IMO Our def scheme sucks...
-
Yeah I really don't agree with most of that.
The Ravens didn't do some "old school, hard nose, out effort" football stuff. They put a bunch of guys in motions and tried to trick the defense. Something they've been doing for a short amount of time so there's not a lot of film on it.
I only caught the first half and the back of the 4th, but it didn't seem like a defensive scheme issue. It was guys not following their assignments. On Lamar's first TD run we had Collins setting the edge and watching the RB. Schobert should have stayed with Lamar, but he went outside with the RB as well. That left a big hole in the middle. If anything our LBs were exposed today and it was made clear that our number one need on D.
We also definitely weren't better on D last year. That's some revisioninst history nonsense.
I agree it seemed like more missed assignments but i did have one BIG problem with the scheme.What do you do when team run the read option....you hit the God damn QB and we didn't do that once.
The Ravens have done this to everyone since Jackson took over at QB. I do remember them bringing up a stat in which over the 7 game span where Jackson has been at QB they had the most rushing yards since the Bears of the late 70's. Schobert looked terrible he looked slow hes not physical and at times he seems to want no part in tackling hard physical running backs. I also believe LB are our number one need and we need 2 of them.
I would say the run defense took a big step backwards this year we went from #7 to #28 which was probably a direct result of getting rid of both Shelton and Meder.
I would say the run defense took a big step backwards this year we went from #7 to #28 which was probably a direct result of getting rid of both Shelton and Meder.
but it's a passing league bro, I mean we were 26th against the pass....that's amazing. Wait....remind me is it better to have a high or low number here?
-
Your guy's rose colored glasses are the direct result of Baker taking over the team. Had he not, that defense would have completely folded by midseason. They would have been on the field forever. But if you objectively look at the defense, it's worse than last year and spent far fewer snaps on the field cause we finally got an offense worth a damn. The secondary is building something for sure, it's not like Im completely down on them. The talent at certain spots is absolutely there...this "should" have easily been a top 15 defense. The only reason I can conceive of why it wasn't are these weird hybrid looks I've been pointing out for prob 2 months now. They weren't fooling anyone and it looked like it wasn't putting our talented players in positions to make plays. That's on the DC, period. I could let Sunday go if it was the first time we got run over and it was our first look at a pro RO offense blah blah blah.....but we were near dead last against the run and you can't have that if you want a defense that supports the offense. That concept should not have to be explained to any of you.
-
NFL Team Total Defense Statistics - 2017
