Skip to content
The Browns Board
  1. Home
  2. The Browns Board
  3. WIMBLEY TO OAKLAND

WIMBLEY TO OAKLAND

The Browns Board
74 41 9.5k
  • A Athensbuck26

    @kosar_for_president said:

    He was 38th in the league in sacks.

    Please explain TOP 10? People please stay off the board if you don't know shit about football.

    sacks are not the only single thing in football

    owned hard

    C ClevelandBigDawg wrote on
    #23

    @athensbuck26 said:

    sacks are not the only single thing in football

    owned hard

    Well no crap. That comment was so laughable...

    For a pass-rushing LB, sacks pretty much are the only single thing. Wimbley sucked in coverage too, so... whats your point?

    Owned harder

    ❤️
  • C ClevelandBigDawg

    @athensbuck26 said:

    sacks are not the only single thing in football

    owned hard

    Well no crap. That comment was so laughable...

    For a pass-rushing LB, sacks pretty much are the only single thing. Wimbley sucked in coverage too, so... whats your point?

    Owned harder

    Kosar_For_PresidentK Kosar_For_President wrote on
    #24

    @clevelandbigdawg said:

    Well no crap. That comment was so laughable...

    For a pass-rushing LB, sacks pretty much are the only single thing. Wimbley sucked in coverage too, so... whats your point?

    Owned harder

    I didn't have to come back with anything, that is how dumb that comment was. Then he said I was owned.

    We need to sticky this guys posts for a good laugh.

    Luck is Tim Couch. Big, Dumb Goofy, slow thinking QB - Ghoolie, 2-28-12
    ❤️
  • A Athensbuck26

    @d-bone said:

    If it's true, that's more then I thought we could get for him.

    your joking right? if its true we got ripped off big time

    we could have gotten a 2nd or 3rd at least

    BrownsBacker85B BrownsBacker85 wrote on
    #25

    @athensbuck26 said:

    your joking right? if its true we got ripped off big time

    we could have gotten a 2nd or 3rd at least

    A second? Umm......no. a third would be pushing it.

  • sisky fringoS sisky fringo wrote on
    #26

    picks, picks, picks, picks. picks!

  • miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on
    #27

    if we get a third for him then i'm all for it. keep the picks coming holmgren!

  • P professor_g wrote on
    #28

    Oakland's picks in 2010 are nice and high each round, so a 3rd round would be super nice. A 4th would be acceptable. If it's a 5th, then there's more to the story than we know.

    Coach Holmgren: "I made the decision to keep Eric [Mangini] and every day I know I did the right thing."
    sisky fringoS 1 Reply
  • A Athensbuck26

    @kosar_for_president said:

    He was 38th in the league in sacks.

    Please explain TOP 10? People please stay off the board if you don't know shit about football.

    sacks are not the only single thing in football

    owned hard

    D BoneD D Bone wrote on
    #29

    @athensbuck26 said:

    sacks are not the only single thing in football

    owned hard

    Wow, you're a jackass

    ❤️
  • A Athensbuck26

    @kosar_for_president said:

    He was 38th in the league in sacks.

    Please explain TOP 10? People please stay off the board if you don't know shit about football.

    sacks are not the only single thing in football

    owned hard

    DieHardBrownsFanD DieHardBrownsFan wrote on
    #30

    @athensbuck26 said:

    sacks are not the only single thing in football

    owned hard

    Please just STFU.

    "You planning on having a long relationship with that glass or are you going to drink it? Drink up, man. Maybe we can get another.” - Janis Joplin, 1970.
  • P professor_g

    Oakland's picks in 2010 are nice and high each round, so a 3rd round would be super nice. A 4th would be acceptable. If it's a 5th, then there's more to the story than we know.

    sisky fringoS sisky fringo wrote on
    #31

    @professor_g said:

    Oakland's picks in 2010 are nice and high each round, so a 3rd round would be super nice. A 4th would be acceptable. If it's a 5th, then there's more to the story than we know.

    low, high...if it weren't for context we'd never have a clue what each other really meant. 😁

  • A Athensbuck26

    @d-bone said:

    I must have been watching a different OLB these last couple of years...................GREAT JOB MIKE!!!!!!!!

    your right you must have been

    his production was top 10 stats wise in the NFL

    owned

    miktoxicM miktoxic wrote on
    #32

    @athensbuck26 said:

    owned

    hilarious. what, do you and your frat brothers sit around, do bong hits and watch 'YOU GOT SERVED'?

    ballpeenB 1 Reply
  • R roach wrote on
    #33

    LOL on this news. Good riddance to Wimbley and Quinn.

    More than ever, i believe that Holmgren and Mangini are on the same page, and the future is looking bright indeed.

