Skip to content
The Browns Board
Theme
  • System
  • Light
  • Dark
  • Login
  • Register
  • Forums
  • Recent
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Donate
  1. Home
  2. Political Discussion
  3. UN anti-gun, anti-ammunition fraud doesn't influence our America

UN anti-gun, anti-ammunition fraud doesn't influence our America

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Political Discussion
17 Posts 5 Posters 436 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
    • 24k Posts
    • 1k Reputation
    C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by Clevfan4life
    #2

    i want to be clear cal, i am in zero mood for the u.n to dictate any firearms laws on the u.s as it oertains to citizens. however, this sounds like it deals wuth the export of firearms and ammunition. if thats the case then i understand. maybe im wrong, i need to research this more.....but i do know a little but about the international arms trade and the scum of the earth that benefit from it. 

    if the u.s is protecting domestic arms dealers, than im out on this and as a supposed god fearing christian u should be too.

    all that being said, its always been of intetest to me to figure out how to make my own brass. it might take a a couple grand wirth of equipment but it would be well worth it. 

    1 Reply Last reply
    Quote Reply
    • Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
      • 39k Posts
      • 9k Reputation
      W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
      #3

      However =  but.

      Everything before the "but" is bullsht. 

      ?

      WSS

      www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
      1 Reply Last reply
      Quote Reply
      • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
        • 64k Posts
        • 8k Reputation
        C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
        #4

        https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/dec/15/un-arms-trade-treaty-gives-away-rights-of-american/

        C 1 Reply Last reply
        Quote Reply
        • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
          • 64k Posts
          • 8k Reputation
          C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
          #5

          The underhanded ulterior motive, is an across the board gun registration in the U.S.

          Note that Pres Trump, Pres Bush and John Bolton stood up for our 2nd Amendment.

          Obamao didn't, for gun control reasons.

          Can't tax guns out of ownership without knowing where they are. Can't harass gun owners without knowing where the guns are,

          and who the gun owners are.

          https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/arms_trade_treaty

          establish and maintain an effective national control system for the export, import, transit, and transshipment of and brokering activities related to (all defined as “transfers” in the ATT) the eight categories of conventional arms covered by the ATT, as well as exports of related ammunition and of parts and components that are used for assembling conventional arms covered by the treaty (Articles 3, 4, and 5.2);

          • establish and maintain a national control list (Article 5.3) and making it available to other states-parties (Article 5.4);
          • take measures to regulate brokering taking place under its jurisdiction (Article 10);
          • designate competent national authorities responsible for maintaining this system (Article 5.5);
          •  
          C 1 Reply Last reply
          Quote Reply
          • C calfoxwc

            https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/dec/15/un-arms-trade-treaty-gives-away-rights-of-american/

            Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
            • 24k Posts
            • 1k Reputation
            C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
            #6

            @calfoxwc said:

            https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/dec/15/un-arms-trade-treaty-gives-away-rights-of-american/

            "Unfortunately, there is neither time nor space here to go into the onerous provisions of the treaty, which themselves would merit rejection of the instrument"

            so how am i supposed to know then exactly how this treaty affects the private ownership of guns in america? this sounds like a piece written by american arms exporters saying "just trust us they're coming for ur giiinnnzzzz"

            1 Reply Last reply
            Quote Reply
            • C calfoxwc

              The underhanded ulterior motive, is an across the board gun registration in the U.S.

              Note that Pres Trump, Pres Bush and John Bolton stood up for our 2nd Amendment.

              Obamao didn't, for gun control reasons.

              Can't tax guns out of ownership without knowing where they are. Can't harass gun owners without knowing where the guns are,

              and who the gun owners are.

              https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/arms_trade_treaty

              establish and maintain an effective national control system for the export, import, transit, and transshipment of and brokering activities related to (all defined as “transfers” in the ATT) the eight categories of conventional arms covered by the ATT, as well as exports of related ammunition and of parts and components that are used for assembling conventional arms covered by the treaty (Articles 3, 4, and 5.2);

              • establish and maintain a national control list (Article 5.3) and making it available to other states-parties (Article 5.4);
              • take measures to regulate brokering taking place under its jurisdiction (Article 10);
              • designate competent national authorities responsible for maintaining this system (Article 5.5);
              •  
              Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
              • 24k Posts
              • 1k Reputation
              C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
              #7

              @calfoxwc said:

              The underhanded ulterior motive, is an across the board gun registration in the U.S.

