Another school shooting

Westside Steve

Actual quote from the thread Woody posted.

"Never said the kid was not a student. I said that the CNN producer gave him his lines and coached him through his speech. "

which is true.

WSS

MLD Woody

You just posted a YouTube video that claimed he wasn't a student. And then you repeatedly called him an actor.

But no, not under your skin at all.

Westside Steve

@mld-woody said:

You just posted a YouTube video that claimed he wasn't a student. And then you repeatedly called him an actor.

But no, not under your skin at all.

He is an actor. You saw the coaching video. Why is that so hard for you?

WSS

calfoxwc

@mld-woody said:

You just posted a YouTube video that claimed he wasn't a student. And then you repeatedly called him an actor.

But no, not under your skin at all.

http://blog.nwf.org/2013/09/ruffled-feathers-the-scraggly-life-of-molting-birds/

I reckon feathers4brains lost a few due to molting.

calfoxwc

https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/05/20/there-has-been-an-uptick-in-active-shooter-incidents-experts-know-exactly-what-to-blame

calfoxwc

geez - he was a weirdo who wouldn't take no for an answer but she was never interested in the killer.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/mom-slain-santa-fe-victim-believes-daughter-targeted-article-1.3999285

MLD Woody

@calfoxwc said:

https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/05/20/there-has-been-an-uptick-in-active-shooter-incidents-experts-know-exactly-what-to-blame

Sounds like a chicken and the egg thing.

There are more shootings because there is more media coverage

Or there is more media coverage because there are more shootings

MLD Woody

Has this kid been thrown to a political group yet? (Outside of that terrible Photoshop earlier)

DieHardBrownsFan

calfoxwc

@mld-woody said:

Sounds like a chicken and the egg thing.

There are more shootings because there is more media coverage

Or there is more media coverage because there are more shootings

not to me - the one shooting...Columbine? got insane coverage all over our country.

More likely - the msm is hand in hand, happily, with the left anti-Constitution, especially anti-2nd Amendment,

because it's a political fight that would key their dominance and power/control over America.

school murders have been happening since...1764.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_school_shootings_in_the_United_States

Enoch Brown school massacre: Perhaps the earliest shooting to happen on school or college property, in what would become the United States, was the notorious Enoch Brown school massacre during the Pontiac's War. Four Delaware (Lenape) American Indians entered the schoolhouse near present-day Greencastle, Pennsylvania, and shot and killed schoolmaster Enoch Brown and nine children (reports vary). Only two children survived. However, this incident may only incidentally be considered a school "shooting" because only the teacher was shot, while the other nine victims were killed with melee weapons. ^[1]^[2]

^{NOTE: "melee weapons".....}https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melee_weapon

calfoxwc

back in 1965:

August 1, 1966

Austin, Texas

17

31

University of Texas massacre: 25-year-old engineering student, Charles Whitman, got onto the observation deck at the University of Texas-Austin, from where he killed seventeen people and wounded thirty-one during a 96-minute shooting rampage. He had earlier murdered his wife and mother at their homes.^[133]^[134]^[135] It was the deadliest shooting on a U.S. college campus until the Virginia Tech shooting in 2007.

Seems that social media is a gigantic immediate "fame" effect on mentially disturbed murderers, and the msm

is the icing on the cake.

Of course, I suppose social media makes some mentally ill feel like the whole world is their enemy. or something like that.

MLD Woody

Am I supposed to acknowledge something from 1764 as having any relevance today?

Are you saying "liberals" are happy there was a school shooting? Though I guess you already made a similar insane claim in another thread that no one here would even back you up on.

Westside Steve

@mld-woody said:

Am I supposed to acknowledge something from 1764 as having any relevance today?

Are you saying "liberals" are happy there was a school shooting? Though I guess you already made a similar insane claim in another thread that no one here would even back you up on.

Happy about it? Probably not exactly but at least encouraged by more violence because it gives them Steam with which to pursue their dream of a gun-free America. And I would imagine they are at least somewhat disappointed it wasn't an AR-15.