Statistics: Total | Downs | Passing | Rushing | Receiving | Returning | Kicking | Punting | Defense | Give/Take
Season: Select One2018 Regular Season2017 Regular Season2016 Regular Season2015 Regular Season2014 Regular Season2013 Regular Season2012 Regular Season2011 Regular Season2010 Regular Season2009 Regular Season2008 Regular Season2007 Regular Season2006 Regular Season2005 Regular Season2004 Regular Season2003 Regular Season2002 Regular Season
League: NFCAFCNFL
Offense | DefenseNet Total Yards Leaders
RK TEAM YDS YDS/G PASS P YDS/G RUSH R YDS/G PTS PTS/G 1 Minnesota 4415 275.9 3078 192.4 1337 83.6 252 15.8 2 Jacksonville 4578 286.1 2718 169.9 1860 116.3 268 16.8 3 Denver 4640 290.0 3210 200.6 1430 89.4 382 23.9 4 Philadelphia 4904 306.5 3637 227.3 1267 79.2 295 18.4 5 Pittsburgh 4910 306.9 3217 201.1 1693 105.8 308 19.3 6 Arizona 4975 310.9 3541 221.3 1434 89.6 361 22.6 7 Carolina 5074 317.1 3665 229.1 1409 88.1 327 20.4 8 Dallas 5089 318.1 3425 214.1 1664 104.0 332 20.8 9 Atlanta 5094 318.4 3429 214.3 1665 104.1 315 19.7 10 Chicago 5106 319.1 3376 211.0 1730 108.1 320 20.0 11 Seattle 5171 323.2 3347 209.2 1824 114.0 332 20.8 12 Baltimore 5201 325.1 3421 213.8 1780 111.3 303 18.9 13 Tennessee 5248 328.0 3828 239.3 1420 88.8 356 22.3 14 Cleveland 5250 328.1 3684 230.3 1566 97.9 410 25.6 15 LA Chargers 5254 328.4 3156 197.3 2098 131.1 272 17.0 16 Miami 5371 335.7 3603 225.2 1768 110.5 393 24.6 17 New Orleans 5384 336.5 3597 224.8 1787 111.7 326 20.4 18 Cincinnati 5425 339.1 3379 211.2 2046 127.9 349 21.8 19 LA Rams 5434 339.6 3475 217.2 1959 122.4 329 20.6 20 Houston 5546 346.6 3799 237.4 1747 109.2 436 27.3 21 Washington 5566 347.9 3420 213.8 2146 134.1 388 24.3 22 Green Bay 5582 348.9 3789 236.8 1793 112.1 384 24.0 23 Oakland 5601 350.1 3858 241.1 1743 108.9 373 23.3 24 San Francisco 5625 351.6 3764 235.3 1861 116.3 383 23.9 25 NY Jets 5636 352.3 3749 234.3 1887 117.9 382 23.9 26 Buffalo 5682 355.1 3688 230.5 1994 124.6 359 22.4 27 Detroit 5692 355.8 3892 243.3 1800 112.5 376 23.5 28 Kansas City 5842 365.1 3952 247.0 1890 118.1 339 21.2 29 New England 5856 366.0 4020 251.3 1836 114.8 296 18.5 30 Indianapolis 5873 367.1 3946 246.6 1927 120.4 404 25.3 31 NY Giants 5971 373.2 4038 252.4 1933 120.8 388 24.3 32
Tampa Bay 6049 378.1 4169 260.6 1880 117.5 -
NFL Team Total Defense Statistics - 2018
Statistics: Total | Downs | Passing | Rushing | Receiving | Returning | Kicking | Punting | Defense | Give/Take
Season: Select One2018 Regular Season2017 Regular Season2016 Regular Season2015 Regular Season2014 Regular Season2013 Regular Season2012 Regular Season2011 Regular Season2010 Regular Season2009 Regular Season2008 Regular Season2007 Regular Season2006 Regular Season2005 Regular Season2004 Regular Season2003 Regular Season2002 Regular Season
League: NFCAFCNFL
Offense | DefenseNet Total Yards Leaders