              Note that Pres Trump, Pres Bush and John Bolton stood up for our 2nd Amendment.

              Obamao didn't, for gun control reasons.

              Can't tax guns out of ownership without knowing where they are. Can't harass gun owners without knowing where the guns are,

              and who the gun owners are.

              https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/arms_trade_treaty

              establish and maintain an effective national control system for the export, import, transit, and transshipment of and brokering activities related to (all defined as “transfers” in the ATT) the eight categories of conventional arms covered by the ATT, as well as exports of related ammunition and of parts and components that are used for assembling conventional arms covered by the treaty (Articles 3, 4, and 5.2);

              • establish and maintain a national control list (Article 5.3) and making it available to other states-parties (Article 5.4);
              • take measures to regulate brokering taking place under its jurisdiction (Article 10);
              • designate competent national authorities responsible for maintaining this system (Article 5.5);
              •  

              ok, well now we've got some meat i can chew on. ill research this later tonight. but to be clear if this just regulates how guns are exported to other countries i give no fuks and im not sure exactly why u would either

              1 Reply Last reply
              Quote Reply
              • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                • 64k Posts
                • 8k Reputation
                C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                #8

                https://www.nraila.org/articles/20180511/swiss-gun-rights-supporters-refuse-to-capitulate-to-international-gun-controllers

                1 Reply Last reply
                Quote Reply
                • TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                  • 23k Posts
                  • 6k Reputation
                  T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  In reading it through this seems to be the key phrase concerning arms affected.

                  "applies under Article 2(1) to all conventional arms within the seven categories of the UN Register of Conventional Arms (battle tanks, armored combat vehicles, large-caliber artillery systems, combat aircraft, attack helicopters, warships, and missiles and missile launchers) and small arms and light weapons" 

                  I would want to see a refining of the part on small arms and light weapons. What the hell does that mean anyway?

                  The rest of the definition I get and agree with because it's obvious this has nothing to do with the 2nd amendment. But I have a problem with "small arms and light weapons". That is just too damn vague for me.

                  W 1 Reply Last reply
                  Quote Reply
                  • T TexasAg1969

                    In reading it through this seems to be the key phrase concerning arms affected.

                    "applies under Article 2(1) to all conventional arms within the seven categories of the UN Register of Conventional Arms (battle tanks, armored combat vehicles, large-caliber artillery systems, combat aircraft, attack helicopters, warships, and missiles and missile launchers) and small arms and light weapons" 

                    I would want to see a refining of the part on small arms and light weapons. What the hell does that mean anyway?

                    The rest of the definition I get and agree with because it's obvious this has nothing to do with the 2nd amendment. But I have a problem with "small arms and light weapons". That is just too damn vague for me.

                    Westside Steve W Dedicated Reacting Well Posting Machine Collaborator First Post Conversation Starter Week One Done One Year In One Month Later Very Popular
                    • 39k Posts
                    • 9k Reputation
                    W Westside Steve wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    @texasag1969 said:

                    In reading it through this seems to be the key phrase concerning arms affected.

                    "applies under Article 2(1) to all conventional arms within the seven categories of the UN Register of Conventional Arms (battle tanks, armored combat vehicles, large-caliber artillery systems, combat aircraft, attack helicopters, warships, and missiles and missile launchers) and small arms and light weapons" 

                    I would want to see a refining of the part on small arms and light weapons. What the hell does that mean anyway?

                    The rest of the definition I get and agree with because it's obvious this has nothing to do with the 2nd amendment. But I have a problem with "small arms and light weapons". That is just too damn vague for me.

                    Unfortunately I don't think it's vague whatsoever nor is it meant to be. I'm guessing that would mean anything small enough for one man to carry.

                    WSS

                    www.westsidesteve.com www.myspace.com/westsidestevemusic www.cdbaby.com/artist/westsidestevesimmons
                    T 1 Reply Last reply
                    Quote Reply
                    • W Westside Steve

                      @texasag1969 said:

                      In reading it through this seems to be the key phrase concerning arms affected.

                      "applies under Article 2(1) to all conventional arms within the seven categories of the UN Register of Conventional Arms (battle tanks, armored combat vehicles, large-caliber artillery systems, combat aircraft, attack helicopters, warships, and missiles and missile launchers) and small arms and light weapons" 

                      I would want to see a refining of the part on small arms and light weapons. What the hell does that mean anyway?

