Skip to content

Coughlin out in Jville

The Browns Board
45 14 1.1k
  • U Unsympathetic wrote on last edited by
    #6

    Coughlin is not even remotely useful as an executive.  He was forced into trading one of the best CB's, ramsey.  JAX can also thank him for the next several millions of dollars thrown into the air and burned in the general direction of Nick Foles.

    And he let Robinson go. And he signed Norwell. And he wasted way too much time on Bortles.

    Fun fact: Over 25% of all NFLPA player grievances came just from JAX.

  • Coughlin is not even remotely useful as an executive.  He was forced into trading one of the best CB's, ramsey.  JAX can also thank him for the next several millions of dollars thrown into the air and burned in the general direction of Nick Foles.

    And he let Robinson go. And he signed Norwell. And he wasted way too much time on Bortles.

    Fun fact: Over 25% of all NFLPA player grievances came just from JAX.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #7

    @unsympathetic said:

    Coughlin is not even remotely useful as an executive.  He was forced into trading one of the best CB's, ramsey.  JAX can also thank him for the next several millions of dollars thrown into the air and burned in the general direction of Nick Foles.

    And he let Robinson go. And he signed Norwell. And he wasted way too much time on Bortles.

    Fun fact: Over 25% of all NFLPA player grievances came just from JAX.

    And that latter fact is what got the union to tell its players not to go there.    

  • @unsympathetic said:

    Coughlin is not even remotely useful as an executive.  He was forced into trading one of the best CB's, ramsey.  JAX can also thank him for the next several millions of dollars thrown into the air and burned in the general direction of Nick Foles.

    And he let Robinson go. And he signed Norwell. And he wasted way too much time on Bortles.

    Fun fact: Over 25% of all NFLPA player grievances came just from JAX.

    And that latter fact is what got the union to tell its players not to go there.    

    Dutch OvenD Dutch Oven wrote on last edited by
    #8

    @the-gipper said:

    And that latter fact is what got the union to tell its players not to go there.    

    Yikes.

    I can't believe that team is still in Jacksonville. What were the cities that lost out on getting that expansion team? 

  • @the-gipper said:

    And that latter fact is what got the union to tell its players not to go there.    

    Yikes.

    I can't believe that team is still in Jacksonville. What were the cities that lost out on getting that expansion team? 

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #9

    @dutch-oven said:

    Yikes.

    I can't believe that team is still in Jacksonville. What were the cities that lost out on getting that expansion team? 

    There were 5 cities bidding:   Baltimore was one...and, of course, later, they got Modell to try to move there.  St. Louis....which did get the Rams, but has since lost them...   And Memphis......where the Oilers originally played when they left Houston, but their bid was usurped by Nashville ultimately getting the Oilers.     

    And JAX and Charlotte, which were chosen.

  • @dutch-oven said:

    Yikes.

    I can't believe that team is still in Jacksonville. What were the cities that lost out on getting that expansion team? 

    There were 5 cities bidding:   Baltimore was one...and, of course, later, they got Modell to try to move there.  St. Louis....which did get the Rams, but has since lost them...   And Memphis......where the Oilers originally played when they left Houston, but their bid was usurped by Nashville ultimately getting the Oilers.     

    And JAX and Charlotte, which were chosen.

    I Icecube wrote on last edited by
    #10

    @the-gipper said:

    There were 5 cities bidding:   Baltimore was one...and, of course, later, they got Modell to try to move there.  St. Louis....which did get the Rams, but has since lost them...   And Memphis......where the Oilers originally played when they left Houston, but their bid was usurped by Nashville ultimately getting the Oilers.     

    And JAX and Charlotte, which were chosen.

    Jville has not been a bad NFL city. Like anywhere, when they win, they get fans to show. 

  • @the-gipper said:

    There were 5 cities bidding:   Baltimore was one...and, of course, later, they got Modell to try to move there.  St. Louis....which did get the Rams, but has since lost them...   And Memphis......where the Oilers originally played when they left Houston, but their bid was usurped by Nashville ultimately getting the Oilers.     

    And JAX and Charlotte, which were chosen.

    Jville has not been a bad NFL city. Like anywhere, when they win, they get fans to show. 

    hoortaH hoorta wrote on last edited by
    #11

    @icecube said:

    Jville has not been a bad NFL city. Like anywhere, when they win, they get fans to show. 

    And when they don't win- remember the tarps covering the upper levels? MHO is Jacksonville should never have gotten a franchise in the first place, too small a market. Not with Tampa and Miami already NFL cities in Florida. Unfortunately, I believe they have a Cleveland level poison pill stadium lease, meaning relocating them would be difficult if not impossible in the near future.  

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #12

    Well, the home situation in Jax is such that they have contracted to play at least one or two games each year in London.

  • @icecube said:

    Jville has not been a bad NFL city. Like anywhere, when they win, they get fans to show. 

    And when they don't win- remember the tarps covering the upper levels? MHO is Jacksonville should never have gotten a franchise in the first place, too small a market. Not with Tampa and Miami already NFL cities in Florida. Unfortunately, I believe they have a Cleveland level poison pill stadium lease, meaning relocating them would be difficult if not impossible in the near future.  

