Browns make trade with Rams

BigBrownsFan

@dawgpound3 said:
How am I joking? If it doesn't happen, it doesn't happen. Don't blame me, blame Schein having xxxxing shitty sources.

So u post something that nobody else can find anywhere, and now you want to pass the buck?

You are the one who posted it HERE, not Adam Schlong.....

Rooster Dick

Bradford on the Browns = Tim Ouch

dawgpound3

Zombo said:
Or you for jumping the gun and posting it like it already happened?
Zombo

--Changing to "rumor" staus...

I am not jumping the gun nor posting it like it happened. Adam Schein confirmed it. It's just weird that it's hasn't leaked to another.

This is from another Browns board. My247forums.com

Quote

"listening to sirius radio show the nfl blitz and they announced the browns have made a trade with the rams.

but they wouldn't announce what it is until later in the 2 o'clock hour.

haven't been able to find anything else on it anywhere"

585Dawg

This better NOT BE TRUE... why does everyone think Bradford is the best thing since sliced bread?! he was a good college qb... but not great. And he's a spread offense qb.. name me successful college qbs who ran spread offenses and are also successful in the nfl. The ONLY one (and this is a HUGE reach) would be alex smith. Stay at 7!! This would be a GREAT trade for the rams.

Bob806

Please don't do it, we need many players...use all picks.

Vagitron

@sisky-fringo said:
so, he's that enamored with beaver cleaver bradford.
so it is. i do love that the franchise's future will be present on day-one for the offensive install at Lake Erie WCO University.

he'll have a bright mentor well versed in the system to pop quiz at will, and a solid veteran showing him how it's done on the field. ironically, Jake has a two year contract...i can't imagine a better situation right now.

Supposedly more than a few teams are and one of them (granted also a Rumor) is the Steelers. Either way the Stains will have to unload A LOT to get the number one pick in the draft. It's a bold move because as others have said on this very board, if Bradford doesn't pan out in this scenario the franchise is set back yet again.

dawgpound3

@585dawg said:
This better NOT BE TRUE... why does everyone think Bradford is the best thing since sliced bread?! he was a good college qb... but not great. And he's a spread offense qb.. name me successful college qbs who ran spread offenses and are also successful in the nfl. The ONLY one (and this is a HUGE reach) would be alex smith. Stay at 7!! This would be a GREAT trade for the rams.

Oh really? What about Drew Brees? He ran the spread offense in college and was successful in college and is successful in the NFL.

dawgpound3

Chickenwang said:
Bradford on the Browns = Tim Ouch

You are so wrong, man. We have a better much o-line than we did than. GTFO off this board.

Vagitron

Chickenwang said:
Bradford on the Browns = Tim Ouch

Who would have been a fine QB had he not landed with the Browns. The Browns were in a whirlwind at that point. I'd say if you transplanted a rookie Couch in to the league right now with a Browns organization on the mend you'd have a franchise QB. He just came out at the wrong time. You can't blame Couch. I also believe Bradford is legit.

sisky fringo

@585dawg said:
This better NOT BE TRUE... why does everyone think Bradford is the best thing since sliced bread?! he was a good college qb... but not great. And he's a spread offense qb.. name me successful college qbs who ran spread offenses and are also successful in the nfl. The ONLY one (and this is a HUGE reach) would be alex smith. Stay at 7!! This would be a GREAT trade for the rams.

i'd hate it too...if he sucked.

can you imagine them trading up to #1 for anyone else than bradford? it would have to be for him.

if true the QB guru's cred is on the line for about the 5th time in as many months.

it's clear this new regime has no problem making a decision.

DawgTracker

Chickenwang said:
Bradford on the Browns = Tim Ouch

I respectfully disagree. This team has a strong running game and a pretty good pass blocking line. Add another receiving threat and there will be weapons to use. Plus, if the browns picked up bradford he won't be thrown in immediately, he will be given time to learn first

Speedyd900rr

Rorbotron said:
Supposedly more than a few teams are and one of them (granted also a Rumor) is the Steelers. Either way the Stains will have to unload A LOT to get the number one pick in the draft. It's a bold move because as others have said on this very board, if Bradford doesn't pan out in this scenario the franchise is set back yet again.

How do you find the time to check in on the pissburgh squeelers when your always trolling this board like a rat?

CLEVELandMILIDH

Adam_Schefter The St. Louis Rams and QB Sam Bradford will not have a contract in place before the draft -- both sides' decision.

29 minutes ago via web

First time in 3 years the #1 pick wasnt signed before the draft. There leaving it open for a possible trade, I just hope it aint us. I like the draft to much to have it over before it starts lol

dawgpound3

nmills said:
Adam_Schefter The St. Louis Rams and QB Sam Bradford will not have a contract in place before the draft -- both sides' decision.
29 minutes ago via web

First time in 3 years the #1 pick wasnt signed before the draft. There leaving it open for a possible trade, I just hope it aint us. I like the draft to much to have it over before it starts lol

Why? Because you think we would give up too much. I doubt it. I rather have 2 great players than 6 shitty players. Get my point, capische?

LeBrent

John Clayton just said virtually no chance Browns trade for Bradford.

I agree with him but remember he did say that there was a 100% chance Holmgren would fire Mangini.

dawgpound3

@lebrent said:
John Clayton just said virtually no chance Browns trade for Bradford.
I agree with him but remember he did say that there was a 100% chance Holmgren would fire Mangini.

I don't believe anything Clayton says. I go by with what Schefter says.

playerjdd

@dawgpound3 said:
You are so wrong, man. We have a better much o-line than we did than. GTFO off this board.

No you GTFO this board. Are you the one that posted that we traded for Brandon Marshall a few weeks ago?? Dont report something that just isnt true. You should be banned for that!!!!!! Rumors are just what they are rumors!!!! There was a rumor that Big Ben was getting traded to St. Louis for 2 first round picks. Does this make it true since it was a swirling rumor?? Separate your facts for here say. Well i see you switched it to make the topic say rumor now so ill give you a little credit for that now.

dawgpound3

@playerjdd said:
No you GTFO this board. Are you the one that posted that we traded for Brandon Marshall a few weeks ago?? Dont report something that just isnt true. You should be banned for that!!!!!! Rumors are just what they are rumors!!!! There was a rumor that Big Ben was getting traded to St. Louis for 2 first round picks. Does this make it true since it was a swirling rumor?? Separate your facts for here say. Well i see you switched it to make the topic say rumor now so ill give you a little credit for that now.

Adam Schien actually confirmed this. So It's just not a rumor.

metcalf

Romeo Holgrem please pick Bradford you fat xxxx

playerjdd

Im saying your FOS and that this a rumor. Ill eat crow later if im wrong but even on Adam Scheins twitter it says nothing about a trade : http://twitter.com/adamschein

I have Espn insider and says nothing about this trade happening. Unless you have it in writing it never happened. Simple as that.