Skip to content

Maybe linebacker in the first or....second round?

The Browns Board
58 15 1.6k 2
  • @dutch-oven said:

    In a system that a lot of time deploys only two linebackers and three safeties, instead of the traditional 3 LB, 2 S, wouldn't you want your LBs to be beefier guys who can take on blockers instead of fast, 220ish lb guys who can get overwhelmed vs the run? 

    Depends on the coach and his demands, really.

    Gene Chizik had linebackers that were 205 and 210lb's when he won a ring at Texas.

    @tiamat63 said:

    Depends on the coach and his demands, really.

    Yup... but the default in a 4-3 is for the DL to keep the LBs clean...

    ... and to paraphrase an idiom speed fills.

  • @tiamat63 said:

    Depends on the coach and his demands, really.

    Yup... but the default in a 4-3 is for the DL to keep the LBs clean...

    ... and to paraphrase an idiom speed fills.

    @tour2ma said:

    Yup... but the default in a 4-3 is for the DL to keep the LBs clean...

    ... and to paraphrase an idiom speed fills.

    That's the job for all DL regardless of front.  You really don't want Oline getting clean splits to the 2nd level unless you like seeing people getting fucked up. 

  • @the-gipper said:

    Do you mean Auburn?  

    No I don't.  He was the DC at Texas in 05'.      

    @tiamat63 said:

    No I don't.  He was the DC at Texas in 05'.      

    Ah!  OK. 

  • Loads of good reads up in here (up in here)... adding *Better team speed* has been the off-season mantra all off season..Just tossing in some truck weights/40 speed digits up in here

    Cox 232 dnp
    JOK 221 dnp
     
                                                           Zaven Collins 259 lbs./ 4.56
    ellerson smith 252 4.74
    Rashed 251 4.58
    __________________________________250's^^
                                                            Micah Parsons 246 lbs. 4.39 ***6.94 3c (freak)
    *Browning 245 4.58
    *S.Toney 242 4.55
    Patrick Johnson 240 4.59/6.97 cone
    ______________________________________240's^^
    D.Barnes 238 4.57
    Bolton 237 4.59
                                                              Jamin Davis 234 lbs. /4.47*****
    KJ Britt 235 4.75
    ______________________________________230's^^
    Borland 229 4.98
    Hilliard 229 4.81
                                                                 Chazz  Surratt 229 lbs. 4.58
                                                                Buddy Johnson 229 lbs. 4.57
     

    Jacob Phillips Overview                                                   

    Position: Inside Linebacker
    Height: 6’3″
    Weight: 229 pounds

    40-Yard Dash: 4.66 seconds
    Vertical Jump: 39 inches
    Broad Jump: 10 feet 6 inches
    Three Cone Drill: 7.38 seconds
    20-Yard Shuttle: 4.33 seconds

     
    Mack Wilson Overview

    Position: Linebacker
    Height: 6’1″
    Weight: 240 pounds
    School: Alabama Crimson Tide

    Combine Performance Data 
    40-yard dash: 4.71 seconds
    Vertical Jump: 33 inches
    Broad Jump: 10.08 inches
    Three-cone drill: 7.20 seconds
    20-yard shuttle: 4.50 seconds

    Yeah... adding better team speed is highly doable...but, Seeing the LB position, while adding better speed as a 'higher drafting priority' is a wait & see ?
     
  • Yeah, we could certainly use more speed at LB.  But it's currently a downgraded position in the new defenses.  Kind of a catch 22.  You want more speed but you don't want to invest much.  

  • It's not just "more speed" - it's short-area quickness and change of direction skills for coverage purposes which is the component that's lacking.

    Wilson/taki/Phillips have enough of a 40 time.. 3-cone is more precise.

  • Before we bypass a LB in this draft...

    Anyone think Mack Wilson is a trade or cut candidate prior to Week 1?  

    But If Mack is included Week 1, we have Taki and Phillips as well and both have flashed.  I am particularly interested in seeing Phillips in Year 2 (hopefully healthy too).

    Walker and Smith are ? Beyond 2021. Maybe you draft and develop behind these two? 

    So if everything works out health wise we have five for the position group and Keep in mind we had five LBs get significant PT (defensive snap counts) last season. 

    We have bigger needs DE, DT, CB but a second day LB to push guys like Wilson, Taki, Phillips and provide insurance in case an older player like Smith breaks down - not a bad idea and it certainly can’t be ruled out. 

  • I would go LB'er in the 1st.. DL looks average this draft...

