The Official Browns at Patriots Game 8 Thread
-
I like Kevin. We will do worse IMO with a replacement. He will be HC in the league if he’s out of a job.
You can’t win with a limited QB, two twin turnstiles for some of the year and the worst collection of WRs in the NFL. There is no scheme or game plan to work around that.
Having said that. I hated the Ken Dorsey move last year.
-
I think the analytics were wrong on Gabriel and the football guys were right. I'm sure he has a high football IQ, but not the physical traits to be an NFL QB at least not enough to overcome his size.
Sanders doesn't have the IQ, and has showed F tier pocket presence in pre season. The season is dead but at least there's next year.
I think it makes sense to give Gabriel the jets and then give sanders some games, evaluate what you got.
I think the analytics were wrong on Gabriel and the football guys were right. I'm sure he has a high football IQ, but not the physical traits to be an NFL QB at least not enough to overcome his size.
Sanders doesn't have the IQ, and has showed F tier pocket presence in pre season. The season is dead but at least there's next year.
I think it makes sense to give Gabriel the jets and then give sanders some games, evaluate what you got.
Gilbert was a Stefanski pick, they were tricked by Fools gold of an Oregon system QB. I read a quote where he said "besides the height what isn't great about this guy?". They apparently disliked Sanders because he took to many sacks but Gabriel has proven to be a disaster. As long time Browns fans we can spot bad QB play from a mile away, this sample size is big enough to move onto Sanders and see if he can offer anything. Sanders played pretty well in the Panthers game, the Rams game was a disaster but he didn't turn the ball over in preseason unlike Gabriel.
-
My first video from before the season kicked in.
Some strong foreshadowing.
-
My first video from before the season kicked in.
Foreshadowing:
Yep and I stayed to the end. You're welcome. I had no trouble whatsoever following along. I have no idea what cal's problem is following it. And I'm older than he.?
-
Yep and I stayed to the end.
Thank you... for your service?
-
I think the analytics were wrong on Gabriel and the football guys were right. I'm sure he has a high football IQ, but not the physical traits to be an NFL QB at least not enough to overcome his size.
Sanders doesn't have the IQ, and has showed F tier pocket presence in pre season. The season is dead but at least there's next year.
I think it makes sense to give Gabriel the jets and then give sanders some games, evaluate what you got.
I think the analytics were wrong on Gabriel and the football guys were right. I'm sure he has a high football IQ, but not the physical traits to be an NFL QB at least not enough to overcome his size.
Sanders doesn't have the IQ, and has showed F tier pocket presence in pre season. The season is dead but at least there's next year.
I think it makes sense to give Gabriel the jets and then give sanders some games, evaluate what you got.
I'm not a big Shadeur fan... But at this point.. Anyone with simple observation can see Shrimp boy doesn't have it.. He might be smart , high football IQ.. But physically... He cannot drive the ball or hit the deep out with crisp consistency.. At this point I just want to see if Shadeur can ignite the team at least with a false sense of energy and hope for the offense even if it is temporary... But in reality.. I'm not far off for tanking for Mendoza/Klubnik and the best WR in the draft.. then just taking O lineman with the rest of the pics.. And I'm ready to move on from Kevin.. 6 years is long enough... Both sides need a fresh start... That's just my honest opinion.. Right or wrong..
-
Aren't you in NC? Get your Goat was something I heard that shit all the time growing up as a kid in the Carolinas.
I'm on the North Coast, my guy. I lived in noVA for a few years though.
1) I get Watson saddled this team down hard, and not unlike Tua in Miami right now you have to play the guy who is earning that level of cheddar. But your points are all circling to my central thought around all this- has Kevin's scheme, offensive philosophy, and talent evaluation (which I'm overtly including the GM, etc in that) run it's course? Has the process gotten stale to the point where even if we had more solid play making, would it show in the record?
Kevin's offensive philosophy isn't all that dissimilar to a lot of what Shanny and KoC do.
- He's a zone blocking disciple
- Effectively run on vertical, iso, duo, and power concepts.
- Generate explosive runs on outside zones and pin & Pull
- Setup the misdirection and vertical passing game off the running game.
These things don't require spectacular players. But they do require a mix of starting and NFL average talent to execute.
Right now we lack either of those for the QB spot and 40% of the OL. That's no small deficiency when you're in a league of the finest football players on earth. If I said 40% of the workforce at, wherever your job is, wasn't up to standard, there would be a company wide issue, no?
2) A la Shanny- I've never been to suggest Kevin deserves a short leash. It's apparent that this squad blows and sucked last year as well. But to your point, there has to at least be something there, IMO, that shows a coach is getting the most out of the roster they do have.