    I Icecube wrote on last edited by
    #13

    @hoorta said:

    And when they don't win- remember the tarps covering the upper levels? MHO is Jacksonville should never have gotten a franchise in the first place, too small a market. Not with Tampa and Miami already NFL cities in Florida. Unfortunately, I believe they have a Cleveland level poison pill stadium lease, meaning relocating them would be difficult if not impossible in the near future.  

    But you think Pitt deserves an NFL team, right? Every year Jville gets more fans to go to games than the Steelers do. So now what? 

    Oh, and guess who outdrew the Browns that last full season on record? Oh that's right,  the Jags out -pulled the Browns in 2018. So should we remove

    the Browns out of Cleveland again. Basing it on what you assert, it's time to move the Browns to London; Jville fills more seats than Cleveland does. 

    https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2018/attendance.htm

  • @the-gipper said:

    And that latter fact is what got the union to tell its players not to go there.    

    Yikes.

    I can't believe that team is still in Jacksonville. What were the cities that lost out on getting that expansion team? 

    I Icecube wrote on last edited by
    #14

    @dutch-oven said:

    Yikes.

    I can't believe that team is still in Jacksonville. What were the cities that lost out on getting that expansion team? 

    https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2018/attendance.htm

  • Coughlin is not even remotely useful as an executive.  He was forced into trading one of the best CB's, ramsey.  JAX can also thank him for the next several millions of dollars thrown into the air and burned in the general direction of Nick Foles.

    And he let Robinson go. And he signed Norwell. And he wasted way too much time on Bortles.

    Fun fact: Over 25% of all NFLPA player grievances came just from JAX.

    I Icecube wrote on last edited by
    #15

    @unsympathetic said:

    Coughlin is not even remotely useful as an executive.  He was forced into trading one of the best CB's, ramsey.  JAX can also thank him for the next several millions of dollars thrown into the air and burned in the general direction of Nick Foles.

    And he let Robinson go. And he signed Norwell. And he wasted way too much time on Bortles.

    Fun fact: Over 25% of all NFLPA player grievances came just from JAX.

    Now, with the facts coming out, it is beyond obvious Tom had to go. His Nazi level fining players was so over-the-top. 

  • @hoorta said:

    And when they don't win- remember the tarps covering the upper levels? MHO is Jacksonville should never have gotten a franchise in the first place, too small a market. Not with Tampa and Miami already NFL cities in Florida. Unfortunately, I believe they have a Cleveland level poison pill stadium lease, meaning relocating them would be difficult if not impossible in the near future.  

    But you think Pitt deserves an NFL team, right? Every year Jville gets more fans to go to games than the Steelers do. So now what? 

    Oh, and guess who outdrew the Browns that last full season on record? Oh that's right,  the Jags out -pulled the Browns in 2018. So should we remove

    the Browns out of Cleveland again. Basing it on what you assert, it's time to move the Browns to London; Jville fills more seats than Cleveland does. 

    https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2018/attendance.htm

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #16

    @icecube said:

    But you think Pitt deserves an NFL team, right? Every year Jville gets more fans to go to games than the Steelers do. So now what? 

    Oh, and guess who outdrew the Browns that last full season on record? Oh that's right,  the Jags out -pulled the Browns in 2018. So should we remove

    the Browns out of Cleveland again. Basing it on what you assert, it's time to move the Browns to London; Jville fills more seats than Cleveland does. 

    https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2018/attendance.htm

    And by that same link, both had more attendance than Pittsburgh did.   Or the Washington Redskins.  A lot of that depends on the capacity of the stadiums they play in....home and road.  Cowboys have a 90K stadium.   Others have capacities that are only 50-60K.   I mean, the Jags were #10 overall per your link.  That does not make them the 10th most popular team in the league.

  • The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #17

    Browns stadium is only ranked 20th in the NFL in capacity:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_current_National_Football_League_stadiums

    Remember also, that next year there will be 2 new stadiums in the league:   Vegas/LA.

  • Bob806B Bob806 wrote on last edited by
    #18

    The Patriots should be punished and moved to London for two years for the Spygate 2 crime.

    Have Kraft pay for the season ticket holders flights and lodging. 

    Now that would be a punishment. Losing a draft pick and a million bucks isn't going to make a difference in their ways.

  • @icecube said:

    But you think Pitt deserves an NFL team, right? Every year Jville gets more fans to go to games than the Steelers do. So now what? 

    Oh, and guess who outdrew the Browns that last full season on record? Oh that's right,  the Jags out -pulled the Browns in 2018. So should we remove

    the Browns out of Cleveland again. Basing it on what you assert, it's time to move the Browns to London; Jville fills more seats than Cleveland does. 

    https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2018/attendance.htm

    And by that same link, both had more attendance than Pittsburgh did.   Or the Washington Redskins.  A lot of that depends on the capacity of the stadiums they play in....home and road.  Cowboys have a 90K stadium.   Others have capacities that are only 50-60K.   I mean, the Jags were #10 overall per your link.  That does not make them the 10th most popular team in the league.