RK TEAM YDS YDS/G PASS P YDS/G RUSH R YDS/G PTS PTS/G 1 Baltimore 4687 292.9 3360 210.0 1327 82.9 287 17.9 2 Buffalo 4706 294.1 2867 179.2 1839 114.9 374 23.4 3 Chicago 4795 299.7 3515 219.7 1280 80.0 283 17.7 4 Minnesota 4955 309.7 3140 196.3 1815 113.4 341 21.3 5 Jacksonville 4983 311.4 3113 194.6 1870 116.9 316 19.8 6 Pittsburgh 5235 327.2 3697 231.1 1538 96.1 360 22.5 7 Dallas 5268 329.3 3755 234.7 1513 94.6 324 20.3 8 Tennessee 5334 333.4 3471 216.9 1863 116.4 303 18.9 9 LA Chargers 5339 333.7 3646 227.9 1693 105.8 329 20.6 10 Detroit 5360 335.0 3599 224.9 1761 110.1 360 22.5 11 Indianapolis 5431 339.4 3805 237.8 1626 101.6 344 21.5 12 Houston 5490 343.1 4167 260.4 1323 82.7 316 19.8 13 San Francisco 5546 346.6 3732 233.3 1814 113.4 435 27.2 14 New Orleans 5585 349.1 4302 268.9 1283 80.2 353 22.1 15 Carolina 5651 353.2 3847 240.4 1804 112.8 382 23.9 16 Seattle 5653 353.3 3842 240.1 1811 113.2 347 21.7 17 Washington 5654 353.4 3794 237.1 1860 116.3 359 22.4 18 Green Bay 5670 354.4 3752 234.5 1918 119.9 400 25.0 19 LA Rams 5737 358.6 3780 236.3 1957 122.3 384 24.0 20 Arizona 5741 358.8 3262 203.9 2479 154.9 425 26.6 21 New England 5746 359.1 3943 246.4 1803 112.7 325 20.3 22 Denver 5842 365.1 3929 245.6 1913 119.6 349 21.8 23 Philadelphia 5859 366.2 4308 269.3 1551 96.9 348 21.8 24 NY Giants 5942 371.4 4044 252.8 1898 118.6 412 25.8 25 NY Jets 6086 380.4 4065 254.1 2021 126.3 441 27.6 26 Oakland 6102 381.4 3853 240.8 2249 140.6 467 29.2 27 Tampa Bay 6134 383.4 4151 259.4 1983 123.9 464 29.0 28 Atlanta 6152 384.5 4153 259.6 1999 124.9 423 26.4 29 Miami 6257 391.1 3932 245.8 2325 145.3 433 27.1 30 Cleveland 6288 393.0 4125 257.8 2163 135.2 392 24.5 31 Kansas City 6488 405.5 4374 273.4 2114 132.1 421 26.3 32 Cincinnati 6618 413.6 4414 275.9 2204 137.8 455 28.4 -
NFL Team Total Defense Statistics - 2018
Statistics: Total | Downs | Passing | Rushing | Receiving | Returning | Kicking | Punting | Defense | Give/Take
Season: Select One2018 Regular Season2017 Regular Season2016 Regular Season2015 Regular Season2014 Regular Season2013 Regular Season2012 Regular Season2011 Regular Season2010 Regular Season2009 Regular Season2008 Regular Season2007 Regular Season2006 Regular Season2005 Regular Season2004 Regular Season2003 Regular Season2002 Regular Season
League: NFCAFCNFL
Offense | DefenseNet Total Yards Leaders
RK TEAM YDS YDS/G PASS P YDS/G RUSH R YDS/G PTS PTS/G 1 Baltimore 4687 292.9 3360 210.0 1327 82.9 287 17.9 2 Buffalo 4706 294.1 2867 179.2 1839 114.9 374 23.4 3 Chicago 4795 299.7 3515 219.7 1280 80.0 283 17.7 4 Minnesota 4955 309.7 3140 196.3 1815 113.4 341 21.3 5 Jacksonville 4983 311.4 3113 194.6 1870 116.9 316 19.8 6 Pittsburgh 5235 327.2 3697 231.1 1538 96.1 360 22.5 7 Dallas 5268 329.3 3755 234.7 1513 94.6 324 20.3 8 Tennessee 5334 333.4 3471 216.9 1863 116.4 303 18.9 9 LA Chargers 5339 333.7 3646 227.9 1693 105.8 329 20.6 10 Detroit 5360 335.0 3599 224.9 1761 110.1 360 22.5 11 Indianapolis 5431 339.4 3805 237.8 1626 101.6 344 21.5 12 Houston 5490 343.1 4167 260.4 1323 82.7 316 19.8 13 San Francisco 5546 346.6 3732 233.3 1814 113.4 435 27.2 14 New Orleans 5585 349.1 4302 268.9 1283 80.2 353 22.1 15 Carolina 5651 353.2 3847 240.4 1804 112.8 382 23.9 16 Seattle 5653 353.3 3842 240.1 1811 113.2 347 21.7 17 Washington 5654 353.4 3794 237.1 1860 116.3 359 22.4 18 Green Bay 5670 354.4 3752 234.5 1918 119.9 400 25.0 19 LA Rams 5737 358.6 3780 236.3 1957 122.3 384 24.0 20 Arizona 5741 358.8 3262 203.9 2479 154.9 425 26.6 21 New