  • It's not just "more speed" - it's short-area quickness and change of direction skills for coverage purposes which is the component that's lacking.

    Wilson/taki/Phillips have enough of a 40 time.. 3-cone is more precise.

    @unsympathetic said:

    Wilson/taki/Phillips have enough of a 40 time.. 3-cone is more precise.

    Agreed! (but, has Taki reached the endzone yet on that Wentz pick ? 😉) 

     Lamar was lucky enough to have Yanda at RG when he was drafted..Now it will be our old pal Kevin Zeitler.... 10-15 play calls are Lamar read options off the back of his RG/LG...

    It causes me to play drinking games seeing it coming..  dbce5ceed37e1edada550050c75e5fc8.jpg  if a decent 3-cone drill LB can plant his foot in the ground, than plant his arss... Am all In...

  • The reason Symp is pointing out 3 cone agility and change of direction speed is because in a game such as football putting ever more importance on plays between the 20's that place linebackers in a conflict of assignment (RPO's are the best example of this) that makeup first step becomes critical compared to what it may used to have been valued.

  • Before we bypass a LB in this draft...

    Anyone think Mack Wilson is a trade or cut candidate prior to Week 1?  

    But If Mack is included Week 1, we have Taki and Phillips as well and both have flashed.  I am particularly interested in seeing Phillips in Year 2 (hopefully healthy too).

    Walker and Smith are ? Beyond 2021. Maybe you draft and develop behind these two? 

    So if everything works out health wise we have five for the position group and Keep in mind we had five LBs get significant PT (defensive snap counts) last season. 

    We have bigger needs DE, DT, CB but a second day LB to push guys like Wilson, Taki, Phillips and provide insurance in case an older player like Smith breaks down - not a bad idea and it certainly can’t be ruled out. 

    @sdbacker80 said:

    We have bigger needs DE, DT, CB

    I don't know how high CB is on the list right now with our FA signing.  I know that you can neve have enough of 'em, but you can only 'afford' so many.

  • Blurb on Jamin Davis I found...if you are talking  40 times:

    Jamin Davis' measurements, included a 4.37 40-yard dash at 6'3, 234 lbs. Davis also had a 42” vertical and a 11' broad jump. 

    I think that is  basically cornerback speed, fair to say? 

    But can he shed blockers and tackle the hell out of people?  Sometimes really fast guys can't do those things.   Not saying he can't, just asking that question. 

    @the-gipper said:

    Blurb on Jamin Davis I found...if you are talking  40 times:

    Jamin Davis' measurements, included a 4.37 40-yard dash at 6'3, 234 lbs. Davis also had a 42” vertical and a 11' broad jump. 

    I think that is  basically cornerback speed, fair to say? 

    But can he shed blockers and tackle the hell out of people?  Sometimes really fast guys can't do those things.   Not saying he can't, just asking that question. 

    Here is a nice film breakdown on Davis.  If we pick a LB early, Davis is the guy.  He fits the mold of the type of backer our D wants to play.

  • @the-gipper said:

    Blurb on Jamin Davis I found...if you are talking  40 times:

    Jamin Davis' measurements, included a 4.37 40-yard dash at 6'3, 234 lbs. Davis also had a 42” vertical and a 11' broad jump. 

    I think that is  basically cornerback speed, fair to say? 

    But can he shed blockers and tackle the hell out of people?  Sometimes really fast guys can't do those things.   Not saying he can't, just asking that question. 

    Here is a nice film breakdown on Davis.  If we pick a LB early, Davis is the guy.  He fits the mold of the type of backer our D wants to play.

    @ballpeen said:

    Here is a nice film breakdown on Davis.

    I dunno.  Might as well just add another safety IMO.

  • @sdbacker80 said:

    We have bigger needs DE, DT, CB

    I don't know how high CB is on the list right now with our FA signing.  I know that you can neve have enough of 'em, but you can only 'afford' so many.

    @orion said:

    I don't know how high CB is on the list right now with our FA signing.  I know that you can neve have enough of 'em, but you can only 'afford' so many.

    If the right guy falls it could be the pick.

    Greedy is an injury question mark.
    Hill is a good slot corner. 
    Ward plays 12 games a year. 
     

    Unpopular opinion we could be drafting Wards replacement this year 

  • @orion said:

    I don't know how high CB is on the list right now with our FA signing.  I know that you can neve have enough of 'em, but you can only 'afford' so many.

    If the right guy falls it could be the pick.

