Skip to content

Nearly Half Of The Twitter Accounts Discussing ‘Reopening America’ May Be Bots

Political Discussion
69 11 835
  • Wouldn't surprise me the least bit. How may of those IPs you think originate from Russia or China? Add in the GOP paid shills it's a bunch for sure.

  • Wouldn't surprise me the least bit. How may of those IPs you think originate from Russia or China? Add in the GOP paid shills it's a bunch for sure.

    @warriorsrpussies said:

    Wouldn't surprise me the least bit. How may of those IPs you think originate from Russia or China? Add in the GOP paid shills it's a bunch for sure.

    Who, exactly, is paying these shills? It never hurts to have a second income. 

    Is it the joker? Do you suppose the joker is behind it?

  • @westside-steve said:

    Don't care. Don't care at all. Don't give a shit about Twitter nor people who do. (or Q or 4Chan BTW) basis of the entire conversation is whining about who's making the Twitter posts about reopening the country which has been based on fake science. 

    No more no less. You can cry about directions and the Bots as much as you want. Swamp draining thread would be a good place for you.

    WSS

    You don't need to get all pissy because you made a claim you couldn't back up. Just don't make the claim next time or follow up with saying you don't have any evidence to back up your claim. You don't need to try and deflect and then dig your hole deeper with "fake science" nonsense. 

    @mld-woody said:

    You don't need to get all pissy because you made a claim you couldn't back up. Just don't make the claim next time or follow up with saying you don't have any evidence to back up your claim. You don't need to try and deflect and then dig your hole deeper with "fake science" nonsense. 

    Just responding to your ridiculous whining. The only deflection is you bellyaching about Russians and Bots. Honest to God if you think we're committing suicide by going back to business as usual move to California or Pennsylvania. I don't know what else to tell you.

    WSS

  • @mld-woody said:

    You don't need to get all pissy because you made a claim you couldn't back up. Just don't make the claim next time or follow up with saying you don't have any evidence to back up your claim. You don't need to try and deflect and then dig your hole deeper with "fake science" nonsense. 

    Just responding to your ridiculous whining. The only deflection is you bellyaching about Russians and Bots. Honest to God if you think we're committing suicide by going back to business as usual move to California or Pennsylvania. I don't know what else to tell you.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Just responding to your ridiculous whining. The only deflection is you bellyaching about Russians and Bots. Honest to God if you think we're committing suicide by going back to business as usual move to California or Pennsylvania. I don't know what else to tell you.

    WSS

    Alright Steve, you've now attempted to fully shift and deflect this back and forth. Congrats.

    I'll try one more time. You claimed CMU's study was completely inaccurate. Why? What evidence do you have to think that's the case? Can you back that comment up at all?

  • @westside-steve said:

    Just responding to your ridiculous whining. The only deflection is you bellyaching about Russians and Bots. Honest to God if you think we're committing suicide by going back to business as usual move to California or Pennsylvania. I don't know what else to tell you.

    WSS

    Alright Steve, you've now attempted to fully shift and deflect this back and forth. Congrats.

    I'll try one more time. You claimed CMU's study was completely inaccurate. Why? What evidence do you have to think that's the case? Can you back that comment up at all?

    @mld-woody said:

    Alright Steve, you've now attempted to fully shift and deflect this back and forth. Congrats.

    I'll try one more time. You claimed CMU's study was completely inaccurate. Why? What evidence do you have to think that's the case? Can you back that comment up at all?

    Now you're wasting my time. Put your tinfoil hat back on and get under the bed. Here come the Bots.

    WSS

  • @mld-woody said:

    Alright Steve, you've now attempted to fully shift and deflect this back and forth. Congrats.

    I'll try one more time. You claimed CMU's study was completely inaccurate. Why? What evidence do you have to think that's the case? Can you back that comment up at all?

    Now you're wasting my time. Put your tinfoil hat back on and get under the bed. Here come the Bots.

    WSS

    @westside-steve said:

    Now you're wasting my time. Put your tinfoil hat back on and get under the bed. Here come the Bots.

    WSS

    Alright Steve. Fine. You have no answer, you've been backed into a corner, and you're hoping your previous post is forgotten. I have no idea why it's so hard for you to either back up your claim or just admit you were wrong. 

    We'll end it here then. No point in you continuing to not answer me while attempting to insult me. 

    Get the last word if you'd like

  • @westside-steve said:

    Now you're wasting my time. Put your tinfoil hat back on and get under the bed. Here come the Bots.

    WSS

    Alright Steve. Fine. You have no answer, you've been backed into a corner, and you're hoping your previous post is forgotten. I have no idea why it's so hard for you to either back up your claim or just admit you were wrong. 

    We'll end it here then. No point in you continuing to not answer me while attempting to insult me. 

    Get the last word if you'd like

    @mld-woody said:

    Alright Steve. Fine. You have no answer, you've been backed into a corner, and you're hoping your previous post is forgotten. I have no idea why it's so hard for you to either back up your claim or just admit you were wrong. 

    We'll end it here then. No point in you continuing to not answer me while attempting to insult me. 

    Get the last word if you'd like

    There wasn't a question so blow me. Even if there was I don't care about the Bots.

    WSS

  • Careful Steve, he'll get all butthurt and try to organize another boycott 😉

  • AxeA Axe

    Careful Steve, he'll get all butthurt and try to organize another boycott 😉

    @axe said:

    Careful Steve, he'll get all butthurt and try to organize another boycott 😉

    No shit. I don't think these guys even care about the Russians I think it's just a talking point that they're forced to Yap about.

  • AxeA Axe

    Careful Steve, he'll get all butthurt and try to organize another boycott 😉

    @axe said:

    Careful Steve, he'll get all butthurt and try to organize another boycott 😉

    LOL

  • maybe fake dr woodpecker, now known as dr greta woodpecka, is a bot.

    or, just hypnotized to be an ignorant asswhole birdbrain.

    FEATHERED+FRENZY.gif

  • Then again they MAY NOT be bots...see how that works! ?

    @vambo said:

    Then again they MAY NOT be bots...see how that works! ?

    But I heard from a good source they were 95% Russian bots.

  • @vambo said:

    Then again they MAY NOT be bots...see how that works! ?

    But I heard from a good source they were 95% Russian bots.

    @mjp28 said:

    But I heard from a good source they were 95% Russian bots.

     are you saying that Woody's experts who believe it's nearly 50% are wrong?

    He's not going to like that...

    WSS

  • @vambo said:

    Then again they MAY NOT be bots...see how that works! ?

    But I heard from a good source they were 95% Russian bots.

    @mjp28 said:

    But I heard from a good source they were 95% Russian bots.

    But I heard from a better source they were 99.9999999999999999999999999% NOT Russian bots.

  • @mjp28 said:

    But I heard from a good source they were 95% Russian bots.

    But I heard from a better source they were 99.9999999999999999999999999% NOT Russian bots.

    @vambo said:

    But I heard from a better source they were 99.9999999999999999999999999% NOT Russian bots.

    Really ?  A better source ?  😮

  • @vambo said:

    But I heard from a better source they were 99.9999999999999999999999999% NOT Russian bots.

    Really ?  A better source ?  😮

    @mjp28 said:

    Really ?  A better source ?  😮

    Sure why not?