Voting
-
There's an article about fees to own guns.
Speaking of constitutional, which it isn't, there is a fee for a wedding license.
WSS
There's an article about fees to own guns.
Speaking of constitutional, which it isn't, there is a fee for a wedding license.
WSS
Thank lawd for Ohio. I've seen some of these states restrict magazine capacity and such - which would also suck. Does 10 rounds versus 15 really make a difference? You can kill a giant with 10 rounds.
-
There's an article about fees to own guns.
Speaking of constitutional, which it isn't, there is a fee for a wedding license.
WSS
Thank lawd for Ohio. I've seen some of these states restrict magazine capacity and such - which would also suck. Does 10 rounds versus 15 really make a difference? You can kill a giant with 10 rounds.
Thank lawd for Ohio. I've seen some of these states restrict magazine capacity and such - which would also suck. Does 10 rounds versus 15 really make a difference? You can kill a giant with 10 rounds.
Oh you can kill with a Derringer.
Whittling away at firepower is just a slippery slope.
It isn't that hard to understand is it?
WSS
-
The best part of voter ID is somehow the 90 year old woman at the polls will be able to spot a fake. If people want to commit fraud they'll find a way to do it. Based on national voting statistics there is more of a problem with people not participating than there is with the people that do.
-
-
CCW doesn't require a registered firearm
-
I don't mind processing fees if they are legit. The idea that they can be raised
high to make money off it, for other reasons, or to price the registration/licenses fees
so high as to make them unpayable... is the slippery slope that liberals in gov will happily
slide down as far as our 2nd Amendment goes, and maybe SUV's and pickup trucks....
and racists could use that slippery slope to exclude the poor from voting, etc.
It's using economics as a weapon.
-
The best part of voter ID is somehow the 90 year old woman at the polls will be able to spot a fake. If people want to commit fraud they'll find a way to do it. Based on national voting statistics there is more of a problem with people not participating than there is with the people that do.
The best part of voter ID is somehow the 90 year old woman at the polls will be able to spot a fake. If people want to commit fraud they'll find a way to do it. Based on national voting statistics there is more of a problem with people not participating than there is with the people that do.
Not a very good argument sir. Tax cheats child molesters crack pushers and rapists will find a way to do it. Doesn't mean it shouldn't be against the law does it?
WSS
-
The best part of voter ID is somehow the 90 year old woman at the polls will be able to spot a fake. If people want to commit fraud they'll find a way to do it. Based on national voting statistics there is more of a problem with people not participating than there is with the people that do.
Not a very good argument sir. Tax cheats child molesters crack pushers and rapists will find a way to do it. Doesn't mean it shouldn't be against the law does it?
WSS
Not a very good argument sir. Tax cheats child molesters crack pushers and rapists will find a way to do it. Doesn't mean it shouldn't be against the law does it?
WSS
Steve going full on Cal, nice. Good analogy between voter fraud and child molestation. The question is to what lengths should the federal government go to try to eliminate voter fraud. IMO, none. Of the issues that need to be solved concerning the election of candidates it doesn't rank in my top 5, campaign finance, term limits, participation, electoral college vs popular vote & gerrymandering because I'll save you from asking. Illegals electing Democrats is another tin foil hat theory.
-
Not a very good argument sir. Tax cheats child molesters crack pushers and rapists will find a way to do it. Doesn't mean it shouldn't be against the law does it?
WSS
Steve going full on Cal, nice. Good analogy between voter fraud and child molestation. The question is to what lengths should the federal government go to try to eliminate voter fraud. IMO, none. Of the issues that need to be solved concerning the election of candidates it doesn't rank in my top 5, campaign finance, term limits, participation, electoral college vs popular vote & gerrymandering because I'll save you from asking. Illegals electing Democrats is another tin foil hat theory.
Steve going full on Cal, nice. Good analogy between voter fraud and child molestation. The question is to what lengths should the federal government go to try to eliminate voter fraud. IMO, none. Of the issues that need to be solved concerning the election of candidates it doesn't rank in my top 5, campaign finance, term limits, participation, electoral college vs popular vote & gerrymandering because I'll save you from asking. Illegals electing Democrats is another tin foil hat theory.
Oh please. Okay if you're so offended by the comparison you pick any of the hundreds of things that require identification, and tell me why we should eliminate them. Because, you know, people are going to cheat anyway.
