Skip to content

Nearly Half Of The Twitter Accounts Discussing ‘Reopening America’ May Be Bots

Political Discussion
69 11 835
  • @mld-woody said:

    Please explain how they are "wholly inaccurate"

     Spare me. I know you're not stupid you just pretend to be so on the board.  here's just one, the first one that popped up

    .

    https://www.cato.org/blog/how-one-model-simulated-22-million-us-deaths-covid-19

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

     Spare me. I know you're not stupid you just pretend to be so on the board.  here's just one, the first one that popped up

    .

    https://www.cato.org/blog/how-one-model-simulated-22-million-us-deaths-covid-19

    WSS

    ...so... Are you not going to answer the question?

    I'll assume you read the link you posted. It doesn't support your claim at all, FYI. If you're trying to use this as a "see! we can't trust these stupid academics at all!" well that just doesn't work. Not only is the CMU study not a model, but even the model explained why their numbers were so high (in a continuingly evolving situation)

    So, instead of you now attempting to change the subject to COVID models as I know you are attempting to do, please explain why the CMU study is inaccurate

    Not to mention you link is from the Cato Institute, a right wing think tank. Now, nothing seems obvious false in their report, you just have to get how models and the one in question work. Though they did refer to some studies that have since been questioned pretty heavily. 

  • @westside-steve said:

     Spare me. I know you're not stupid you just pretend to be so on the board.  here's just one, the first one that popped up

    .

    https://www.cato.org/blog/how-one-model-simulated-22-million-us-deaths-covid-19

    WSS

    ...so... Are you not going to answer the question?

    I'll assume you read the link you posted. It doesn't support your claim at all, FYI. If you're trying to use this as a "see! we can't trust these stupid academics at all!" well that just doesn't work. Not only is the CMU study not a model, but even the model explained why their numbers were so high (in a continuingly evolving situation)

    So, instead of you now attempting to change the subject to COVID models as I know you are attempting to do, please explain why the CMU study is inaccurate

    Not to mention you link is from the Cato Institute, a right wing think tank. Now, nothing seems obvious false in their report, you just have to get how models and the one in question work. Though they did refer to some studies that have since been questioned pretty heavily. 

    @mld-woody said:

    ...so... Are you not going to answer the question?

    I'll assume you read the link you posted. It doesn't support your claim at all, FYI. If you're trying to use this as a "see! we can't trust these stupid academics at all!" well that just doesn't work. Not only is the CMU study not a model, but even the model explained why their numbers were so high (in a continuingly evolving situation)

    So, instead of you now attempting to change the subject to COVID models as I know you are attempting to do, please explain why the CMU study is inaccurate

    Yes ass wipe COVID models are way off there's only about a million hits when you do a Google search. The exact fucking models that people are using to determine the reopening of America. Those models.

    What models are you talking about that have been so accurate?

    Model cars? Supermodels? Model airplanes?

    And they deserve to be discredited.

    WSS

  • @mld-woody said:

    Please explain how they are "wholly inaccurate"

     Spare me. I know you're not stupid you just pretend to be so on the board.  here's just one, the first one that popped up

    .

    https://www.cato.org/blog/how-one-model-simulated-22-million-us-deaths-covid-19

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

     Spare me. I know you're not stupid you just pretend to be so on the board.  here's just one, the first one that popped up

    .

    https://www.cato.org/blog/how-one-model-simulated-22-million-us-deaths-covid-19

    WSS

    Don't sell him short he's been working so hard at it. 😉

  • @tiamat63 said:

    I understand just fine.  I was raised and baptized in the Church.  Even went to catholic school for 3 years.    Abortion isn't a political war, it's a personal decision and cultural issue.  An intensely personal conflict and/or decision.    Politics, at their core, discuss the economics and governance of a select group of peoples through a consent of the governed based on shared ideals.   Sometimes those ideals conflict as well - I.E. abortion.      I try my best to remain "hands off" socially.  Especially when that decision doesn't affect individuals around them in a calculable way.     If I spread Covid? Well, somebody is getting fucked up.     If a woman chooses to not reproduce, then that consequence is limited to the confines of her body and mind.     Doesn't mean I like it.     Dave Chappelle explained my stance quite well... youtube it.

    NO, you don't. Murder is a personal decision too, do you support that? What about the unborn child? Isn't that unborn child a person? or the PBA child? or the child left to die AFTER being born?

    Politics has to do with ALL people, not your chosen few. Not much sharing of ideals with a lot of the leftwing part of the country. They are the anti-everything American. As far as a woman choosing to not reproduce, that's fine. Except murdering the child because she was irresponsible with her body, and started reproducing - it's murder to murder that child. But liberals want zero consequences for their own greed, self-indulgence, graft and sombeitchness.

    @calfoxwc said:

    Abortion isn't a political war, it's a personal decision and cultural issue.  An intensely personal conflict and/or decision.

    bs. here is what you said above. you defended abortion as not being the murder of born and unborn children, you said it was personal decision/conflict. You brought it up as a "back at ya".

