Fun article on “under the radar” Browns
-
a) were not Pitt.. but Haley should not fall far from 20th'ish of the pack of OC's in the league. Been top 15 since 2012..Haley's talent just has to be coachable talent that executes assignments. b) Here's Tyrod's injury history https://www.sportsinjurypredictor.com/player/tyrod-taylor/4785 care to take a look at Ben's?(click near bottom) Taylor has played 15 games/season for 3 straight seasons..has the Bills OL ever been famous for anything? maybe it's just our turn that the sky stops falling in C-town..Jaguars had no big injuries last season. Was a big part of their successful season carrying Bortles who sucks, compared to Tyrod Taylor..Taylor just won't have the advantage of practicing against that Jags D..
An OL has very little to do with how good a QB is. All OLmen are lardasses, mostly equal in ability. The difference in OL is not in talent of player but in the ability of the line to play in synch.. It is the offensive weapons and play calling that determines how successful a QB will be, not forgetting his own skills, of course.
Tie Rod's history has nothing to do with the future. Unless something dramatically changes with our play calling and risk taking, Tie Rod will have to run a lot, and he will get crippled, like RG Tarkenton 3.
An OL has very little to do with how good a QB is. All OLmen are lardasses, mostly equal in ability. The difference in OL is not in talent of player but in the ability of the line to play in synch.. It is the offensive weapons and play calling that determines how successful a QB will be, not forgetting his own skills, of course.
Tie Rod's history has nothing to do with the future. Unless something dramatically changes with our play calling and risk taking, Tie Rod will have to run a lot, and he will get crippled, like RG Tarkenton 3.
You are right about an offensive line having to play in synch. That is very important for sure....however, if you have an outstanding DE or LB matched up one on one on a bad LT who is getting de-pantsed regularly, no talented QB or in synch OL is going to cover up for that.
-
An OL has very little to do with how good a QB is. All OLmen are lardasses, mostly equal in ability. The difference in OL is not in talent of player but in the ability of the line to play in synch.. It is the offensive weapons and play calling that determines how successful a QB will be, not forgetting his own skills, of course.
Tie Rod's history has nothing to do with the future. Unless something dramatically changes with our play calling and risk taking, Tie Rod will have to run a lot, and he will get crippled, like RG Tarkenton 3.
You are right about an offensive line having to play in synch. That is very important for sure....however, if you have an outstanding DE or LB matched up one on one on a bad LT who is getting de-pantsed regularly, no talented QB or in synch OL is going to cover up for that.
You are right about an offensive line having to play in synch. That is very important for sure....however, if you have an outstanding DE or LB matched up one on one on a bad LT who is getting de-pantsed regularly, no talented QB or in synch OL is going to cover up for that.
Dallas has 5 first round picks on the OL. They can't do schidt without Elltion. OL men are a dime a dozen. Lardassses.
-
You are right about an offensive line having to play in synch. That is very important for sure....however, if you have an outstanding DE or LB matched up one on one on a bad LT who is getting de-pantsed regularly, no talented QB or in synch OL is going to cover up for that.
Dallas has 5 first round picks on the OL. They can't do schidt without Elltion. OL men are a dime a dozen. Lardassses.
-
And Elliot can't do shite without them. As you said, they all have to be in synch....the OL and the "skill" players.
Not at all. Skill players make the OL. Next you are going to tell me that it was the fantastic Lions OL that allowed Snaders to do so well. Dude, offensive linemen are the least talented fahkers in all of pro sports. BOTH the Steelers and Patriots won a SB with a walk on OL who never played pro ball before. OL blow.
-
So you are saying if we had an o line with the talent of cam erving at every position at the line we would be okay?
-
And Elliot can't do shite without them. As you said, they all have to be in synch....the OL and the "skill" players.
Not at all. Skill players make the OL. Next you are going to tell me that it was the fantastic Lions OL that allowed Snaders to do so well. Dude, offensive linemen are the least talented fahkers in all of pro sports. BOTH the Steelers and Patriots won a SB with a walk on OL who never played pro ball before. OL blow.
Not at all. Skill players make the OL. Next you are going to tell me that it was the fantastic Lions OL that allowed Snaders to do so well. Dude, offensive linemen are the least talented fahkers in all of pro sports. BOTH the Steelers and Patriots won a SB with a walk on OL who never played pro ball before. OL blow.
Well then...why don't you take a poll of every QB and every RB in the NFL and ask them if they think they can do it all by themselves without much help from their OLs. Every single one of them roll on the floor laughing out loud at your suggestion.
-
So you are saying if we had an o line with the talent of cam erving at every position at the line we would be okay?
-
-

No, what I am saying is that the Browns stink and their lack of offensive weapons and originality make any offensive line look like crap.
-

No, what I am saying is that the Browns stink and their lack of offensive weapons and originality make any offensive line look like crap.
No, what I am saying is that the Browns stink and their lack of offensive weapons and originality make any offensive line look like crap.
That was then....this is now. Browns NOW may in fact have some "lethal weapons" on offense. Hopefully they do. Landry, Gordon for a full year, hopefully CoCo will improve (not holding breath), Njoku has the innate talent to be one of the best pass catching TEs..he just has to show it. Duke out of the Backfield, big back duo of Hyde/Chubb. And hopefully a QB that is not a turnover machine.
On paper I think the Browns appear to have some fire power. But then, the OL must perform. Because while you are right....a lack of offensive weapons can make an offensive line look like crap.....a crappy offensive line can make good offensive weapons look like crap..and we do have some big questions on OL....mainly the two tackle.
And now with Haley...and not Hue calling the offensive plays, hopefully you will see more of that originality you are looking for.
-
File this as "under the radar" for now..but it could get silly in Zona? https://www.revengeofthebirds.com/2018/5/9/17334184/did-the-arizona-cardinals-find-a-gem-in-undrafted-free-agent-kicker-matt-mccrane-phil-dawson I'll buy the flight home, if Gip can do a closing on a house..
-
Another article on under the radar dudes. Denzel Rice mentioned.
How cool would it be to have 2 shutdown Denzels? Dueling Denzels.
-
Another article on under the radar dudes. Denzel Rice mentioned.
How cool would it be to have 2 shutdown Denzels? Dueling Denzels.
Another article on under the radar dudes. Denzel Rice mentioned.
How cool would it be to have 2 shutdown Denzels? Dueling Denzels.
Very interest article on Duke Johnson buried within that one. Seems like they are expanding his receiving role and turning the running over to Hyde and Chubb. Good move!
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login