Indians To Stop Using Chief Wahoo Logo In Their Uniforms in 2019
-
I'm having fun with you. Do you need a safe space or time out?
I'm having fun with you. Do you need a safe space or time out?
He needs his care bear...
-
I'm having fun with you. Do you need a safe space or time out?
He needs his care bear...
He needs his care bear...
Lol Shmuck SJWs and Shmuck safe spaces.
Long live Trump. Long live western civilization.
-
Lol Shmuck SJWs and Shmuck safe spaces.
Long live Trump. Long live western civilization.
Those last two sentences are oxymoronic.
-
Lol Shmuck SJWs and Shmuck safe spaces.
Long live Trump. Long live western civilization.
Those last two sentences are oxymoronic.
Those last two sentences are oxymoronic.
How so?
-
Those last two sentences are oxymoronic.
How so?
How so?
Trump, and civilized. You figure it out.
-
How so?
Trump, and civilized. You figure it out.
Trump, and civilized. You figure it out.
?? Your answer does nothing to prove your point. Do you have any facts to back up your opinion?
-
Trump, and civilized. You figure it out.
?? Your answer does nothing to prove your point. Do you have any facts to back up your opinion?
?? Your answer does nothing to prove your point. Do you have any facts to back up your opinion?
Jesus. Seriously?
-
I don't have as much as a problem of getting "rid of the wahoo logo" as I do "how we got rid of the wahoo logo".
Dolan did it ONLY because his boss (the comissioner) said he'd give us the allstar game.
And the problem is, is that when they see they can change things, they will constantly want more until you don't even have a right to free speech.
First they change team names, then columbus day, then you can't wear any halloween costume, you can't even be a bear for halloween because that's offensive to bears. You have to call everyone by their gender pronouns. Just because someone is offended doesn't give them the right to tell you how to act or what to do. I understand how they feel, and if the owner LEGIT wanted to do it, then why did he do it after the commissioner promised him the allstar game. Because he's a sellout and a pussy.
It’s an interesting argument, but here’s where the discrepancy is. Getting rid of Chief Wahoo does not equate to getting rid of free speech.
You or I can still buy a Chief Wahoo hat and wear it. Taking away free speech would be the government telling you you CANT wear a Chief Wahoo hat. No one is saying that.
You still have the right to express yourself and purchase and wear Chief Wahoo, even to the games.
On a side note:
How is the Cleveland Indians any different than the Cleveland Blacks?
It’s an interesting argument, but here’s where the discrepancy is. Getting rid of Chief Wahoo does not equate to getting rid of free speech.
You or I can still buy a Chief Wahoo hat and wear it. Taking away free speech would be the government telling you you CANT wear a Chief Wahoo hat. No one is saying that.
You still have the right to express yourself and purchase and wear Chief Wahoo, even to the games.
On a side note:
How is the Cleveland Indians any different than the Cleveland Blacks?
Did you really just ask that question and you're still going to claim you're not a PC guy? Okie dokie.
Also, I see you've now moved on to "this isn't a free speech violation" (something no one on this thread IIRC has argued anyway). Seriously, pick one and stick with it.
-
It’s an interesting argument, but here’s where the discrepancy is. Getting rid of Chief Wahoo does not equate to getting rid of free speech.
You or I can still buy a Chief Wahoo hat and wear it. Taking away free speech would be the government telling you you CANT wear a Chief Wahoo hat. No one is saying that.
You still have the right to express yourself and purchase and wear Chief Wahoo, even to the games.
On a side note:
How is the Cleveland Indians any different than the Cleveland Blacks?
Did you really just ask that question and you're still going to claim you're not a PC guy? Okie dokie.
Also, I see you've now moved on to "this isn't a free speech violation" (something no one on this thread IIRC has argued anyway). Seriously, pick one and stick with it.
Did you really just ask that question and you're still going to claim you're not a PC guy? Okie dokie.:
How is the Cleveland Indians any different than the Cleveland Blacks?
Also, I see you've now moved on to "this isn't a free speech violation" (something no one on this thread IIRC has argued anyway). Seriously, pick one and stick with it.
FYI....the Cleveland Browns ARE essentially the Cleveland "Blacks" or Cleveland Negroes if you want.....by one theory. That theory being that the Browns are named after Joe Louis....the Brown (as in brown skin) Bomber. Now....this theory's prime promotor was Paul Brown.....because he wanted to pretend the team was not named after him....so he came up with the Joe Louis thing. My only question, Paul, is if you wanted to name the team after Joe Louis, and not yourself...then why did you not name them the Bombers? Instead going for the Browns? The Bombers may have been a popular nickname...considering we just came out of WWII.