WSS
-
Steve going full on Cal, nice. Good analogy between voter fraud and child molestation. The question is to what lengths should the federal government go to try to eliminate voter fraud. IMO, none. Of the issues that need to be solved concerning the election of candidates it doesn't rank in my top 5, campaign finance, term limits, participation, electoral college vs popular vote & gerrymandering because I'll save you from asking. Illegals electing Democrats is another tin foil hat theory.
Oh please. Okay if you're so offended by the comparison you pick any of the hundreds of things that require identification, and tell me why we should eliminate them. Because, you know, people are going to cheat anyway.
WSS
Oh please. Okay if you're so offended by the comparison you pick any of the hundreds of things that require identification, and tell me why we should eliminate them. Because, you know, people are going to cheat anyway.
WSS
You aren't talking about eliminating something that already exists you are talking about adding a requirement.
-
Oh please. Okay if you're so offended by the comparison you pick any of the hundreds of things that require identification, and tell me why we should eliminate them. Because, you know, people are going to cheat anyway.
WSS
You aren't talking about eliminating something that already exists you are talking about adding a requirement.
You aren't talking about eliminating something that already exists you are talking about adding a requirement.
So?
WSS
-
You aren't talking about eliminating something that already exists you are talking about adding a requirement.
So?
WSS
So?
WSS
Obviously you feel this is an important issue, I don't rank it very high. I also don't think it will be effectively enforced or solve an enormous problem.
-
So?
WSS
Obviously you feel this is an important issue, I don't rank it very high. I also don't think it will be effectively enforced or solve an enormous problem.
Obviously you feel this is an important issue, I don't rank it very high. I also don't think it will be effectively enforced or solve an enormous problem.
Obviously I don't. I don't think there's much of a problem I don't think this will be much of a solution. I think it's a strawman for politicians on both sides but especially your side, Democrats, who are hyperventilating over it.
WSS
-
Obviously you feel this is an important issue, I don't rank it very high. I also don't think it will be effectively enforced or solve an enormous problem.
Obviously I don't. I don't think there's much of a problem I don't think this will be much of a solution. I think it's a strawman for politicians on both sides but especially your side, Democrats, who are hyperventilating over it.
WSS
Obviously I don't. I don't think there's much of a problem I don't think this will be much of a solution. I think it's a strawman for politicians on both sides but especially your side, Democrats, who are hyperventilating over it.
WSS
You likened the stance of saying voter fraud isn't a big issue to letting child molesters run free. Not sure if you are just trying to counter everything I say but you may want to read the thread again.
-
Obviously I don't. I don't think there's much of a problem I don't think this will be much of a solution. I think it's a strawman for politicians on both sides but especially your side, Democrats, who are hyperventilating over it.
WSS
You likened the stance of saying voter fraud isn't a big issue to letting child molesters run free. Not sure if you are just trying to counter everything I say but you may want to read the thread again.
A little bit of bombast which you misinterpreted anyway, relax. If it makes you feel better why erect stop signs because some people are going to run them anyway. Why have the speed limit of 35 when somebody is going to go 38.You likened the stance of saying voter fraud isn't a big issue to letting child molesters run free. Not sure if you are just trying to counter everything I say but you may want to read the thread again.
Why require identification for any of the dozens of things it's required for now? If in fact voting is so special and sacred and important.
WSS
-
A little bit of bombast which you misinterpreted anyway, relax. If it makes you feel better why erect stop signs because some people are going to run them anyway. Why have the speed limit of 35 when somebody is going to go 38.You likened the stance of saying voter fraud isn't a big issue to letting child molesters run free. Not sure if you are just trying to counter everything I say but you may want to read the thread again.
Why require identification for any of the dozens of things it's required for now? If in fact voting is so special and sacred and important.
WSS
A little bit of bombast which you misinterpreted anyway, relax. If it makes you feel better why erect stop signs because some people are going to run them anyway. Why have the speed limit of 35 when somebody is going to go 38.
Why require identification for any of the dozens of things it's required for now? If in fact voting is so special and sacred and important.
WSS
Not worked up at all but I don't think you are grasping my position. Based on voter turnout I'd say voting isn't sacred. Looking at the few swing states I'd argue in the majority of states a persons vote doesn't matter depending on your party affiliation.