England 5746 359.1 3943 246.4 1803 112.7 325 20.3 22 Denver 5842 365.1 3929 245.6 1913 119.6 349 21.8 23 Philadelphia 5859 366.2 4308 269.3 1551 96.9 348 21.8 24 NY Giants 5942 371.4 4044 252.8 1898 118.6 412 25.8 25 NY Jets 6086 380.4 4065 254.1 2021 126.3 441 27.6 26 Oakland 6102 381.4 3853 240.8 2249 140.6 467 29.2 27 Tampa Bay 6134 383.4 4151 259.4 1983 123.9 464 29.0 28 Atlanta 6152 384.5 4153 259.6 1999 124.9 423 26.4 29 Miami 6257 391.1 3932 245.8 2325 145.3 433 27.1 30 Cleveland 6288 393.0 4125 257.8 2163 135.2 392 24.5 31 Kansas City 6488 405.5 4374 273.4 2114 132.1 421 26.3 32 Cincinnati 6618 413.6 4414 275.9 2204 137.8 455 28.4 NFL Team Total Defense Statistics - 2018
Statistics: Total | Downs | Passing | Rushing | Receiving | Returning | Kicking | Punting | Defense | Give/Take
Season: Select One2018 Regular Season2017 Regular Season2016 Regular Season2015 Regular Season2014 Regular Season2013 Regular Season2012 Regular Season2011 Regular Season2010 Regular Season2009 Regular Season2008 Regular Season2007 Regular Season2006 Regular Season2005 Regular Season2004 Regular Season2003 Regular Season2002 Regular Season
League: NFCAFCNFL
Offense | DefenseNet Total Yards Leaders
RK TEAM YDS YDS/G PASS P YDS/G RUSH R YDS/G PTS PTS/G 1 Baltimore 4687 292.9 3360 210.0 1327 82.9 287 17.9 2 Buffalo 4706 294.1 2867 179.2 1839 114.9 374 23.4 3 Chicago 4795 299.7 3515 219.7 1280 80.0 283 17.7 4 Minnesota 4955 309.7 3140 196.3 1815 113.4 341 21.3 5 Jacksonville 4983 311.4 3113 194.6 1870 116.9 316 19.8 6 Pittsburgh 5235 327.2 3697 231.1 1538 96.1 360 22.5 7 Dallas 5268 329.3 3755 234.7 1513 94.6 324 20.3 8 Tennessee 5334 333.4 3471 216.9 1863 116.4 303 18.9 9 LA Chargers 5339 333.7 3646 227.9 1693 105.8 329 20.6 10 Detroit 5360 335.0 3599 224.9 1761 110.1 360 22.5 11 Indianapolis 5431 339.4 3805 237.8 1626 101.6 344 21.5 12 Houston 5490 343.1 4167 260.4 1323 82.7 316 19.8 13 San Francisco 5546 346.6 3732 233.3 1814 113.4 435 27.2 14 New Orleans 5585 349.1 4302 268.9 1283 80.2 353 22.1 15 Carolina 5651 353.2 3847 240.4 1804 112.8 382 23.9 16 Seattle 5653 353.3 3842 240.1 1811 113.2 347 21.7 17 Washington 5654 353.4 3794 237.1 1860 116.3 359 22.4 18 Green Bay 5670 354.4 3752 234.5 1918 119.9 400 25.0 19 LA Rams 5737 358.6 3780 236.3 1957 122.3 384 24.0 20 Arizona 5741 358.8 3262 203.9 2479 154.9 425 26.6 21 New England 5746 359.1 3943 246.4 1803 112.7 325 20.3 22 Denver 5842 365.1 3929 245.6 1913 119.6 349 21.8 23 Philadelphia 5859 366.2 4308 269.3 1551 96.9 348 21.8 24 NY Giants 5942 371.4 4044 252.8 1898 118.6 412 25.8 25 NY Jets 6086 380.4 4065 254.1 2021 126.3 441 27.6 26 Oakland 6102 381.4 3853 240.8 2249 140.6 467 29.2 27 Tampa Bay 6134 383.4 4151 259.4 1983 123.9 464 29.0 28 Atlanta 6152 384.5 4153 259.6 1999 124.9 423 26.4 29 Miami 6257 391.1 3932 245.8 2325 145.3 433 27.1 30 Cleveland 6288 393.0 4125 257.8 2163 135.2 392 24.5 31 Kansas City 6488 405.5 4374 273.4 2114 132.1 421 26.3 32 Cincinnati 6618 413.6 4414 275.9 2204 137.8 455 28.4 I think that the most critical criteria here is points per game. After all, that is what the game is about....which I think puts them at 21st in the league.