    Greedy is an injury question mark.
    Hill is a good slot corner. 
    Ward plays 12 games a year. 
     

    Unpopular opinion we could be drafting Wards replacement this year 

    @sdbacker80 said:

    Unpopular opinion we could be drafting Wards replacement this year 

    Ward is our best CB.....pro bowl caliber.  I'd draft for a different position if I could.  But who knows?  A lot of cards would be played by pick 26.

  • @orion said:

    I don't know how high CB is on the list right now with our FA signing.  I know that you can neve have enough of 'em, but you can only 'afford' so many.

    If the right guy falls it could be the pick.

    Greedy is an injury question mark.
    Hill is a good slot corner. 
    Ward plays 12 games a year. 
     

    Unpopular opinion we could be drafting Wards replacement this year 

    @sdbacker80 said:

    If the right guy falls it could be the pick.

    Greedy is an injury question mark.
    Hill is a good slot corner. 
    Ward plays 12 games a year. 
     

    Unpopular opinion we could be drafting Wards replacement this year 

    I agree.  Ward is a prime candidate to move on.  Hospital Ward misses a lot of games.  I think our offer is going to reflect that.  Some team will probably offer more.  It is what it is.

  • @sdbacker80 said:

    If the right guy falls it could be the pick.

    Greedy is an injury question mark.
    Hill is a good slot corner. 
    Ward plays 12 games a year. 
     

    Unpopular opinion we could be drafting Wards replacement this year 

    I agree.  Ward is a prime candidate to move on.  Hospital Ward misses a lot of games.  I think our offer is going to reflect that.  Some team will probably offer more.  It is what it is.

    @ballpeen said:

    Ward is a prime candidate to move on.  Hospital Ward misses a lot of games. 

    Well, let's use that logic.  Greedy Williams has missed many more games than Ward, so let's ditch him.  And Delpit fits that bill.  Philips missed a bunch too...

    It's tackle football......and the guys now-a-days wear these little shoulder pads and hardly any leg padding.  Guys are going to get hurt.

  • @ballpeen said:

    Ward is a prime candidate to move on.  Hospital Ward misses a lot of games. 

    Well, let's use that logic.  Greedy Williams has missed many more games than Ward, so let's ditch him.  And Delpit fits that bill.  Philips missed a bunch too...

    It's tackle football......and the guys now-a-days wear these little shoulder pads and hardly any leg padding.  Guys are going to get hurt.

    @orion said:

    Well, let's use that logic.  Greedy Williams has missed many more games than Ward, so let's ditch him.  And Delpit fits that bill.  Philips missed a bunch too...

    It's tackle football......and the guys now-a-days wear these little shoulder pads and hardly any leg padding.  Guys are going to get hurt.

    There is a big difference in Ward and Greedy though (which is what these guys are alluding to).

    Ward is entering his final year on a rookie contract, in a year where the Top 2 guys that need to be extended are Baker and Chubb.

    Ward is absolutely better than Greedy, but teams can't just keep everyone they want. Let's just say for the sake of argument that when healthy Ward is a Top 3 CB, that puts him at a minimum of 17.5 million (so 10 million more a year). For someone who plays 12 games a year. 

    So would you rather have Ward at that price and Greedy for 1 more year after this season AT LEAST, or as an example Fuller AND Okudah (on rookie contract).

  • @orion said:

    Well, let's use that logic.  Greedy Williams has missed many more games than Ward, so let's ditch him.  And Delpit fits that bill.  Philips missed a bunch too...

    It's tackle football......and the guys now-a-days wear these little shoulder pads and hardly any leg padding.  Guys are going to get hurt.

    There is a big difference in Ward and Greedy though (which is what these guys are alluding to).

    Ward is entering his final year on a rookie contract, in a year where the Top 2 guys that need to be extended are Baker and Chubb.

    Ward is absolutely better than Greedy, but teams can't just keep everyone they want. Let's just say for the sake of argument that when healthy Ward is a Top 3 CB, that puts him at a minimum of 17.5 million (so 10 million more a year). For someone who plays 12 games a year. 

    So would you rather have Ward at that price and Greedy for 1 more year after this season AT LEAST, or as an example Fuller AND Okudah (on rookie contract).

    @gunz41 said:

    So would you rather

    I would rather not create a need where one does not exist.  Being able to control a team's top flight receiver is huge in today's NFL.  We're trying to get to and win a superbowl here.  And that's a very important position...along with edge rusher, T, QB...

  • I think this FO would choose to pay Ward over Chubb if it came to it (health permitting)