disagree with you?

    Suck it up, buttercup.

    Real fans are only the ones who actively disagree.. because their disagreement is the act of desiring something better.

    Someone who sits around passively accepting anything is by definition not engaged in that thing.. and someone who's not engaged is not a fan.

  • @canton-mike said:

    They are also NOT real fans. REAL Fans would not embarass, belittle, & make fun of their "alleged" team. That isn't support.

    Just one old guy's opinion.

    Mike

    What's wrong, snowflake? Do you need a safe space where your weak mind can somehow remain sheltered from all those mean, mean people who disagree with you?

    Suck it up, buttercup.

    Real fans are only the ones who actively disagree.. because their disagreement is the act of desiring something better.

    Someone who sits around passively accepting anything is by definition not engaged in that thing.. and someone who's not engaged is not a fan.

    @unsympathetic said:

    What's wrong, snowflake? Do you need a safe space where your weak mind can somehow remain sheltered from all those mean, mean people who disagree with you?

    Suck it up, buttercup.

    Real fans are only the ones who actively disagree.. because their disagreement is the act of desiring something better.

    Someone who sits around passively accepting anything is by definition not engaged in that thing.. and someone who's not engaged is not a fan.

    I simply stated my opinion, to which I am entitled. Name calling is neither called for nor necessary. Have a good day.

    Mike

  • @jrb12711 said:

    Any my opinion is that a REAL team wouldn't embarrass, humiliate, and make fans suffer for almost two decades of being the worst run franchise in professional sports.

    Just a young guys opinion.

    So choose another team. The Browns will live without you.

    Mike

    @canton-mike said:

    So choose another team. The Browns will live without you.

    Mike

    Oh save me. You old guys can't understand what I'm saying cause at least you mofos watched a good team. My whole existence has been nothing but watching the worst run organization in sports. 

    To say fans are in the wrong for using their voice to embarrass this team on a national stage is beyond stupid. It is about time actually. Its not about not being a fan, just stop.

  • @canton-mike said:

    So choose another team. The Browns will live without you.

    Mike

    Oh save me. You old guys can't understand what I'm saying cause at least you mofos watched a good team. My whole existence has been nothing but watching the worst run organization in sports. 

    To say fans are in the wrong for using their voice to embarrass this team on a national stage is beyond stupid. It is about time actually. Its not about not being a fan, just stop.

    @jrb12711 said:

    You old guys can't understand what I'm saying cause at least you mofos watched a good team

    Trust me... any comfort that lent has been long gone for a long time...

  • @jrb12711 said:

    You old guys can't understand what I'm saying cause at least you mofos watched a good team

    Trust me... any comfort that lent has been long gone for a long time...

    @tour2ma said:

    Trust me... any comfort that lent has been long gone for a long time...

    You damn kids get off my lawn!

    Wait.. you're older than me..

  • @canton-mike said:

    So choose another team. The Browns will live without you.

    Mike

    Oh save me. You old guys can't understand what I'm saying cause at least you mofos watched a good team. My whole existence has been nothing but watching the worst run organization in sports. 

    To say fans are in the wrong for using their voice to embarrass this team on a national stage is beyond stupid. It is about time actually. Its not about not being a fan, just stop.

    @jrb12711 said:

    Oh save me. You old guys can't understand what I'm saying cause at least you mofos watched a good team. My whole existence has been nothing but watching the worst run organization in sports. 

    To say fans are in the wrong for using their voice to embarrass this team on a national stage is beyond stupid. It is about time actually. Its not about not being a fan, just stop.

    Mofo? I don't believe I ever tapped your mom, but who knows for sure?

    Are you able to communicate intelligently, without name calling? Please try. Thank you.

    I understand your frustration. We just disagree with how it's presented & that's ok.

    Mike

  • @tour2ma said:

    Trust me... any comfort that lent has been long gone for a long time...

    You damn kids get off my lawn!

    Wait.. you're older than me..

    @unsympathetic said:

    Wait.. you're older than me most.

    FIFY