So, they had a bit of a bend but don't break defense.....gave up a lot of yards but did not give up corresponding points. Nevertheless...it needs to vastly improve.
-
NFL Team Total Defense Statistics - 2018
Statistics: Total | Downs | Passing | Rushing | Receiving | Returning | Kicking | Punting | Defense | Give/Take
Season: Select One2018 Regular Season2017 Regular Season2016 Regular Season2015 Regular Season2014 Regular Season2013 Regular Season2012 Regular Season2011 Regular Season2010 Regular Season2009 Regular Season2008 Regular Season2007 Regular Season2006 Regular Season2005 Regular Season2004 Regular Season2003 Regular Season2002 Regular Season
League: NFCAFCNFL
Offense | DefenseNet Total Yards Leaders
RK TEAM YDS YDS/G PASS P YDS/G RUSH R YDS/G PTS PTS/G 1 Baltimore 4687 292.9 3360 210.0 1327 82.9 287 17.9 2 Buffalo 4706 294.1 2867 179.2 1839 114.9 374 23.4 3 Chicago 4795 299.7 3515 219.7 1280 80.0 283 17.7 4 Minnesota 4955 309.7 3140 196.3 1815 113.4 341 21.3 5 Jacksonville 4983 311.4 3113 194.6 1870 116.9 316 19.8 6 Pittsburgh 5235 327.2 3697 231.1 1538 96.1 360 22.5 7 Dallas 5268 329.3 3755 234.7 1513 94.6 324 20.3 8 Tennessee 5334 333.4 3471 216.9 1863 116.4 303 18.9 9 LA Chargers 5339 333.7 3646 227.9 1693 105.8 329 20.6 10 Detroit 5360 335.0 3599 224.9 1761 110.1 360 22.5 11 Indianapolis 5431 339.4 3805 237.8 1626 101.6 344 21.5 12 Houston 5490 343.1 4167 260.4 1323 82.7 316 19.8 13 San Francisco 5546 346.6 3732 233.3 1814 113.4 435 27.2 14 New Orleans 5585 349.1 4302 268.9 1283 80.2 353 22.1 15 Carolina 5651 353.2 3847 240.4 1804 112.8 382 23.9 16 Seattle 5653 353.3 3842 240.1 1811 113.2 347 21.7 17 Washington 5654 353.4 3794 237.1 1860 116.3 359 22.4 18 Green Bay 5670 354.4 3752 234.5 1918 119.9 400 25.0 19 LA Rams 5737 358.6 3780 236.3 1957 122.3 384 24.0 20 Arizona 5741 358.8 3262 203.9 2479 154.9 425 26.6 21 New England 5746 359.1 3943 246.4 1803 112.7 325 20.3 22 Denver 5842 365.1 3929 245.6 1913 119.6 349 21.8 23 Philadelphia 5859 366.2 4308 269.3 1551 96.9 348 21.8 24 NY Giants 5942 371.4 4044 252.8 1898 118.6 412 25.8 25 NY Jets 6086 380.4 4065 254.1 2021 126.3 441 27.6 26 Oakland 6102 381.4 3853 240.8 2249 140.6 467 29.2 27 Tampa Bay 6134 383.4 4151 259.4 1983 123.9 464 29.0 28 Atlanta 6152 384.5 4153 259.6 1999 124.9 423 26.4 29 Miami 6257 391.1 3932 245.8 2325 145.3 433 27.1 30 Cleveland 6288 393.0 4125 257.8 2163 135.2 392 24.5 31 Kansas City 6488 405.5 4374 273.4 2114 132.1 421 26.3 32 Cincinnati 6618 413.6 4414 275.9 2204 137.8 455 28.4 I think that the most critical criteria here is points per game. After all, that is what the game is about....which I think puts them at 21st in the league.