    Here is what you said below:

    @calfoxwc said:

     If a woman chooses to not reproduce, then that consequence is limited to the confines of her body and mind.   

    no, Tiam, the consequences are murder of a born/unborn CHILD.

    btw, do the forum a favor and don't bring up slavery to diss our country's Founding Fathers and our country's beginnings.

    Slavery was very bad. Everybody gets it. It doesn't make your point at all.

  • @mld-woody said:

    ...so... Are you not going to answer the question?

    I'll assume you read the link you posted. It doesn't support your claim at all, FYI. If you're trying to use this as a "see! we can't trust these stupid academics at all!" well that just doesn't work. Not only is the CMU study not a model, but even the model explained why their numbers were so high (in a continuingly evolving situation)

    So, instead of you now attempting to change the subject to COVID models as I know you are attempting to do, please explain why the CMU study is inaccurate

    Yes ass wipe COVID models are way off there's only about a million hits when you do a Google search. The exact fucking models that people are using to determine the reopening of America. Those models.

    What models are you talking about that have been so accurate?

    Model cars? Supermodels? Model airplanes?

    And they deserve to be discredited.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Yes ass wipe COVID models are way off there's only about a million hits when you do a Google search. The exact fucking models that people are using to determine the reopening of America. Those models.

    What models are you talking about that have been so accurate?

    Model cars? Supermodels? Model airplanes?

    And they deserve to be discredited.

    WSS

    Yep, and here you go, steering the whole thing off course. How damn predictable...

    If you want to tell me why the CMU study is l inaccurate, lmk. You've made a claim and have yet to back it up. I'll wait for that instead of following your deflection

  • @westside-steve said:

    Yes ass wipe COVID models are way off there's only about a million hits when you do a Google search. The exact fucking models that people are using to determine the reopening of America. Those models.

    What models are you talking about that have been so accurate?

    Model cars? Supermodels? Model airplanes?

    And they deserve to be discredited.

    WSS

    Yep, and here you go, steering the whole thing off course. How damn predictable...

    If you want to tell me why the CMU study is l inaccurate, lmk. You've made a claim and have yet to back it up. I'll wait for that instead of following your deflection

    @mld-woody said:

    Yep, and here you go, steering the whole thing off course. How damn predictable...

    If you want to tell me why the CMU study is l inaccurate, lmk. You've made a claim and have yet to back it up. I'll wait for that instead of following your deflection

    Don't care. Don't care at all. Don't give a shit about Twitter nor people who do. (or Q or 4Chan BTW) basis of the entire conversation is whining about who's making the Twitter posts about reopening the country which has been based on fake science. 

    No more no less. You can cry about directions and the Bots as much as you want. Swamp draining thread would be a good place for you.

    WSS

  • By the way I don't care about the Russians either. In case you were wondering.

    WSS

  • @mld-woody said:

    Yep, and here you go, steering the whole thing off course. How damn predictable...

    If you want to tell me why the CMU study is l inaccurate, lmk. You've made a claim and have yet to back it up. I'll wait for that instead of following your deflection

    Don't care. Don't care at all. Don't give a shit about Twitter nor people who do. (or Q or 4Chan BTW) basis of the entire conversation is whining about who's making the Twitter posts about reopening the country which has been based on fake science. 

    No more no less. You can cry about directions and the Bots as much as you want. Swamp draining thread would be a good place for you.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Don't care. Don't care at all. Don't give a shit about Twitter nor people who do. (or Q or 4Chan BTW) basis of the entire conversation is whining about who's making the Twitter posts about reopening the country which has been based on fake science. 

    No more no less. You can cry about directions and the Bots as much as you want. Swamp draining thread would be a good place for you.

    WSS

    You don't need to get all pissy because you made a claim you couldn't back up. Just don't make the claim next time or follow up with saying you don't have any evidence to back up your claim. You don't need to try and deflect and then dig your hole deeper with "fake science" nonsense. 

  • Wouldn't surprise me the least bit. How may of those IPs you think originate from Russia or China? Add in the GOP paid shills it's a bunch for sure.

  • Wouldn't surprise me the least bit. How may of those IPs you think originate from Russia or China? Add in the GOP paid shills it's a bunch for sure.

    @warriorsrpussies said:

    Wouldn't surprise me the least bit. How may of those IPs you think originate from Russia or China? Add in the GOP paid shills it's a bunch for sure.

    Who, exactly, is paying these shills? It never hurts to have a second income. 

    Is it the joker? Do you suppose the joker is behind it?

  • @westside-steve said:

    Don't care. Don't care at all. Don't give a shit about Twitter nor people who do. (or Q or 4Chan BTW) basis of the entire conversation is whining about who's making the Twitter posts about reopening the country which has been based on fake science. 

    No more no less. You can cry about directions and the Bots as much as you want. Swamp draining thread would be a good place for you.