I think seeing this team be competitive against a squad that might win the AFCE for 2.5 quarters, and should have walked into halftime with a lead, sort of speaks to that answer.
The issue is squeezing blood from a rock. The opening and sometimes 2nd drives are solid and demonstrating sound game planning and scouting by the offensive coaching staff. But the adjustments don't just happen at halftime. They happen usually in between drives. Once the Patriots Defense settled in after some well designed plays that put them on their heels, then their talent across the board trumped our ability to execute bread and butter offensive staples.
I know @calfoxwc likes to say dumb shit like "draw up plays to confuse the defense"... Stefanski did early, and it worked. But that isn't something you can do and live by every snap. It isn't realistic. We couldn't win on our weakside iso, we couldn't win on outside zone, and they sat all over high percentage concepts after the 1st qtr. We just don't have the horses to counter adjust. This has been the theme across entire position groups for multiple years - OL, WR's, Dline, LB's...
Like, hard to watch flat. Vrabel said it best -when the trick plays ran out, we could stop them.
Circle back around to my comment above. When you don't have the guys to win their individual assignments, you have to get "gimmicky" and reach deep into the bag. But that is not a stable, consistent offense. Once you put a lid on it, the offensive efficiency has to be leaned on. We can't be efficient for a lack of personnel.
It's a tired record, one I know people don't *WANT* to hear, but it's the truth. The problem is fans somehow expecting the same results week to week with a roster imbalance. What this team can do is incredibly limited to our opponents abilities and roster strength. You can run all over Miami, but you can't against New England. As such, the rest of the machine suffers.
I think Stefanski did an incredible job of this in 2023, but the last two years have been an absolute disaster. Scoring more than 20 points 4 times in the last 25+ games is an absolutely brutal call to this.
So the question becomes at the broad level- is this truly a talent problem, or is Kevin's evolution as an offensive mind running dry? Does, as I've mentioned, need to be recalibrated with a fresh start somewhere else? I want to make it clear that I'm not overtly on one side of the fence or the other (although my feet are probably dangling on the parting of ways).
I think Tommy Rees is something of that "recalibration" I've seen fresh concepts and things brought to this offense. I detailed that in my youtube analysis of Gabriel in the pre-season. But with that, there's only so far that these new installs will take you once they're out there for defenses to dissect and prepare for.
What I really can't get over in the immediate is that Dillon was his guy. It may end up coming out that the plan all along was to draft him as a high level back-up (Chase Daniels) type, punt this season, and God willing get the dude next year. It would be prudent to do that, candidly, given the Watson contract and draft capital. But when you have a dude out there who is dead last in YPA, air yards per throw, and 2nd to last in QBR (and essentially dead last) in an extended sample size, knowing that's the dude you reached for? Not ideal.
Agreed almost entirely. I think Stef goes to bat for his guys and won't throw people under the bus like how Hue or Pat Shurmur would. That's how you lose your locker room. But I'm not sold that Stefanski made Gabriel "his guy". You traditionally have a "coaches pick" every season, and I'm sure Stef has stepped up to claim Gabriel, in a respect. But I don't believe he poured over every single game for 2+ seasons and went "this is our guy either 1a or 2b". And if I'm wrong, then Stef may be a fine coach, but a great evaluator of talent he is not. And there's nothing wrong with that, but you can't have a coach having his pick once a year if it blows.
My fear was Gabriel was an overreach. By my estimate 2 rounds. That looks more and more the case every week.
Lastly, funny enough? The Browns in the initial rankings of Madden 25 the Browns were only slightly considered worse than Buffalo (88 to 87), and above both Detroit and New England: https://www.gamesradar.com/games/madden-nfl/madden-25-best-teams/. Makes you think-
Paper Tiger. Everyone looks great on X's and O's until the real bullets start flying. I'd be curious what that rating is now. Not that it really means much.
The issue is squeezing blood from a rock
“I love him. I think he’s a great QB. We can’t ask him to dropback 70-80% of the time because that’s a lot on him. That’s a lot on anyone,” Teller said.
.....Well then Wyatt, you OLinemen have to get guys blocked so we can run the ball. Judkins isn't any wimp runner...and he can't get any yards when given the ball. Giving the RB a ton of carries without getting any production cannot be justified.
We did not match up well with the Patriots. They were strong against the run. Like any other team, they were going to load up against the run and know that they couldn't be beaten by a passing game consisting of a rookie midget QB and Practice Squad receivers.
To expect anything other than what happened offensively against the Patriots is like expecting to squeeze blood from a rock.
