@vikingdawg said:Actually those drafts looked like a joke till Cheat Noll started juicing the hell out of all his players. BINGO

@ghoolie said:Did you see his video asking Jerry Jones to sign him? OK-I laughed.

I freaking love Jack. We may be passing on Bosa if we took him at our pick though,

LOL! Gomer the Homer.

Will they be using the tight ends? We sure have enough of them.

@miktoxic said:why not draft a WR? +1 The game is different. Last year is a perfect example of how rookie WR can easily translate their college success in the NFL alot early. I rather blow the money on other needs.

too bad we got rid of Gray

@soju said:stupid faggots on here still with the OL/DL bs. you need a true WR1. To do what? Not win a Super Bowl lately. Zombo

@the-gipper said: Having Jesse James at TE could be fun (and FYI, the original Jesse James was no hero.....getting shot in the back was propitious for him) And to salve Woody......getting Funchess in Round 2 with our third pick would be fine for me. I would prefer to use the two 1st rounders on Linemen and Linebackers. If he goes in the first round, so be it....but if he is there for the picking in round 2....why not take a shot. He couldn't turn out to be Braylon Jr., could he?

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2276224-leonard-williams-declares-for-2015-nfl-draft-latest-details-and-reaction?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=programming

I didn't relax until the 2 minute warning. And that was just watching the replay.

Well, if Tate's out for a while, West will probably split carries with Crowel, who was 5-32 with 2 TDs on Sunday, so might be worth a look.

@canton-mike said:... as soon as Johnny has learned & is totally comfortable with the playbook, reading Ds, etc, then it's ALL instincts. .. or then it's been learned... The key is knowing so you do not have to think. Knowledge is the product of learning... not "instincts".

@douche-nozzle said:Since anything I can produce is subjective and anything you say is bull shit, I prefer to go with the number of games your D manages to hold off the opponent versus the number of games my D manages to hold off the opponent. After all the difference between the good TOP and the bad TOP is only 4-5 minutes......do you believe your D is so fragile that one more series is more than they can handle? Time of possession is usually a factor of 2-3 things: A. How well a team's offense can control the ball and sustain drives, and B. How well a defense can force the three and outs or otherwise limit drives. and perhaps C. Turnovers Obviously the Browns offense has been very, very poor the last several years at controlling the ball. Last year they practically had no running game whatsoever, and had 3-4 different starting QBs. In any close game, and the Browns had several last year, those 1-2 extra drives the Browns gave the opponents by not sustaining drives of their own and by turning he ball over can and do make all the difference. It can make the difference between a 4-12 season and perhaps an 8-8 season (or on the high end between 8-8 and 12-4).

Well, there's 20 seconds of my life I'll never get back............Oh crap, I replied, make that 60 seconds.

Zombo said: Ya, well in 1992 "Touchdown" Tommy Vardell was a Top Ten pick. Thank you Belichick and Lombardi! Zombo --(Sorry, still catching up on the draft day threads) Didnt like that pick