  • R roach

    LOL on this news. Good riddance to Wimbley and Quinn.

    More than ever, i believe that Holmgren and Mangini are on the same page, and the future is looking bright indeed.

    sisky fringoS sisky fringo wrote on
    #34

    @roach said:

    LOL on this news. Good riddance to Wimbley and Quinn.

    More than ever, i believe that Holmgren and Mangini are on the same page, and the future is looking bright indeed.

    agreed. i think our boy Rob Ryan is in the room with them too (figuratively).

    this invites more complex defensive schemes imo.

  • BrownsFan17B BrownsFan17 wrote on
    #35
    I never thought Wimbley fit well in the 3-4 D so going to Oakland should be a great move for him. I wish him much success. He always had a great attitude while he was here.
    <!--coloro:#0000FF--><span style="color:#0000FF"><!--/coloro-->I can't help but think that we are destined to go to the playoffs this year!!<!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc-->
    ❤️
  • miktoxicM miktoxic

    @athensbuck26 said:

    owned

    hilarious. what, do you and your frat brothers sit around, do bong hits and watch 'YOU GOT SERVED'?

    ballpeenB ballpeen wrote on
    #36

    @miktoxic said:

    hilarious. what, do you and your frat brothers sit around, do bong hits and watch 'YOU GOT SERVED'?

    I agree buddy!

    If everybody had like minds, we would never learn.
    ❤️
  • C calfoxwc wrote on
    #37

    It doesn't have to be the player SUCKS.. just that the player just doesn't fit into the refined scheme of things.

    Could be a player just isn't happy in a 3-4, whatever. If we traded him for less than the Raiders' third round pick this year,

    we will have gotten taken on that deal, imho.

    Wimbley may not have the burst for going after the passer,....

    and there are several terrific 3-4 lb's in this draft.

    all said and done, I think the Browns may very well take McClain, or one of a few other lb's in the first round.

    This draft is going to be very surprising to us all, I think, and I CAN'T WAIT !

    Canton MikeC 1 Reply
  • F FloridaBrownsFan wrote on
    #38

    What im really confused about is how is the Quinn trade getting more exposure than this one? I understand that Quinn carries all that hype with him, but we just lost one of our best defensive players and there is only a small paragraph in the Quinn article on ESPN on Wimbley. Hell there is no mention of it at all on the Cleveland Browns website yet...

    E R 2 Replies
  • F FloridaBrownsFan

    What im really confused about is how is the Quinn trade getting more exposure than this one? I understand that Quinn carries all that hype with him, but we just lost one of our best defensive players and there is only a small paragraph in the Quinn article on ESPN on Wimbley. Hell there is no mention of it at all on the Cleveland Browns website yet...

    E Earl34 wrote on
    #39

    @floridabrownsfan said:

    What im really confused about is how is the Quinn trade getting more exposure than this one? I understand that Quinn carries all that hype with him, but we just lost one of our best defensive players and there is only a small paragraph in the Quinn article on ESPN on Wimbley. Hell there is no mention of it at all on the Cleveland Browns website yet...

    I think they weren't going to write a huge article without knowing the compensation. NFL.com says it's a 3rd rounder this year.

    cambridgehoC 1 Reply
  • ElbamboozlerE Elbamboozler wrote on
    #40

    I liked Wimbley and all but with all these draft picks we have now we can probably fill that position with the picks. Also did we get anything else besides the 3rd rounder?

    When in doubt burn it with fire its the best way.
  • 7 7moses7 wrote on
    #41

    the Raiders have 2 3rd. round picks,8 and 22 which one was part of the trade?

  • E Earl34

    @floridabrownsfan said:

    What im really confused about is how is the Quinn trade getting more exposure than this one? I understand that Quinn carries all that hype with him, but we just lost one of our best defensive players and there is only a small paragraph in the Quinn article on ESPN on Wimbley. Hell there is no mention of it at all on the Cleveland Browns website yet...

    I think they weren't going to write a huge article without knowing the compensation. NFL.com says it's a 3rd rounder this year.

    cambridgehoC cambridgeho wrote on
    #42

    @earl34 said:

    I think they weren't going to write a huge article without knowing the compensation. NFL.com says it's a 3rd rounder this year.

    Wimbley played pretty solid last year, but I think they just want to get as many young fellas as possible. 3 3rd rounders now is really sweet. Im just wondering if they are going to go QB with the first pick. Also they must have seen enough out of Bernard to think he can start. Or they plan on using Vikune more, who really knows. The good thing is we didn't really get worse by any of these moves this year, we might have gotten a tad better with the extra pick in the 3rd.

    miktoxicM 1 Reply
Log in to reply