-
Aren't you in NC? Get your Goat was something I heard that shit all the time growing up as a kid in the Carolinas.
I'm on the North Coast, my guy. I lived in noVA for a few years though.
1) I get Watson saddled this team down hard, and not unlike Tua in Miami right now you have to play the guy who is earning that level of cheddar. But your points are all circling to my central thought around all this- has Kevin's scheme, offensive philosophy, and talent evaluation (which I'm overtly including the GM, etc in that) run it's course? Has the process gotten stale to the point where even if we had more solid play making, would it show in the record?
Kevin's offensive philosophy isn't all that dissimilar to a lot of what Shanny and KoC do.
- He's a zone blocking disciple
- Effectively run on vertical, iso, duo, and power concepts.
- Generate explosive runs on outside zones and pin & Pull
- Setup the misdirection and vertical passing game off the running game.
These things don't require spectacular players. But they do require a mix of starting and NFL average talent to execute.
Right now we lack either of those for the QB spot and 40% of the OL. That's no small deficiency when you're in a league of the finest football players on earth. If I said 40% of the workforce at, wherever your job is, wasn't up to standard, there would be a company wide issue, no?
2) A la Shanny- I've never been to suggest Kevin deserves a short leash. It's apparent that this squad blows and sucked last year as well. But to your point, there has to at least be something there, IMO, that shows a coach is getting the most out of the roster they do have.
I think seeing this team be competitive against a squad that might win the AFCE for 2.5 quarters, and should have walked into halftime with a lead, sort of speaks to that answer.
The issue is squeezing blood from a rock. The opening and sometimes 2nd drives are solid and demonstrating sound game planning and scouting by the offensive coaching staff. But the adjustments don't just happen at halftime. They happen usually in between drives. Once the Patriots Defense settled in after some well designed plays that put them on their heels, then their talent across the board trumped our ability to execute bread and butter offensive staples.
I know @calfoxwc likes to say dumb shit like "draw up plays to confuse the defense"... Stefanski did early, and it worked. But that isn't something you can do and live by every snap. It isn't realistic. We couldn't win on our weakside iso, we couldn't win on outside zone, and they sat all over high percentage concepts after the 1st qtr. We just don't have the horses to counter adjust. This has been the theme across entire position groups for multiple years - OL, WR's, Dline, LB's...
Like, hard to watch flat. Vrabel said it best -when the trick plays ran out, we could stop them.
Circle back around to my comment above. When you don't have the guys to win their individual assignments, you have to get "gimmicky" and reach deep into the bag. But that is not a stable, consistent offense. Once you put a lid on it, the offensive efficiency has to be leaned on. We can't be efficient for a lack of personnel.
It's a tired record, one I know people don't *WANT* to hear, but it's the truth. The problem is fans somehow expecting the same results week to week with a roster imbalance. What this team can do is incredibly limited to our opponents abilities and roster strength. You can run all over Miami, but you can't against New England. As such, the rest of the machine suffers.
I think Stefanski did an incredible job of this in 2023, but the last two years have been an absolute disaster. Scoring more than 20 points 4 times in the last 25+ games is an absolutely brutal call to this.
So the question becomes at the broad level- is this truly a talent problem, or is Kevin's evolution as an offensive mind running dry? Does, as I've mentioned, need to be recalibrated with a fresh start somewhere else? I want to make it clear that I'm not overtly on one side of the fence or the other (although my feet are probably dangling on the parting of ways).
I think Tommy Rees is something of that "recalibration" I've seen fresh concepts and things brought to this offense. I detailed that in my youtube analysis of Gabriel in the pre-season. But with that, there's only so far that these new installs will take you once they're out there for defenses to dissect and prepare for.
What I really can't get over in the immediate is that Dillon was his guy. It may end up coming out that the plan all along was to draft him as a high level back-up (Chase Daniels) type, punt this season, and God willing get the dude next year. It would be prudent to do that, candidly, given the Watson contract and draft capital. But when you have a dude out there who is dead last in YPA, air yards per throw, and 2nd to last in QBR (and essentially dead last) in an extended sample size, knowing that's the dude you reached for? Not ideal.
Agreed almost entirely. I think Stef goes to bat for his guys and won't throw people under the bus like how Hue or Pat Shurmur would. That's how you lose your locker room. But I'm not sold that Stefanski made Gabriel "his guy". You traditionally have a "coaches pick" every season, and I'm sure Stef has stepped up to claim Gabriel, in a respect. But I don't believe he poured over every single game for 2+ seasons and went "this is our guy either 1a or 2b". And if I'm wrong, then Stef may be a fine coach, but a great evaluator of talent he is not. And there's nothing wrong with that, but you can't have a coach having his pick once a year if it blows.