-
It’s an interesting argument, but here’s where the discrepancy is. Getting rid of Chief Wahoo does not equate to getting rid of free speech.
You or I can still buy a Chief Wahoo hat and wear it. Taking away free speech would be the government telling you you CANT wear a Chief Wahoo hat. No one is saying that.
You still have the right to express yourself and purchase and wear Chief Wahoo, even to the games.
On a side note:
How is the Cleveland Indians any different than the Cleveland Blacks?
Did you really just ask that question and you're still going to claim you're not a PC guy? Okie dokie.
Also, I see you've now moved on to "this isn't a free speech violation" (something no one on this thread IIRC has argued anyway). Seriously, pick one and stick with it.
Did you really just ask that question and you're still going to claim you're not a PC guy? Okie dokie.
Also, I see you've now moved on to "this isn't a free speech violation" (something no one on this thread IIRC has argued anyway). Seriously, pick one and stick with it.
Dude, the guy before me literally said it’s a free speech violation. Lol, do you even read?
No matter what I say, you’re going to twist it. At the end of the day, you lost. Just accept that Chief Wahoo is gone and move on
-
?? Your answer does nothing to prove your point. Do you have any facts to back up your opinion?
Jesus. Seriously?
Jesus. Seriously?
Absolutely. If it’s so obvious, why can’t you back up your claim?
Oh yeah, because it’s based on emotion and not facts.
-
Don't you have something else to contribute except Chief Wahoo? Are you a redskin?
-
Jesus. Seriously?
Absolutely. If it’s so obvious, why can’t you back up your claim?
Oh yeah, because it’s based on emotion and not facts.
Absolutely. If it’s so obvious, why can’t you back up your claim?
Oh yeah, because it’s based on emotion and not facts.
OK...here you go....just turn to any new media outlet in America....and you will have your information all day, every day. (except for a couple of the sychophantic ones).
-
Absolutely. If it’s so obvious, why can’t you back up your claim?
Oh yeah, because it’s based on emotion and not facts.
OK...here you go....just turn to any new media outlet in America....and you will have your information all day, every day. (except for a couple of the sychophantic ones).
OK...here you go....just turn to any new media outlet in America....and you will have your information all day, every day. (except for a couple of the sychophantic ones).
-
OK...here you go....just turn to any new media outlet in America....and you will have your information all day, every day. (except for a couple of the sychophantic ones).
Are you always gonna be this big of an idjit? (Likely, considering)
-
Are you always gonna be this big of an idjit? (Likely, considering)
Are you always gonna be this big of an idjit? (Likely, considering)
What specifically is idiotic about the contents of that video?
-
Are you always gonna be this big of an idjit? (Likely, considering)
What specifically is idiotic about the contents of that video?
What specifically is idiotic about the contents of that video?
I didn't bother to watch. It came from you...and that was enough for me to believe it was likely idiotic.
-
What specifically is idiotic about the contents of that video?
I didn't bother to watch. It came from you...and that was enough for me to believe it was likely idiotic.
I didn't bother to watch. It came from you...and that was enough for me to believe it was likely idiotic.
Lol the fact that you call me an idiot based on a video you didn’t even watch is so hilarious and ironic. Anyways, I don’t have time for this.
Lets bond through our love for the Browns, not bicker over the dichotomy of politics
-
I didn't bother to watch. It came from you...and that was enough for me to believe it was likely idiotic.
Lol the fact that you call me an idiot based on a video you didn’t even watch is so hilarious and ironic. Anyways, I don’t have time for this.
Lets bond through our love for the Browns, not bicker over the dichotomy of politics
Lol the fact that you call me an idiot based on a video you didn’t even watch is so hilarious and ironic. Anyways, I don’t have time for this.
Lets bond through our love for the Browns, not bicker over the dichotomy of politics
I never bickered. I gave you info and You just started acting like a dumb blond.....pretending like you have no clue.
-
Are you always gonna be this big of an idjit? (Likely, considering)
What specifically is idiotic about the contents of that video?
What specifically is idiotic about the contents of that video?
The claim that mainstream media is biased. That is idiotic. It is idiotic because those people only want to hear the news that that meets their OWN biased point of view. FACTS that show someone they are akin to in a bad light...are fake. Facts that tell the truth about the corruption of this administration is fake....even if it is true. Again.....anything and everything that you don't like or agree to is fake news.
Are mistakes made in reporting some of these facts? Certainly....nothing and no one is perfect. Is commentary based on current issues fake? Uhh, no....it is commentary. It is not news at all.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login