Tyrod Taylor A Brown
-
Interesting factoid...
The Liberal Browns @LiberalBrowns
@TyrodTaylor owns teams who sit in Zone coverage. Coincidentally, The Steelers & Bengals are both in the Top 3 for Zone usage... with the Ravens not too far behind. Dorsey's decision to trade for Tyrod was no mistake#Browns fans.#AnalyticsAreForNerds"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Interesting factoid...
The Liberal Browns @LiberalBrowns
@TyrodTaylor owns teams who sit in Zone coverage. Coincidentally, The Steelers & Bengals are both in the Top 3 for Zone usage... with the Ravens not too far behind. Dorsey's decision to trade for Tyrod was no mistake#Browns fans.#AnalyticsAreForNerdsInteresting factoid...
The Liberal Browns @LiberalBrowns
@TyrodTaylor owns teams who sit in Zone coverage. Coincidentally, The Steelers & Bengals are both in the Top 3 for Zone usage... with the Ravens not too far behind. Dorsey's decision to trade for Tyrod was no mistake#Browns fans.#AnalyticsAreForNerdsWhat does this mean? I think you have to flesh this out a bit.
-
Interesting factoid...
The Liberal Browns @LiberalBrowns
@TyrodTaylor owns teams who sit in Zone coverage. Coincidentally, The Steelers & Bengals are both in the Top 3 for Zone usage... with the Ravens not too far behind. Dorsey's decision to trade for Tyrod was no mistake#Browns fans.#AnalyticsAreForNerdsWhat does this mean? I think you have to flesh this out a bit.
What does this mean? I think you have to flesh this out a bit.
Tyrod has great production against Zone Coverage. Our AFC North rivals are among the very top users of zone coverage in the entire league.
Therefore, he appears to be a shrewd choice for Dorsey and the Browns.
Zombo
-
What does this mean? I think you have to flesh this out a bit.
Tyrod has great production against Zone Coverage. Our AFC North rivals are among the very top users of zone coverage in the entire league.
Therefore, he appears to be a shrewd choice for Dorsey and the Browns.
Zombo
Zombo said:
Tyrod has great production against Zone Coverage. Our AFC North rivals are among the very top users of zone coverage in the entire league.
Therefore, he appears to be a shrewd choice for Dorsey and the Browns.
Zombo
I got that much....I am just wondering about the statistics that bear that out.
-
This ought to help...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
-
What does this mean? I think you have to flesh this out a bit.
Tyrod has great production against Zone Coverage. Our AFC North rivals are among the very top users of zone coverage in the entire league.
Therefore, he appears to be a shrewd choice for Dorsey and the Browns.
Zombo
Zombo said:
Therefore, he appears to be a shrewd choice for Dorsey and the Browns.
Zombo
When's the last time we had any kind of real plan in "team building" with a purpose? not sure who opened who's eyes on Tyrod, from FO to coaches? but it's New..Now to get a roster built with similar planning. Than a coaching staff, preparing their team to weaknesses from weekly game film of opponents..We may just surprise ourselves into finishing some games..a lot to like here..(good find tour)
-
If we are forced to sign TT to an extension, then we drafted the wrong QB.
Well it took Rodgers 3 years to be ready to take over at GB, so an extension may very well be in order.
-
Well it took Rodgers 3 years to be ready to take over at GB, so an extension may very well be in order.
More like it took Favre three years to get out of the way.
There's no indication that Rodgers needed to wait one year let alone 3.
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Well it took Rodgers 3 years to be ready to take over at GB, so an extension may very well be in order.
More like it took Favre three years to get out of the way.
There's no indication that Rodgers needed to wait one year let alone 3.
More like it took Favre three years to get out of the way.
There's no indication that Rodgers needed to wait one year let alone 3.
Nevertheless how many times have the Browns rushed in QBs who were not really ready? And if TT is playing well, why not extend him? It's not like he's Brady's age.
-
More like it took Favre three years to get out of the way.
There's no indication that Rodgers needed to wait one year let alone 3.
Nevertheless how many times have the Browns rushed in QBs who were not really ready? And if TT is playing well, why not extend him? It's not like he's Brady's age.