Photo identification is not a federal voting law, sorry. If we've solved the larger issues our democratic process faces, I'd support a free voter ID requirement.
I think we typically have fruitful discussion but lately it seemed like you've been Calified
-
A little bit of bombast which you misinterpreted anyway, relax. If it makes you feel better why erect stop signs because some people are going to run them anyway. Why have the speed limit of 35 when somebody is going to go 38.
Why require identification for any of the dozens of things it's required for now? If in fact voting is so special and sacred and important.
WSS
Not worked up at all but I don't think you are grasping my position. Based on voter turnout I'd say voting isn't sacred. Looking at the few swing states I'd argue in the majority of states a persons vote doesn't matter depending on your party affiliation.
Photo identification is not a federal voting law, sorry. If we've solved the larger issues our democratic process faces, I'd support a free voter ID requirement.
I think we typically have fruitful discussion but lately it seemed like you've been Calified
Well I'm sure you meant that as an insult and that's your right.Not worked up at all but I don't think you are grasping my position. Based on voter turnout I'd say voting isn't sacred. Looking at the few swing states I'd argue in the majority of states a persons vote doesn't matter depending on your party affiliation.
Photo identification is not a federal voting law, sorry. If we've solved the larger issues our democratic process faces, I'd support a free voter ID requirement.
I think we typically have fruitful discussion but lately it seemed like you've been Calified
But please if everything else about the political system was fixed you would then Support voter ID?
Why would that be if its a bad thing now?
And remember what I said it's a straw man now for both sides, follow the money, or the votes or whatever.
WSS
-
Well I'm sure you meant that as an insult and that's your right.Not worked up at all but I don't think you are grasping my position. Based on voter turnout I'd say voting isn't sacred. Looking at the few swing states I'd argue in the majority of states a persons vote doesn't matter depending on your party affiliation.
Photo identification is not a federal voting law, sorry. If we've solved the larger issues our democratic process faces, I'd support a free voter ID requirement.
I think we typically have fruitful discussion but lately it seemed like you've been Calified
But please if everything else about the political system was fixed you would then Support voter ID?
Why would that be if its a bad thing now?
And remember what I said it's a straw man now for both sides, follow the money, or the votes or whatever.
WSS
Well I'm sure you meant that as an insult and that's your right.
But please if everything else about the political system was fixed you would then Support voter ID?
Why would that be if its a bad thing now?
And remember what I said it's a straw man now for both sides, follow the money, or the votes or whatever.
WSS
If everything was corrected in our political system I'd support voter ID. It is a costly endeavor but if would create less griping, I'm for it.
-
Well I'm sure you meant that as an insult and that's your right.
But please if everything else about the political system was fixed you would then Support voter ID?
Why would that be if its a bad thing now?
And remember what I said it's a straw man now for both sides, follow the money, or the votes or whatever.
WSS
If everything was corrected in our political system I'd support voter ID. It is a costly endeavor but if would create less griping, I'm for it.
If everything was corrected in our political system I'd support voter ID. It is a costly endeavor but if would create less griping, I'm for it.
Come on pal, we both know that it would not.
WSS
-
If everything was corrected in our political system I'd support voter ID. It is a costly endeavor but if would create less griping, I'm for it.
Come on pal, we both know that it would not.
WSS
Come on pal, we both know that it would not.
WSS
Of course it is.
Let's say the easiest way is to add an endorsement to the States' driver license or non-driver ID cards. The cost of producing documents will be in the hundreds of millions. You'd have to shorten driver license renewal periods and require those people to go into local DMV offices more often to update their photo. That increases the amount of workers needed at the local level and would increase state/local tax burden
http://www.timesunion.com/news/article/State-picks-high-bid-for-driver-s-licenses-4035353.php
Then there is hiring/training competent poll workers since an ID card isn't effective if there is no verification. You would have to staff local Board of Election offices with the equipment to spot a forged document whereas now you have volunteers from the community that earn a daily wage. You'd have toAbsentee ballots would have to be notarized, which incurs an individual cost. You'd also have to create a mechanism for quickly resolving disputes, so if I hand the inspector a driver license that shows me with hair and glass, however, I'm now bald with contacts.
It would cost more than you think
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login