WSS

MLD Woody

@westside-steve said:

Happy about it? Probably not exactly but at least encouraged by more violence because it gives them Steam with which to pursue their dream of a gun-free America. And I would imagine they are at least somewhat disappointed it wasn't an AR-15.

WSS

Hmm, I see. But still not going far enough out there to defend Cal's view

calfoxwc

@mld-woody said:

Am I supposed to acknowledge something from 1764 as having any relevance today?

Are you saying "liberals" are happy there was a school shooting? Though I guess you already made a similar insane claim in another thread that no one here would even back you up on.

Well, I think you are, but it never works, so...

That site references many school shootings of one form or another, from way, way back. The question is, why?

because there are defenseless possible future victims there. That is why. And they used weapons other than guns back then.

Other than guns happens today too. So, another question is, why? It isn't guns.

Here is a great read. Read it, for once, woody.

*********************************************************

https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/sorry-despite-gun-control-advocates-claims-u-s-isnt-the-worst-country-for-mass-shootings/

"("But the U.S. has a population four times greater than Germany's and five times the U.K.'s, so on a per-capita basis the U.S. ranks low in comparison — actually, those two countries would have had a frequency of attacks 1.96 (Germany) and 2.46 (UK) times higher."

Yes, the U.S. rate is still high, and nothing to be proud of. But it's not the highest in the developed world. Not by a long shot.

Yet, some today propose banning rifles, in particular AR-15s, because they've been used in a number of mass killings. It's important to note however that, according to FBI crime data cited this week by the Daily Caller, deaths by knives in the U.S. outnumber deaths by rifles by five to 1: In 2016, 1,604 people were killed by knives and other cutting instruments, while 374 were killed by rifles.

So is it not fair to ask: If we're banning rifles, why not knives, too?

The point is, guns aren't the problem; deranged killers that grow up in broken families often without positive male role models in their lives are the problem. So are political and religious extremists, in particular Islamists. If these people didn't have guns, they would find some other means to do the job.

Bombs are illegal in both the U.S. and Europe. Yet Europe loses far more people to bombings than the U.S. Doesn't that make them more violent?)"

MLD Woody

Oh Shmuck of with that "read it for once" cowpoop Cal. Whenever I read your Sheet and pick it apart you respond with woodpecker nonsense. Why should I wastey time with a thoughtful rebuttal when I'm not going to get anything close in return? Not to mention you just Google phrases that support your argument and vomit the links back in here.

MLD Woody

Btw, I gave a quick Google of the "research" group that link is referencing for it's claims. It's exactly what anyone on here with half a brain would expect. Same song and dance...

Westside Steve

"Woodpecker nonsense" is that a thing?

WSS

calfoxwc

@mld-woody said:

Oh Shmuck of with that "read it for once" cowpoop Cal. Whenever I read your Sheet and pick it apart you respond with woodpecker nonsense. Why should I wastey time with a thoughtful rebuttal when I'm not going to get anything close in return? Not to mention you just Google phrases that support your argument and vomit the links back in here.

you are such a COWARD. LOL. Yellowbellied sapsucking woodpecker ?

you didn't read it. and you nearly? NEVER respond with any kind of "thoughtful rebuttal".

It isn't about rebuttal, asswhole woodypeckerhead - it's about an issue, and everyone else on the board knows how to discuss them intelligently in one manner or another.

You just smart off. Just will never learn, will never admit you don't know your tailfeathers from your beak. Not good.

Go watch Fox News, and your dirty little obamao-ites are being exposed as being MORe corrupt than I have been saying for a long time now.

The few times you didn't make an butt of your cowardly self, I gave you "woody" and replied like I would to other people.

but you are a woodpecker butt - too bad. Why are you even here? All you do is show off your ignorance of every single issue ever brought up.

Have a nice birdpoop in your eye day, fool.

calfoxwc

@westside-steve said:

"Woodpecker nonsense" is that a thing?

WSS

Another school shooting

UPF3A UPF3A, regulator of nonsense mediated mRNA decay - NCBI

SMG6 SMG6, nonsense mediated mRNA decay factor [ (Downy ...

She was a very strange woodpecker – Tetrapod Zoology - ScienceBlogs

Woodpeckers: barbed tentacles and the avoidance of brain injury ...