And if TT is playing well, why not extend him?
Because we are at the end of the bridge... or should be.
Don't get me wrong, if Tyrod is cheap enough I'd consider him, but I don't think he'll be "cheap". He'll be in that 2nd tier $15mm-ish per year area and still want to start.
-
More like it took Favre three years to get out of the way.
There's no indication that Rodgers needed to wait one year let alone 3.
Nevertheless how many times have the Browns rushed in QBs who were not really ready? And if TT is playing well, why not extend him? It's not like he's Brady's age.
Nevertheless how many times have the Browns rushed in QBs who were not really ready? And if TT is playing well, why not extend him? It's not like he's Brady's age.
Browns fans were very loudly clamouring for Jonny with a 7-4 record, I was in the stadium at the time and heard it first hand.
You draft a QB at #1 and you start 2-4/2-5 the fans will be demanding you play him. Bank it.
-
Nevertheless how many times have the Browns rushed in QBs who were not really ready? And if TT is playing well, why not extend him? It's not like he's Brady's age.
Browns fans were very loudly clamouring for Jonny with a 7-4 record, I was in the stadium at the time and heard it first hand.
You draft a QB at #1 and you start 2-4/2-5 the fans will be demanding you play him. Bank it.
Browns fans were very loudly clamouring for Jonny with a 7-4 record, I was in the stadium at the time and heard it first hand.
You draft a QB at #1 and you start 2-4/2-5 the fans will be demanding you play him. Bank it.
actually the phrase is "book it" or you could have said "you can take that to the bank" just trying to help man
-
Nevertheless how many times have the Browns rushed in QBs who were not really ready? And if TT is playing well, why not extend him? It's not like he's Brady's age.
Browns fans were very loudly clamouring for Jonny with a 7-4 record, I was in the stadium at the time and heard it first hand.
You draft a QB at #1 and you start 2-4/2-5 the fans will be demanding you play him. Bank it.
Browns fans were very loudly clamouring for Jonny with a 7-4 record, I was in the stadium at the time and heard it first hand.
You draft a QB at #1 and you start 2-4/2-5 the fans will be demanding you play him. Bank it.
Shmuck the fans. 90% of them WANTED Johnny.
-
Browns fans were very loudly clamouring for Jonny with a 7-4 record, I was in the stadium at the time and heard it first hand.
You draft a QB at #1 and you start 2-4/2-5 the fans will be demanding you play him. Bank it.
Shmuck the fans. 90% of them WANTED Johnny.
Shmuck the fans. 90% of them WANTED Johnny.
Silly gooses, all of them.
They probably were the same fans who wanted the Browns to use the #3 overall pick on Troy Smith.
-
Silly gooses, all of them.
They probably were the same fans who wanted the Browns to use the #3 overall pick on Troy Smith.
Can't hate them for that. I wanted Troy. Granted not first round but I liked him more than Brady. A Cleveland boy that wanted to stay home and wasn't an off field distraction? Yes please.
-
Browns fans were very loudly clamouring for Jonny with a 7-4 record, I was in the stadium at the time and heard it first hand.
You draft a QB at #1 and you start 2-4/2-5 the fans will be demanding you play him. Bank it.
Shmuck the fans. 90% of them WANTED Johnny.
Shmuck the fans. 90% of them WANTED Johnny.
Happy to say I was in the minority...
Silly gooses, all of them.
They probably were the same fans who wanted the Browns to use the #3 overall pick on Troy Smith.
Or the the guys who say Saquon at #1, or worse- don't take QB at all this year in the first round.
-
Silly gooses, all of them.
They probably were the same fans who wanted the Browns to use the #3 overall pick on Troy Smith.
Can't hate them for that. I wanted Troy. Granted not first round but I liked him more than Brady. A Cleveland boy that wanted to stay home and wasn't an off field distraction? Yes please.
Can't hate them for that. I wanted Troy. Granted not first round but I liked him more than Brady. A Cleveland boy that wanted to stay home and wasn't an off field distraction? Yes please.
Not sure where you are coming up with Troy vs. Brady. Brady was drafted in 2000.....7 years before Troy came out.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login