So, they had a bit of a bend but don't break defense.....gave up a lot of yards but did not give up corresponding points. Nevertheless...it needs to vastly improve.
I think that the most critical criteria here is points per game. After all, that is what the game is about....which I think puts them at 21st in the league.
So, they had a bit of a bend but don't break defense.....gave up a lot of yards but did not give up corresponding points. Nevertheless...it needs to vastly improve.
Which is why I hope our first 3 rounds are all about defensive picks and/or pickups in free agency. And I still have hope that this coming year we finally see a 100% healthy CB in Wilson from Houston. I'd really like to see what he can add to this team. I don't think we have kept him on IR for 2 years for no reason. If we had no expectations of him in the FO, he would have already been let go.
-
here's a top 50 EARly FA browns wish list ... https://www.cleveland.com/expo/sports/g66l-2019/01/bb65f89efd8320/nfl-free-agents-2019-top-50-pl.html (maybe not our list?,lol) early birds have at it. big payouts or in draft we trust?
-
why do you continually use total defense, like it actually means anything. its not normalized data, which means any comparisons made with said data are slightly meaningful at best, and completely misleading at worst.
total defense menas nothing. as an aside to that, ben just threw for over 5000 yards this season and is watching the playoff from his couch.
for someone who writes an awful lot of words concerning football, you dont seem to have a very good grasp of the subject matter.
-
why do you continually use total defense, like it actually means anything. its not normalized data, which means any comparisons made with said data are slightly meaningful at best, and completely misleading at worst.
total defense menas nothing. as an aside to that, ben just threw for over 5000 yards this season and is watching the playoff from his couch.
for someone who writes an awful lot of words concerning football, you dont seem to have a very good grasp of the subject matter.
why do you continually use total defense, like it actually means anything. its not normalized data, which means any comparisons made with said data are slightly meaningful at best, and completely misleading at worst.
total defense menas nothing. as an aside to that, ben just threw for over 5000 yards this season and is watching the playoff from his couch.
for someone who writes an awful lot of words concerning football, you dont seem to have a very good grasp of the subject matter.
What would you use? As I said, PPG, to me, is the most important.
I would also think that red zone defense is something vital to look at. Not sure where to find stats on that.
-
-
why do you continually use total defense, like it actually means anything. its not normalized data, which means any comparisons made with said data are slightly meaningful at best, and completely misleading at worst.
total defense menas nothing. as an aside to that, ben just threw for over 5000 yards this season and is watching the playoff from his couch.
for someone who writes an awful lot of words concerning football, you dont seem to have a very good grasp of the subject matter.
why do you continually use total defense
1) i didnt just use tot d, i also talked about pass and rush D. U can only put so much "context" into yds given up on the ground and in the air. Over the course of 16 games total def is the final word.
2) what metric would u use then? Perhaps how many mean looks or insults were given to the qb across the line pre snap?
-
As I already pointed out, the Browns played four overtime games, almost an extra game. Think that might skew the " total yards given up" just a tad?
If i was "just" looking at the stats maybe. But ive been bringing up things every week since tge beginning of the season win or loss. Theres certain things that are there whether the beowns win or lose but after a win nobody wanted to hear any negativity whatsoever. But someone who knows a smidgen of football knew some if this seemingly experimentive defensive crap was eventually going to cost us, and it did.
"In my opinion", had they left the defense intact personnel and scheme wise that essentially toyed with the eagles #1's........i mean we're not just talking now about having won the division, we're talking now about which city the rd to the SB comes through. I honestly beleive that.
-
why do you continually use total defense
1) i didnt just use tot d, i also talked about pass and rush D. U can only put so much "context" into yds given up on the ground and in the air. Over the course of 16 games total def is the final word.
2) what metric would u use then? Perhaps how many mean looks or insults were given to the qb across the line pre snap?
