Another school shooting
-
-
Yawn.
New twist.
First I've heard of this.
There's another article somewhere about timing of events being off, but this being a bit of a rush job guess they haven't got that down pat yet.
-
Your batshit crazy posts on this shooting will provide me much amusement
-
Your batshit crazy posts on this shooting will provide me much amusement
JAFBF will at least not blame it on the Jews.
-
Actual quote from the thread Woody posted.
"Never said the kid was not a student. I said that the CNN producer gave him his lines and coached him through his speech. "
which is true.
WSS
-
You just posted a YouTube video that claimed he wasn't a student. And then you repeatedly called him an actor.
But no, not under your skin at all.
-
You just posted a YouTube video that claimed he wasn't a student. And then you repeatedly called him an actor.
But no, not under your skin at all.
You just posted a YouTube video that claimed he wasn't a student. And then you repeatedly called him an actor.
But no, not under your skin at all.
He is an actor. You saw the coaching video. Why is that so hard for you?
WSS
-
You just posted a YouTube video that claimed he wasn't a student. And then you repeatedly called him an actor.
But no, not under your skin at all.
You just posted a YouTube video that claimed he wasn't a student. And then you repeatedly called him an actor.
But no, not under your skin at all.
http://blog.nwf.org/2013/09/ruffled-feathers-the-scraggly-life-of-molting-birds/
I reckon feathers4brains lost a few due to molting.
-
geez - he was a weirdo who wouldn't take no for an answer but she was never interested in the killer.
-
Sounds like a chicken and the egg thing.
There are more shootings because there is more media coverage
Or there is more media coverage because there are more shootings
-
Has this kid been thrown to a political group yet? (Outside of that terrible Photoshop earlier)
-
-
Sounds like a chicken and the egg thing.
There are more shootings because there is more media coverage
Or there is more media coverage because there are more shootings
Sounds like a chicken and the egg thing.
There are more shootings because there is more media coverage
Or there is more media coverage because there are more shootings
not to me - the one shooting...Columbine? got insane coverage all over our country.
More likely - the msm is hand in hand, happily, with the left anti-Constitution, especially anti-2nd Amendment,
because it's a political fight that would key their dominance and power/control over America.
school murders have been happening since...1764.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_school_shootings_in_the_United_States
Enoch Brown school massacre: Perhaps the earliest shooting to happen on school or college property, in what would become the United States, was the notorious Enoch Brown school massacre during the Pontiac's War. Four Delaware (Lenape) American Indians entered the schoolhouse near present-day Greencastle, Pennsylvania, and shot and killed schoolmaster Enoch Brown and nine children (reports vary). Only two children survived. However, this incident may only incidentally be considered a school "shooting" because only the teacher was shot, while the other nine victims were killed with melee weapons. [1][2]
NOTE: "melee weapons".....https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melee_weapon
-
back in 1965:
August 1, 1966 Austin, Texas 17 31 University of Texas massacre: 25-year-old engineering student, Charles Whitman, got onto the observation deck at the University of Texas-Austin, from where he killed seventeen people and wounded thirty-one during a 96-minute shooting rampage. He had earlier murdered his wife and mother at their homes.[133][134][135] It was the deadliest shooting on a U.S. college campus until the Virginia Tech shooting in 2007. Seems that social media is a gigantic immediate "fame" effect on mentially disturbed murderers, and the msm
is the icing on the cake.
Of course, I suppose social media makes some mentally ill feel like the whole world is their enemy. or something like that.
-
Am I supposed to acknowledge something from 1764 as having any relevance today?
Are you saying "liberals" are happy there was a school shooting? Though I guess you already made a similar insane claim in another thread that no one here would even back you up on.
Ja.brill Peppers - Cleveland Brown OldBrownsFan, on 02 Jun 2017 - 5:09PM said: "No you are not the work of the devil but you are deceived by the devil." Who's got it better than us? Nooooobody! -
Am I supposed to acknowledge something from 1764 as having any relevance today?
Are you saying "liberals" are happy there was a school shooting? Though I guess you already made a similar insane claim in another thread that no one here would even back you up on.
Am I supposed to acknowledge something from 1764 as having any relevance today?
Are you saying "liberals" are happy there was a school shooting? Though I guess you already made a similar insane claim in another thread that no one here would even back you up on.
Happy about it? Probably not exactly but at least encouraged by more violence because it gives them Steam with which to pursue their dream of a gun-free America. And I would imagine they are at least somewhat disappointed it wasn't an AR-15.
WSS
-
Am I supposed to acknowledge something from 1764 as having any relevance today?
Are you saying "liberals" are happy there was a school shooting? Though I guess you already made a similar insane claim in another thread that no one here would even back you up on.
Happy about it? Probably not exactly but at least encouraged by more violence because it gives them Steam with which to pursue their dream of a gun-free America. And I would imagine they are at least somewhat disappointed it wasn't an AR-15.
WSS
Happy about it? Probably not exactly but at least encouraged by more violence because it gives them Steam with which to pursue their dream of a gun-free America. And I would imagine they are at least somewhat disappointed it wasn't an AR-15.
WSS
Hmm, I see. But still not going far enough out there to defend Cal's view
-
Am I supposed to acknowledge something from 1764 as having any relevance today?
Are you saying "liberals" are happy there was a school shooting? Though I guess you already made a similar insane claim in another thread that no one here would even back you up on.
Am I supposed to acknowledge something from 1764 as having any relevance today?
Are you saying "liberals" are happy there was a school shooting? Though I guess you already made a similar insane claim in another thread that no one here would even back you up on.
Well, I think you are, but it never works, so...
That site references many school shootings of one form or another, from way, way back. The question is, why?
because there are defenseless possible future victims there. That is why. And they used weapons other than guns back then.
Other than guns happens today too. So, another question is, why? It isn't guns.
Here is a great read. Read it, for once, woody.
*********************************************************
"("But the U.S. has a population four times greater than Germany's and five times the U.K.'s, so on a per-capita basis the U.S. ranks low in comparison — actually, those two countries would have had a frequency of attacks 1.96 (Germany) and 2.46 (UK) times higher."
Yes, the U.S. rate is still high, and nothing to be proud of. But it's not the highest in the developed world. Not by a long shot.
Yet, some today propose banning rifles, in particular AR-15s, because they've been used in a number of mass killings. It's important to note however that, according to FBI crime data cited this week by the Daily Caller, deaths by knives in the U.S. outnumber deaths by rifles by five to 1: In 2016, 1,604 people were killed by knives and other cutting instruments, while 374 were killed by rifles.
So is it not fair to ask: If we're banning rifles, why not knives, too?
The point is, guns aren't the problem; deranged killers that grow up in broken families often without positive male role models in their lives are the problem. So are political and religious extremists, in particular Islamists. If these people didn't have guns, they would find some other means to do the job.
Bombs are illegal in both the U.S. and Europe. Yet Europe loses far more people to bombings than the U.S. Doesn't that make them more violent?)"
-
Oh Shmuck of with that "read it for once" cowpoop Cal. Whenever I read your Sheet and pick it apart you respond with woodpecker nonsense. Why should I wastey time with a thoughtful rebuttal when I'm not going to get anything close in return? Not to mention you just Google phrases that support your argument and vomit the links back in here.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login