My fear was Gabriel was an overreach. By my estimate 2 rounds. That looks more and more the case every week.
Lastly, funny enough? The Browns in the initial rankings of Madden 25 the Browns were only slightly considered worse than Buffalo (88 to 87), and above both Detroit and New England: https://www.gamesradar.com/games/madden-nfl/madden-25-best-teams/. Makes you think-
Paper Tiger. Everyone looks great on X's and O's until the real bullets start flying. I'd be curious what that rating is now. Not that it really means much.
I know @calfoxwc likes to say dumb shit like "draw up plays to confuse the defense"... Stefanski did early, and it worked. But that isn't something you can do and live by every snap. It isn't realistic. We couldn't win on our weakside iso, we couldn't win on outside zone, and they sat all over high percentage concepts after the 1st qtr. We just don't have the horses to counter adjust. This has been the theme across entire position groups for multiple years - OL, WR's, Dline, LB's...
well, you aRE a dumb shit on a lot of things, just not "Xs" and "Os".
I blasted the play calling, and since you are too arrogant to read it, Shirley Tiam, I'll tell you flat out - Mike Vrabel blasted Stupanskis play calling.
So, you want to say Vrable doesn't know anything, but you are a so called grand poobah of football?
You should STFU once in a while, and yes, you would probably be like Aikman or Collinsworth. Too arrogant to be decent in most conversations.
Guess what I just found:
-
Aren't you in NC? Get your Goat was something I heard that shit all the time growing up as a kid in the Carolinas.
I'm on the North Coast, my guy. I lived in noVA for a few years though.
1) I get Watson saddled this team down hard, and not unlike Tua in Miami right now you have to play the guy who is earning that level of cheddar. But your points are all circling to my central thought around all this- has Kevin's scheme, offensive philosophy, and talent evaluation (which I'm overtly including the GM, etc in that) run it's course? Has the process gotten stale to the point where even if we had more solid play making, would it show in the record?
Kevin's offensive philosophy isn't all that dissimilar to a lot of what Shanny and KoC do.
- He's a zone blocking disciple
- Effectively run on vertical, iso, duo, and power concepts.
- Generate explosive runs on outside zones and pin & Pull
- Setup the misdirection and vertical passing game off the running game.
These things don't require spectacular players. But they do require a mix of starting and NFL average talent to execute.
Right now we lack either of those for the QB spot and 40% of the OL. That's no small deficiency when you're in a league of the finest football players on earth. If I said 40% of the workforce at, wherever your job is, wasn't up to standard, there would be a company wide issue, no?
2) A la Shanny- I've never been to suggest Kevin deserves a short leash. It's apparent that this squad blows and sucked last year as well. But to your point, there has to at least be something there, IMO, that shows a coach is getting the most out of the roster they do have.
I think seeing this team be competitive against a squad that might win the AFCE for 2.5 quarters, and should have walked into halftime with a lead, sort of speaks to that answer.
The issue is squeezing blood from a rock. The opening and sometimes 2nd drives are solid and demonstrating sound game planning and scouting by the offensive coaching staff. But the adjustments don't just happen at halftime. They happen usually in between drives. Once the Patriots Defense settled in after some well designed plays that put them on their heels, then their talent across the board trumped our ability to execute bread and butter offensive staples.
I know @calfoxwc likes to say dumb shit like "draw up plays to confuse the defense"... Stefanski did early, and it worked. But that isn't something you can do and live by every snap. It isn't realistic. We couldn't win on our weakside iso, we couldn't win on outside zone, and they sat all over high percentage concepts after the 1st qtr. We just don't have the horses to counter adjust. This has been the theme across entire position groups for multiple years - OL, WR's, Dline, LB's...
Like, hard to watch flat. Vrabel said it best -when the trick plays ran out, we could stop them.
Circle back around to my comment above. When you don't have the guys to win their individual assignments, you have to get "gimmicky" and reach deep into the bag. But that is not a stable, consistent offense. Once you put a lid on it, the offensive efficiency has to be leaned on. We can't be efficient for a lack of personnel.
It's a tired record, one I know people don't *WANT* to hear, but it's the truth. The problem is fans somehow expecting the same results week to week with a roster imbalance. What this team can do is incredibly limited to our opponents abilities and roster strength. You can run all over Miami, but you can't against New England. As such, the rest of the machine suffers.