1) i didnt just use tot d, i also talked about pass and rush D. U can only put so much "context" into yds given up on the ground and in the air. Over the course of 16 games total def is the final word.
I don't think it is.
2) what metric would u use then? Perhaps how many mean looks or insults were given to the qb across the line pre snap?\
LIke I said: Points given up. There is a reason they keep score in these games. The fewer the points you give up, the more likely you are to win.
-
1) i didnt just use tot d, i also talked about pass and rush D. U can only put so much "context" into yds given up on the ground and in the air. Over the course of 16 games total def is the final word.
I don't think it is.
2) what metric would u use then? Perhaps how many mean looks or insults were given to the qb across the line pre snap?\
LIke I said: Points given up. There is a reason they keep score in these games. The fewer the points you give up, the more likely you are to win.
im not doubting you that points given up is a "not" inconsequential metric. It shows this defense stepped up in the red zone. I've given them props for doing that btw, at crucial times during the season some individuals absolutely stood up...have been saying that from the beginning of this thread. The talent on this defense is top 5 material. I honestly believe with another pass rusher and solid run defender in Ansah on the LDE and maybe another DT either from FA or the draft....this defense could be #1. My issue is with the weird hybrid scheme Wiliams employed a lot throughout the season. I let it go for a time but it seemed like it was biting us in the ass at all the wrong times. It never looked settled. I believe that the rushing TD that Collins missed his assignment on is a direct result of players having too much on their minds pre snap, just like Baker who said after Hue and Haley were gone...we started doing things we were good at.
And it isn't just Collins that's screwed up assignments here and there throughout the whole season. I mean we're talking about Kirksey too, and this guys been a stud. Collins comes from NE where there's no lack of complexity. And I've pointed out numerous times that while standing up Myles is seemingly fine, cause he's a freak.....why would you standup depth players like Zettel when they come in? Anthony Zettel has no business standing up I don't care what any of you think. It's ridiculous tbh. Depth players especially need to strictly doing what they're built for.
-
As I already pointed out, the Browns played four overtime games, almost an extra game. Think that might skew the " total yards given up" just a tad?
If i was "just" looking at the stats maybe. But ive been bringing up things every week since tge beginning of the season win or loss. Theres certain things that are there whether the beowns win or lose but after a win nobody wanted to hear any negativity whatsoever. But someone who knows a smidgen of football knew some if this seemingly experimentive defensive crap was eventually going to cost us, and it did.
"In my opinion", had they left the defense intact personnel and scheme wise that essentially toyed with the eagles #1's........i mean we're not just talking now about having won the division, we're talking now about which city the rd to the SB comes through. I honestly beleive that.
If i was "just" looking at the stats maybe. But ive been bringing up things every week since tge beginning of the season win or loss. There's certain things that are there whether the beowns win or lose but after a win nobody wanted to hear any negativity whatsoever. But someone who knows a smidgen of football knew some if this seemingly experimentive defensive crap was eventually going to cost us, and it did.
"In my opinion", had they left the defense intact personnel and scheme wise that essentially toyed with the eagles #1's........i mean we're not just talking now about having won the division, we're talking now about which city the rd to the SB comes through. I honestly believe that.
Yeah, Williams does play a high risk, high reward type of defense. Has the rest of the league caught up with it? Maybe. But I also remember last year with that "better" defense, he had Peppers playing so far back he was in a different area code.
As to the guys we let go & keeping things intact on defense- Shelton is second string with the Patriots, and Meder is currently out of football. So looks like Dorsey (and probably with input from Williams) was right again.
You can win a Super Bowl without having a top 10 defense. The Colts did it with Manning. Let's see if Kansas City can win one by outscoring everybody.
-
im not doubting you that points given up is a "not" inconsequential metric. It shows this defense stepped up in the red zone. I've given them props for doing that btw, at crucial times during the season some individuals absolutely stood up...have been saying that from the beginning of this thread. The talent on this defense is top 5 material. I honestly believe with another pass rusher and solid run defender in Ansah on the LDE and maybe another DT either from FA or the draft....this defense could be #1. My issue is with the weird hybrid scheme Wiliams employed a lot throughout the season. I let it go for a time but it seemed like it was biting us in the ass at all the wrong times. It never looked settled. I believe that the rushing TD that Collins missed his assignment on is a direct result of players having too much on their minds pre snap, just like Baker who said after Hue and Haley were gone...we started doing things we were good at.