    I Icecube wrote on last edited by
    #19

    @the-gipper said:

    And by that same link, both had more attendance than Pittsburgh did.   Or the Washington Redskins.  A lot of that depends on the capacity of the stadiums they play in....home and road.  Cowboys have a 90K stadium.   Others have capacities that are only 50-60K.   I mean, the Jags were #10 overall per your link.  That does not make them the 10th most popular team in the league.

    No but it does dispel the myth that they don't have support. 

  • @the-gipper said:

    And by that same link, both had more attendance than Pittsburgh did.   Or the Washington Redskins.  A lot of that depends on the capacity of the stadiums they play in....home and road.  Cowboys have a 90K stadium.   Others have capacities that are only 50-60K.   I mean, the Jags were #10 overall per your link.  That does not make them the 10th most popular team in the league.

    No but it does dispel the myth that they don't have support. 

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #20

    @icecube said:

    No but it does dispel the myth that they don't have support. 

    List average home attendance...that would be better than total attendance.

  • jrb12711J jrb12711 wrote on last edited by
    #21

    I think everyone should use this as the prime example of “tough guy” football coaching and leadership is over. Coughlin Tried to old school kick trash cans over type leadership with the Jags and he blew the whole thing up and had a literal mutiny as a result.

    gotta find that middle ground.

  • @the-gipper said:

    And by that same link, both had more attendance than Pittsburgh did.   Or the Washington Redskins.  A lot of that depends on the capacity of the stadiums they play in....home and road.  Cowboys have a 90K stadium.   Others have capacities that are only 50-60K.   I mean, the Jags were #10 overall per your link.  That does not make them the 10th most popular team in the league.

    No but it does dispel the myth that they don't have support. 

    hish747H hish747 wrote on last edited by
    #22

    @icecube said:

    No but it does dispel the myth that they don't have support. 

    Well, Jacksonville is the largest city in the US so that would account for a lot of support I would think.

  • The Patriots should be punished and moved to London for two years for the Spygate 2 crime.

    Have Kraft pay for the season ticket holders flights and lodging. 

    Now that would be a punishment. Losing a draft pick and a million bucks isn't going to make a difference in their ways.

    mjp28M mjp28 wrote on last edited by
    #23

    @bob806 said:

    The Patriots should be punished and moved to London for two years for the Spygate 2 crime.

    Have Kraft pay for the season ticket holders flights and lodging. 

    Now that would be a punishment. Losing a draft pick and a million bucks isn't going to make a difference in their ways.

    Relocate them to Jacksonville.

  • @icecube said:

    No but it does dispel the myth that they don't have support. 

    Well, Jacksonville is the largest city in the US so that would account for a lot of support I would think.

    The GipperT The Gipper wrote on last edited by
    #24

    @hish747 said:

    Well, Jacksonville is the largest city in the US so that would account for a lot of support I would think.

    Actually there are several cities in Alaska that are larger area wise than Jacksonville 

  • @hoorta said:

    And when they don't win- remember the tarps covering the upper levels? MHO is Jacksonville should never have gotten a franchise in the first place, too small a market. Not with Tampa and Miami already NFL cities in Florida. Unfortunately, I believe they have a Cleveland level poison pill stadium lease, meaning relocating them would be difficult if not impossible in the near future.  

    But you think Pitt deserves an NFL team, right? Every year Jville gets more fans to go to games than the Steelers do. So now what? 

    Oh, and guess who outdrew the Browns that last full season on record? Oh that's right,  the Jags out -pulled the Browns in 2018. So should we remove

    the Browns out of Cleveland again. Basing it on what you assert, it's time to move the Browns to London; Jville fills more seats than Cleveland does. 

    https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2018/attendance.htm

    bjh2130B bjh2130 wrote on last edited by bjh2130
    #25

    @icecube said:

    But you think Pitt deserves an NFL team, right? Every year Jville gets more fans to go to games than the Steelers do. So now what? 

    Oh, and guess who outdrew the Browns that last full season on record? Oh that's right,  the Jags out -pulled the Browns in 2018. So should we remove

    the Browns out of Cleveland again. Basing it on what you assert, it's time to move the Browns to London; Jville fills more seats than Cleveland does. 

    https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2018/attendance.htm

    Is that including their "home game" in London where they drew 85k?  That right there is 18k more than the browns stadium holds which pulls them within 8k.  Not too mention their stadium holds 15k more than the browns. So they had the opportunity to have 123k more fans attended their games yet only out did there browns by 26k in home numbers. Lastly I believe hoorta was pointing out when they  don't have a winning team (and the previous year they went to the conference champ) they don't draw. Even when they win they don't sell out lol. Granted they didn't have a great year last year but season tickets are bought in advance of the season and those numbers go off tickets sold not actually people in building. The tarps he is referencing is what makes it go from an 82k stadium to a 67k stadium. 

    Seeing as how they have an opportunity to get more fans let's talk percentage of stadium filled. 81.3% for jags (not including London game because that's not a home game) 96.8% for the browns.