I think Stefanski did an incredible job of this in 2023, but the last two years have been an absolute disaster. Scoring more than 20 points 4 times in the last 25+ games is an absolutely brutal call to this.
So the question becomes at the broad level- is this truly a talent problem, or is Kevin's evolution as an offensive mind running dry? Does, as I've mentioned, need to be recalibrated with a fresh start somewhere else? I want to make it clear that I'm not overtly on one side of the fence or the other (although my feet are probably dangling on the parting of ways).
I think Tommy Rees is something of that "recalibration" I've seen fresh concepts and things brought to this offense. I detailed that in my youtube analysis of Gabriel in the pre-season. But with that, there's only so far that these new installs will take you once they're out there for defenses to dissect and prepare for.
What I really can't get over in the immediate is that Dillon was his guy. It may end up coming out that the plan all along was to draft him as a high level back-up (Chase Daniels) type, punt this season, and God willing get the dude next year. It would be prudent to do that, candidly, given the Watson contract and draft capital. But when you have a dude out there who is dead last in YPA, air yards per throw, and 2nd to last in QBR (and essentially dead last) in an extended sample size, knowing that's the dude you reached for? Not ideal.
Agreed almost entirely. I think Stef goes to bat for his guys and won't throw people under the bus like how Hue or Pat Shurmur would. That's how you lose your locker room. But I'm not sold that Stefanski made Gabriel "his guy". You traditionally have a "coaches pick" every season, and I'm sure Stef has stepped up to claim Gabriel, in a respect. But I don't believe he poured over every single game for 2+ seasons and went "this is our guy either 1a or 2b". And if I'm wrong, then Stef may be a fine coach, but a great evaluator of talent he is not. And there's nothing wrong with that, but you can't have a coach having his pick once a year if it blows.
My fear was Gabriel was an overreach. By my estimate 2 rounds. That looks more and more the case every week.
Lastly, funny enough? The Browns in the initial rankings of Madden 25 the Browns were only slightly considered worse than Buffalo (88 to 87), and above both Detroit and New England: https://www.gamesradar.com/games/madden-nfl/madden-25-best-teams/. Makes you think-
Paper Tiger. Everyone looks great on X's and O's until the real bullets start flying. I'd be curious what that rating is now. Not that it really means much.
I know @calfoxwc likes to say dumb shit like "draw up plays to confuse the defense"... Stefanski did early, and it worked. But that isn't something you can do and live by every snap. It isn't realistic.
oh, and I was talking about his play-calling.
and, you are a liar. I searched for "draw up plays to confuse the defense" in this entire thread, and the only result was your post. A few inventive plays can get a defense to second guess, maybe hesitate. Again, I've listened over the years to Vrabel, and shirley, you are NO Vrabel.
You make lame excuses to defend Teflon Stupanski. fine. And you dissed Josh Allen as garbage when we had the first pick and he was my pick in my stupid mock draft.......
. But you know your "Xs" and "Os", sure. LOL
-
I know @calfoxwc likes to say dumb shit like "draw up plays to confuse the defense"... Stefanski did early, and it worked. But that isn't something you can do and live by every snap. It isn't realistic. We couldn't win on our weakside iso, we couldn't win on outside zone, and they sat all over high percentage concepts after the 1st qtr. We just don't have the horses to counter adjust. This has been the theme across entire position groups for multiple years - OL, WR's, Dline, LB's...
well, you aRE a dumb shit on a lot of things, just not "Xs" and "Os".
I blasted the play calling, and since you are too arrogant to read it, Shirley Tiam, I'll tell you flat out - Mike Vrabel blasted Stupanskis play calling.
So, you want to say Vrable doesn't know anything, but you are a so called grand poobah of football?
You should STFU once in a while, and yes, you would probably be like Aikman or Collinsworth. Too arrogant to be decent in most conversations.
Guess what I just found:
well, you aRE a dumb shit on a lot of things, just not "Xs" and "Os".
I blasted the play calling, and since you are too arrogant to read it, Shirley Tiam, I'll tell you flat out - Mike Vrabel blasted Stupanskis play calling.
So, you want to say Vrable doesn't know anything, but you are a so called grand poobah of football?
You should STFU once in a while, and yes, you would probably be like Aikman or Collinsworth. Too arrogant to be decent in most conversations.
You're socially awkward, bud. And you grew up that way, so I don't blame you for not picking up on social queues.
Mike Vrabel isn't blasting any coach. That isn't his style. And those believing that's what he's doing here are misrepresenting his intent or completely failed to understand what the man is saying.
- The Brownies opened with some trickery, some "gimmicky" play calls early. They did this to take advantage of an overly aggressive Patriots defense.