And it isn't just Collins that's screwed up assignments here and there throughout the whole season. I mean we're talking about Kirksey too, and this guys been a stud. Collins comes from NE where there's no lack of complexity. And I've pointed out numerous times that while standing up Myles is seemingly fine, cause he's a freak.....why would you standup depth players like Zettel when they come in? Anthony Zettel has no business standing up I don't care what any of you think. It's ridiculous tbh. Depth players especially need to strictly doing what they're built for.
im not doubting you that points given up is a "not" inconsequential metric. It shows this defense stepped up in the red zone. I've given them props for doing that btw, at crucial times during the season some individuals absolutely stood up...
Well, I said that I don't know what the stats are in red zone defense....though I suspect they are pretty fair....much better than their overall defensive ranking.
have been saying that from the beginning of this thread. The talent on this defense is top 5 material.
No, no, no, no, no. They have some good players, but they are far from Top 5 in talent. I believe they would need another elite player at each level...DB, LB, DL to reach that height.
I honestly believe with another pass rusher and solid run defender in Ansah on the LDE and maybe another DT either from FA or the draft....this defense could be #1.
Well...that is half the DL. Sure, two more elite DL would help a lot.
My issue is with the weird hybrid scheme Wiliams employed a lot throughout the season. I let it go for a time but it seemed like it was biting us in the ass at all the wrong times. It never looked settled. I believe that the rushing TD that Collins missed his assignment on is a direct result of players having too much on their minds pre snap, just like Baker who said after Hue and Haley were gone...we started doing things we were good at.
And it isn't just Collins that's screwed up assignments here and there throughout the whole season. I mean we're talking about Kirksey too, and this guys been a stud. Collins comes from NE where there's no lack of complexity. And I've pointed out numerous times that while standing up Myles is seemingly fine, cause he's a freak.....why would you standup depth players like Zettel when they come in? Anthony Zettel has no business standing up I don't care what any of you think. It's ridiculous tbh. Depth players especially need to strictly doing what they're built for.
Beyond my depth of knowledge to comprehend the nuances you are talking about. Not sure it is in your depth of knowledge either.
-
If i was "just" looking at the stats maybe. But ive been bringing up things every week since tge beginning of the season win or loss. There's certain things that are there whether the beowns win or lose but after a win nobody wanted to hear any negativity whatsoever. But someone who knows a smidgen of football knew some if this seemingly experimentive defensive crap was eventually going to cost us, and it did.
"In my opinion", had they left the defense intact personnel and scheme wise that essentially toyed with the eagles #1's........i mean we're not just talking now about having won the division, we're talking now about which city the rd to the SB comes through. I honestly believe that.
Yeah, Williams does play a high risk, high reward type of defense. Has the rest of the league caught up with it? Maybe. But I also remember last year with that "better" defense, he had Peppers playing so far back he was in a different area code.
As to the guys we let go & keeping things intact on defense- Shelton is second string with the Patriots, and Meder is currently out of football. So looks like Dorsey (and probably with input from Williams) was right again.
You can win a Super Bowl without having a top 10 defense. The Colts did it with Manning. Let's see if Kansas City can win one by outscoring everybody.
Yeah, Williams does play a high risk, high reward type of defense. Has the rest of the league caught up with it? Maybe. But I also remember last year with that "better" defense, he had Peppers playing so far back he was in a different area code.
As to the guys we let go & keeping things intact on defense- Shelton is second string with the Patriots, and Meder is currently out of football. So looks like Dorsey (and probably with input from Williams) was right again.
You can win a Super Bowl without having a top 10 defense. The Colts did it with Manning. Let's see if Kansas City can win one by outscoring everybody.
actually, Shelton is also on the street as soon as the season is over, I believe.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login