Skip to content

UN anti-gun, anti-ammunition fraud doesn't influence our America

Political Discussion
17 5 436 1
  • In reading it through this seems to be the key phrase concerning arms affected.

    "applies under Article 2(1) to all conventional arms within the seven categories of the UN Register of Conventional Arms (battle tanks, armored combat vehicles, large-caliber artillery systems, combat aircraft, attack helicopters, warships, and missiles and missile launchers) and small arms and light weapons" 

    I would want to see a refining of the part on small arms and light weapons. What the hell does that mean anyway?

    The rest of the definition I get and agree with because it's obvious this has nothing to do with the 2nd amendment. But I have a problem with "small arms and light weapons". That is just too damn vague for me.

  • In reading it through this seems to be the key phrase concerning arms affected.

    "applies under Article 2(1) to all conventional arms within the seven categories of the UN Register of Conventional Arms (battle tanks, armored combat vehicles, large-caliber artillery systems, combat aircraft, attack helicopters, warships, and missiles and missile launchers) and small arms and light weapons" 

    I would want to see a refining of the part on small arms and light weapons. What the hell does that mean anyway?

    The rest of the definition I get and agree with because it's obvious this has nothing to do with the 2nd amendment. But I have a problem with "small arms and light weapons". That is just too damn vague for me.

    @texasag1969 said:

    In reading it through this seems to be the key phrase concerning arms affected.

    "applies under Article 2(1) to all conventional arms within the seven categories of the UN Register of Conventional Arms (battle tanks, armored combat vehicles, large-caliber artillery systems, combat aircraft, attack helicopters, warships, and missiles and missile launchers) and small arms and light weapons" 

    I would want to see a refining of the part on small arms and light weapons. What the hell does that mean anyway?

    The rest of the definition I get and agree with because it's obvious this has nothing to do with the 2nd amendment. But I have a problem with "small arms and light weapons". That is just too damn vague for me.

    Unfortunately I don't think it's vague whatsoever nor is it meant to be. I'm guessing that would mean anything small enough for one man to carry.

    WSS

  • @texasag1969 said:

    In reading it through this seems to be the key phrase concerning arms affected.

    "applies under Article 2(1) to all conventional arms within the seven categories of the UN Register of Conventional Arms (battle tanks, armored combat vehicles, large-caliber artillery systems, combat aircraft, attack helicopters, warships, and missiles and missile launchers) and small arms and light weapons" 

    I would want to see a refining of the part on small arms and light weapons. What the hell does that mean anyway?

    The rest of the definition I get and agree with because it's obvious this has nothing to do with the 2nd amendment. But I have a problem with "small arms and light weapons". That is just too damn vague for me.

    Unfortunately I don't think it's vague whatsoever nor is it meant to be. I'm guessing that would mean anything small enough for one man to carry.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Unfortunately I don't think it's vague whatsoever nor is it meant to be. I'm guessing that would mean anything small enough for one man to carry.

    WSS

    That is exactly why I want to see a specific listing of exactly what they mean. Light weapons can include M-60 machineguns and grenade launchers which I agree are military grade weapons and not for civilians. But if it also includes the old 1911 .45 or more modern 9mm pistols the Army carries now, forget it.

  • https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/gunmakers-with-sales-slumping-at-home-ready-for-eased-export-rules/ar-AAvYesr?ocid=spartandhp

    that's all this is about. The gun lobby is ginning up false controversy cause they want to export guns easier. Same old same old. 

  • Image result for my cold dead hands gif

  • @westside-steve said:

    Unfortunately I don't think it's vague whatsoever nor is it meant to be. I'm guessing that would mean anything small enough for one man to carry.

    WSS

    That is exactly why I want to see a specific listing of exactly what they mean. Light weapons can include M-60 machineguns and grenade launchers which I agree are military grade weapons and not for civilians. But if it also includes the old 1911 .45 or more modern 9mm pistols the Army carries now, forget it.

    @texasag1969 said:

    That is exactly why I want to see a specific listing of exactly what they mean. Light weapons can include M-60 machineguns and grenade launchers which I agree are military grade weapons and not for civilians. But if it also includes the old 1911 .45 or more modern 9mm pistols the Army carries now, forget it.

    If they did give you a list, they could just add to the list everything we could own.

    https://globalnews.ca/news/3853197/un-arms-trade-treaty-bill-amendments/

    "The former Conservative government kept Canada out of the UN treaty because it feared it was a back door way to bring back the federal gun registry."

    © 2017 The Canadian Press

  • It says the petition is closed. Wat the fk?

  • yeah, I saw that. wtf alright.