It worked a treat early. This is where the Xs and Os come in, so pay close attention.
- Vrabel is a Bill Belicheck disiple
- Means he has stolen some things defensively along the way.
- One of those things are installing odd fronts that naturally 2 gap. This means IDL plugging 2 gaps instead of just 1 (like Schwartz does) This (usually) means they feature 3 big IDLs that occupy anywhere from 3-5 gaps along the offensive line.
- what this means is that the Patriots, provided their DL holds up, can committ fewer bodies to limiting the running game while not surrendering numbers on the backend. It's incredibly effective against "lesser" teams, or teams that don't have the ability along the OL to win assignments against 2 gap defenses.
- the Patriots came out and starting A LOT of 2 gapping. Brownies OL couldn't win their assignments, and running lanes were a traffic ridden mess where you average 2ypc.
- So this mean that your standard offensive calls, which have a certain efficiency number tied to them (4ypc as an example) are cut in half. Your offense cant efficiently move the ball.
- the defense no longer has to play aggressive to run fits. They can patiently pace their heels and instead focus on being assignment sound and "staying home"
- your trick plays that you would use to counter an aggressive defense no longer work. Your gimmick, to manufacture cheap offensive yards, is gone.
- your play calling is incredibly limited. Now, like a python, you're slowly being constricted on offense. No efficiency means little to no explosion. Defense wears down, flood gates open late.
No, to clarify for yourself or anyone here who thinks Vrabel was insulting Stefanski directly - you are wrong.
He was saying that once the game settled in, and it came time to run your offense, they could limit the trick plays because the Pats just straight up were better across the board.
It sounds harsh, coming from coach Vrabel. But it isn't meant to be insulting.
-
well, you aRE a dumb shit on a lot of things, just not "Xs" and "Os".
I blasted the play calling, and since you are too arrogant to read it, Shirley Tiam, I'll tell you flat out - Mike Vrabel blasted Stupanskis play calling.
So, you want to say Vrable doesn't know anything, but you are a so called grand poobah of football?
You should STFU once in a while, and yes, you would probably be like Aikman or Collinsworth. Too arrogant to be decent in most conversations.
You're socially awkward, bud. And you grew up that way, so I don't blame you for not picking up on social queues.
Mike Vrabel isn't blasting any coach. That isn't his style. And those believing that's what he's doing here are misrepresenting his intent or completely failed to understand what the man is saying.
- The Brownies opened with some trickery, some "gimmicky" play calls early. They did this to take advantage of an overly aggressive Patriots defense.
It worked a treat early. This is where the Xs and Os come in, so pay close attention.
- Vrabel is a Bill Belicheck disiple
- Means he has stolen some things defensively along the way.
- One of those things are installing odd fronts that naturally 2 gap. This means IDL plugging 2 gaps instead of just 1 (like Schwartz does) This (usually) means they feature 3 big IDLs that occupy anywhere from 3-5 gaps along the offensive line.
- what this means is that the Patriots, provided their DL holds up, can committ fewer bodies to limiting the running game while not surrendering numbers on the backend. It's incredibly effective against "lesser" teams, or teams that don't have the ability along the OL to win assignments against 2 gap defenses.
- the Patriots came out and starting A LOT of 2 gapping. Brownies OL couldn't win their assignments, and running lanes were a traffic ridden mess where you average 2ypc.
- So this mean that your standard offensive calls, which have a certain efficiency number tied to them (4ypc as an example) are cut in half. Your offense cant efficiently move the ball.
- the defense no longer has to play aggressive to run fits. They can patiently pace their heels and instead focus on being assignment sound and "staying home"
- your trick plays that you would use to counter an aggressive defense no longer work. Your gimmick, to manufacture cheap offensive yards, is gone.
- your play calling is incredibly limited. Now, like a python, you're slowly being constricted on offense. No efficiency means little to no explosion. Defense wears down, flood gates open late.
No, to clarify for yourself or anyone here who thinks Vrabel was insulting Stefanski directly - you are wrong.
He was saying that once the game settled in, and it came time to run your offense, they could limit the trick plays because the Pats just straight up were better across the board.
It sounds harsh, coming from coach Vrabel. But it isn't meant to be insulting.
(Troy Aikman, Chris Collinsworth blah blah blahblah blah blahblah blah blahblah blah blahblah blah blahblah blah blahblah blah blahblah blah blahblah blah blahblah blah blahblah blah blahblah blah blahblah blah blahblah blah blah)
I never said anything about Vrabel intending to insult your stupanski, Shirley.