                      The rest of the definition I get and agree with because it's obvious this has nothing to do with the 2nd amendment. But I have a problem with "small arms and light weapons". That is just too damn vague for me.

                      Unfortunately I don't think it's vague whatsoever nor is it meant to be. I'm guessing that would mean anything small enough for one man to carry.

                      WSS

                      TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                      • 23k Posts
                      • 6k Reputation
                      T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      @westside-steve said:

                      Unfortunately I don't think it's vague whatsoever nor is it meant to be. I'm guessing that would mean anything small enough for one man to carry.

                      WSS

                      That is exactly why I want to see a specific listing of exactly what they mean. Light weapons can include M-60 machineguns and grenade launchers which I agree are military grade weapons and not for civilians. But if it also includes the old 1911 .45 or more modern 9mm pistols the Army carries now, forget it.

                      C 1 Reply Last reply
                      Quote Reply
                      • Clevfan4life C Banned Very Popular
                        • 24k Posts
                        • 1k Reputation
                        C Clevfan4life wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/gunmakers-with-sales-slumping-at-home-ready-for-eased-export-rules/ar-AAvYesr?ocid=spartandhp

                        that's all this is about. The gun lobby is ginning up false controversy cause they want to export guns easier. Same old same old. 

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Quote Reply
                        • DieHardBrownsFan DieHardBrownsFanD Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Collaborator Posting Machine First Post One Month Later Week One Done One Year In
                          • 28k Posts
                          • 6k Reputation
                          DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          Image result for my cold dead hands gif

                          "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          😂
                          Quote Reply
                          • T TexasAg1969

                            @westside-steve said:

                            Unfortunately I don't think it's vague whatsoever nor is it meant to be. I'm guessing that would mean anything small enough for one man to carry.

                            WSS

                            That is exactly why I want to see a specific listing of exactly what they mean. Light weapons can include M-60 machineguns and grenade launchers which I agree are military grade weapons and not for civilians. But if it also includes the old 1911 .45 or more modern 9mm pistols the Army carries now, forget it.

                            calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                            • 64k Posts
                            • 8k Reputation
                            C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            @texasag1969 said:

                            That is exactly why I want to see a specific listing of exactly what they mean. Light weapons can include M-60 machineguns and grenade launchers which I agree are military grade weapons and not for civilians. But if it also includes the old 1911 .45 or more modern 9mm pistols the Army carries now, forget it.

                            If they did give you a list, they could just add to the list everything we could own.

                            https://globalnews.ca/news/3853197/un-arms-trade-treaty-bill-amendments/

                            "The former Conservative government kept Canada out of the UN treaty because it feared it was a back door way to bring back the federal gun registry."

                            © 2017 The Canadian Press

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Quote Reply
                            • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                              • 64k Posts
                              • 8k Reputation
                              C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              https://www.change.org/p/the-u-s-senate-force-the-un-to-remove-it-s-twisted-gun-statue-by-blocking-fundingjhBLvOmFvtXAmyE-800x450-noPad.jpg?151694

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              Quote Reply
                              • TexasAg1969 T Conversation Starter Dedicated Reacting Well Very Popular Posting Machine Collaborator First Post One Year In One Month Later Week One Done
                                • 23k Posts
                                • 6k Reputation
                                T TexasAg1969 wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                It says the petition is closed. Wat the fk?

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                Quote Reply
                                • calfoxwc C Dedicated Very Popular Conversation Starter Collaborator First Post Posting Machine Reacting Well Week One Done One Year In One Month Later
                                  • 64k Posts
                                  • 8k Reputation
                                  C calfoxwc wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  yeah, I saw that. wtf alright.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Quote Reply

                                  Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                  Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                  With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                  Register Login
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  Theme
                                  • System
                                  • Light
                                  • Dark
                                  The Browns Board Terms Privacy

                                  The Browns Board is an independent fan community. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the Cleveland Browns, Cleveland Cavaliers, Cleveland Guardians, the NFL, NBA, MLB, or any of their affiliates. Team names, logos, and other marks are the property of their respective owners.

                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Forums
                                  • Recent
                                  • Popular
                                  • Users
                                  • Donate