If you had a QB Draft
-
1. Rivers
2. Brees
3. Brady
4. Ryan
5. P. Manning
6. Rodgers
7. Vick
8. E. Manning
9. Roethlisberger
10. Schaub
11. Romo
12. Cutler
13. Orton
14. McNabb
15. Bradford
1. Rivers
2. Brees
3. Brady
4. Ryan
5. P. Manning
6. Rodgers
7. Vick
8. E. Manning
9. Roethlisberger
10. Schaub
11. Romo
12. Cutler
13. Orton
14. McNabb
15. Bradford
get Eli out of the top 10 man.. I'd put Tony Homo on top of Eli almost every time.
-
1. Rivers
2. Brees
3. Brady
4. Ryan
5. P. Manning
6. Rodgers
7. Vick
8. E. Manning
9. Roethlisberger
10. Schaub
11. Romo
12. Cutler
13. Orton
14. McNabb
15. Bradford
get Eli out of the top 10 man.. I'd put Tony Homo on top of Eli almost every time.
Colt12 said:
get Eli out of the top 10 man.. I'd put Tony Homo on top of Eli almost every time.They are close but I'll take the guy with the ring.
-
Colt12 said:
get Eli out of the top 10 man.. I'd put Tony Homo on top of Eli almost every time.They are close but I'll take the guy with the ring.
They are close but I'll take the guy with the ring.
And here I thought football was a team sport.
-
They are close but I'll take the guy with the ring.
And here I thought football was a team sport.
And here I thought football was a team sport.
All good teams need a leader.
-
1. Rodgers
2. Rivers
3. Ryan
4. Roethlisberger
5. Flacco
6. Bradford
7. Cutler
8. Stafford
9. Schaub
10. E. Manning
11. Sanchez
12. Freeman
13. Brees
14. Vick
15.
-
If it is a qb I had to have this year only, it would be Brees. However, long term I like Rogers. He's the next great qb.
-
Are you guys that are listing Sanchez serious?
-
Colt12 said:
get Eli out of the top 10 man.. I'd put Tony Homo on top of Eli almost every time.They are close but I'll take the guy with the ring.
They are close but I'll take the guy with the ring.
Eli better than Ben is the comical part.
-
They are close but I'll take the guy with the ring.
Eli better than Ben is the comical part.
Homotron said:
Eli better than Ben is the comical part.He would no doubt be higher if it weren't for the off the field antics. Nothing comical about that. It is the same reason why most people didn't want to give the most talented QB in the league a second chance.
-
Formerly Stone said:
The love affair with Rivers is nauseating!1 & 2 Brady & Manning (take your pick)
3. Roethlisberger
4. Brees
5. Rodgers
6. Ryan
7. Rivers
8. Schaub
9. Flacco
10. Vick (if he keeps it up)
11. Sanchez
12. Garrard
13, 14 & 15 Romo, E. Manning, McNaab (flip a coin, they all suck)
Bradford (should be in their but not as a rookie)
Having Garrard and Sanchez in the same conversation as Rivers throws all credibility out of the window.
-
1. Manning
2. Brady
3. Schaub
4. Rivers
5. Brees
6. Vick
7. Rodgers
8. Ryan
9. Orton
10. Flacco
11. Garrard
12. Ben
13. Eli
14. Bradford
15. Cassel
-
The record speaks for itself. Not including a QB who played in four super bowls and won three and QB who played in two and won one and a QB who played in two and won two pretty much discredits that persons ability to rank the top ten.
here we go
1. Brady
2. Peyton
3. Brees
4. Ben
5. Rivers
6. Rogers*
7. Ryan*
8. Schaub
9. Flacco*
10 Eli
11. Freeman*
12. Vick
13. Garrard
14 Cassell
15. Bradford*
16. Sanchez*
Asterisk for QB's on the rise
-
The record speaks for itself. Not including a QB who played in four super bowls and won three and QB who played in two and won one and a QB who played in two and won two pretty much discredits that persons ability to rank the top ten.
here we go
1. Brady
2. Peyton
3. Brees
4. Ben
5. Rivers
6. Rogers*
7. Ryan*
8. Schaub
9. Flacco*
10 Eli
11. Freeman*
12. Vick
13. Garrard
14 Cassell
15. Bradford*
16. Sanchez*
Asterisk for QB's on the rise
The record speaks for itself. Not including a QB who played in four super bowls and won three and QB who played in two and won one and a QB who played in two and won two pretty much discredits that persons ability to rank the top ten.
here we go
1. Brady
2. Peyton
3. Brees
4. Ben
5. Rivers
6. Rogers*
7. Ryan*
8. Schaub
9. Flacco*
10 Eli
11. Freeman*
12. Vick
13. Garrard
14 Cassell
15. Bradford*
16. Sanchez*
Asterisk for QB's on the rise
When I was putting together my list it most resemble this one. I had Rogers at 4.
-
You guys do realize that Sanchez's career rating is actually lower than Tim Couch's?
-
Other QBs with a better rating than Sanchez.......
Patrick Ramsey
David Carr
Ryan Fitzpatrick
JP Losman
-
You guys do realize that Sanchez's career rating is actually lower than Tim Couch's?
You guys do realize that Sanchez's career rating is actually lower than Tim Couch's?
Ratings are over rated.
-
The record speaks for itself. Not including a QB who played in four super bowls and won three and QB who played in two and won one and a QB who played in two and won two pretty much discredits that persons ability to rank the top ten.
here we go
1. Brady
2. Peyton
3. Brees
4. Ben
5. Rivers
6. Rogers*
7. Ryan*
8. Schaub
9. Flacco*
10 Eli
11. Freeman*
12. Vick
13. Garrard
14 Cassell
15. Bradford*
16. Sanchez*
Asterisk for QB's on the rise
The record speaks for itself. Not including a QB who played in four super bowls and won three and QB who played in two and won one and a QB who played in two and won two pretty much discredits that persons ability to rank the top ten.
Maybe those players aren't included because they are starting to get up there in age but hey if you want to draft guys in their mid 30's thats up to you
-
You guys do realize that Sanchez's career rating is actually lower than Tim Couch's?
Ratings are over rated.
Ratings are over rated.
So is Sanchez obviously. Rating is by no means the end all but it does serve as a decent stat to gauge QBs for comparison purposes. When you are in the same ballpark as QBs that can't make it in the NFL it raises red flags. Do you really think that if the Jets had no running game and a mediocre defense leading them to a .500 record that anyone would be mentioning Sanchez? He is currently 20th in rating, 17th in TDs, 29th in Comp%, and 18th in yardage. The Yardage and TDs may jump a little after tonight but not enough to make a big difference. The only positives that I can come with is that he is young and could certainly improve and he has done a much better job of not turning the ball over. Let's not forget that he also has a great offensive line and a very good receiving corp at his disposal.
OK, rant over.
-
The record speaks for itself. Not including a QB who played in four super bowls and won three and QB who played in two and won one and a QB who played in two and won two pretty much discredits that persons ability to rank the top ten.
Maybe those players aren't included because they are starting to get up there in age but hey if you want to draft guys in their mid 30's thats up to you
Maybe those players aren't included because they are starting to get up there in age but hey if you want to draft guys in their mid 30's thats up to you
Yeah, I took the initial question to mean that if you were starting a team tomorrow who would you pick going forward not just for this season.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login