Those of us who have been criticizing stupanski's play calling watch the game without playing with our egos, or worse.
Even your sweetheart head coach said his play calling needs to improve.
So, that is straight from the horse's mouth, you pompous, bloviated horses ass.
Have a nice day in pouty Shirley Land.
Kevin Stefanski shares update on Cleveland Browns' playcalling situation
With pressure mounting to deliver better results, Cleveland's head coach acknowledges the need for improvement in this area -
I know @calfoxwc likes to say dumb shit like "draw up plays to confuse the defense"... Stefanski did early, and it worked. But that isn't something you can do and live by every snap. It isn't realistic.
oh, and I was talking about his play-calling.
and, you are a liar. I searched for "draw up plays to confuse the defense" in this entire thread, and the only result was your post. A few inventive plays can get a defense to second guess, maybe hesitate. Again, I've listened over the years to Vrabel, and shirley, you are NO Vrabel.
You make lame excuses to defend Teflon Stupanski. fine. And you dissed Josh Allen as garbage when we had the first pick and he was my pick in my stupid mock draft.......
. But you know your "Xs" and "Os", sure. LOL
oh, and I was talking about his play-calling.
and, you are a liar. I searched for "draw up plays to confuse the defense" in this entire thread, and the only result was your post.
10/16
Sorry, I said "confuse" instead of "fool"
The point remains the same for both you and I.
And never call me a liar again.
-
Sweet Jesus, the 70 something toddler must have a full diaper today.
Your inferiority complexes have inferiority complexes, cal.
-
oh, and I was talking about his play-calling.
and, you are a liar. I searched for "draw up plays to confuse the defense" in this entire thread, and the only result was your post.
10/16
Sorry, I said "confuse" instead of "fool"
The point remains the same for both you and I.
And never call me a liar again.
10/16
Sorry, I said "confuse" instead of "fool"
The point remains the same for both you and I.
And never call me a liar again.
And the point remains Shitmypantski is an awful head coach no matter how you choose to spin it.. But keep on keepin on...
-
10/16
Sorry, I said "confuse" instead of "fool"
The point remains the same for both you and I.
And never call me a liar again.
And the point remains Shitmypantski is an awful head coach no matter how you choose to spin it.. But keep on keepin on...
And the point remains Shitmypantski is an awful head coach no matter how you choose to spin it.. But keep on keepin on...
Don't you think it's just a *little* odd to have un-clever attempts at nicknames for people you don't like? And don't you notice the, I guess I'll say "brand" of people who do that on here?
Look, I want to like you. But I need people to be reasonable.
I think there's a collective short term memory here.
Hue Jackson was awful
Pat Shurmur was awful
Freddie Kitchens was awful
Jim O Neil was fucking horrendous
When we over-apply words, they lose the gravity of their impact.
I'd ask you this, would a great head coach have beaten the Patriots with this roster?
-
oh, and I was talking about his play-calling.
and, you are a liar. I searched for "draw up plays to confuse the defense" in this entire thread, and the only result was your post.
10/16
Sorry, I said "confuse" instead of "fool"
The point remains the same for both you and I.
And never call me a liar again.
Sorry, I said "confuse" instead of "fool"
The point remains the same for both you and I.
And never call me a liar again.
ok, dumbass.
I said: "The Browns need a leader, to inspire the team, fool defenses with his playcalling"
I know @calfoxwc likes to say dumb shit like "draw up plays to confuse the defense".
I never said anything like "draw plays up to confuse the defense".
I was not talking about trick plays, shirley. I was talking about play-calling.
So, that is right there is your face, and I think you are a liar. or, I'm wrong and you are so arrogant because you are stupid and can't read well.
This surely looks like you, Shirley.
-
And the point remains Shitmypantski is an awful head coach no matter how you choose to spin it.. But keep on keepin on...
Don't you think it's just a *little* odd to have un-clever attempts at nicknames for people you don't like? And don't you notice the, I guess I'll say "brand" of people who do that on here?
Look, I want to like you. But I need people to be reasonable.
I think there's a collective short term memory here.
Hue Jackson was awful
Pat Shurmur was awful
Freddie Kitchens was awful
Jim O Neil was fucking horrendous
When we over-apply words, they lose the gravity of their impact.
I'd ask you this, would a great head coach have beaten the Patriots with this roster?
Don't you think it's just a *little* odd to have un-clever attempts at nicknames for people you don't like? And don't you notice the, I guess I'll say "brand" of people who do that on here?
Look, I want to like you. But I need people to be reasonable.
I think there's a collective short term memory here.