    WSS

    You don't need to get all pissy because you made a claim you couldn't back up. Just don't make the claim next time or follow up with saying you don't have any evidence to back up your claim. You don't need to try and deflect and then dig your hole deeper with "fake science" nonsense. 

    @mld-woody said:

    You don't need to get all pissy because you made a claim you couldn't back up. Just don't make the claim next time or follow up with saying you don't have any evidence to back up your claim. You don't need to try and deflect and then dig your hole deeper with "fake science" nonsense. 

    Just responding to your ridiculous whining. The only deflection is you bellyaching about Russians and Bots. Honest to God if you think we're committing suicide by going back to business as usual move to California or Pennsylvania. I don't know what else to tell you.

    WSS

  • @mld-woody said:

    You don't need to get all pissy because you made a claim you couldn't back up. Just don't make the claim next time or follow up with saying you don't have any evidence to back up your claim. You don't need to try and deflect and then dig your hole deeper with "fake science" nonsense. 

    Just responding to your ridiculous whining. The only deflection is you bellyaching about Russians and Bots. Honest to God if you think we're committing suicide by going back to business as usual move to California or Pennsylvania. I don't know what else to tell you.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Just responding to your ridiculous whining. The only deflection is you bellyaching about Russians and Bots. Honest to God if you think we're committing suicide by going back to business as usual move to California or Pennsylvania. I don't know what else to tell you.

    WSS

    Alright Steve, you've now attempted to fully shift and deflect this back and forth. Congrats.

    I'll try one more time. You claimed CMU's study was completely inaccurate. Why? What evidence do you have to think that's the case? Can you back that comment up at all?

  • @westside-steve said:

    Just responding to your ridiculous whining. The only deflection is you bellyaching about Russians and Bots. Honest to God if you think we're committing suicide by going back to business as usual move to California or Pennsylvania. I don't know what else to tell you.

    WSS

    Alright Steve, you've now attempted to fully shift and deflect this back and forth. Congrats.

    I'll try one more time. You claimed CMU's study was completely inaccurate. Why? What evidence do you have to think that's the case? Can you back that comment up at all?

    @mld-woody said:

    Alright Steve, you've now attempted to fully shift and deflect this back and forth. Congrats.

    I'll try one more time. You claimed CMU's study was completely inaccurate. Why? What evidence do you have to think that's the case? Can you back that comment up at all?

    Now you're wasting my time. Put your tinfoil hat back on and get under the bed. Here come the Bots.

    WSS

  • @mld-woody said:

    Alright Steve, you've now attempted to fully shift and deflect this back and forth. Congrats.

    I'll try one more time. You claimed CMU's study was completely inaccurate. Why? What evidence do you have to think that's the case? Can you back that comment up at all?

    Now you're wasting my time. Put your tinfoil hat back on and get under the bed. Here come the Bots.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Now you're wasting my time. Put your tinfoil hat back on and get under the bed. Here come the Bots.

    WSS

    Alright Steve. Fine. You have no answer, you've been backed into a corner, and you're hoping your previous post is forgotten. I have no idea why it's so hard for you to either back up your claim or just admit you were wrong. 

    We'll end it here then. No point in you continuing to not answer me while attempting to insult me. 

    Get the last word if you'd like

  • @westside-steve said:

    Now you're wasting my time. Put your tinfoil hat back on and get under the bed. Here come the Bots.

    WSS

    Alright Steve. Fine. You have no answer, you've been backed into a corner, and you're hoping your previous post is forgotten. I have no idea why it's so hard for you to either back up your claim or just admit you were wrong. 

    We'll end it here then. No point in you continuing to not answer me while attempting to insult me. 

    Get the last word if you'd like

    @mld-woody said:

    Alright Steve. Fine. You have no answer, you've been backed into a corner, and you're hoping your previous post is forgotten. I have no idea why it's so hard for you to either back up your claim or just admit you were wrong. 

    We'll end it here then. No point in you continuing to not answer me while attempting to insult me. 

    Get the last word if you'd like

    There wasn't a question so blow me. Even if there was I don't care about the Bots.

    WSS

  • Careful Steve, he'll get all butthurt and try to organize another boycott 😉

  • AxeA Axe

    Careful Steve, he'll get all butthurt and try to organize another boycott 😉

    @axe said:

    Careful Steve, he'll get all butthurt and try to organize another boycott 😉

    No shit. I don't think these guys even care about the Russians I think it's just a talking point that they're forced to Yap about.

  • AxeA Axe

    Careful Steve, he'll get all butthurt and try to organize another boycott 😉

    @axe said:

    Careful Steve, he'll get all butthurt and try to organize another boycott 😉

    LOL

  • maybe fake dr woodpecker, now known as dr greta woodpecka, is a bot.

    or, just hypnotized to be an ignorant asswhole birdbrain.

    FEATHERED+FRENZY.gif