Our Trading GM ....The Dorse
-
I think the one thing I had wrong this offseason is Linebacker. I think they REALLY value Genard Avery, and I think Kirkseys leadership and ability registers higher than I thought.
I expected a bigger turnover/addition.
Z
Zombo said:
I think the one thing I had wrong this offseason is Linebacker. I think they REALLY value Genard Avery, and I think Kirkseys leadership and ability registers higher than I thought.
I expected a bigger turnover/addition.
Z
I think your right..If were talking Chad Thomas/Smith/Avery getting more reps? Vernon has no issue lining up at linebacker either..Any of them.Giants did.The LB Dorse picked up from TB, ain't no joker either. Let's Move to Simmons..Only 2 teams with Pro Day & Private meeting equals Browns & Colts. Private only-TB(PICKS-#5 & 2.7)/KC(29)/Colts(26 &2.2)/Mia.(13 & 2.16)/Oak.(4-24-27 & 2.3)/Sea.(21)/Texans(23)/Vikings (18)..2 additional teams just showed at Pro Day/ Eagles(25) & Jags (7 & 2.6)..Combined teams keeping picks would have to pass on Simmons 17 times that had visits..before the Browns pick at #49..I just don't see that happening with Simmons on field talents..and Simmons may not even be the name on the card with Dorsey
-
Dorsey has put together a team that has depth. Year in, year out, half decent starter gets hurt, no quality backup. Now we have second teamers that could be starters on other teams.
-
Dorsey has put together a team that has depth. Year in, year out, half decent starter gets hurt, no quality backup. Now we have second teamers that could be starters on other teams.
Dorsey has put together a team that has depth. Year in, year out, half decent starter gets hurt, no quality backup. Now we have second teamers that could be starters on other teams.
Hopefully we don't have to find that out for certain this year. I prefer not to test your theory.??
-
Dorsey has put together a team that has depth. Year in, year out, half decent starter gets hurt, no quality backup. Now we have second teamers that could be starters on other teams.
Hopefully we don't have to find that out for certain this year. I prefer not to test your theory.??
Hopefully we don't have to find that out for certain this year. I prefer not to test your theory.??
Every year every team deals with injuries. If you have depth of talent, you’re in pretty good shape. Our team has been the model for otherwise
-
Hopefully we don't have to find that out for certain this year. I prefer not to test your theory.??
Every year every team deals with injuries. If you have depth of talent, you’re in pretty good shape. Our team has been the model for otherwise
Every year every team deals with injuries. If you have depth of talent, you’re in pretty good shape. Our team has been the model for otherwise
True but every year a team that should have gone deep in the playoffs does not because of too many key injuries and a team or two with none gets there despite the odds going in. I want us to be the latter.
-
Every year every team deals with injuries. If you have depth of talent, you’re in pretty good shape. Our team has been the model for otherwise
True but every year a team that should have gone deep in the playoffs does not because of too many key injuries and a team or two with none gets there despite the odds going in. I want us to be the latter.
True but every year a team that should have gone deep in the playoffs does not because of too many key injuries and a team or two with none gets there despite the odds going in. I want us to be the latter.
True but? Lol
-
Dorsey has put together a team that has depth. Year in, year out, half decent starter gets hurt, no quality backup. Now we have second teamers that could be starters on other teams.
Now we have second teamers that could be starters on other teams.
We do?
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Every year every team deals with injuries. If you have depth of talent, you’re in pretty good shape. Our team has been the model for otherwise
True but every year a team that should have gone deep in the playoffs does not because of too many key injuries and a team or two with none gets there despite the odds going in. I want us to be the latter.
True but every year a team that should have gone deep in the playoffs does not because of too many key injuries and a team or two with none gets there despite the odds going in. I want us to be the latter.
I've pointed out before, not necessarily making the playoffs, but costing you a bunch of wins. Living in Bengal territory- I'll posit some of their poor record was due to the rash of injuries they had. Eifert was out nearly the entire year, Dalton and AJ Green essentially missed 1\2 the season. How would the Browns do if the same happened to Baker, Landry, and Njoku?
Now some of the following stats are skewed with non-contributors on both teams sitting out the entire season so take it FWIW.
Looking at pro football reference the Bengals had an astounding 250+ player\games missed either due to "out" or "IR". https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/cin/2018_injuries.htm
By comparison the Browns were around 200 https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/cle/2018_injuries.htm
-
Now we have second teamers that could be starters on other teams.
We do?
-
Yes, that’s what I wrote.
I thought maybe you had some examples you might like to share...
"When you have a shared vision it is a lot easier to make unpopular decisions." - Paul DePodesta "When you win, say nothing. When you lose, say less." - Paul Brown Complete 2017 Browns Board Mock: http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=46196 -
Yes, that’s what I wrote.
I thought maybe you had some examples you might like to share...
-
our businessmen don't wear suits... https://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000001027372/article/nfl-gm-power-rankings-john-dorsey-kevin-colbert-rank-top-5 thanks Sashi !
-
Adam SchefterVerified account @AdamSchefter 20m20 minutes ago
Adam Schefter@AdamSchefterAt No. 31, the Rams already have received calls from teams interested in trading into the back of the first round, per sources. Teams value getting the fifth-year option in the contract’s of first-round picks, and the back of the draft tonight is likely to be fluid and busy.MoreAt No. 31, the Rams already have received calls from teams interested in trading into the back of the first round, per sources. Teams value getting the fifth-year option in the contract’s of first-round picks, and the back of the draft tonight is likely to be fluid and busy.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login