Hue Jackson was awful
Pat Shurmur was awful
Freddie Kitchens was awful
Jim O Neil was fucking horrendous
When we over-apply words, they lose the gravity of their impact.
I'd ask you this, would a great head coach have beaten the Patriots with this roster?
I believe a Tom Coughlan or Bill Parcells could get more mileage than this buffoon does so a direct answer is yes.. Winning the game?.. Yeah that's debatable.. The bottom line here... is.. He is LOSING! The name thing.. Nothing clever about it.. But the guy sucks... So yeah.. He deserves it.. He sucks so bad even Stephon Diggs wanted to get away from him...
Nickers...."There are no old running QB's in the NFL "~Sam Rutigliano~ -
Don't you think it's just a *little* odd to have un-clever attempts at nicknames for people you don't like? And don't you notice the, I guess I'll say "brand" of people who do that on here?
Look, I want to like you. But I need people to be reasonable.
I think there's a collective short term memory here.
Hue Jackson was awful
Pat Shurmur was awful
Freddie Kitchens was awful
Jim O Neil was fucking horrendous
When we over-apply words, they lose the gravity of their impact.
I'd ask you this, would a great head coach have beaten the Patriots with this roster?
I believe a Tom Coughlan or Bill Parcells could get more mileage than this buffoon does so a direct answer is yes.. Winning the game?.. Yeah that's debatable.. The bottom line here... is.. He is LOSING! The name thing.. Nothing clever about it.. But the guy sucks... So yeah.. He deserves it.. He sucks so bad even Stephon Diggs wanted to get away from him...
I believe a Tom Coughlan or Bill Parcells could get more mileage than this buffoon does so a direct answer is yes.. Winning the game?.. Yeah that's debatable.. The bottom line here... is.. He is LOSING! The name thing.. Nothing clever about it.. But the guy sucks... So yeah.. He deserves it.. He sucks so bad even Stephon Diggs wanted to get away from him...
up arrow ! (ran out of em)
-
Don't you think it's just a *little* odd to have un-clever attempts at nicknames for people you don't like? And don't you notice the, I guess I'll say "brand" of people who do that on here?
Look, I want to like you. But I need people to be reasonable.
I think there's a collective short term memory here.
Hue Jackson was awful
Pat Shurmur was awful
Freddie Kitchens was awful
Jim O Neil was fucking horrendous
When we over-apply words, they lose the gravity of their impact.
I'd ask you this, would a great head coach have beaten the Patriots with this roster?
I believe a Tom Coughlan or Bill Parcells could get more mileage than this buffoon does so a direct answer is yes.. Winning the game?.. Yeah that's debatable.. The bottom line here... is.. He is LOSING! The name thing.. Nothing clever about it.. But the guy sucks... So yeah.. He deserves it.. He sucks so bad even Stephon Diggs wanted to get away from him...
I believe a Tom Coughlan or Bill Parcells could get more mileage than this buffoon does so a direct answer is yes.. Winning the game?.. Yeah that's debatable.. The bottom line here... is.. He is LOSING! The name thing.. Nothing clever about it.. But the guy sucks... So yeah.. He deserves it.. He sucks so bad even Stephon Diggs wanted to get away from him...
I want to make sure we're clear, I was asking for current coaches.
- Bill Parcells is a HoF head coach. If you're saying a HoF coach could possibly get more out of this squad, then... yeah, sure. I would be inclined to agree.
- Tom Coughlan, who was fired from his first gig in Jacksonville, was a head coach who rode the coat-tails of having superior OC/DC's on his staff, including Steve Spagnuolo, who is likely going down as a HoF coach himself. While having having underperforming seasons pretty much marred his coaching career every year but two.
You'll forgive me if that isn't a widely impressive list. If anything, Coughlan would absolutely fit your mold of Stefanski.
-
Damn guys, all this Browns losing is making us turn on each other. Let's not drive people out of here, it's sadly becoming a ghost town for who knows what reason(s).
The world would be boring if we all agreed on everything. We're all here for one reason.....our love for the Browns.
Besides another lousy season, the thing that's pissing me off is how AFC teams who were kind of down have turned it around ( Denver, Indianapolis, New England), and here we are talking about tanking, draft picks, & play calling.
My theory is Haslam is giving Berry & Stefanski more time to turn this around because he realizes the DW situation crippled this team far worse than even DePodesta could have imagined (analyzed).
Unless the players totally revolt, they're running everything back in 2026.
I'm in the acceptance stage, even though I hate what's going on. I admit, I was overly-optimistic about 2025 even though I saw the difficult starting schedule. I urge all to join me.
Go Browns.
Karlis Missed
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login